This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7713,11.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2713 11.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7713,13.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2713 13.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7713,13.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2713 13.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2713* 17 25 28.68 -11 43 33.3 12.7 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7713,12.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2713 12.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461099.01326235 27.02.2026 12:18:55.867 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
First image: 2461099.01326235 27.02.2026 12:18:55.867 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Last image: 2461146.77245016 16.04.2026 06:32:09.694 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 12
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.16
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4387
Objects passed selection criteria: 4381
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4114.25
Average stars matched: 4006.75 (97.3871 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 110924 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 15 18:49:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-18-ga9a0ae89
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 01:36:13 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461099.01326235 27.02.2026 12:18:55.867 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
First image: 2461099.01326235 27.02.2026 12:18:55.867 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Last image: 2461146.77245016 16.04.2026 06:32:09.694 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 75
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 44361
Objects passed selection criteria: 44304
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 39793.2
Average stars matched: 38375.8 (96.4378 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 150416 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 15 18:49:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-18-ga9a0ae89
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 01:37:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461146.77021311
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits'
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:33.337 -10:00:14.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Image size: 938.9'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:29.623 -10:02:45.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:33.337 -10:00:14.71
Second-epoch image center 17:08:29.623 -10:02:45.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0446 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Image size: 938.4'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:30.146 -10:03:15.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:33.337 -10:00:14.71
Second-epoch image center 17:08:30.146 -10:03:15.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0519 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:29.623 -10:02:45.64
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:30.146 -10:03:15.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00852 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NYKjhYhQE6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits &> /tmp/tmp.y7vphMzqam
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FNoNsTvRtI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nEDOjArx9N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6291 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0335 to 265.1596 deg, Dec -15.2758 to -4.6406 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0335 to 265.1596 deg, Dec -15.2758 to -4.6406 deg
Loaded 4109 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3268 out of 3414 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3414 out of 6291 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.964209
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.964209
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.16
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
2.4 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
2.9 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits
2.9 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
14.8 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.NYKjhYhQE6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=458, passed=6287
Got 6287 stars (including 5821 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6287 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.y7vphMzqam (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=388, passed=6127
Got 6127 stars (including 5735 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6127 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5999 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5998 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5998 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FNoNsTvRtI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=237, passed=4940
Got 4940 stars (including 4698 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013040 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010432 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nEDOjArx9N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=317, passed=5023
Got 5023 stars (including 4703 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5023 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013033 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010427 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20242.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20243.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20194_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 20194_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:57.00 -12:12:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20210_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 20210_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:10.79 -10:28:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20217_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 20217_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:31.52 -11:47:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20224_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 20224_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:19.72 -06:38:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20226_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 20226_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:11.49 -10:52:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20235_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 20235_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:30.56 -10:59:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20242_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 20242_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:38.75 -08:09:56.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.089 4167869356766664960 261.16168251634 -08.16543316703 10.9781 9.7775 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.089#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20243_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 20243_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:19.74 -07:53:17.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.01, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.99)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.768 4359983308336103552 258.33230684920 -07.88804412470 11.3539 10.3750 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.768#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20244_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 20244_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:29.38 -09:37:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03859_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 03859_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:52.11 -09:32:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:33.337 -10:00:14.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Image size: 938.9'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:29.623 -10:02:45.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:33.337 -10:00:14.71
Second-epoch image center 17:08:29.623 -10:02:45.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0446 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Image size: 938.4'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:30.146 -10:03:15.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:33.337 -10:00:14.71
Second-epoch image center 17:08:30.146 -10:03:15.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0519 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:29.623 -10:02:45.64
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:30.146 -10:03:15.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00852 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pLr4Rgw4r4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eaeM6JsJq7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KboJ8ABUAH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fLy1PrcjdW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 64679 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 248.9951 to 265.1706 deg, Dec -15.2833 to -4.6303 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 248.9951 to 265.1706 deg, Dec -15.2833 to -4.6303 deg
Loaded 4125 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3192 out of 3626 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3626 out of 64679 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.739902
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.739902
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 52 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
2.1 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
2.6 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits
2.7 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.pLr4Rgw4r4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=5, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=3753, passed=64663
Got 64663 stars (including 60806 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64663 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63713 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eaeM6JsJq7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=3159, passed=61397
Got 61397 stars (including 58163 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61397 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60548 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60549 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60548 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KboJ8ABUAH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1980, passed=41178
Got 41178 stars (including 39158 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41178 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013040 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010432 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fLy1PrcjdW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=2083, passed=38038
