This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7930,12.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2930 12.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7930,14.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2930 14.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2930* 13 34 30.78 +10 00 42.3 14.1 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7930,14.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2930 14.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2930* 13 25 43.28 +06 03 18.0 13.4 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
OQ Vir,2461146.7930,13.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
OQ Vir 20260416.2930 13.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.94661763 22.02.2026 10:42:57.763 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
First image: 2461093.94661763 22.02.2026 10:42:57.763 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
Last image: 2461146.79418561 16.04.2026 07:03:27.637 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5173
Objects passed selection criteria: 5171
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4856.75
Average stars matched: 4675.5 (96.2681 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111396 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 15 18:49:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-18-ga9a0ae89
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 02:14:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.94661763 22.02.2026 10:42:57.763 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
First image: 2461093.94661763 22.02.2026 10:42:57.763 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
Last image: 2461146.79418561 16.04.2026 07:03:27.637 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 166
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27978
Objects passed selection criteria: 27891
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 25768.5
Average stars matched: 24656.5 (95.6847 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 131412 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 15 18:49:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-18-ga9a0ae89
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 02:14:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461146.79173933
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits'
wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:51.358 +05:59:16.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Image size: 936.8'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:47.289 +05:59:45.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:51.358 +05:59:16.47
Second-epoch image center 13:42:47.289 +05:59:45.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0187 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:48.379 +05:59:45.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:51.358 +05:59:16.47
Second-epoch image center 13:42:48.379 +05:59:45.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0147 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 13:42:47.289 +05:59:45.71
Second-epoch second image center 13:42:48.379 +05:59:45.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00452 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kGD7EdiV9Z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qATUPdQbBf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Cyn3R6mvLh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GhkkYLe9iL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits and wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits and wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits and wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6371 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 197.6203 to 214.0565 deg, Dec +0.1313 to +11.7245 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 197.6203 to 214.0565 deg, Dec 0.1313 to 11.7245 deg
Loaded 4511 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3361 out of 3468 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3468 out of 6371 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.948201
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.948201
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
2.3 pix Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
3.4 pix fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits
2.4 pix fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
15.3 mag. Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.kGD7EdiV9Z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=356, passed=6371
Got 6371 stars (including 6012 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6371 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.1 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 982 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 976 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.1 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 982 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 982 stars left (next iteration limit 1080)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits -region wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qATUPdQbBf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=378, passed=6255
Got 6255 stars (including 5875 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6255 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.1 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 982 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.1 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 982 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 982 stars left (next iteration limit 1080)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits -region wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Cyn3R6mvLh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=508, passed=6263
Got 6263 stars (including 5752 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6263 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GhkkYLe9iL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=385, passed=5924
Got 5924 stars (including 5536 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5924 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5813 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:51.358 +05:59:16.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Image size: 936.8'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:47.289 +05:59:45.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:51.358 +05:59:16.47
Second-epoch image center 13:42:47.289 +05:59:45.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0187 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:48.379 +05:59:45.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:51.358 +05:59:16.47
Second-epoch image center 13:42:48.379 +05:59:45.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0147 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 13:42:47.289 +05:59:45.71
Second-epoch second image center 13:42:48.379 +05:59:45.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00452 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yDPyPBI45e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pnYWDEK2jc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZIZEwd20R5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IeSpwtoWW7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits and wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits and wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits and wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 33426 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 197.5473 to 214.0698 deg, Dec +0.1166 to +11.7520 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 197.5473 to 214.0698 deg, Dec 0.1166 to 11.7520 deg
Loaded 4535 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3241 out of 3477 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3477 out of 33426 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.827622
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.827622
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 100 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
2.2 pix Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
3.2 pix fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
15.5 mag. Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.yDPyPBI45e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1360, passed=33416
Got 33416 stars (including 32008 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33416 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.1 to 11.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33035 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.1 to 11.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33036 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33036 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits -region wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pnYWDEK2jc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1371, passed=33591
Got 33591 stars (including 32174 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33591 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.1 to 11.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.1 to 11.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33125 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33125 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits -region wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZIZEwd20R5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2199, passed=26332
Got 26332 stars (including 24117 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26332 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25664 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25666 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25666 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IeSpwtoWW7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=1293, passed=32793
Got 32793 stars (including 31467 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32793 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-59-56_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_020404_TTUQ2b1x1_18271_ujlHZwHk/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52058.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52063.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53262.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out17508.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52272.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52649.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52802.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52051_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52051_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:44:32.65 +05:53:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52052_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52052_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52058_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52058_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:04:36.95 +05:30:11.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.58)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.529 3672189620672219648 211.15381841449 +05.50317511597 14.2744 13.5693 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.529#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52059_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52059_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:52:16.11 +02:06:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52060_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52060_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:30:33.96 +07:10:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52063_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52063_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:29:17.92 +02:07:27.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.64, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.62)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.443 3711518155165347328 202.32437471481 +02.12480723452 13.6688 13.1681 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.443#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52115_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52115_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52165_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52165_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52168_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52168_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52272_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
Preparing report for the candidate 52272_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52292_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52292_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52313_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52313_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52353_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52353_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52372_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52372_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52374_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52374_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52376_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52376_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52433_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52433_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52434_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52434_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52438_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52438_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52454_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52454_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52474_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52474_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52477_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52477_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52485_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52485_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52505_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52505_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52523_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52523_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52525_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52525_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52527_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52527_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:04:19.50 +02:35:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52537_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52537_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52543_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52543_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52560_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52560_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52573_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52573_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52576_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52576_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52577_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52577_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52592_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52592_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52594_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52594_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52598_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52598_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52602_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52602_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52611_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52611_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52616_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52616_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52633_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52633_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52649_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
Preparing report for the candidate 52649_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52664_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52664_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52669_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52669_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52675_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52675_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52704_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52704_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52713_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52713_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52718_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52718_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52723_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52723_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52759_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52759_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52760_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52760_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52761_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52761_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52783_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52783_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52785_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52785_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52793_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52793_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52797_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52797_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52802_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
Preparing report for the candidate 52802_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52807_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52807_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52821_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52821_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52823_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52823_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52830_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52830_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52843_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52843_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52860_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52860_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52867_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52867_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52876_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52876_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52893_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52893_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52898_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52898_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52918_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52918_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52929_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52929_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52931_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52931_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52935_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52935_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:06:26.60 +04:16:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52950_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52950_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52964_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52964_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52970_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52970_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:03:57.34 +02:36:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52974_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52974_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52980_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52980_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:10:03.56 +03:49:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52995_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52995_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52997_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 52997_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53005_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 53005_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53008_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 53008_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53013_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 53013_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:02:41.48 +02:14:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53032_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 53032_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53038_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 53038_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53047_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 53047_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53085_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 53085_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:55:02.79 +06:31:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53091_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 53091_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53115_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 53115_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53123_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 53123_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53125_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 53125_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53133_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 53133_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53141_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 53141_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53150_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 53150_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53164_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 53164_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53171_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 53171_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53176_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 53176_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53195_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 53195_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53230_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 53230_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53262_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 53262_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:28:40.08 +09:58:38.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.694 3738058991470242688 202.16630319802 +09.97757602472 15.0446 14.5516 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.694#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09606_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 09606_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:48:55.30 +07:57:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04462_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263
The candidate 04462_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-03-27_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0263 did not pass the final checks