This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2407* 10 11 35.34 +15 38 49.7 11.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7407,11.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2407 11.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2407* 09 49 12.30 +16 21 08.9 12.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7407,12.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2407 12.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2407* 09 32 18.59 +09 19 46.1 13.0 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7407,12.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2407 12.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2407* 09 37 40.49 +16 50 25.0 13.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7407,13.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2407 13.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2407* 10 04 39.98 +18 42 45.5 13.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7407,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2407 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2407* 10 07 22.37 +10 08 37.7 14.2 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7407,14.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2407 14.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2407* 09 28 04.72 +14 01 43.8 14.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7407,14.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2407 14.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2407* 10 12 44.62 +17 49 05.1 14.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7407,14.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2407 14.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2407* 09 37 21.12 +16 35 48.2 14.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7407,14.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2407 14.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.86919819 18.01.2026 08:51:28.724 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
First image: 2461058.86919819 18.01.2026 08:51:28.724 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Last image: 2461147.74110462 17.04.2026 05:47:01.439 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7792
Objects passed selection criteria: 7786
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7112.5
Average stars matched: 6942.25 (97.6063 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113364 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 17 00:49:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.86919819 18.01.2026 08:51:28.724 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
First image: 2461058.86919819 18.01.2026 08:51:28.724 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Last image: 2461147.74110462 17.04.2026 05:47:01.439 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 62
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 43201
Objects passed selection criteria: 43062
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 40577.5
Average stars matched: 39340.8 (96.9521 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 142868 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 17 00:49:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461147.74025758
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:34.262 +13:59:45.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:43.717 +14:00:14.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:34.262 +13:59:45.34
Second-epoch image center 09:46:43.717 +14:00:14.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0390 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:41.691 +14:00:16.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:34.262 +13:59:45.34
Second-epoch image center 09:46:41.691 +14:00:16.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0312 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:46:43.717 +14:00:14.03
Second-epoch second image center 09:46:41.691 +14:00:16.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00822 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4zRuvbMNHC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits &> /tmp/tmp.W76MQ48kUG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Torv4mQBEn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qzjLOzUQ17
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7958 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.3852 to 154.9366 deg, Dec +8.6225 to +19.2659 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.3852 to 154.9366 deg, Dec 8.6225 to 19.2659 deg
Loaded 4773 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3901 out of 4125 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4125 out of 7958 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.893593
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.893593
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
2.1 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
15.4 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.4zRuvbMNHC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=534, passed=7958
Got 7958 stars (including 7414 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7958 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7692 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7692 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.W76MQ48kUG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=535, passed=8039
Got 8039 stars (including 7496 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8039 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7745 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7745 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Torv4mQBEn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=402, passed=6331
Got 6331 stars (including 5926 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6331 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1002)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qzjLOzUQ17 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=401, passed=6290
Got 6290 stars (including 5885 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6290 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6115 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20526.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20526_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
Preparing report for the candidate 20526_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20624_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 20624_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:57:57.91 +15:51:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20633_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 20633_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:19:25.17 +16:59:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:11:35.34 +15:38:49.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:34.262 +13:59:45.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:43.717 +14:00:14.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:34.262 +13:59:45.34
Second-epoch image center 09:46:43.717 +14:00:14.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0390 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:41.691 +14:00:16.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:34.262 +13:59:45.34
Second-epoch image center 09:46:41.691 +14:00:16.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0312 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:46:43.717 +14:00:14.03
Second-epoch second image center 09:46:41.691 +14:00:16.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00822 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GyeClmI0g9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TwSdbX2N8A
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fLGGugzxCa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xgh0qwFVwN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43775 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.3793 to 154.9626 deg, Dec +8.6120 to +19.2857 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.3793 to 154.9626 deg, Dec 8.6120 to 19.2857 deg
Loaded 4796 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3707 out of 4153 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4153 out of 43775 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.782622
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.782622
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 55 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
2.0 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
15.5 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.GyeClmI0g9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=1969, passed=43753
Got 43753 stars (including 41699 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43753 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42351 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TwSdbX2N8A (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1988, passed=43712
Got 43712 stars (including 41658 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43712 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42220 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42219 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 908 stars left (next iteration limit 998)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fLGGugzxCa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1532, passed=38087
Got 38087 stars (including 36490 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38087 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37051 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 909 stars left (next iteration limit 999)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xgh0qwFVwN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1513, passed=37891
Got 37891 stars (including 36327 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37891 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36758 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36758 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36758 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 909 stars left (next iteration limit 999)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-45-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_004752_TTUQ1b1x1_2306668_xsTDkt1p/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52947.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52957.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53711.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53769.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53803.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53822.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53971.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54022.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54039.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54046.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54112.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54120.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53180.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53269.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53411.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53413.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53709.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53906.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54064.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54098.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52946_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 52946_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:44:47.51 +13:28:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52947_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 52947_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:29:19.14 +17:47:16.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.585 631558383778315648 142.32930020770 +17.78799094201 14.6304 14.1376 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.585#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52952_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 52952_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:39:26.39 +14:13:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52953_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 52953_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:41:47.87 +11:28:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52957_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 52957_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:04:52.67 +17:07:17.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.72)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53024_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53024_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:11:35.35 +15:38:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53170_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53170_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:42:57.95 +17:02:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53180_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
