This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461146.9138,13.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260416.4138 13.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J185631.68-241214.9,2461146.9138,12.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J185631.68-241214.9 20260416.4138 12.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.9138,12.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.4138 12.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.9138,13.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.4138 13.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.9138,13.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.4138 13.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J281.2071-24.5654,2461146.9138,13.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J281.2071-24.5654 20260416.4138 13.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.9138,12.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.4138 12.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J185535-2348.7,2461146.9138,11.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J185535-2348.7 20260416.4138 11.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461125.96625102 26.03.2026 11:11:14.088 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
First image: 2461125.96625102 26.03.2026 11:11:14.088 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Last image: 2461146.91515920 16.04.2026 09:57:39.755 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 14
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.49
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9435
Objects passed selection criteria: 9434
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9172
Average stars matched: 8551.25 (93.2321 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115456 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 15 18:49:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-18-ga9a0ae89
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 05:03:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461125.96625102 26.03.2026 11:11:14.088 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
First image: 2461125.96625102 26.03.2026 11:11:14.088 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Last image: 2461146.91515920 16.04.2026 09:57:39.755 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 153
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 50 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 97219
Objects passed selection criteria: 97108
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 90074.2
Average stars matched: 84900.5 (94.2561 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1991556 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 15 18:49:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-18-ga9a0ae89
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 05:05:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461146.91252992
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:56.571 -25:59:36.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
Image size: 938.3'x625.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.150 -26:00:01.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:56.571 -25:59:36.82
Second-epoch image center 19:12:01.150 -26:00:01.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0185 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:02.505 -26:00:44.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:56.571 -25:59:36.82
Second-epoch image center 19:12:02.505 -26:00:44.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0291 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:01.150 -26:00:01.74
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:02.505 -26:00:44.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01286 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F7PWdGXWNO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lIyv2eoRYx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ro36aG6mMf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FxHA3ATzjS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10651 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9134 to 297.0413 deg, Dec -31.2592 to -20.5068 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9134 to 297.0413 deg, Dec -31.2592 to -20.5068 deg
Loaded 13424 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7844 out of 8105 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8105 out of 10651 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.652325
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.652325
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.49
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.16
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.16
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
2.5 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
2.7 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
3.1 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
14.2 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.F7PWdGXWNO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=714, passed=10651
Got 10651 stars (including 9923 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10651 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10493 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10491 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lIyv2eoRYx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=701, passed=10578
Got 10578 stars (including 9862 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10578 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10414 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10413 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ro36aG6mMf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=677, passed=10311
Got 10311 stars (including 9623 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10311 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10165 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FxHA3ATzjS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=813, passed=12212
Got 12212 stars (including 11388 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12212 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.94"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12023 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.95"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12022 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.96"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12019 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.07"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20671.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20680.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20683.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20684.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20685.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20689.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20691.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20671_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 20671_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:44.18 -28:24:19.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.789 6764800097974650112 291.68391895790 -28.40522426814 11.0788 10.7388 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.789#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20680_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 20680_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:04.81 -24:30:42.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.973 6769710242027388928 291.26976228996 -24.51178639929 11.1708 10.6965 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.973#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20683_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 20683_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:12:41.26 -26:05:40.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.879 6763277686690335488 288.17173501805 -26.09479273363 11.0356 10.3426 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.879#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20684_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 20684_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:33.14 -25:38:30.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.517 6764103557362380032 287.63793916825 -25.64178319712 11.0800 10.3054 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.517#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20685_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 20685_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:56.72 -23:56:08.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.50, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.48)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.688 6769943372853740800 291.73599924087 -23.93599461783 11.1997 10.8087 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.688#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20689_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 20689_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:20.35 -25:05:29.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.911 6770194611261283584 288.83451900317 -25.09136168970 11.0548 10.3118 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.911#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20691_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 20691_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:18:06.58 -21:49:03.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.084 4082530864860923648 289.52727340703 -21.81788134945 11.2082 10.5012 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.084#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07492_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 07492_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:42.18 -23:42:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:56.571 -25:59:36.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
Image size: 938.3'x625.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.150 -26:00:01.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:56.571 -25:59:36.82
Second-epoch image center 19:12:01.150 -26:00:01.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0185 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:02.505 -26:00:44.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:56.571 -25:59:36.82
Second-epoch image center 19:12:02.505 -26:00:44.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0291 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:01.150 -26:00:01.74
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:02.505 -26:00:44.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01286 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DAvUVtiB5G
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits &> /tmp/tmp.diLT1GLvIe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits &> /tmp/tmp.w0M7WLKZgM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits &> /tmp/tmp.n3oGgSZDvb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 108796 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8622 to 297.0498 deg, Dec -31.2698 to -20.5069 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8622 to 297.0498 deg, Dec -31.2698 to -20.5069 deg
Loaded 13477 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9921 out of 11624 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11624 out of 108796 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.409319
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.409319
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.26
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.26
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 81 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
2.8 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
14.3 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.DAvUVtiB5G (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=8591, passed=108793
Got 108793 stars (including 100032 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 108793 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 106938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 106939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 106939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.diLT1GLvIe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=8843, passed=110133
Got 110133 stars (including 101112 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 110133 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 107867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 107866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 107862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.w0M7WLKZgM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=7837, passed=93041
