This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
OGLE-BLG-ECL-404886,2461146.8704,12.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
OGLE-BLG-ECL-404886 20260416.3704 12.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4056592797185166080,2461146.8704,12.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4056592797185166080 20260416.3704 12.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4057375653753781376,2461146.8704,11.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4057375653753781376 20260416.3704 11.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4090532766970501248,2461146.8704,12.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4090532766970501248 20260416.3704 12.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461118.98182816 19.03.2026 11:33:39.953 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
First image: 2461118.98182816 19.03.2026 11:33:39.953 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Last image: 2461146.87168552 16.04.2026 08:55:03.629 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.61
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13564
Objects passed selection criteria: 13557
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12635
Average stars matched: 12157.2 (96.2188 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 118928 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 15 18:49:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-18-ga9a0ae89
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 04:06:26 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461118.98182816 19.03.2026 11:33:39.953 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
First image: 2461118.98182816 19.03.2026 11:33:39.953 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Last image: 2461146.87168552 16.04.2026 08:55:03.629 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 149
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 143 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 156919
Objects passed selection criteria: 156659
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 138928
Average stars matched: 131652 (94.7622 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1933256 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 15 18:49:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-18-ga9a0ae89
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 04:10:35 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461146.86918079
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits'
wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:14:25.391 -25:59:48.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits
Image size: 938.5'x625.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:14:21.937 -25:59:42.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:14:25.391 -25:59:48.34
Second-epoch image center 18:14:21.937 -25:59:42.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0130 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:14:23.403 -26:00:08.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:14:25.391 -25:59:48.34
Second-epoch image center 18:14:23.403 -26:00:08.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0094 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:14:21.937 -25:59:42.91
Second-epoch second image center 18:14:23.403 -26:00:08.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00906 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lO3Y4C6Bb6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rkKy6dMwdf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits &> /tmp/tmp.glFEChMz4h
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits &> /tmp/tmp.t3pXBxWOxg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits and wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits and wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits and wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16719 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 264.4302 to 282.6069 deg, Dec -31.2746 to -20.4260 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 264.4302 to 282.6069 deg, Dec -31.2746 to -20.4260 deg
Loaded 19370 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11077 out of 11719 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11719 out of 16719 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.803743
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.803743
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.61
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.19
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.19
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
2.4 pix Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits
2.7 pix fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits
3.1 pix fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
14.2 mag. Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.lO3Y4C6Bb6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1482, passed=16719
Got 16719 stars (including 15219 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16719 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16199 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16203 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16203 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.83"
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1008)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits -region wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rkKy6dMwdf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1517, passed=16501
Got 16501 stars (including 14968 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16501 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
Excluding outliers - 917 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits -region wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.glFEChMz4h (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1003, passed=12916
Got 12916 stars (including 11901 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013035 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010428 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.92"
Excluding outliers - 917 stars left (next iteration limit 1009)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.t3pXBxWOxg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1098, passed=14614
Got 14614 stars (including 13503 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14614 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.17"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14133 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.21"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14133 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.22"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14124 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.35"
Excluding outliers - 900 stars left (next iteration limit 992)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21108.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21115.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21132.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20945_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 20945_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21087_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 21087_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:11.54 -27:43:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21088_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 21088_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:50:50.24 -30:13:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21108_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 21108_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:34.52 -25:47:17.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.411 4064741247838368896 273.14404417073 -25.78864854648 11.1939 10.8488 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.411#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21115_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 21115_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:32.67 -30:08:56.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.941 4056835106322011776 266.13604533905 -30.14950697424 11.1717 10.5538 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.941#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21124_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 21124_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:50:30.19 -28:25:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21127_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 21127_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:48.21 -27:03:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21132_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 21132_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:37.47 -25:27:47.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.623 4064213443513680256 270.65636816123 -25.46380578528 11.3825 11.0316 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.623#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:14:25.391 -25:59:48.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits
Image size: 938.5'x625.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:14:21.937 -25:59:42.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:14:25.391 -25:59:48.34
Second-epoch image center 18:14:21.937 -25:59:42.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0130 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:14:23.403 -26:00:08.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:14:25.391 -25:59:48.34
Second-epoch image center 18:14:23.403 -26:00:08.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0094 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:14:21.937 -25:59:42.91
Second-epoch second image center 18:14:23.403 -26:00:08.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00906 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FLJhtrMAS0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HV1HxH13rW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ey1DFqlfAH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YQKdy8yFGm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits and wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits and wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits and wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 200125 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 264.4217 to 282.6069 deg, Dec -31.2857 to -20.4094 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 264.4217 to 282.6069 deg, Dec -31.2857 to -20.4094 deg
Loaded 19419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12665 out of 16837 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16837 out of 200125 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.519710
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.519710
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.24
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.24
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 84 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
2.2 pix Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits
2.9 pix fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
14.2 mag. Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.FLJhtrMAS0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=25986, passed=200094
Got 200094 stars (including 173914 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 200094 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 195066 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 195069 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 195068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Excluding outliers - 924 stars left (next iteration limit 1015)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits -region wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HV1HxH13rW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=27503, passed=207780
Got 207780 stars (including 180064 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 207780 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 202015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 202014 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 202038 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Excluding outliers - 926 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits -region wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ey1DFqlfAH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=16767, passed=142675
Got 142675 stars (including 125739 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 142675 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013035 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010428 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 139878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 139878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 139877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
Excluding outliers - 922 stars left (next iteration limit 1014)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YQKdy8yFGm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=18155, passed=125581
Got 125581 stars (including 107345 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 125581 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.13"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 121009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.14"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 121009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.15"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 121008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.26"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1005)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-33-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0219.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/wcs_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-34-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0220.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-51-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0349.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_035549_TTUQ2b1x1_7985_2FpuXjqF/wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out225144.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out232514.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out232576.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out232642.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out232720.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out232721.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out232741.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out232777.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out232800.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out232855.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out232901.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out232908.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out232941.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out233881.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out234600.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out234632.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out234680.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out234758.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out234820.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out232719.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out211683.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out232853.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out232914.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out232958.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232514_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232514_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:50.09 -23:40:40.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.45)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232576_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232576_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:50:08.87 -29:35:50.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.25)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232602_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232602_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232631_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232631_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:05.95 -24:51:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232642_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232642_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:20.78 -27:39:56.