This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0542365+631950,2461147.6635,13.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0542365+631950 20260417.1635 13.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0442423+640229,2461147.6635,11.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0442423+640229 20260417.1635 11.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.69737530 09.01.2026 04:44:03.226 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
First image: 2461049.69737530 09.01.2026 04:44:03.226 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Last image: 2461147.66378580 17.04.2026 03:55:41.093 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 16163
Objects passed selection criteria: 16096
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11661.2
Average stars matched: 10599.5 (90.8951 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 119540 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 23:00:48 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.69737530 09.01.2026 04:44:03.226 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
First image: 2461049.69737530 09.01.2026 04:44:03.226 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Last image: 2461147.66378580 17.04.2026 03:55:41.093 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 103
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 41 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 114271
Objects passed selection criteria: 113900
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 82231.5
Average stars matched: 74910.5 (91.0971 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1937192 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 23:03:04 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461147.66317274
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:28.126 +61:59:49.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
Image size: 937.2'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:09:22.080 +61:59:05.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:28.126 +61:59:49.99
Second-epoch image center 05:09:22.080 +61:59:05.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1063 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
Image size: 937.2'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:09:19.802 +61:58:51.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:28.126 +61:59:49.99
Second-epoch image center 05:09:19.802 +61:58:51.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1024 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:09:22.080 +61:59:05.83
Second-epoch second image center 05:09:19.802 +61:58:51.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00598 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9W19GUoM6P
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KGi5oyUjdJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Y6uqgW7SWM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PKR7qSftOZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 18409 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 57.0231 to 95.6672 deg, Dec +55.2649 to +67.4913 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 57.0231 to 95.6672 deg, Dec 55.2649 to 67.4913 deg
Loaded 14048 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8129 out of 8891 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8891 out of 18409 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.955063
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.955063
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
2.0 pix Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
2.6 pix fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
2.6 pix fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
15.5 mag. Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.9W19GUoM6P (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1604, passed=18409
Got 18409 stars (including 16782 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18409 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18199 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KGi5oyUjdJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1596, passed=18487
Got 18487 stars (including 16865 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18224 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits -region wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Y6uqgW7SWM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1043, passed=11332
Got 11332 stars (including 10282 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11332 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11035 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11035 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PKR7qSftOZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1039, passed=11346
Got 11346 stars (including 10296 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11346 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11095 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11094 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11094 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21971_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 21971_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:45.93 +64:26:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22209_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 22209_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:24.12 +57:49:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22927_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 22927_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:44.19 +64:34:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23642_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 23642_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:30.49 +63:46:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10918_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 10918_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:18.28 +62:16:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20049_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 20049_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:17.29 +59:35:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20605_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 20605_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:02.26 +57:44:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09621_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 09621_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:46.01 +62:14:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:28.126 +61:59:49.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
Image size: 937.2'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:09:22.080 +61:59:05.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:28.126 +61:59:49.99
Second-epoch image center 05:09:22.080 +61:59:05.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1063 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
Image size: 937.2'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:09:19.802 +61:58:51.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:28.126 +61:59:49.99
Second-epoch image center 05:09:19.802 +61:58:51.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1024 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:09:22.080 +61:59:05.83
Second-epoch second image center 05:09:19.802 +61:58:51.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00598 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Z3wSYuhhnt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EwQNh47wA3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MlEVfapvsS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9Cz4qir7c2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 131449 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.9471 to 95.6842 deg, Dec +55.1951 to +67.5012 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.9471 to 95.6842 deg, Dec 55.1951 to 67.5012 deg
Loaded 14165 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6817 out of 9000 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9000 out of 131449 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.808691
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.808691
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 87 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
1.9 pix Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
15.6 mag. Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Z3wSYuhhnt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=31, blended=12667, passed=131418
Got 131418 stars (including 118531 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 131418 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EwQNh47wA3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=12449, passed=130538
Got 130538 stars (including 117858 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 130538 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129189 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129188 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129189 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits -region wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MlEVfapvsS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=6585, passed=67419
Got 67419 stars (including 60766 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 67419 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65403 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65403 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9Cz4qir7c2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=6649, passed=67495
Got 67495 stars (including 60778 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 67495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65613 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65614 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65614 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/wcs_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-54-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0084.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_225629_TTUQ2b1x1_623601_IPhqyxr6/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out150668.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out150670.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162623.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out163583.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out118109.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out150672.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150652_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 150652_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:38.56 +65:25:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150668_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 150668_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:37.00 +58:19:55.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.24, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.22)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.671 281617848800549248 083.90384781541 +58.33213743401 14.0249 13.1636 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.671#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150670_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 150670_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:42.93 +58:25:53.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.68, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.66)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150671_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 150671_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:07.09 +60:17:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150672_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
