This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J225228.41+414011.8,2461146.9225,11.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J225228.41+414011.8 20260416.4225 11.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx3708737,2461146.9225,11.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx3708737 20260416.4225 11.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J225317.19+364957.3,2461146.9225,11.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J225317.19+364957.3 20260416.4225 11.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J340.1084+39.4142,2461146.9225,12.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J340.1084+39.4142 20260416.4225 12.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx3713202,2461146.9225,12.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx3713202 20260416.4225 12.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.4225* 23 13 17.49 +40 43 36.8 13.5 U And 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1918464519922924416,2461146.9225,13.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1918464519922924416 20260416.4225 13.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1915562084103348352,2461146.9225,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1915562084103348352 20260416.4225 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.4225* 23 04 04.05 +39 25 13.5 10.1 U And 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.9225,10.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.4225 10.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0571 Peg,2461146.9225,10.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0571 Peg 20260416.4225 10.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.4225* 23 06 08.41 +36 20 01.2 9.6 U And 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0832 And,2461146.9225,9.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0832 And 20260416.4225 9.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 6130704,2461146.9225,12.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 6130704 20260416.4225 12.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461036.56478288 27.12.2025 01:33:07.241 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
First image: 2461036.56478288 27.12.2025 01:33:07.241 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Last image: 2461146.92274247 16.04.2026 10:08:34.949 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 18
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.90
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 16309
Objects passed selection criteria: 16235
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12290.5
Average stars matched: 10947.8 (89.0749 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 119112 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 15 18:49:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-18-ga9a0ae89
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 05:13:11 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461036.56478288 27.12.2025 01:33:07.241 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
First image: 2461036.56478288 27.12.2025 01:33:07.241 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Last image: 2461146.92274247 16.04.2026 10:08:34.949 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 168
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 40 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 97036
Objects passed selection criteria: 96778
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 72069.8
Average stars matched: 64399 (89.3565 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1939300 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 15 18:49:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-18-ga9a0ae89
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 05:18:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461146.92222330
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits'
wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:54:33.665 +37:59:57.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits
Image size: 938.9'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:54:41.929 +37:59:50.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 22:54:33.665 +37:59:57.42
Second-epoch image center 22:54:41.929 +37:59:50.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0272 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
Image size: 938.8'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:54:42.649 +37:59:56.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 22:54:33.665 +37:59:57.42
Second-epoch image center 22:54:42.649 +37:59:56.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0295 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 22:54:41.929 +37:59:50.87
Second-epoch second image center 22:54:42.649 +37:59:56.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00291 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LarQNciCA8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EhPZMjIaJz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SGCvZWHLb8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iV9TZZXetu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits and wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits and wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits and wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 18119 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 333.1660 to 354.5509 deg, Dec +32.1552 to +43.3293 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 333.1660 to 354.5509 deg, Dec 32.1552 to 43.3293 deg
Loaded 14556 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10113 out of 10887 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10887 out of 18119 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.949504
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.949504
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.90
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.05
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.05
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.5 pix Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
3.1 pix fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits
3.1 pix fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
15.0 mag. Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.LarQNciCA8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1596, passed=18119
Got 18119 stars (including 16496 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18119 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17678 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EhPZMjIaJz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=5, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1514, passed=17864
Got 17864 stars (including 16334 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17864 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17377 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17378 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17378 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SGCvZWHLb8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=877, passed=13501
Got 13501 stars (including 12614 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13501 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013040 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010432 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.85"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13179 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.87"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.87"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.92"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits -region wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iV9TZZXetu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=895, passed=13606
Got 13606 stars (including 12704 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13606 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.84"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.84"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13303 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.84"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13303 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.90"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits -region wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lac-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out24282.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out23491.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out23578.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24127.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24304.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24623.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 179s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21057_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 21057_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:52:18.06 +34:13:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21076_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 21076_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:39:19.69 +39:03:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22976_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 22976_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:39:28.19 +38:44:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23088_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 23088_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:54:15.45 +34:21:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23204_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 23204_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:02:23.82 +41:43:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23491_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 23491_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23578_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 23578_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24127_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 24127_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24282_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 24282_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:52:35.69 +41:10:51.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.15, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.13)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.847 1929759150040471296 343.14833545683 +41.18194784813 11.1154 9.6173 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.847#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24304_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 24304_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24384_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 24384_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:02:02.34 +39:59:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24623_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 24623_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04485_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 04485_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:14:43.92 +40:47:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04479_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 04479_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:49:57.08 +41:02:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10962_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 10962_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:16:24.06 +37:04:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 183s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lac-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
22:52:28.45 +41:40:09.1
22:35:38.40 +38:31:09.9
22:53:17.22 +36:49:56.7
22:40:27.05 +39:24:17.7
22:49:13.96 +39:38:47.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:54:33.665 +37:59:57.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits
Image size: 938.9'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:54:41.929 +37:59:50.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 22:54:33.665 +37:59:57.42
Second-epoch image center 22:54:41.929 +37:59:50.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0272 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
Image size: 938.8'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:54:42.649 +37:59:56.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 22:54:33.665 +37:59:57.42
Second-epoch image center 22:54:42.649 +37:59:56.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0295 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 22:54:41.929 +37:59:50.87
Second-epoch second image center 22:54:42.649 +37:59:56.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00291 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KHo03I9vj8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.y1mkKKqhHg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QdMk2aQrQJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Xkqe6xPJXk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits and wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits and wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits and wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 113364 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 333.1651 to 354.5509 deg, Dec +32.1159 to +43.3308 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 333.1651 to 354.5509 deg, Dec 32.1159 to 43.3308 deg
Loaded 14615 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8792 out of 11346 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11346 out of 113364 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.767109
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.767109
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 135 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.3 pix Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
3.1 pix fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits
3.1 pix fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
15.2 mag. Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.KHo03I9vj8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=39, blended=11711, passed=113325
Got 113325 stars (including 101408 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 113325 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 110552 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 110553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 110552 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.y1mkKKqhHg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=6, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=54, blended=11652, passed=114003
Got 114003 stars (including 102164 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 114003 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 111326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 111326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 111327 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QdMk2aQrQJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=4, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=6282, passed=65837
Got 65837 stars (including 59489 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 65837 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013040 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010432 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.88"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.85"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64108 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.85"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64107 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.89"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits -region wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Xkqe6xPJXk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=2, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=6325, passed=66842
Got 66842 stars (including 60459 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66842 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.85"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.88"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits -region wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-33-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/wcs_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-07-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0404.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_050937_TTUQ2b1x1_31808_dLaqv8wH/wcs_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lac-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out125211.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out131238.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out131242.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out131243.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out131249.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out146817.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out151876.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out151954.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out112007.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out131246.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out144295.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out25672.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out44463.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out88212.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131238_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 131238_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:34:21.73 +34:36:29.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.454 1903920317549041024 338.59101934793 +34.60823169923 13.6643 13.1625 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.454#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131242_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 131242_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:00:54.88 +40:46:44.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.79)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131243_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 131243_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:33:11.13 +38:19:29.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.574 1908133749186835456 338.29657609210 +38.32475467070 13.6663 13.1457 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.574#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131244_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 131244_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:36:08.50 +34:37:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131245_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 131245_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:33:30.31 +37:30:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131246_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 131246_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131249_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 131249_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:51:32.58 +33:44:38.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.21, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.19)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131250_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 131250_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:13:47.07 +39:29:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131251_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 131251_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:54:25.10 +37:31:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131252_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 131252_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:44:04.50 +40:29:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131682_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 131682_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:39:19.69 +39:03:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133605_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 133605_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:39:28.12 +38:44:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133661_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 133661_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134761_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 134761_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:49:51.52 +41:05:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135608_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 135608_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:53:20.54 +36:30:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137075_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 137075_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:45:19.59 +34:17:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137544_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 137544_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137846_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 137846_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138364_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 138364_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139014_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 139014_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:39:13.23 +39:05:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139327_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 139327_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139397_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 139397_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139436_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 139436_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:38:31.17 +41:24:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139466_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 139466_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139727_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 139727_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139767_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 139767_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:52:57.29 +38:38:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139865_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 139865_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140064_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 140064_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140102_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 140102_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:06:17.01 +36:47:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140702_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 140702_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:41:30.24 +38:48:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140841_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 140841_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:53:56.04 +40:22:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140882_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 140882_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140912_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 140912_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:13:35.93 +39:16:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140927_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 140927_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:06:48.30 +40:15:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141199_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 141199_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141374_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 141374_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141409_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 141409_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:51:37.17 +38:40:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141556_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 141556_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:04:57.04 +41:27:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141571_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 141571_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:46:53.59 +39:26:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141691_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 141691_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141761_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 141761_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:35:21.63 +39:34:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141869_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 141869_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141910_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 141910_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:47:02.90 +39:24:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142041_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 142041_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142229_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 142229_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142309_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 142309_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142310_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 142310_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142335_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 142335_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:13:18.86 +41:29:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142352_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 142352_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142441_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 142441_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:08:34.94 +40:35:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142477_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 142477_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:02:46.86 +41:12:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142835_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 