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.23, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.21)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232704_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232704_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:14.74 -23:33:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232713_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232713_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:58.64 -22:48:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232719_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232719_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:43.11 -22:25:29.7 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=13.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.10)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232720_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232720_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:19.46 -25:44:17.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.05, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.03)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232721_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232721_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:41.74 -29:55:17.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.099 4049664018465386496 273.42351133688 -29.92063071032 12.3909 11.1662 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.099#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232732_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232732_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232741_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232741_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:11.28 -21:51:40.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.02)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.863 4090742704978677760 273.79735757525 -21.86290000687 13.4690 12.9796 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.863#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232777_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232777_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:31.89 -28:49:07.8 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.69)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232791_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232791_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232800_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232800_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:13.77 -26:21:11.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.64, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.62)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232807_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232807_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:07.08 -27:45:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232832_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232832_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232836_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232836_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232841_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232841_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232848_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232848_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232853_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
Preparing report for the candidate 232853_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232855_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232855_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:33.21 -30:06:10.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.84)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232860_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232860_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232864_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232864_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232866_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232866_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:32.70 -27:22:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232898_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232898_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:29.42 -29:40:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232901_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232901_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:23.76 -24:03:37.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.33, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.31)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232908_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232908_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:24.89 -28:20:38.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.36)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232914_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
Preparing report for the candidate 232914_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232941_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232941_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:10.47 -27:25:24.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.31, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.29)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.168 4063546594071821440 269.29433311104 -27.42274528702 12.6451 12.1180 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.168#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232949_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232949_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:49.81 -24:11:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232952_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232952_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232957_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 232957_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:58.73 -24:12:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232958_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
Preparing report for the candidate 232958_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233137_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 233137_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233338_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 233338_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:52.46 -28:23:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233676_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 233676_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:19.33 -30:12:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233808_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 233808_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:06:36.51 -28:59:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233819_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 233819_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233852_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 233852_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:01.61 -23:51:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233881_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 233881_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:34.74 -23:37:01.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.77)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233928_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 233928_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:37.61 -28:01:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233950_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 233950_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:17.80 -28:26:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233969_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 233969_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:52.49 -28:41:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233973_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 233973_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:34.22 -22:25:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233997_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 233997_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:06.84 -27:02:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234028_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 234028_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234106_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 234106_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:10:12.39 -28:44:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234278_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 234278_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:21:29.35 -23:26:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234347_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 234347_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:06:47.35 -27:11:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234380_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 234380_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:07:07.46 -27:31:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234414_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 234414_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:18.90 -23:23:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234480_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 234480_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:22:40.43 -25:48:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234491_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 234491_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:24.73 -24:15:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234522_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 234522_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:46.64 -25:22:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234600_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 234600_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:37.34 -26:18:07.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.936 4052837105944661760 276.15572497944 -26.30255045572 12.9049 11.4706 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.936#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234605_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 234605_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:07.76 -23:48:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234632_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 234632_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:34:11.01 -27:59:56.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.47)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234649_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 234649_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:29.13 -22:06:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234680_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 234680_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:21:22.49 -23:47:27.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.52)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.832 4089368757728734976 275.34397050195 -23.79144882283 12.9952 11.8315 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.832#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234689_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 234689_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:53.05 -26:41:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234696_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 234696_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:19.52 -23:43:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234720_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 234720_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:15.20 -24:07:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234758_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 234758_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:09.99 -28:40:12.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.447 4051348302834050560 274.54233734968 -28.67029520739 13.2398 11.9242 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.447#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234820_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 234820_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:57.17 -21:51:55.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.958 4069949149000518784 270.23892620173 -21.86598075994 13.4401 12.5874 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.958#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234827_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 234827_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:43.90 -23:11:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41597_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 41597_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:05.28 -29:03:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 225144_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 225144_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:10.14 -28:23:58.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.581 4048557879794156928 277.29234352340 -28.39990373932 12.4249 11.2963 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.581#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74954_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 74954_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:48.91 -27:33:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88828_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 88828_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:33.74 -26:56:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29252_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 29252_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:50.66 -29:38:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211683_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
Preparing report for the candidate 211683_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64509_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 64509_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:49.86 -28:01:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25436_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 25436_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:08:25.14 -29:46:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98090_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 98090_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:32:18.28 -26:30:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86981_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 86981_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:00.00 -27:00:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 215794_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 215794_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:31.73 -28:21:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33151_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 33151_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:30.99 -29:26:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53405_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 53405_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:19.11 -28:19:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219366_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 219366_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:25:36.59 -29:00:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26293_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 26293_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:53.46 -29:47:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227299_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 227299_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:25:02.59 -23:05:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132041_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 132041_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:32:09.96 -24:46:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65573_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350
The candidate 65573_fd_Sgr-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-55-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0350 did not pass the final checks