Got 93041 stars (including 85087 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 93041 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91648 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91647 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91632 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.n3oGgSZDvb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=9896, passed=97732
Got 97732 stars (including 87722 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 97732 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.94"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95976 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.91"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.91"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.03"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-53-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_045819_TTUQ2b1x1_18583_XbmE0oVs/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129474.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129475.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129483.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129501.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129511.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129516.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129528.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129542.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129575.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129636.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130253.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130559.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130577.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130769.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130777.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130797.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130815.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130892.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130984.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out131030.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out131071.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out131084.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out131093.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out131125.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out131159.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out131180.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out131295.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out131329.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out131346.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out131388.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out131393.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out131418.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out131466.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out131475.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out131647.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out131659.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out131840.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out44219.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out129518.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out130882.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103884.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out129515.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out129596.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out130155.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out130494.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out131163.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out131502.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52683.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 24s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129474_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 129474_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:03.82 -24:37:27.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.64, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.62)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.272 4074819543153933440 284.01653607935 -24.62510237646 14.0805 13.2192 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.272#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129475_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 129475_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:16.63 -29:29:21.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.63)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.755 6761665287265067904 283.81974244256 -29.48967814051 13.3264 12.5743 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.755#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129481_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 129481_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129483_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 129483_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:54.16 -23:20:10.8 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.59, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.57)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129501_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 129501_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:11.36 -28:05:25.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.52)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.562 6762055613887262208 284.29778970262 -28.09066143060 13.6291 13.1246 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.562#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129511_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 129511_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:43.42 -26:16:21.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.34, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.32)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129515_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
Preparing report for the candidate 129515_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129516_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 129516_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:11:43.27 -25:54:52.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.707 6764046103576650752 287.93089271124 -25.91534860113 13.0562 11.8966 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.707#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129517_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 129517_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:24:23.13 -26:33:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129518_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 129518_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:25.49 -23:05:09.0 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=13.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.38)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129528_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 129528_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:41.73 -23:17:26.1 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.34, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.32)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129542_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 129542_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:09.75 -27:21:14.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.629 4072555339496335872 280.54092298872 -27.35428385567 13.6649 13.0227 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.629#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129550_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 129550_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:40.34 -29:34:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129558_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 129558_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:17.18 -25:35:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129564_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 129564_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129573_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 129573_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:11.83 -21:48:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129575_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 129575_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:09.63 -25:32:51.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.94)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129596_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
Preparing report for the candidate 129596_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129602_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 129602_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:41.45 -22:58:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129605_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 129605_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129614_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 129614_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:21.96 -26:32:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129617_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 129617_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:51.67 -27:38:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129627_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 129627_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:05.74 -27:14:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129636_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 129636_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:58.97 -21:56:42.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.35, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.33)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.592 4078775581674315776 283.74605906193 -21.94541071483 11.1508 10.6483 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.592#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130116_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 130116_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:57.24 -23:16:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130129_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 130129_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:59.81 -22:17:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130155_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
Preparing report for the candidate 130155_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130237_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 130237_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:13.72 -28:07:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130253_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 130253_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:59.13 -27:37:33.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.75, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.73)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.487 4072112889129482496 281.99636996625 -27.62610755077 13.2276 11.1863 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.487#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130476_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 130476_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:01.96 -26:53:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130494_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
