This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.1010* 04 12 11.65 +39 26 52.1 13.2 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J041212.42+392650.9,2461147.6010,13.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J041212.42+392650.9 20260417.1010 13.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.1010* 04 13 36.73 +41 52 26.6 14.1 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 228792843436877824,2461147.6010,14.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 228792843436877824 20260417.1010 14.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.59692772 12.02.2026 02:19:24.555 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
First image: 2461083.59692772 12.02.2026 02:19:24.555 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Last image: 2461147.60134071 17.04.2026 02:25:45.837 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 17428
Objects passed selection criteria: 17323
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11337.8
Average stars matched: 10986 (96.8975 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 122372 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 21:29:29 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.59692772 12.02.2026 02:19:24.555 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
First image: 2461083.59692772 12.02.2026 02:19:24.555 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Last image: 2461147.60134071 17.04.2026 02:25:45.837 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 60
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 20 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 131849
Objects passed selection criteria: 131527
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 92346.5
Average stars matched: 88558.8 (95.8983 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2203216 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 21:31:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461147.60060485
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits'
wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits'
wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:21:49.659 +38:00:02.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:21:50.179 +37:59:32.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:21:49.659 +38:00:02.98
Second-epoch image center 04:21:50.179 +37:59:32.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0087 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:21:52.911 +38:00:12.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:21:49.659 +38:00:02.98
Second-epoch image center 04:21:52.911 +38:00:12.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0110 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:21:50.179 +37:59:32.35
Second-epoch second image center 04:21:52.911 +38:00:12.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01442 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YIi4pz0Fym
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tjtIcm2Idb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GadHkno8BW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5BhagCqVID
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits and wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits and wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits and wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits) and catalog (wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 18830 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 54.9680 to 76.3320 deg, Dec +32.2038 to +43.3213 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 54.9680 to 76.3320 deg, Dec 32.2038 to 43.3213 deg
Loaded 9186 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6363 out of 7115 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7115 out of 18830 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.972881
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.972881
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
2.0 pix Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
2.1 pix fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
2.0 pix fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
15.5 mag. Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.YIi4pz0Fym (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1807, passed=18830
Got 18830 stars (including 16990 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18830 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18389 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits -region wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tjtIcm2Idb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1869, passed=18776
Got 18776 stars (including 16879 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18776 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits -region wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GadHkno8BW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=338, passed=4676
Got 4676 stars (including 4329 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4676 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4550 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4549 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4549 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5BhagCqVID (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=291, passed=3401
Got 3401 stars (including 3105 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3401 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 614 to 669 (Dec 32.8 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 614 to 669 (Dec 32.8 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3355 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3355 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Per-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21396_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 21396_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:33.14 +39:06:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Per-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:21:49.659 +38:00:02.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:21:50.179 +37:59:32.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:21:49.659 +38:00:02.98
Second-epoch image center 04:21:50.179 +37:59:32.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0087 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:21:52.911 +38:00:12.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:21:49.659 +38:00:02.98
Second-epoch image center 04:21:52.911 +38:00:12.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0110 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:21:50.179 +37:59:32.35
Second-epoch second image center 04:21:52.911 +38:00:12.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01442 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WIEwnLw6et
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IAlAIRBtPm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9eMFgAfgXY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NWCvSlvNhA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits and wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits and wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits and wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits) and catalog (wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 145138 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 54.9680 to 76.3546 deg, Dec +32.1479 to +43.3235 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 54.9680 to 76.3546 deg, Dec 32.1479 to 43.3235 deg
Loaded 9259 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5279 out of 7192 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7192 out of 145138 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.835078
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.835078
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 55 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
1.8 pix Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
2.0 pix fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
1.8 pix fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
15.6 mag. Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.WIEwnLw6et (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=15711, passed=145113
Got 145113 stars (including 129125 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 145113 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 141858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 141857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 141856 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits -region wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IAlAIRBtPm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=37, blended=15921, passed=145724
Got 145724 stars (including 129496 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 145724 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 142056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 142057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 142057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits -region wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9eMFgAfgXY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=2345, passed=45710
Got 45710 stars (including 43253 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 45710 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44401 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44402 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44400 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NWCvSlvNhA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=2071, passed=35594
Got 35594 stars (including 33453 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35594 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 613 to 669 (Dec 32.6 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 613 to 669 (Dec 32.6 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-24-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212636_TTUQ1b1x1_1110093_g0sj3E7p/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Per-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out168839.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out168841.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out169298.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out169436.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out169509.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out169941.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out168875.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out169969.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168831_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 168831_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:07.82 +35:00:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168839_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 168839_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:11.24 +41:00:26.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.85)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.470 230856489324120448 058.29695826270 +41.00736806661 13.0620 11.8880 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.470#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168840_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 168840_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:00.15 +41:49:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168841_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 168841_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:52:32.86 +39:58:56.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.071 230037795538742528 058.13712742829 +39.98261105111 13.8367 13.0687 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.071#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168845_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 168845_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:01:50.12 +43:05:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168849_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 168849_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:51.05 +41:45:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168859_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 168859_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:52.88 +34:31:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168871_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 168871_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:32.70 +42:14:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168872_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 168872_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:13.43 +36:25:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168873_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 168873_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:08.49 +35:17:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168874_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 168874_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:14:21.50 +43:05:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168875_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 168875_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168880_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 168880_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:37.26 +39:59:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168886_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 168886_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:40.42 +38:31:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168891_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 168891_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:14:04.58 +43:01:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168894_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 168894_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:55.34 +41:11:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168895_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 168895_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:37.37 +40:40:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168896_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 168896_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:35.11 +34:51:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168897_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 168897_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:52:16.65 +33:35:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168898_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 168898_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:41.19 +33:31:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168957_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 168957_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:14.32 +42:27:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169032_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169032_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:07.44 +41:50:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169069_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169069_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:03:09.81 +41:55:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169140_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169140_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:58:18.00 +39:37:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169155_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169155_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:46.52 +34:53:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169171_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169171_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:58:46.52 +35:47:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169172_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169172_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:10.14 +37:01:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169282_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169282_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:20.24 +43:10:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169298_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169298_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:58.26 +41:24:59.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.446 231113706326122624 056.74175669187 +41.41543155746 12.8828 11.9868 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.446#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169301_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169301_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:15.60 +41:27:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169309_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169309_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:29.40 +40:24:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169319_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169319_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:48.86 +40:37:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169353_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169353_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:25.15 +35:31:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169360_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169360_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:04.82 +38:21:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169376_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169376_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:06.68 +33:36:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169412_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169412_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:45.68 +34:21:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169425_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169425_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169427_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169427_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:29.49 +36:26:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169436_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169436_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:58:13.05 +43:05:26.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.31, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.29)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.027 231494584025290496 059.55405299330 +43.09039391608 13.2128 12.2245 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.027#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169444_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169444_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:35.55 +37:15:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169476_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169476_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:00.20 +40:05:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169509_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169509_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:20.98 +42:21:53.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.27)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.691 203722152963258240 071.58711460818 +42.36565787802 13.1761 12.4277 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.691#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169561_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169561_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:38.39 +37:27:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169569_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169569_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:40.44 +42:35:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169584_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169584_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:16.01 +43:01:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169621_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169621_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:23.02 +38:14:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169653_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169653_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:00.29 +35:43:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169680_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169680_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:50.90 +37:44:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169777_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169777_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:48.09 +41:27:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169887_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169887_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:23.55 +35:19:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169902_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169902_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:04.53 +40:27:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169941_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169941_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:03:30.56 +42:12:26.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.20, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.18)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.222 230680567465681280 060.87736652751 +42.20730657480 14.3919 13.7764 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.222#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169969_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 169969_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169977_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 169977_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:58:22.15 +41:27:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71848_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 71848_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_21-25-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks