This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2265* 10 04 40.08 +18 42 48.9 13.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7265,13.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2265 13.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2265* 10 29 27.19 +24 56 17.4 13.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7265,13.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2265 13.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2265* 10 15 41.41 +20 32 47.4 14.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7265,14.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2265 14.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2265* 09 56 54.15 +20 03 37.1 14.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7265,14.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2265 14.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.76950778 22.02.2026 06:27:55.472 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461093.76950778 22.02.2026 06:27:55.472 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461147.72677501 17.04.2026 05:26:23.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6733
Objects passed selection criteria: 6703
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5133
Average stars matched: 4723 (92.0125 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112104 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 17 00:30:37 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.76950778 22.02.2026 06:27:55.472 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461093.76950778 22.02.2026 06:27:55.472 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461147.72677501 17.04.2026 05:26:23.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 44
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 34397
Objects passed selection criteria: 34284
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 27475
Average stars matched: 25260.2 (91.939 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 133372 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 17 00:31:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461147.72622875
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:07.513 +22:03:31.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:27.246 +22:01:21.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:09:07.513 +22:03:31.11
Second-epoch image center 10:09:27.246 +22:01:21.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0843 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:25.410 +22:01:18.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:09:07.513 +22:03:31.11
Second-epoch image center 10:09:25.410 +22:01:18.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0784 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:09:27.246 +22:01:21.55
Second-epoch second image center 10:09:25.410 +22:01:18.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00716 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.veuKu059TW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.x9rxsZTmwS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PfexOKQr6K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XG3k2Skm5b
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7416 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.6263 to 161.4713 deg, Dec +15.9835 to +27.7570 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.6263 to 161.4713 deg, Dec 15.9835 to 27.7570 deg
Loaded 5159 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3609 out of 3783 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3783 out of 7416 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.939489
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.939489
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.4 pix Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.5 pix fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
2.5 pix fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.4 mag. Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.veuKu059TW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=459, passed=7416
Got 7416 stars (including 6953 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7416 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 529 to 590 (Dec 16.0 to 27.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 529 to 590 (Dec 16.0 to 27.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 901 stars left (next iteration limit 991)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.x9rxsZTmwS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=475, passed=7467
Got 7467 stars (including 6987 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7467 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 529 to 590 (Dec 16.0 to 27.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 529 to 590 (Dec 16.0 to 27.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 898 stars left (next iteration limit 987)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PfexOKQr6K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=369, passed=6134
Got 6134 stars (including 5759 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6134 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6016 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6017 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6017 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 904 stars left (next iteration limit 994)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XG3k2Skm5b (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=368, passed=6157
Got 6157 stars (including 5783 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6157 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6034 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6036 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6036 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 905 stars left (next iteration limit 995)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21456.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21456_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156
The candidate 21456_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:56:33.85 +21:52:12.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.51)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.079 628246822259124608 149.14106524994 +21.87013846337 12.3849 11.7407 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.079#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:07.513 +22:03:31.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:27.246 +22:01:21.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:09:07.513 +22:03:31.11
Second-epoch image center 10:09:27.246 +22:01:21.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0843 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:25.410 +22:01:18.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:09:07.513 +22:03:31.11
Second-epoch image center 10:09:25.410 +22:01:18.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0784 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:09:27.246 +22:01:21.55
Second-epoch second image center 10:09:25.410 +22:01:18.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00716 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.s9WNlyVM1K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DOBU9WtUxH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Xe6UAzSBlB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5FlBsJrysw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 36419 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.6171 to 161.4713 deg, Dec +15.9835 to +27.7791 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.6171 to 161.4713 deg, Dec 15.9835 to 27.7791 deg
Loaded 5179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3446 out of 3795 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3795 out of 36419 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.820111
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.820111
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 23 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.3 pix Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.6 mag. Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.s9WNlyVM1K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=1750, passed=36394
Got 36394 stars (including 34600 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36394 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 529 to 590 (Dec 16.0 to 27.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35738 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 529 to 590 (Dec 16.0 to 27.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35738 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35738 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 897 stars left (next iteration limit 986)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DOBU9WtUxH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1825, passed=36174
Got 36174 stars (including 34311 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36174 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 529 to 590 (Dec 16.0 to 27.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35506 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 529 to 590 (Dec 16.0 to 27.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35506 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35507 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 891 stars left (next iteration limit 981)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Xe6UAzSBlB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=1325, passed=31785
Got 31785 stars (including 30413 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31785 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 895 stars left (next iteration limit 984)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5FlBsJrysw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1390, passed=31931
Got 31931 stars (including 30504 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31931 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31212 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31212 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 898 stars left (next iteration limit 987)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-25-36_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_002817_TTUQ2b1x1_1532382_HCUGqDA8/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out56294.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54477.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54502.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56053.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57038.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51983_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156
The candidate 51983_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:00:16.82 +20:39:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51984_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156
The candidate 51984_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:06:55.71 +22:02:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51985_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156
The candidate 51985_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:07:09.37 +17:46:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51987_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156
The candidate 51987_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:09:17.98 +19:44:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53432_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156
The candidate 53432_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:51:32.72 +24:49:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53836_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156
The candidate 53836_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:06:11.62 +23:48:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54448_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156
The candidate 54448_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:59:30.73 +21:17:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54477_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156
Preparing report for the candidate 54477_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54502_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156
Preparing report for the candidate 54502_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55456_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156
The candidate 55456_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:09:35.30 +21:35:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55494_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156
The candidate 55494_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:53:44.33 +25:39:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55763_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156
The candidate 55763_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:27:01.47 +24:55:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55927_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156
The candidate 55927_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:53:58.77 +25:45:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56053_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156
Preparing report for the candidate 56053_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56107_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156
The candidate 56107_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:52:16.16 +19:05:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56163_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156
The candidate 56163_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:11:18.79 +18:10:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56294_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156
The candidate 56294_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:51:58.94 +19:20:12.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.436 627344024428580608 147.99518158278 +19.33747723547 14.7271 14.0536 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.436#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56506_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156
The candidate 56506_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:52:37.93 +23:55:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56657_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156
The candidate 56657_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:51:05.85 +23:53:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56726_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156
The candidate 56726_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:58:18.03 +24:02:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56739_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156
The candidate 56739_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:59:59.29 +24:31:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57038_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156
Preparing report for the candidate 57038_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57228_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156
The candidate 57228_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_00-26-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0156 did not pass the final checks