Got 38038 stars (including 35913 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38038 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013033 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010427 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37619 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37617 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37616 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_013249_TTUQ2b1x1_8157_TGUDPR4E/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out78998.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79076.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79140.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79187.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79196.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79224.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out26867.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78632.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78948.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out79105.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78586_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 78586_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:24.65 -07:56:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78632_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
Preparing report for the candidate 78632_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78650_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 78650_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:46.85 -12:43:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78662_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 78662_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:59.24 -14:03:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78698_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 78698_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:25.72 -10:50:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78784_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 78784_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78801_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 78801_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:41.91 -08:56:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78864_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 78864_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:13.07 -11:20:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78868_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 78868_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:28.14 -13:23:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78904_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 78904_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:33.07 -09:06:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78929_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 78929_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:44.60 -11:48:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78948_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
Preparing report for the candidate 78948_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78967_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 78967_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:24.53 -12:50:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78983_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 78983_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:37.00 -07:37:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78998_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 78998_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:39.60 -09:05:23.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.896 4339295039283724032 252.66551293968 -09.08960597496 13.9782 13.1358 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.896#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79013_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 79013_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:00.14 -06:50:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79070_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 79070_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:15.21 -06:13:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79072_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 79072_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:42.70 -09:48:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79076_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 79076_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:06.09 -12:51:42.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.291 4138659967087434112 260.77657971418 -12.86160288205 12.1348 10.3540 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.291#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79099_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 79099_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:30.35 -09:15:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79102_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 79102_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:32.03 -07:26:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79105_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
Preparing report for the candidate 79105_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79106_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 79106_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:04.61 -08:16:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79119_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 79119_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:32.87 -09:10:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79125_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 79125_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:13.57 -11:50:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79135_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 79135_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:12.90 -09:59:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79140_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 79140_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:45.07 -06:22:09.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.38)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.489 4340881359684771840 251.93796612602 -06.36954216777 14.1613 13.3923 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.489#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79147_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 79147_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79148_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 79148_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:44.66 -06:20:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79160_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 79160_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:29.22 -05:51:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79163_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 79163_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:58.68 -10:05:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79169_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 79169_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:34.79 -11:29:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79179_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 79179_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:18.12 -06:36:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79182_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 79182_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:00.85 -06:52:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79187_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 79187_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:38.62 -08:13:56.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.949 4339425675010244864 254.16116004499 -08.23222595634 14.1518 13.3000 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.949#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79196_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 79196_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:23.36 -06:55:04.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.70, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.68)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.894 4352737462286563072 250.34749004926 -06.91772304271 14.2462 13.4253 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.894#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79197_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 79197_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:49.02 -07:35:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79212_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 79212_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:52.96 -07:16:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79224_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 79224_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:06.82 -08:11:42.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.64)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.842 4339568091827548928 252.77893347105 -08.19499906370 14.4631 13.6624 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.842#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34578_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 34578_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:46.53 -10:37:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50662_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 50662_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:19.73 -06:38:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22755_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 22755_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:24.51 -12:14:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40753_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 40753_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:00.54 -09:32:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34174_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 34174_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:44.43 -10:40:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40045_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 40045_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:52.11 -09:32:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25116_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 25116_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:39.56 -11:38:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32237_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 32237_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:30.56 -10:59:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22747_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 22747_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:57.00 -12:12:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48929_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 48929_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:54.21 -06:24:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25148_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 25148_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:31.54 -11:47:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36413_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237
The candidate 36413_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-32-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0237 did not pass the final checks