Preparing report for the candidate 150672_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150680_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 150680_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:48.76 +65:17:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151978_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 151978_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:21.15 +58:57:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153196_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 153196_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154341_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 154341_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:13.81 +58:04:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154375_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 154375_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155170_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 155170_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155199_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 155199_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:35.05 +59:25:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155438_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 155438_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:17.22 +62:42:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155730_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 155730_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:39.79 +58:06:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155763_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 155763_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155814_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 155814_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:56.82 +59:46:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156740_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 156740_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:32.04 +61:17:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157290_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 157290_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:38.64 +64:17:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157609_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 157609_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:29.18 +63:20:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158466_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 158466_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:52.46 +63:07:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158490_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 158490_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:12.65 +61:09:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158892_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 158892_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:26.40 +62:03:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159391_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 159391_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:24.77 +57:50:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159426_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 159426_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:12.55 +64:37:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159592_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 159592_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:46.50 +62:12:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159910_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 159910_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:36.39 +62:40:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160058_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 160058_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:56.27 +61:48:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160381_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 160381_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:20.72 +60:48:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160413_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 160413_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160416_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 160416_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:50.68 +66:00:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160444_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 160444_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:58.24 +63:06:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160683_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 160683_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:38.87 +64:48:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160690_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 160690_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:13.96 +57:52:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160710_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 160710_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:41.84 +57:49:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160894_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 160894_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:30.15 +59:16:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161023_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 161023_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:02.13 +63:56:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161390_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 161390_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:01.25 +58:12:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161406_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 161406_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161714_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 161714_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:51.07 +63:58:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161952_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 161952_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:11.80 +65:21:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161968_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 161968_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:20.33 +65:47:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162034_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 162034_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:32.55 +63:16:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162115_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 162115_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:26.02 +60:19:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162120_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 162120_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:09.35 +60:10:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162284_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 162284_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:46.26 +59:27:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162488_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 162488_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:08.08 +60:53:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162611_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 162611_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:11.87 +58:46:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162623_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 162623_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:35.85 +62:06:16.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.14, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.12)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.622 283545430123539712 086.14910396169 +62.10496006492 14.1358 13.1770 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.622#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162687_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 162687_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:07.69 +62:21:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162815_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 162815_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:22.91 +59:49:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162935_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 162935_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:16.43 +59:28:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163069_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 163069_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:11.95 +63:57:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163385_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 163385_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:24.43 +61:24:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163563_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 163563_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:55.91 +60:46:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163579_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 163579_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:23.73 +57:49:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163583_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 163583_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:28.51 +64:16:11.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.83, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.81)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.630 478453622996917120 078.11830798866 +64.26913370036 13.9785 13.1367 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.630#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163721_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 163721_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:52.19 +62:45:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163790_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 163790_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:44.89 +64:09:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163897_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 163897_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:15.15 +57:53:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164263_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 164263_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:24.98 +63:58:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164551_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 164551_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:36.55 +59:49:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164754_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 164754_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:13.99 +60:38:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164868_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 164868_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:44.97 +58:57:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165069_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 165069_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:38.54 +58:18:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167375_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 167375_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124534_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 124534_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:43.59 +64:14:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103232_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 103232_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:39.42 +62:33:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71135_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 71135_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:46.02 +62:14:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44559_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 44559_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:17.35 +59:35:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19902_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 19902_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:58.46 +57:33:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118109_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
Preparing report for the candidate 118109_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114638_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 114638_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:44.22 +64:34:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17362_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 17362_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:02.29 +57:44:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35828_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 35828_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:31.19 +59:02:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123975_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 123975_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:30.56 +63:46:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116668_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 116668_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32261_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 32261_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:33.89 +59:13:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121037_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 121037_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:45.93 +64:26:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81854_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 81854_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:18.49 +62:16:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92395_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 92395_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:51.67 +63:15:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142166_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 142166_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:27.88 +63:01:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146432_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 146432_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:36.54 +58:17:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29216_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 29216_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:06.60 +58:38:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73386_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 73386_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:28.91 +62:29:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38817_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 38817_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109716_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 109716_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:50.98 +64:52:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25460_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085
The candidate 25460_fd_Cam-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_22-55-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0085 did not pass the final checks