This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
YZ Cnc,2461147.7093,11.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
YZ Cnc 20260417.2093 11.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7093,13.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2093 13.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7093,13.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2093 13.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7093,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2093 14.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7093,14.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2093 14.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
YZ Cnc,2461147.7093,11.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
YZ Cnc 20260417.2093 11.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.71692514 12.02.2026 05:12:12.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
First image: 2461083.71692514 12.02.2026 05:12:12.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Last image: 2461147.70973336 17.04.2026 05:01:50.962 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14195
Objects passed selection criteria: 14172
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12564
Average stars matched: 12224.2 (97.2958 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 118608 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 17 00:04:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.71692514 12.02.2026 05:12:12.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
First image: 2461083.71692514 12.02.2026 05:12:12.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Last image: 2461147.70973336 17.04.2026 05:01:50.962 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 108
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 31 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 90520
Objects passed selection criteria: 90305
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 82487
Average stars matched: 79463.8 (96.3349 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2667836 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 17 00:05:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461147.70891597
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:03.798 +29:58:25.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65
Second-epoch image center 08:00:03.798 +29:58:25.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0288 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:06.889 +29:58:48.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65
Second-epoch image center 08:00:06.889 +29:58:48.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0313 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:00:03.798 +29:58:25.01
Second-epoch second image center 08:00:06.889 +29:58:48.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01296 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dKAbtKsf38
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2talayAecx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zR92pHlqCc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vFUJ3DikET
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14371 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.1895 to 129.2995 deg, Dec +24.1558 to +35.3509 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.1895 to 129.2995 deg, Dec 24.1558 to 35.3509 deg
Loaded 9871 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7216 out of 7782 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7782 out of 14371 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.912020
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.912020
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
1.9 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.dKAbtKsf38 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1108, passed=14371
Got 14371 stars (including 13247 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14371 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14189 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14187 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14175 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2talayAecx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1133, passed=14315
Got 14315 stars (including 13161 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14143 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14142 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14132 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zR92pHlqCc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=699, passed=10983
Got 10983 stars (including 10271 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10983 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vFUJ3DikET (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=691, passed=10848
Got 10848 stars (including 10149 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10848 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10765 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10765 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10765 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20696_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 20696_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:23.45 +26:33:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20697_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 20697_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:22.39 +30:08:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20995_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 20995_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21021_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 21021_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:29.07 +27:36:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06746_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 06746_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:11.03 +29:09:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12811_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 12811_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:13.98 +33:22:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:03.798 +29:58:25.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65
Second-epoch image center 08:00:03.798 +29:58:25.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0288 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:06.889 +29:58:48.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65
Second-epoch image center 08:00:06.889 +29:58:48.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0313 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:00:03.798 +29:58:25.01
Second-epoch second image center 08:00:06.889 +29:58:48.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01296 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DtoHMnKe1b
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YqoBL0mKyH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hfAJ5vGboP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0TFfB72Pth
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 92293 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.1895 to 129.3003 deg, Dec +24.1558 to +35.3693 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.1895 to 129.3003 deg, Dec 24.1558 to 35.3693 deg
Loaded 9883 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6521 out of 7921 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7921 out of 92293 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.781221
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.781221
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 92 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
1.8 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.0 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
2.0 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
15.6 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.DtoHMnKe1b (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=6631, passed=92272
Got 92272 stars (including 85483 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 92272 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YqoBL0mKyH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=37, blended=6656, passed=92132
Got 92132 stars (including 85329 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 92132 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hfAJ5vGboP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=3936, passed=73581
Got 73581 stars (including 69516 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 73581 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73014 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73014 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73014 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0TFfB72Pth (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=3964, passed=73962
Got 73962 stars (including 69873 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 73962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73380 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73381 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73380 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-00-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_000252_TTUQ1b1x1_447136_KXIDKnUZ/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109317.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109318.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109323.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109328.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109330.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109333.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109344.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out110633.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out110939.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out111105.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out111201.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out111752.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out111839.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out111877.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112000.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112074.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112143.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112358.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112564.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112902.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112970.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113063.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113081.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out110364.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out111231.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out111625.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out112558.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109317_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 109317_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:08:25.47 +34:23:10.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.84, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.82)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.885 905428657035702528 122.10585197202 +34.38572167519 14.8682 14.2871 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.885#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109318_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 109318_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:22.92 +29:52:00.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.060 878944960977132416 117.84549765024 +29.86648342989 14.7840 14.2789 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.060#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109322_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 109322_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:54:20.55 +29:31:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109323_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 109323_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:02:57.89 +30:34:22.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.521 877718524474446080 120.74116907806 +30.57288718492 14.9339 14.4237 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.521#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109328_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 109328_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:42.43 +30:51:45.8 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.69)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109329_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 109329_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:57:12.71 +32:52:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109330_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 109330_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:01:33.46 +30:28:52.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.56, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.54)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.823 877339742718694912 120.38916170998 +30.48129752551 14.8132 14.2446 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.823#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109333_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 109333_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:59:27.18 +32:01:41.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.855 881060386988579968 119.86299796824 +32.02767004047 14.8467 14.4124 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.855#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109343_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 109343_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:30:53.02 +33:18:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109344_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 109344_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:23:47.99 +25:20:10.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.24, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.22)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109346_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 109346_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:12:52.76 +27:29:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109349_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 109349_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:11:25.27 +28:35:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109354_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 109354_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:13.87 +29:33:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109355_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 109355_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:23:52.62 +30:20:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109356_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 109356_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:11:46.78 +34:16:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109358_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 109358_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:50:16.43 +31:50:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109360_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 109360_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:09:58.51 +30:16:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109759_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 109759_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:58:20.59 +30:59:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109800_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 109800_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:23.77 +27:43:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110002_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 110002_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:37.18 +32:14:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110364_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 110364_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110618_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 110618_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:22.37 +25:02:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110633_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 110633_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:26.59 +32:11:24.