This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J065.1934+53.4068,2461147.6145,14.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J065.1934+53.4068 20260417.1145 14.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.1145* 04 02 45.10 +52 12 16.6 13.9 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
MU Per,2461147.6145,13.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
MU Per 20260417.1145 13.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.60610205 18.01.2026 02:32:37.217 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
First image: 2461058.60610205 18.01.2026 02:32:37.217 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Last image: 2461147.61489385 17.04.2026 02:45:16.829 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15980
Objects passed selection criteria: 15928
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11302.5
Average stars matched: 10408.2 (92.088 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 120208 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 21:49:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.60610205 18.01.2026 02:32:37.217 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
First image: 2461058.60610205 18.01.2026 02:32:37.217 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Last image: 2461147.61489385 17.04.2026 02:45:16.829 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 98
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 38 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 118043
Objects passed selection criteria: 117776
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 89585.8
Average stars matched: 82472.2 (92.0596 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1944172 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 21:51:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461147.61405888
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits'
wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:05.422 +54:00:05.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:26.649 +54:00:02.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:05.422 +54:00:05.55
Second-epoch image center 04:14:26.649 +54:00:02.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0520 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:26.013 +53:59:24.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:05.422 +54:00:05.55
Second-epoch image center 04:14:26.013 +53:59:24.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0517 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:14:26.649 +54:00:02.65
Second-epoch second image center 04:14:26.013 +53:59:24.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01076 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FXBQ80bEZB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits &> /tmp/tmp.i7HdBFE5at
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pyOOsZtWen
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uDz5A1dBsG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 19207 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 48.0247 to 77.8890 deg, Dec +47.5181 to +59.4402 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 48.0247 to 77.8890 deg, Dec 47.5181 to 59.4402 deg
Loaded 11742 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7353 out of 8106 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8106 out of 19207 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.937546
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.937546
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
2.1 pix Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
2.6 pix fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
15.3 mag. Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.FXBQ80bEZB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1798, passed=19207
Got 19207 stars (including 17377 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19207 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18814 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18814 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18814 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.i7HdBFE5at (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1805, passed=19223
Got 19223 stars (including 17389 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19223 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pyOOsZtWen (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=655, passed=10667
Got 10667 stars (including 10006 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10667 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uDz5A1dBsG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=604, passed=9541
Got 9541 stars (including 8931 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9541 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9400 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9397 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9397 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21722_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 21722_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:05.11 +53:21:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:05.422 +54:00:05.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:26.649 +54:00:02.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:05.422 +54:00:05.55
Second-epoch image center 04:14:26.649 +54:00:02.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0520 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:26.013 +53:59:24.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:05.422 +54:00:05.55
Second-epoch image center 04:14:26.013 +53:59:24.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0517 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:14:26.649 +54:00:02.65
Second-epoch second image center 04:14:26.013 +53:59:24.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01076 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qj68roLIQS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2TPuZ4b8WM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XAOpj03ukQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits &> /tmp/tmp.THFZiSOzgP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 141337 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 47.9570 to 77.9024 deg, Dec +47.5181 to +59.4506 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 47.9570 to 77.9024 deg, Dec 47.5181 to 59.4506 deg
Loaded 11785 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5989 out of 8187 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8187 out of 141337 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.779746
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.779746
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 82 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
2.0 pix Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
15.5 mag. Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.qj68roLIQS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=15933, passed=141313
Got 141313 stars (including 125129 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 141313 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 139588 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 139587 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 139587 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2TPuZ4b8WM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=16037, passed=141692
Got 141692 stars (including 125423 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 141692 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 139921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 139923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 139923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XAOpj03ukQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=6177, passed=79743
Got 79743 stars (including 73491 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 79743 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78541 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78541 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78542 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.THFZiSOzgP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=5283, passed=72459
Got 72459 stars (including 67110 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 72459 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-32-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/wcs_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-33-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-44-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_214618_TTUQ2b1x1_1961397_6KtLTUYa/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out177176.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out177412.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out162171.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52166.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162171_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 162171_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162192_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 162192_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:25.34 +56:47:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162207_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 162207_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:03:09.89 +57:40:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162212_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 162212_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:09.50 +50:32:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162216_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 162216_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:37.66 +57:50:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162228_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 162228_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:01:54.34 +56:35:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162230_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 162230_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:35.09 +56:08:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165807_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 165807_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:41.88 +51:07:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166990_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 166990_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:10.35 +58:01:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167433_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 167433_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:08.37 +57:55:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167551_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 167551_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:02.03 +51:42:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167856_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 167856_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:19.55 +52:03:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167893_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 167893_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:27.52 +57:06:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168108_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 168108_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:35.84 +54:23:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168301_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 168301_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:09.21 +53:23:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168333_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 168333_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:12.11 +53:43:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168582_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 168582_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:01:40.63 +53:50:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168787_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 168787_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:04.25 +52:35:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168856_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 