This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.1106* 05 45 59.37 +21 26 39.0 11.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.6106,11.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.1106 11.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.1106* 05 42 34.55 +25 12 07.3 14.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461147.6106,13.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260417.1106 13.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.1106* 05 40 50.68 +22 18 38.1 13.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.6106,12.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.1106 12.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.1106* 05 45 37.03 +18 59 57.5 14.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3399237847645963520,2461147.6106,14.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3399237847645963520 20260417.1106 14.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.1106* 05 28 23.83 +20 51 36.6 14.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.6106,14.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.1106 14.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.1106* 05 43 44.14 +20 11 53.1 14.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.6106,14.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.1106 14.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.62137122 11.02.2026 02:54:36.473 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
First image: 2461082.62137122 11.02.2026 02:54:36.473 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Last image: 2461147.61086557 17.04.2026 02:39:28.785 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 18911
Objects passed selection criteria: 18844
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14137.2
Average stars matched: 12601.5 (89.1369 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 121716 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 21:46:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.62137122 11.02.2026 02:54:36.473 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
First image: 2461082.62137122 11.02.2026 02:54:36.473 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Last image: 2461147.61086557 17.04.2026 02:39:28.785 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 198
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 50 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 137325
Objects passed selection criteria: 136970
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 107880
Average stars matched: 97366 (90.2542 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1908028 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 21:48:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461147.61026850
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits'
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.616 +22:00:01.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:22.602 +22:00:13.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.616 +22:00:01.42
Second-epoch image center 05:32:22.602 +22:00:13.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0120 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:24.307 +21:59:34.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.616 +22:00:01.42
Second-epoch image center 05:32:24.307 +21:59:34.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0196 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:22.602 +22:00:13.13
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:24.307 +21:59:34.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01259 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits &> /tmp/tmp.itDKyReSCv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MV07L4mGFX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JxGWSWVX0e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yLj9if8ehq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23525 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.1682 to 91.6910 deg, Dec +16.3328 to +27.3474 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.1682 to 91.6910 deg, Dec 16.3328 to 27.3474 deg
Loaded 12326 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9058 out of 10254 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10254 out of 23525 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.945337
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.945337
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
2.3 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
15.3 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.itDKyReSCv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2582, passed=23525
Got 23525 stars (including 20915 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23525 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22051 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22047 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22047 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MV07L4mGFX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2595, passed=23514
Got 23514 stars (including 20891 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23514 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22179 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 926 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JxGWSWVX0e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1161, passed=14881
Got 14881 stars (including 13700 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14881 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14411 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yLj9if8ehq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1126, passed=14432
Got 14432 stars (including 13295 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14432 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14021 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33801.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33801_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 33801_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34451_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 34451_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:28.93 +20:02:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30860_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 30860_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.41 +17:54:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:45:59.37 +21:26:39.0
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.616 +22:00:01.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:22.602 +22:00:13.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.616 +22:00:01.42
Second-epoch image center 05:32:22.602 +22:00:13.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0120 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:24.307 +21:59:34.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.616 +22:00:01.42
Second-epoch image center 05:32:24.307 +21:59:34.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0196 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:22.602 +22:00:13.13
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:24.307 +21:59:34.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01259 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vlVkZBFMdW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qMDLuobc0O
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2zayIvxA65
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F9gEgki4sW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 163644 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.1103 to 91.6919 deg, Dec +16.3196 to +27.3524 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.1103 to 91.6919 deg, Dec 16.3196 to 27.3524 deg
Loaded 12375 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7170 out of 10499 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10499 out of 163644 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.769457
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.769457
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 160 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.vlVkZBFMdW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=55, blended=21410, passed=163589
Got 163589 stars (including 141908 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 163589 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154540 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qMDLuobc0O (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=54, blended=21418, passed=163772
Got 163772 stars (including 142086 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 163772 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154755 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154755 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 929 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2zayIvxA65 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=42, blended=10001, passed=104593
Got 104593 stars (including 94438 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 104593 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 102070 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 102070 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 101981 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1021)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.F9gEgki4sW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=9775, passed=102604
Got 102604 stars (including 92715 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 102604 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 100448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 100448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 100373 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 925 stars left (next iteration limit 1018)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_214016_TTUQ2b1x1_1542776_IMi4QZtW/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out185142.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out185162.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out185167.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out185183.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out201861.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out202741.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out206374.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out209018.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out209257.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out210637.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out211705.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out212291.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out212347.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out185220.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out194279.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out206969.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out206977.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out211559.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 17s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185142_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 185142_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:42.86 +23:47:46.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.63)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.744 3428394495131776512 085.92876734946 +23.79624145810 14.8871 14.2242 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.744#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185162_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 185162_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:31.69 +21:52:46.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.402 3403767908570673280 083.63165759546 +21.87939824954 14.4975 13.6747 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.402#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185167_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 185167_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:50.16 +25:30:30.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.667 3440900752702122368 085.20918280642 +25.50866774661 14.4809 13.9253 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.667#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185170_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 185170_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:26.27 +18:58:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185180_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 185180_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:29.16 +21:40:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185183_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 185183_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:54.84 +22:53:23.