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.37, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.35)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.270 880419509147612032 115.36072326391 +32.18995227782 13.4811 12.9435 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.270#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110816_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 110816_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:20.19 +32:28:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110851_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 110851_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:06.84 +27:56:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110930_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 110930_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:17.68 +29:14:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110939_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 110939_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:05:06.52 +32:14:31.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.52)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.053 878124897100769024 121.27682282572 +32.24211489743 13.8953 13.3782 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.053#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110942_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 110942_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:33.81 +30:50:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111004_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111004_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:24:19.25 +27:54:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111017_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111017_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:42.91 +30:53:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111062_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111062_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:32:53.02 +31:03:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111105_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111105_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:39.00 +34:56:03.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.114 906428525422038528 119.16248736347 +34.93388522929 14.1373 13.6578 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.114#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111136_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111136_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:23.47 +25:40:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111180_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111180_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:32:29.44 +30:45:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111201_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111201_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:09:12.55 +26:11:50.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.87)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.273 683429356648190208 122.30190041212 +26.19734611148 14.2023 13.5817 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.273#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111231_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 111231_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111341_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111341_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:02:00.76 +34:54:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111370_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111370_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:31:52.14 +33:13:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111372_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111372_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:02.20 +31:46:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111436_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111436_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:35:11.15 +31:36:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111457_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111457_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:10.67 +32:11:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111491_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111491_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:21.99 +26:35:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111512_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111512_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:30.19 +29:36:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111526_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111526_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:34.08 +27:31:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111557_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111557_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:23.11 +31:15:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111610_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111610_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:54:34.39 +26:10:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111625_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 111625_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111637_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111637_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:14:47.36 +29:01:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111639_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111639_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:31:37.11 +29:27:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111671_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111671_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:26.07 +25:37:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111736_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111736_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:09.36 +32:59:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111752_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111752_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:27.78 +34:44:28.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.21, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.19)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.353 894416463967421824 115.36530177947 +34.74111982502 14.5048 13.9943 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.353#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111778_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111778_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:13:03.36 +34:00:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111806_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111806_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:29.72 +27:51:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111832_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111832_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:36.06 +28:26:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111839_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111839_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:58.46 +25:48:02.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.32, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.30)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.053 868952221345579776 114.99417201257 +25.80053956097 14.6485 14.2526 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.053#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111844_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111844_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:55:58.65 +32:57:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111861_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111861_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:24.11 +34:11:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111877_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111877_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:18:18.54 +29:05:14.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.889 684247496378383744 124.57776410300 +29.08749344145 14.2198 13.2088 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.889#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111901_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111901_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:29.17 +25:13:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111970_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 111970_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:27.60 +32:17:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112000_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 112000_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:40.99 +33:59:14.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.839 893755348242413312 111.42052801549 +33.98676067684 14.7649 14.1600 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.839#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112063_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 112063_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:03.60 +28:28:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112074_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 112074_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:30:03.24 +29:19:10.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.36, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.34)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.586 707719595730662784 127.51345520082 +29.31945305462 14.3916 13.8744 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.586#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112076_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 112076_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:06:37.04 +33:53:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112081_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 112081_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:44:21.69 +33:13:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112097_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 112097_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:06:46.42 +32:01:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112142_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 112142_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:12:46.09 +30:39:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112143_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 112143_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:31.39 +27:51:14.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.31, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.29)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.263 878278794368347904 114.88130672855 +27.85448878446 14.4616 13.9745 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.263#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112195_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 112195_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:28:37.92 +28:46:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112249_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 112249_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:42:08.77 +34:39:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112250_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 112250_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:36:50.34 +33:37:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112358_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 112358_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:32.36 +28:12:36.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.52, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.50)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.310 873107756822928512 111.13461847129 +28.21039406847 14.7314 14.2256 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.310#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112410_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 112410_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:58:12.96 +31:55:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112545_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 112545_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:54.47 +33:54:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112558_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 112558_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112564_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 112564_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:32.82 +32:13:48.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.091 881722361707443328 117.38649653410 +32.22992459548 14.9234 14.3997 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.091#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112661_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 112661_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:20:19.35 +30:01:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112666_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 112666_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:56.97 +28:28:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112794_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 112794_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:31:07.92 +31:55:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112798_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 112798_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:07:55.57 +27:57:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112818_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 112818_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:50.71 +29:07:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112878_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 112878_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:30.59 +32:41:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112902_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 112902_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:39.38 +34:59:37.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.83, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.81)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.769 894668527009275776 117.41420144305 +34.99414855005 14.5910 13.5368 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.769#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112947_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 112947_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:11:03.08 +28:52:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112970_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 112970_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:56.96 +35:05:28.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.92, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.90)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.662 906492022218643584 120.23740595453 +35.09115924646 15.1119 14.5998 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.662#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112977_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 112977_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:47:42.00 +30:20:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113063_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 113063_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:30:26.03 +28:36:47.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.874 707249795027439616 127.60841963057 +28.61275820976 14.9698 14.3493 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.874#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113081_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 113081_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:03.09 +34:36:08.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.961 882635162516672896 117.76287228318 +34.60198320340 15.2299 14.7108 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.961#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30129_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
Preparing report for the candidate 30129_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44359_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 44359_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:11.04 +29:09:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69850_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104
The candidate 69850_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_00-01-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0104 did not pass the final checks