168856_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:32.59 +52:38:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169009_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 169009_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:51.34 +54:43:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169266_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 169266_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:47.13 +52:50:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169528_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 169528_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:04.64 +51:47:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169546_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 169546_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:28.01 +51:12:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169711_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 169711_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:36.44 +51:23:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169787_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 169787_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:36.74 +55:54:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169908_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 169908_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:27.89 +51:21:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169966_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 169966_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:46.48 +51:25:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170592_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 170592_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:23.93 +51:29:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170936_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 170936_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:59.58 +55:46:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171030_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 171030_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:52:58.51 +52:14:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171082_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 171082_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:33.17 +56:24:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171192_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 171192_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:21.65 +52:37:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171259_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 171259_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:44.98 +55:44:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171533_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 171533_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:00.49 +51:33:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171828_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 171828_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:52:51.19 +55:49:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171930_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 171930_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:52:57.18 +52:16:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171941_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 171941_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:52:44.44 +53:28:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171972_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 171972_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:46.82 +53:20:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171980_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 171980_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:41.24 +51:34:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172050_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 172050_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:58:53.85 +56:41:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172159_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 172159_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:52:50.96 +54:49:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172311_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 172311_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:45.80 +55:43:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172547_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 172547_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:52.63 +58:07:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172602_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 172602_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:15.64 +56:43:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172639_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 172639_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:55:03.66 +57:26:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172753_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 172753_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:55:52.33 +56:56:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172987_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 172987_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:10.22 +53:44:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173273_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 173273_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:14.55 +53:09:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173428_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 173428_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:37.32 +52:06:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173592_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 173592_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:58.23 +56:38:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173740_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 173740_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:59.98 +55:53:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173818_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 173818_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:26.72 +57:40:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173869_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 173869_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173953_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 173953_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:35.06 +51:14:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174162_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 174162_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:49.72 +53:16:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174280_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 174280_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:19.68 +52:47:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174518_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 174518_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:42.42 +56:25:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174546_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 174546_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:52.06 +56:16:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174584_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 174584_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:02.50 +56:07:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174643_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 174643_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:01:07.19 +55:19:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174943_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 174943_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:16:51.02 +56:50:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174945_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 174945_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:03:43.16 +52:06:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174946_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 174946_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:16.31 +51:10:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175122_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175122_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:50.65 +52:14:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175298_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175298_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:06.97 +52:56:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175399_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175399_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:09.51 +51:21:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175667_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175667_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:19.11 +53:39:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175997_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 175997_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:25.98 +52:25:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176080_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 176080_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:14.68 +53:13:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176539_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 176539_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:55:01.88 +57:02:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176746_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 176746_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:16:09.12 +56:26:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176971_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 176971_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:28.58 +51:19:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177037_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 177037_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:32.30 +53:14:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177176_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 177176_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:18.91 +52:39:49.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.097 272120198642240768 067.07693939833 +52.66365184446 15.2313 14.4156 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.097#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177412_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 177412_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:30.89 +55:46:11.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.845 468735520760743936 059.37955456149 +55.76991189053 14.6609 13.9102 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.845#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177478_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 177478_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:25.89 +57:21:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177537_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 177537_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:08.27 +56:05:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177778_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 177778_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:30.25 +56:20:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177815_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 177815_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:30.53 +55:02:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177993_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 177993_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:17.91 +53:38:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52166_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 52166_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75761_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029
The candidate 75761_fd_Cam-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-45-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0029 did not pass the final checks