This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.1093* 05 00 57.37 +25 15 08.1 11.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.6093,11.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.1093 11.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.1093* 04 56 22.75 +27 35 36.2 12.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.6093,12.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.1093 12.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.6093,13.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.1093 13.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.1093* 04 44 24.59 +28 43 23.3 14.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.6093,14.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.1093 14.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.1093* 04 35 24.77 +28 26 46.9 14.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.6093,14.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.1093 14.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
First image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Last image: 2461147.60975529 17.04.2026 02:37:52.857 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15327
Objects passed selection criteria: 15281
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12884.5
Average stars matched: 12536.8 (97.301 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 120372 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 21:40:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
First image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Last image: 2461147.60975529 17.04.2026 02:37:52.857 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 104
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 45 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 126675
Objects passed selection criteria: 126392
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 110421
Average stars matched: 106416 (96.373 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2041524 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 21:42:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461147.60894083
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:58.392 +29:59:51.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 04:59:58.392 +29:59:51.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0092 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.322 +29:59:24.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 05:00:01.322 +29:59:24.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0066 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:59:58.392 +29:59:51.05
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:01.322 +29:59:24.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01289 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qo1jztogIX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bgILbJVpWJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wooAwuaWl3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LDsElmxutS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16419 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5643 to 84.6649 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.3019 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5643 to 84.6649 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.3019 deg
Loaded 8463 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6027 out of 6737 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6737 out of 16419 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.972082
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.972082
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
1.8 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.1 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
2.1 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.qo1jztogIX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1510, passed=16419
Got 16419 stars (including 14877 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16419 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bgILbJVpWJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1544, passed=16335
Got 16335 stars (including 14759 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16335 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wooAwuaWl3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=10, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=755, passed=9517
Got 9517 stars (including 8754 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9517 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9172 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9173 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9173 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LDsElmxutS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=703, passed=9683
Got 9683 stars (including 8969 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9683 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9294 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9294 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21317.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21256_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 21256_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.50 +31:18:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21280_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 21280_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.67 +34:09:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21286_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 21286_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:10.93 +26:11:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21298_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 21298_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.46 +34:26:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21317_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
Preparing report for the candidate 21317_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21323_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 21323_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06267_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 06267_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.25 +32:10:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:00:57.37 +25:15:08.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:58.392 +29:59:51.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 04:59:58.392 +29:59:51.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0092 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.322 +29:59:24.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 05:00:01.322 +29:59:24.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0066 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:59:58.392 +29:59:51.05
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:01.322 +29:59:24.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01289 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FuLShOTJIb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1SwKppvlSq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rmOtx9oXCg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7gnVgI8iZI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 137583 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5579 to 84.6894 deg, Dec +24.3186 to +35.3036 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5579 to 84.6894 deg, Dec 24.3186 to 35.3036 deg
Loaded 8491 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4933 out of 6876 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6876 out of 137583 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825942
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825942
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 96 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.7 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
1.7 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.0 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
2.0 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.FuLShOTJIb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=14362, passed=137559
Got 137559 stars (including 122963 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 137559 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1SwKppvlSq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=14447, passed=138047
Got 138047 stars (including 123396 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 138047 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rmOtx9oXCg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=5634, passed=82951
Got 82951 stars (including 77172 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 82951 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7gnVgI8iZI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=6553, passed=86199
Got 86199 stars (including 79488 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 86199 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83067 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83065 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83066 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-36-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213852_TTUQ1b1x1_1514065_vgUwmTE1/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160911.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160921.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160927.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160934.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160935.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160943.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160945.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160957.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161742.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162146.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162148.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162245.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162310.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162345.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162544.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162555.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162587.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out161309.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out161902.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out162484.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out162603.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160911_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160911_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:15.50 +33:46:57.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.903 181807413047136256 077.56455708601 +33.78211064138 14.8579 14.2169 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.903#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160912_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160912_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:45.94 +32:30:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160921_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160921_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:48.65 +34:17:52.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.147 184839518221101696 077.20246851486 +34.29669861887 14.9528 14.5392 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.147#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160927_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160927_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:15.58 +28:47:24.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.332 155799255764783488 076.06560726999 +28.78982495717 14.5164 13.6453 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.332#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160934_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160934_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:40.03 +33:03:12.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.35, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.33)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160935_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160935_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:21.07 +34:22:14.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.33, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.31)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.040 184884911733881216 076.08788102534 +34.37024378985 14.6799 13.9867 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.040#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160937_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160937_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:05.25 +26:28:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160943_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160943_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:31.76 +32:36:05.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.06, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.04)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160945_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160945_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:36.42 +32:03:17.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.19, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.17)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.216 180612926807635584 079.40179383630 +32.05435786043 14.1379 13.6128 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.216#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160947_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160947_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:48.84 +31:25:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160949_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160949_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:48.87 +33:02:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160954_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160954_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:33.44 +29:31:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160956_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160956_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:00.66 +29:52:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160957_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160957_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:09.53 +28:28:09.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.11, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.09)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.790 3421606763174555648 080.04000192814 +28.46970287675 14.1062 13.3628 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.790#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160961_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160961_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:22.63 +28:33:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160962_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160962_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:25.01 +29:02:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160964_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160964_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:31.92 +29:23:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160965_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160965_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:18.31 +31:24:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160967_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160967_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:34.20 +30:02:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160968_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160968_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:41.63 +33:02:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160972_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160972_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:55.16 +33:10:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160978_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160978_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:52.00 +31:06:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160979_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160979_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:45.57 +28:44:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160982_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160982_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:25.66 +34:37:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161157_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161157_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.66 +34:09:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161176_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161176_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:31.23 +27:01:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161186_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161186_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:57.35 +25:15:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161195_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161195_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.30 +34:07:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161270_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161270_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:25.49 +34:49:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161308_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161308_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.64 +34:23:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161309_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