142835_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:45:21.73 +39:35:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142926_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 142926_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142935_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 142935_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143104_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 143104_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143112_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 143112_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143159_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 143159_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143166_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 143166_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:52:11.86 +40:49:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143307_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 143307_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143618_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 143618_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143701_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 143701_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:36:03.72 +34:36:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143826_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 143826_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143838_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 143838_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:42:49.36 +37:26:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144042_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 144042_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:43:58.72 +41:35:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144090_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 144090_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144163_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 144163_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:06:01.77 +41:47:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144295_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 144295_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144329_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 144329_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144496_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 144496_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:34:46.56 +40:35:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144557_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 144557_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144599_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 144599_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144612_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 144612_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:36:32.09 +35:52:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144679_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 144679_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:41:36.59 +40:12:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144684_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 144684_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145000_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 145000_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:58:09.93 +36:10:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145625_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 145625_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:04:59.30 +41:27:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145700_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 145700_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145733_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 145733_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:09:08.64 +42:11:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146012_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 146012_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:56:58.82 +40:52:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146339_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 146339_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146817_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 146817_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:36:29.33 +37:50:33.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.83, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.81)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.071 1907891135074443904 339.12327077368 +37.84265462302 14.3247 13.7621 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.071#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146836_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 146836_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:48:35.30 +38:17:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146837_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 146837_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146962_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 146962_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147428_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 147428_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147436_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 147436_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147661_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 147661_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147969_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 147969_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147992_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 147992_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148058_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 148058_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:48:47.83 +38:51:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148424_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 148424_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148615_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 148615_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148760_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 148760_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149193_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 149193_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149505_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 149505_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149793_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 149793_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149821_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 149821_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150029_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 150029_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150353_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 150353_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150366_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 150366_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150559_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 150559_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150854_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 150854_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150912_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 150912_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151112_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 151112_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151248_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 151248_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151283_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 151283_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151420_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 151420_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151459_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 151459_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151535_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 151535_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151576_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 151576_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151647_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 151647_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151770_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 151770_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151778_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 151778_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151858_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 151858_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151876_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 151876_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:38:53.54 +39:35:23.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.67, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.65)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.616 1932328055879791616 339.72366469903 +39.58980593188 14.4680 13.7074 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.616#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151954_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 151954_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:37:54.17 +40:49:33.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.727 1932463570688070912 339.47582337742 +40.82647178572 14.4359 13.5445 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.727#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151997_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 151997_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25296_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 25296_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:49:57.01 +41:02:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19874_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 19874_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:52:28.40 +41:40:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44463_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 44463_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21803_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 21803_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88212_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 88212_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67999_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 67999_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:16:24.04 +37:04:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18411_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 18411_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:02:23.75 +41:43:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112007_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 112007_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51029_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 51029_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:16:25.65 +38:43:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84934_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 84934_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:52:18.05 +34:13:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125211_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 125211_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:44:11.24 +40:09:12.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.952 1932218993772620032 341.04617657229 +40.15353835556 12.7216 11.2215 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.952#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86603_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 86603_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:54:15.41 +34:21:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38847_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 38847_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:02:02.27 +39:59:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58000_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 58000_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25672_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 25672_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30496_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 30496_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:03:01.02 +40:42:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25402_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 25402_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:14:43.98 +40:47:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128871_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405
The candidate 128871_fd_Lac-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-08-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0405 did not pass the final checks