Preparing report for the candidate 130494_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130549_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 130549_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:48:22.79 -25:45:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130555_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 130555_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:11.37 -27:05:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130559_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 130559_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:30.84 -29:02:18.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.38)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.424 4071358757267088896 280.87894410262 -29.03848011717 13.2839 12.5268 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.424#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130577_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 130577_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:22.76 -27:43:41.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.41)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130675_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 130675_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:02.32 -23:34:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130735_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 130735_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:24:44.68 -28:52:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130769_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 130769_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:51.10 -29:14:12.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.778 6761687827253947904 283.46310849186 -29.23696996818 13.4537 12.6392 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.778#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130775_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 130775_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130777_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 130777_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:45.86 -23:25:19.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.51)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.618 4078333268760367104 280.94217494088 -23.42205820248 12.9270 11.8184 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.618#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130797_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 130797_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:00.03 -24:44:44.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.33, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.31)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.219 4074814457912722048 283.75073491350 -24.74625733436 12.8531 11.5796 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.219#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130801_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 130801_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130815_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 130815_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:45.59 -22:15:51.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.36, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.34)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130821_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 130821_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:11.56 -30:00:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130829_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 130829_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:36.52 -22:04:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130882_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 130882_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:51.68 -23:23:29.2 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=13.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.67)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130892_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 130892_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:39.96 -30:09:57.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.079 6760779523249697280 284.66698487839 -30.16636941132 13.6806 13.2174 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.079#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130984_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 130984_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:50.83 -27:32:40.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.63)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.635 6759893252459634560 289.46144970112 -27.54494918705 13.4450 12.7212 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.635#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131004_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 131004_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:04.93 -27:55:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131030_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 131030_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:18:03.57 -21:52:05.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.64)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.337 4081017696343796864 289.51526146725 -21.86798640953 13.7253 13.0459 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.337#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131067_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 131067_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:39.60 -29:06:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131071_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 131071_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:03.43 -22:57:09.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.617 4075597447632954240 283.51484968819 -22.95318107498 13.6592 13.0594 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.617#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131084_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 131084_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:56.08 -26:41:33.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.901 6768990714747005440 289.48383824295 -26.69319970834 13.9904 13.3093 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.901#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131093_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 131093_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:51.65 -28:39:17.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.56, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.54)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.508 4071584298932262272 280.96620249623 -28.65521177865 13.3099 12.4966 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.508#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131117_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 131117_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:31.24 -22:23:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131125_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 131125_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:17.92 -25:30:30.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.296 4073920825522404864 283.32551309460 -25.50933338516 13.9540 13.0441 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.296#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131159_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 131159_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:03.29 -23:53:06.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.75, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.73)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.099 4080403481660579712 287.51433749041 -23.88501641665 13.3482 12.2888 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.099#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131163_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
Preparing report for the candidate 131163_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131180_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 131180_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:00:37.22 -22:48:00.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.77)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131237_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 131237_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:40.02 -25:27:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131295_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 131295_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:35.21 -22:31:00.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.745 4075683583176874240 284.39742385142 -22.51726922991 13.5999 12.8726 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.745#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131329_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 131329_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:28.09 -22:14:01.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.72, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.70)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.630 4078694423970649088 282.86798816556 -22.23463610910 13.7171 13.1920 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.630#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131338_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 131338_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:45.49 -27:27:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131346_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 131346_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:26.35 -22:26:16.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.800 4075729728307642880 284.11101678272 -22.43897933420 13.5521 12.9553 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.800#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131388_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 131388_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:22.23 -23:11:38.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.76)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131393_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 131393_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:00:08.46 -22:02:30.8 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.64)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131418_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 131418_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:33.32 -23:35:50.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.727 4075186294684791168 282.63926254131 -23.59758019875 13.5365 12.9156 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.727#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131466_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 131466_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:06.48 -22:28:10.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.545 4081545668088445312 286.02821807193 -22.47074583978 13.7413 12.9541 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.545#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131475_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 131475_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:03.00 -23:43:23.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.70, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.68)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.087 4075486328234586368 283.51310488336 -23.72347665835 13.3394 12.3895 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.087#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131502_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
Preparing report for the candidate 131502_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131647_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 131647_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:53.94 -22:17:32.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.886 4081684653237313280 284.97508665743 -22.29312768393 12.8506 11.6600 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.886#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131659_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 131659_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:55.15 -24:27:40.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.68, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.66)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131840_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 131840_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:47.08 -22:58:11.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.591 4078455215807009792 280.94693534009 -22.97059188092 13.4908 12.8883 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.591#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52683_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
Preparing report for the candidate 52683_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44366_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 44366_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:49.31 -26:26:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92745_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 92745_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:19.71 -22:29:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44219_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 44219_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:38.07 -26:14:29.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.602 4073239373167033600 280.65854254835 -26.24167761764 13.1704 11.5838 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.602#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72227_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 72227_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:42.16 -23:42:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29896_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 29896_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:19.43 -27:42:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103884_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
Preparing report for the candidate 103884_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49415_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 49415_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_04-57-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