Preparing report for the candidate 161309_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161365_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161365_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:55.18 +32:26:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161379_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161379_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:26.81 +26:55:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161402_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161402_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:21.95 +28:31:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161422_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161422_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:28.49 +33:11:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161508_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161508_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:17.50 +32:33:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161517_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161517_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:10.20 +34:24:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161555_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161555_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:01.32 +33:48:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161582_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161582_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:19.54 +33:12:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161585_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161585_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:18.82 +29:47:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161605_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161605_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:17.84 +33:11:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161643_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161643_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:46.85 +29:10:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161693_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161693_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:17.67 +29:45:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161699_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161699_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:20.29 +31:44:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161708_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161708_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:34.71 +33:55:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161742_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161742_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:59.47 +25:52:45.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.68, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.66)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.472 3441121788898789376 083.24858208933 +25.87851533418 13.8024 13.2821 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.472#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161751_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161751_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:19.68 +33:23:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161766_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161766_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:31.70 +30:49:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161780_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161780_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:56.22 +33:34:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161784_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161784_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:41.84 +30:48:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161823_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161823_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:28.82 +29:39:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161843_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161843_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:08.03 +34:09:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161864_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161864_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:23.25 +33:52:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161890_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161890_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:26.90 +30:56:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161894_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161894_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.71 +26:10:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161896_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161896_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:57.14 +32:25:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161901_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161901_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:21.24 +32:55:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161902_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
Preparing report for the candidate 161902_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161944_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161944_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:53.05 +30:28:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161961_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161961_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:41.25 +33:56:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161965_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161965_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:15.31 +30:12:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161968_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161968_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:24.09 +31:04:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161983_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161983_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:16.34 +32:24:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161985_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161985_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:30.94 +32:48:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161993_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161993_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:04.96 +32:03:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162020_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162020_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:53.30 +32:52:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162032_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162032_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:51.07 +28:31:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162047_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162047_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:08.85 +33:20:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162049_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162049_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:38.16 +31:15:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162071_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162071_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:21.75 +28:40:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162093_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162093_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:29.41 +34:32:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162101_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162101_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:08.52 +33:13:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162144_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162144_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:31.01 +32:40:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162146_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162146_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:15.44 +34:09:20.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.15, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.13)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.296 182535976940858496 081.56532604506 +34.15471783496 14.2630 13.6030 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.296#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162148_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162148_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:01.24 +28:18:10.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.05, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.03)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.586 155668310801710080 075.50563124877 +28.30313618245 14.2314 13.6351 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.586#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162184_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162184_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:27.47 +32:27:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162191_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162191_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:43.76 +32:21:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162204_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162204_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:50.92 +32:54:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162240_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162240_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:22.09 +31:25:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162245_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162245_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:05.00 +30:58:07.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.15, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.13)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.705 160177785944294144 072.27200611712 +30.96850298939 14.1247 13.2140 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.705#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162305_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162305_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:21.28 +29:22:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162310_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162310_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:01.15 +29:44:31.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.15, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.13)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.503 158498075774605696 071.00506324041 +29.74137377357 14.2425 13.5079 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.503#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162312_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162312_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:11.07 +33:19:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:48.77 +30:10:10.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.25, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.23)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.561 156741056193678976 074.95398367844 +30.16920636321 14.4699 13.7110 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.561#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162349_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162349_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:11.75 +34:12:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162484_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
Preparing report for the candidate 162484_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162540_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162540_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:09.57 +31:24:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162544_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162544_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:16.59 +32:27:40.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.319 160429058710852224 072.81917038221 +32.46155888335 14.5025 13.7338 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.319#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162555_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162555_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:57.97 +32:45:34.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.52)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.727 181597853002797696 077.24261966654 +32.75897250617 14.2107 13.4097 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.727#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162587_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162587_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:28.24 +34:12:34.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.724 184878383383639552 076.11835638696 +34.20911373327 14.5984 13.6527 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.724#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162595_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162595_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:03.40 +33:20:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162603_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
Preparing report for the candidate 162603_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61547_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 61547_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.53 +31:18:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33755_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 33755_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:00.54 +32:53:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47553_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 47553_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.20 +32:10:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111869_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 111869_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-37-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks