This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.4175* 16 31 00.16 +38 04 37.0 12.3 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461146.9175,12.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260416.4175 12.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.4175* 16 46 10.31 +35 37 27.6 12.5 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1327200248002529664,2461146.9175,12.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1327200248002529664 20260416.4175 12.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx3460291,2461146.9175,12.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx3460291 20260416.4175 12.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.4175* 16 31 17.99 +38 32 12.2 12.5 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461146.9175,12.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260416.4175 12.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1332071535486936448,2461146.9175,12.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1332071535486936448 20260416.4175 12.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.4175* 16 27 30.35 +39 13 26.8 12.6 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1332214884315561600,2461146.9175,12.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1332214884315561600 20260416.4175 12.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.4175* 16 34 13.17 +37 41 24.8 12.6 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461146.9175,12.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260416.4175 12.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.4175* 16 30 25.24 +37 49 26.6 12.6 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461146.9175,12.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260416.4175 12.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.4175* 16 41 54.07 +36 27 59.8 13.4 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J250.4739+36.4699,2461146.9175,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J250.4739+36.4699 20260416.4175 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.4175* 16 41 54.23 +36 27 52.2 13.5 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J250.4809+36.4648,2461146.9175,13.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J250.4809+36.4648 20260416.4175 13.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.4175* 16 35 13.01 +37 22 05.2 14.5 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461146.9175,14.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260416.4175 14.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.4175* 16 42 11.67 +39 27 18.7 14.9 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461146.9175,14.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260416.4175 14.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461121.97230774 22.03.2026 11:19:57.389 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
First image: 2461121.97230774 22.03.2026 11:19:57.389 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Last image: 2461146.91776941 16.04.2026 10:01:25.277 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 20
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9445
Objects passed selection criteria: 9441
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8762.5
Average stars matched: 8282.25 (94.5193 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114952 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 15 18:49:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-18-ga9a0ae89
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 05:10:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461121.97230774 22.03.2026 11:19:57.389 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
First image: 2461121.97230774 22.03.2026 11:19:57.389 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Last image: 2461146.91776941 16.04.2026 10:01:25.277 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 316
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.13
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 25 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 49616
Objects passed selection criteria: 49534
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 45664
Average stars matched: 44233.5 (96.8673 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 152296 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 15 18:49:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-18-ga9a0ae89
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 05:17:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461146.91725302
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits'
wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits'
wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits'
wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:21:48.591 +38:00:08.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Image size: 936.8'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:21:34.568 +37:59:52.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:21:48.591 +38:00:08.03
Second-epoch image center 16:21:34.568 +37:59:52.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0463 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Image size: 936.8'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:21:35.531 +37:59:56.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:21:48.591 +38:00:08.03
Second-epoch image center 16:21:35.531 +37:59:56.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0430 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:21:34.568 +37:59:52.24
Second-epoch second image center 16:21:35.531 +37:59:56.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00338 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9Qqx2yOe03
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EJ3v0CKZgx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7VWF3yMdkk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Eva5LdXnLA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits and wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits and wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits and wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits) and catalog (wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat) found
'wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10322 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.0605 to 256.3322 deg, Dec +32.1214 to +43.3393 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.0605 to 256.3322 deg, Dec 32.1214 to 43.3393 deg
Loaded 7032 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4977 out of 5259 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5259 out of 10322 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.951996
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.951996
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 18 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
2.0 pix CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
3.4 pix fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
3.4 pix fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
15.5 mag. CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
15.2 mag. fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
15.2 mag. fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.9Qqx2yOe03 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits' -> 'wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=710, passed=10322
Got 10322 stars (including 9592 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10322 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10073 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10073 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits -region wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EJ3v0CKZgx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits' -> 'wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=714, passed=10255
Got 10255 stars (including 9525 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10255 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10053 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10053 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10053 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits -region wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7VWF3yMdkk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=879, passed=11131
Got 11131 stars (including 10248 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11131 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10865 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10865 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10865 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits -region wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Eva5LdXnLA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=900, passed=11109
Got 11109 stars (including 10207 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11109 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits -region wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field CrB-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20589.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20606.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20609.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20618.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out20614.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out20615.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20570.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20592.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20597.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20608.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20611.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20613.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20619.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20620.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 360s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20439_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 20439_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:22:26.57 +39:17:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20570_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
Preparing report for the candidate 20570_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20589_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 20589_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:31.23 +38:08:59.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.034 1331347850677391488 247.38013102714 +38.14989719323 12.3622 11.8705 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.034#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20592_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
Preparing report for the candidate 20592_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20597_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
Preparing report for the candidate 20597_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20599_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 20599_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:49.59 +42:05:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20602_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 20602_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:28.26 +41:52:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20604_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 20604_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:37.03 +36:25:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20606_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 20606_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:28:51.37 +41:55:23.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.51)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.939 1381119477891384576 247.21494529474 +41.92397433560 12.7422 12.3341 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.939#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20608_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
Preparing report for the candidate 20608_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20609_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 20609_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:41.51 +36:05:39.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.51)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.475 1351092708689917056 253.42279915208 +36.09433214594 12.6570 12.2748 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.475#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20611_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
Preparing report for the candidate 20611_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20613_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
Preparing report for the candidate 20613_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20614_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 20614_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:10.47 +39:03:14.9 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=12.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.52)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20615_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 20615_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:30:21.02 +38:19:10.4 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=12.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.51)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20618_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 20618_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:57.06 +35:00:22.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.818 1371966073653887232 240.73723754370 +35.00533147879 12.5463 12.0677 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.818#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20619_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
Preparing report for the candidate 20619_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20620_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
Preparing report for the candidate 20620_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 367s
Prepared the HTML report for the field CrB-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:31:00.16 +38:04:37.0
16:46:10.31 +35:37:27.6
16:22:01.43 +39:16:03.1
16:31:17.99 +38:32:12.2
16:24:22.59 +38:18:18.3
16:27:30.35 +39:13:26.8
16:34:13.17 +37:41:24.8
16:30:25.24 +37:49:26.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:21:48.591 +38:00:08.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Image size: 936.8'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:21:34.568 +37:59:52.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:21:48.591 +38:00:08.03
Second-epoch image center 16:21:34.568 +37:59:52.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0463 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Image size: 936.8'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:21:35.531 +37:59:56.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:21:48.591 +38:00:08.03
Second-epoch image center 16:21:35.531 +37:59:56.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0430 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:21:34.568 +37:59:52.24
Second-epoch second image center 16:21:35.531 +37:59:56.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00338 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits &> /tmp/tmp.p9nUvtPlpK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits &> /tmp/tmp.872lZfblxc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5UYXvAO972
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JEg2dFGhjQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits and wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits and wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits and wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits) and catalog (wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat) found
'wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 61628 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.0124 to 256.3632 deg, Dec +32.1070 to +43.3397 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.0124 to 256.3632 deg, Dec 32.1070 to 43.3397 deg
Loaded 7076 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4610 out of 5285 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5285 out of 61628 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.839470
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.839470
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.13
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.71
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.71
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 177 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
1.9 pix CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
3.2 pix fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
3.2 pix fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
15.7 mag. CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
15.4 mag. fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
15.4 mag. fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.p9nUvtPlpK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits' -> 'wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=3241, passed=61610
Got 61610 stars (including 58251 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61610 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60422 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60422 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60422 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits -region wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.872lZfblxc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits' -> 'wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=11, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=3229, passed=61566
Got 61566 stars (including 58229 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61566 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits -region wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5UYXvAO972 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=4592, passed=46392
Got 46392 stars (including 41754 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46392 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits -region wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JEg2dFGhjQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=4571, passed=46463
Got 46463 stars (including 41852 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46463 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits -region wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-00-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0396.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_050204_TTUQ2b1x1_9661_eZskld8B/wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field CrB-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out07463.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out75842.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out75844.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out75846.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out75848.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out75861.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out76705.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out76757.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76170.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76182.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76674.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76794.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 28s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75842_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 75842_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:50.02 +41:26:06.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.79)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.290 1354760404602580224 253.70762857798 +41.43526330519 14.3419 13.8594 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.290#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75844_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 75844_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:49.41 +38:10:34.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.64)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75846_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 75846_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:00.67 +37:16:46.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.56, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.54)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75848_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 75848_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:20.69 +41:40:42.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.31, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.29)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.288 1383397906502403840 240.58597401205 +41.67772238863 14.0747 13.5438 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.288#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75854_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 75854_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75861_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 75861_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:30:28.87 +34:56:20.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.434 1326227150148868480 247.62041440621 +34.93890604729 13.5808 12.9740 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.434#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75901_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 75901_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75991_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 75991_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76058_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76058_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76077_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76077_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76091_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76091_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76093_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76093_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76095_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76095_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76096_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76096_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76113_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76113_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76121_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76121_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76127_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76127_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76131_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76131_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76133_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76133_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76135_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76135_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76141_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76141_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76152_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76152_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76154_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76154_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76157_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76157_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76160_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76160_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76170_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
Preparing report for the candidate 76170_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76173_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76173_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76179_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76179_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76182_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
Preparing report for the candidate 76182_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76183_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76183_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:29.28 +36:08:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76184_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76184_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76195_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76195_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76196_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76196_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76199_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76199_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76201_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76201_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76203_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76203_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76204_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76204_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76205_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76205_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76206_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76206_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76208_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76208_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76209_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76209_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76210_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76210_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76217_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76217_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76219_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76219_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76223_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76223_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76227_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76227_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76231_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76231_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76253_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76253_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76257_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76257_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76259_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76259_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76260_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76260_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76265_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76265_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76267_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76267_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76274_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76274_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76275_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76275_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76277_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76277_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76297_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76297_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76299_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76299_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76301_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76301_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76311_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76311_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76315_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76315_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76326_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76326_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76328_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76328_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76334_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76334_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76348_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76348_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76349_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76349_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76351_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76351_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76354_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76354_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76359_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76359_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76363_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76363_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76364_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76364_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76368_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76368_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76371_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76371_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76375_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76375_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:15:19.76 +37:48:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76383_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76383_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76384_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76384_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:22:28.75 +40:10:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76394_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76394_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76398_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76398_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76408_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76408_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76414_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76414_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76418_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76418_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76426_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76426_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76436_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76436_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76440_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76440_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76443_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76443_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76447_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76447_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76450_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76450_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:36:42.94 +40:28:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76455_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76455_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76463_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76463_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76468_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76468_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76480_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76480_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76483_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76483_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76485_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76485_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76492_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76492_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76495_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76495_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:04:51.51 +40:46:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76498_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76498_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76505_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76505_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76514_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76514_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76520_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76520_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76527_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76527_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76531_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76531_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76534_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76534_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76536_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76536_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76544_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76544_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76556_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76556_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76564_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76564_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76566_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76566_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:34.99 +39:22:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76571_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76571_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76572_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76572_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76575_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76575_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:31:25.70 +40:26:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76581_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76581_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76587_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76587_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76588_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76588_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76589_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76589_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76593_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76593_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76595_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76595_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76600_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76600_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76621_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76621_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76626_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76626_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76630_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76630_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76642_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76642_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76646_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76646_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76648_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76648_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76653_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76653_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76661_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76661_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76674_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
Preparing report for the candidate 76674_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76676_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76676_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76681_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76681_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76694_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76694_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76700_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76700_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76703_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76703_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76705_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76705_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:43:15.48 +41:26:03.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.887 1356450903729703168 250.81469042283 +41.43450621138 14.6901 14.0354 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.887#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76709_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76709_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76715_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76715_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76718_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76718_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76719_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76719_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:09.69 +39:28:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76724_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76724_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76732_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76732_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76740_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76740_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76746_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76746_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76751_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76751_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76752_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76752_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76756_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76756_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76757_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76757_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:58.08 +35:21:51.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.809 1327592468712611072 249.74207987941 +35.36403497974 15.3216 14.7740 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.809#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76759_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76759_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76760_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76760_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76761_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76761_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76766_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76766_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76767_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76767_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76768_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76768_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76769_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76769_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76771_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76771_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76773_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76773_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76780_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76780_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76783_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76783_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76784_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76784_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76786_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76786_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76794_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
Preparing report for the candidate 76794_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76796_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76796_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76801_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76801_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76803_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76803_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76804_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76804_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76815_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76815_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76816_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76816_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76819_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76819_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76822_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76822_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76834_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76834_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76838_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76838_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76842_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76842_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76852_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76852_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76861_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76861_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76868_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76868_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76874_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76874_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76878_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 76878_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07463_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 07463_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:19.18 +41:18:37.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.06, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.04)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29804_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 29804_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73587_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397
The candidate 73587_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_05-01-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0397 did not pass the final checks