Preparing report for the candidate 53180_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53219_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53219_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:24:41.35 +11:37:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53223_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53223_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:30:25.83 +12:57:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53235_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53235_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:39:00.81 +14:25:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53269_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
Preparing report for the candidate 53269_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53338_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53338_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:59:33.25 +09:20:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53341_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53341_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:31:51.14 +17:15:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53361_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53361_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:48:01.95 +18:05:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53369_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53369_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:31:05.14 +11:30:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53395_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53395_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:15:09.19 +10:52:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53404_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53404_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:29:04.08 +17:44:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53411_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
Preparing report for the candidate 53411_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53413_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
Preparing report for the candidate 53413_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53457_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53457_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:32:04.41 +11:19:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53522_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53522_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:44:02.27 +17:34:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53542_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53542_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:29:04.60 +17:51:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53582_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53582_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:05:35.54 +15:44:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53585_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53585_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:52:12.32 +16:27:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53594_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53594_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:08:43.81 +10:39:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53595_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53595_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:53:15.00 +09:36:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53606_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53606_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:18:40.57 +13:49:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53617_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53617_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:15:16.68 +09:45:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53653_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53653_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:05:26.94 +12:07:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53662_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53662_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:30:08.60 +09:16:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53666_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53666_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:37:43.13 +09:03:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53684_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53684_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:35:14.04 +10:16:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53709_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
Preparing report for the candidate 53709_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53711_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53711_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:10:18.48 +11:17:29.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.30, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.28)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.536 3880130462307578112 152.57743227364 +11.29163271995 14.5579 14.0319 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.536#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53769_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53769_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:45:12.79 +12:04:43.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.023 614178987593842048 146.30326669118 +12.07832803653 14.4040 13.9116 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.023#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53779_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53779_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:20:19.58 +13:59:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53803_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53803_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:50:05.50 +15:31:21.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.000 616426900461693824 147.52323499392 +15.52346924162 14.8768 14.2845 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.000#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53822_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53822_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:14:48.06 +12:12:00.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.707 593745113747226880 138.70044862093 +12.20021996146 14.6785 13.9612 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.707#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53823_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53823_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:18:18.84 +15:00:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53842_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53842_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:39:23.02 +13:17:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53872_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53872_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:34:34.24 +16:56:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53906_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
Preparing report for the candidate 53906_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53916_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53916_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:39:15.67 +12:26:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53938_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53938_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:22:59.22 +10:00:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53971_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 53971_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:15:06.53 +14:31:50.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.80)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.516 606635616272613504 138.77729989587 +14.53075148655 14.9502 14.4680 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.516#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54022_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 54022_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:20:49.49 +16:54:05.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.89)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.878 631825698247718784 140.20670993471 +16.90159305910 15.0541 14.5240 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.878#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54039_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 54039_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:27:43.01 +12:55:12.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.591 593334343075132928 141.92936691429 +12.92019409902 15.1822 14.6364 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.591#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54046_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 54046_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:34:00.61 +18:41:21.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.258 633207891738098176 143.50251679861 +18.68895702851 15.0961 14.4087 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.258#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54064_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
Preparing report for the candidate 54064_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54070_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 54070_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:41:09.26 +13:54:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54098_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
Preparing report for the candidate 54098_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54112_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 54112_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:29:00.94 +16:01:21.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.295 631079198572082176 142.25381934223 +16.02195279059 15.0817 14.5878 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.295#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54120_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 54120_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:15:49.92 +15:53:40.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.79)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.587 607629265546388864 138.95783327197 +15.89460927108 14.8461 14.1667 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.587#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54122_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136
The candidate 54122_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-47-01_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0136 did not pass the final checks
