This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.1072* 04 56 22.55 +27 35 35.2 12.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.6072,12.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.1072 12.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.6072,13.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.1072 13.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.1072* 04 44 24.34 +28 43 22.1 14.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.6072,14.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.1072 14.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
First image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Last image: 2461147.60743748 17.04.2026 02:34:32.598 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12692
Objects passed selection criteria: 12651
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10441.8
Average stars matched: 10149 (97.1964 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 118864 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 21:36:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
First image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Last image: 2461147.60743748 17.04.2026 02:34:32.598 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 63
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 32 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 109321
Objects passed selection criteria: 109064
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 90329
Average stars matched: 86910 (96.2149 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1945964 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 21:38:40 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461147.60687477
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:00.347 +30:00:09.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 05:00:00.347 +30:00:09.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0065 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:59.746 +30:00:38.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 04:59:59.746 +30:00:38.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0147 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:00.347 +30:00:09.59
Second-epoch second image center 04:59:59.746 +30:00:38.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00823 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CG2ooqS2ex
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cwAGzzikSm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits &> /tmp/tmp.G56p2OknrZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3Wax4HmdmJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16419 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5643 to 84.6649 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.3019 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5643 to 84.6649 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.3019 deg
Loaded 8463 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6027 out of 6737 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6737 out of 16419 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.972082
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.972082
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
1.8 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.6 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
2.6 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.CG2ooqS2ex (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1510, passed=16419
Got 16419 stars (including 14877 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16419 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cwAGzzikSm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1544, passed=16335
Got 16335 stars (including 14759 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16335 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.G56p2OknrZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=573, passed=8949
Got 8949 stars (including 8363 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8949 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8678 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8678 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3Wax4HmdmJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=542, passed=8455
Got 8455 stars (including 7910 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8455 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8129 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8129 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06267_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 06267_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.19 +32:10:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:00.347 +30:00:09.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 05:00:00.347 +30:00:09.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0065 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:59:59.746 +30:00:38.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 04:59:59.746 +30:00:38.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0147 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:00.347 +30:00:09.59
Second-epoch second image center 04:59:59.746 +30:00:38.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00823 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nla0OxPgd8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A4buR10kqt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SHuf2pASxH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DUFytLVj3U
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 137583 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5579 to 84.6894 deg, Dec +24.3186 to +35.3036 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5579 to 84.6894 deg, Dec 24.3186 to 35.3036 deg
Loaded 8491 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4933 out of 6876 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6876 out of 137583 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825942
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825942
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 52 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.7 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
1.7 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.nla0OxPgd8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=14362, passed=137559
Got 137559 stars (including 122963 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 137559 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.A4buR10kqt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=14447, passed=138047
Got 138047 stars (including 123396 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 138047 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SHuf2pASxH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=5609, passed=70259
Got 70259 stars (including 64553 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 70259 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68736 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68736 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68735 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DUFytLVj3U (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=5065, passed=67725
Got 67725 stars (including 62595 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 67725 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65790 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-33-43_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_213514_TTUQ2b1x1_1356301_Z15F1x0x/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159384.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159391.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159395.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159396.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159407.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159409.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159429.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159431.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159443.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159448.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160882.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159707.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out160172.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out160911.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159384_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 159384_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:54.66 +27:39:34.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.58)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.872 154882709743603200 072.72801758368 +27.65964415408 14.4336 13.4848 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.872#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159391_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 159391_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:54.17 +28:59:46.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.970 155222733714277888 072.22589450810 +28.99614651562 14.0545 13.3147 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.970#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159395_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 159395_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:19.03 +31:29:43.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.18, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.16)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159396_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 159396_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:16.71 +26:08:25.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.26, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.24)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159407_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 159407_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:42.08 +28:59:56.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.32, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.30)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.280 155633259571639296 076.92573421528 +28.99888509545 14.2155 13.5393 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.280#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159409_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 159409_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:26.30 +25:47:00.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.18, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.16)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.023 3420135616616932736 076.35987600316 +25.78346745520 13.8982 12.9180 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.023#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159422_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 159422_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:32.03 +29:23:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159429_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 159429_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:21.85 +27:43:10.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.421 154687477709891968 071.84118281565 +27.71909786629 13.4800 12.3336 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.421#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159431_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 159431_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:00.51 +30:53:01.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.80)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.775 156462738015520512 077.00237583764 +30.88364556129 13.5388 12.6833 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.775#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159443_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 159443_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:18.97 +27:46:08.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.375 154661639186495616 070.82933362293 +27.76933669904 13.3379 12.3797 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.375#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159446_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 159446_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:31.21 +33:17:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159447_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 159447_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:54.41 +28:06:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159448_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 159448_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:25.94 +33:24:52.8 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.25)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159452_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 159452_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:45.70 +28:44:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159453_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 159453_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:46.02 +28:46:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159458_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 159458_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:51.96 +31:06:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159461_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 159461_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:10.24 +30:00:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159462_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 159462_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:03.59 +26:37:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159707_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
Preparing report for the candidate 159707_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159719_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 159719_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:32.61 +28:37:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159791_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 159791_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:21.95 +28:31:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159812_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 159812_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:28.35 +33:11:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159814_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 159814_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:17.63 +32:33:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159881_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 159881_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:19.69 +33:12:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159907_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 159907_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:16.70 +27:54:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159940_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 159940_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:18.80 +29:47:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159958_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 159958_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:17.88 +33:11:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160006_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 160006_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:17.62 +29:45:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160037_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 160037_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:08.97 +33:24:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160091_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 160091_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:31.70 +30:49:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160102_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 160102_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:20.21 +31:44:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160146_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 160146_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:21.85 +28:40:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160172_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
Preparing report for the candidate 160172_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160177_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 160177_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:46.83 +29:10:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160178_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 160178_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:53.02 +30:28:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160217_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 160217_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:24.11 +31:04:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160285_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 160285_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:59.78 +32:25:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160293_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 160293_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:57.70 +34:00:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160402_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 160402_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:38.16 +31:15:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160441_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 160441_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:15.45 +34:09:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160523_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 160523_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:17.14 +33:06:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160534_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 160534_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:27.43 +32:27:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160624_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 160624_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:25.36 +31:04:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160627_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 160627_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:04.88 +32:02:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160641_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 160641_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:48.71 +30:10:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160813_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 160813_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:30.14 +32:25:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160881_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 160881_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:06.74 +29:08:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160882_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 160882_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:19.44 +30:43:30.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.56, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.54)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.666 159972623946253696 072.58178874922 +30.72473026536 14.6390 13.8658 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.666#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160910_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 160910_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:59.30 +28:14:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160911_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
Preparing report for the candidate 160911_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33755_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 33755_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:00.63 +32:53:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47553_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017
The candidate 47553_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_21-34-32_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0017 did not pass the final checks