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.25)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185197_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 185197_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:17.83 +22:36:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185199_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 185199_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:25.29 +20:52:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185205_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 185205_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:15.11 +25:07:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185209_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 185209_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:32.92 +22:49:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185212_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 185212_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:12.20 +18:57:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185213_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 185213_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:49.05 +19:18:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185220_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 185220_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185223_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 185223_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:35.38 +24:16:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185230_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 185230_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:30.98 +18:09:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185235_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 185235_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:37.82 +25:27:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185238_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 185238_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:00.33 +19:35:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185245_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 185245_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:08.14 +18:27:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185246_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 185246_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:25.60 +22:52:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185247_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 185247_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:34.28 +21:42:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185249_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 185249_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:36.60 +20:06:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185253_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 185253_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:48.81 +25:04:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185254_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 185254_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:33.59 +17:55:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185256_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 185256_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:21.98 +20:01:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185257_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 185257_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:26.67 +25:17:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185266_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 185266_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:25.15 +25:17:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185271_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 185271_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:28.02 +19:55:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185278_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 185278_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:22.90 +22:40:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187915_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 187915_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:59.42 +21:26:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188560_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 188560_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:07.93 +21:23:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191934_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 191934_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:36.91 +25:05:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192023_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 192023_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.28 +18:59:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192368_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 192368_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:37.37 +18:52:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192493_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 192493_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.74 +19:34:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192738_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 192738_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:50.23 +21:18:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192740_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 192740_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:54.66 +19:28:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193058_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 193058_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.97 +20:10:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193074_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 193074_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:46.97 +21:22:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193483_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 193483_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:30.87 +18:25:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194279_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 194279_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194362_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 194362_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:54.85 +22:33:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194492_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 194492_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:29.01 +21:16:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194712_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 194712_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:02.89 +20:17:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194767_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 194767_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:11.37 +19:48:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194829_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 194829_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:52.31 +21:18:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194904_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 194904_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:18.94 +21:12:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194968_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 194968_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:17.16 +18:20:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195429_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195429_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:02.92 +18:33:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195583_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 195583_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:32.26 +22:45:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196807_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 196807_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:43.24 +17:55:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197025_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 197025_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:46.38 +20:08:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197216_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 197216_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:57.96 +24:13:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197727_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 197727_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:13.59 +25:22:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197735_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 197735_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:37.48 +22:23:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197991_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 197991_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:22.35 +23:21:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198108_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 198108_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:15.02 +19:35:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198178_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 198178_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:20.18 +24:24:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198342_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 198342_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:29.55 +21:46:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198363_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 198363_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:08.55 +20:02:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198939_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 198939_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:20.43 +25:08:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198974_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 198974_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:25.21 +23:07:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199293_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 199293_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:11.91 +19:49:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199401_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 199401_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:54.89 +19:05:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200031_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 200031_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:44.09 +26:10:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200200_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 200200_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:04.27 +20:48:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200451_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 200451_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:44.84 +21:12:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200743_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 200743_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:50.98 +26:06:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200768_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 200768_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:08.10 +19:33:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201059_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 201059_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:45.89 +18:05:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201237_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 201237_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:40.68 +18:53:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201286_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 201286_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:45.57 +21:24:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201291_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 201291_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:38.11 +22:58:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201326_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 201326_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:30.10 +21:58:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201345_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 201345_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:27.39 +21:47:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201365_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 201365_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:10.29 +18:50:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201420_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 201420_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:27.45 +18:28:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201446_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 201446_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:57.24 +25:53:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201476_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 201476_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:24.54 +18:32:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201836_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 201836_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:20.94 +24:22:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201846_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 201846_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:08.28 +22:06:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201861_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 201861_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:40.31 +23:56:32.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.58)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.640 3427710461459911296 087.66746594401 +23.94217970311 13.6084 13.1140 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.640#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201866_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 201866_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:30.36 +20:09:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201875_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 201875_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:31.45 +18:39:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201910_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 201910_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:34.58 +21:24:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202434_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 202434_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:37.65 +19:23:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202440_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 202440_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:51.86 +20:00:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202499_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 202499_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:04.16 +21:09:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202517_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 202517_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:54.49 +19:27:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202578_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 202578_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:52.00 +23:51:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202704_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 202704_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:04.44 +20:26:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202741_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 202741_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:40.43 +18:46:48.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.85)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.390 3397915414332909696 083.91873085819 +18.78080609507 14.4141 13.7041 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.390#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202825_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 202825_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:31.02 +20:47:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202910_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 202910_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:12.81 +20:42:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202929_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 202929_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:26.08 +20:34:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203074_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 203074_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:31.19 +19:46:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203291_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 203291_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:27.98 +21:07:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203381_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 203381_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:39.26 +21:58:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203605_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 203605_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:48.04 +21:18:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203611_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 203611_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:43.16 +24:06:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203638_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 203638_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:12.32 +19:42:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203830_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 203830_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:37.21 +23:38:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204080_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 204080_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:09.35 +18:20:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204092_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 204092_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:42.19 +22:29:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204284_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 204284_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.72 +19:39:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204528_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 204528_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:56.34 +22:27:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204567_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 204567_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:02.52 +24:22:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204612_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 204612_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:48.04 +20:07:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204752_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 204752_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:26.31 +25:43:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204777_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 204777_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:55.76 +19:56:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204885_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 204885_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:57.05 +21:39:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205130_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 205130_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:23.03 +21:26:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205439_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 205439_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:36.35 +19:12:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205525_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 205525_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:36.88 +24:06:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205587_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 205587_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:49.88 +18:07:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205671_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 205671_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:17.05 +18:17:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205719_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 205719_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:55.13 +24:07:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205827_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 205827_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:34.35 +21:00:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205980_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 205980_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:08.02 +20:44:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 206049_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 206049_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:37.57 +17:47:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 206274_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 206274_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:44.37 +18:15:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 206374_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 206374_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:48.62 +20:25:38.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.11, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.09)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.489 3402762886223002112 083.95299701210 +20.42747725491 14.0542 13.1718 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.489#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 206709_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 206709_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:57.89 +20:46:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 206833_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 206833_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:21.69 +22:50:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 206902_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 206902_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:19.91 +25:31:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 206969_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 206969_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 206977_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 206977_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207250_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 207250_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:23.65 +23:10:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207257_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 207257_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:30.25 +23:55:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207334_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 207334_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:44.96 +22:11:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207521_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 207521_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:11.83 +21:19:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207628_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 207628_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:34.88 +22:55:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207638_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 207638_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:15.26 +22:18:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207979_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 207979_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:55.00 +20:46:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207980_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 207980_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:05.72 +21:42:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208096_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 208096_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:22.68 +21:36:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208249_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 208249_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:10.96 +21:13:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208545_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 208545_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:37.65 +23:37:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208670_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 208670_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:02.30 +19:42:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208986_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 208986_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:18.53 +19:54:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209004_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 209004_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:45.83 +17:45:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209018_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 209018_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:43.80 +25:54:23.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.36, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.34)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.791 3440934695825573376 085.43194872449 +25.90645538070 14.6529 14.0429 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.791#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209257_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 209257_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:00.22 +18:36:28.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.31, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.29)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.366 3401368735541669120 080.00109037373 +18.60855286699 14.3174 13.7037 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.366#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209668_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 209668_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:51.03 +23:24:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210135_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 210135_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:28.60 +21:47:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210312_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 210312_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:37.60 +18:57:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210548_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 210548_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:04.23 +22:41:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210637_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 210637_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:44.57 +18:36:59.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.55, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.53)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.334 3397851092902666752 084.18572738528 +18.61635334680 14.6611 13.8467 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.334#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210780_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 210780_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:17.00 +21:29:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211559_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 211559_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211675_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 211675_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:55.67 +21:17:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211705_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 211705_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:51.59 +19:54:36.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.49)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.428 3399727890532976768 086.96483087720 +19.90970533084 14.7335 14.0646 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.428#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211855_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 211855_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:09.37 +23:15:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212219_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 212219_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:37.12 +20:03:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212255_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 212255_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:50.33 +20:53:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212291_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 212291_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:42.13 +20:27:06.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.59, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.57)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.793 3402763710856722816 083.92452777921 +20.45215043750 14.7733 13.9047 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.793#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212299_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 212299_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:53.09 +22:26:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212347_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 212347_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:19.02 +22:31:54.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.68, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.66)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.899 3404232482294660992 084.07953520968 +22.53123732111 14.8445 13.7906 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.899#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212414_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 212414_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:18.49 +21:31:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56342_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 56342_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:28.98 +20:02:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18025_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 18025_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-39-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks