This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2539* 12 01 29.06 +07 12 10.1 13.0 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7539,13.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2539 13.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2539* 11 42 17.08 +04 27 42.3 13.2 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7539,13.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2539 13.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2539* 12 22 02.23 +02 15 00.9 14.0 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7539,14.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2539 14.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2539* 12 04 31.33 +05 34 31.7 14.1 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7539,14.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2539 14.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2539* 12 17 14.51 +09 40 16.4 14.5 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7539,14.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2539 14.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.88997624 12.02.2026 09:21:23.947 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
First image: 2461083.88997624 12.02.2026 09:21:23.947 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
Last image: 2461146.75417242 16.04.2026 06:05:50.497 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 0
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.61
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4540
Objects passed selection criteria: 4540
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4364
Average stars matched: 4183.75 (95.8696 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 110984 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 15 18:49:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-18-ga9a0ae89
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 01:09:13 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.88997624 12.02.2026 09:21:23.947 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
First image: 2461083.88997624 12.02.2026 09:21:23.947 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
Last image: 2461146.75417242 16.04.2026 06:05:50.497 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 222
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 24904
Objects passed selection criteria: 24837
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 24012.5
Average stars matched: 23171 (96.4956 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 128856 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 15 18:49:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-18-ga9a0ae89
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 01:09:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461146.75354428
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits'
wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:45.239 +06:01:01.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:59.349 +06:00:15.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:45.239 +06:01:01.03
Second-epoch image center 11:59:59.349 +06:00:15.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0598 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:59.630 +06:00:32.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:45.239 +06:01:01.03
Second-epoch image center 11:59:59.630 +06:00:32.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0601 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:59:59.349 +06:00:15.54
Second-epoch second image center 11:59:59.630 +06:00:32.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00497 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MbgtLcSmwv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GGjzcVLjVr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Up0dT8l9z6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0BwI4wK4OZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits and wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits and wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits and wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5639 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.9617 to 187.9245 deg, Dec +0.7227 to +11.3009 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.9617 to 187.9245 deg, Dec 0.7227 to 11.3009 deg
Loaded 3777 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3057 out of 3201 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3201 out of 5639 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.906660
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.906660
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.61
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
2.1 pix Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits
2.4 pix fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits
2.4 pix fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
15.3 mag. Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.MbgtLcSmwv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=420, passed=5639
Got 5639 stars (including 5212 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5639 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5589 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5585 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5585 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits -region wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GGjzcVLjVr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=430, passed=5662
Got 5662 stars (including 5221 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5662 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5571 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5571 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5571 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits -region wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Up0dT8l9z6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=335, passed=6011
Got 6011 stars (including 5672 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6011 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0BwI4wK4OZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=350, passed=6002
Got 6002 stars (including 5645 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6002 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:45.239 +06:01:01.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:59.349 +06:00:15.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:45.239 +06:01:01.03
Second-epoch image center 11:59:59.349 +06:00:15.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0598 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:59.630 +06:00:32.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:45.239 +06:01:01.03
Second-epoch image center 11:59:59.630 +06:00:32.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0601 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:59:59.349 +06:00:15.54
Second-epoch second image center 11:59:59.630 +06:00:32.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00497 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WtDY4GAeQU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits &> /tmp/tmp.egZZtB5W54
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SHfiEPhinB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gFRNHOCCv6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits and wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits and wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits and wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 30429 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 171.9429 to 187.9244 deg, Dec +0.7228 to +11.3053 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 171.9429 to 187.9244 deg, Dec 0.7228 to 11.3053 deg
Loaded 3782 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3010 out of 3256 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3256 out of 30429 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.798794
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.798794
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 130 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
1.9 pix Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits
2.3 pix fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits
2.3 pix fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
15.5 mag. Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.WtDY4GAeQU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1092, passed=30425
Got 30425 stars (including 29267 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30425 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30172 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30171 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30171 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits -region wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.egZZtB5W54 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1123, passed=30625
Got 30625 stars (including 29453 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30625 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30332 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30333 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30333 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits -region wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SHfiEPhinB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1229, passed=28848
Got 28848 stars (including 27580 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28848 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28604 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28604 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28604 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gFRNHOCCv6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1205, passed=28833
Got 28833 stars (including 27591 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28833 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28598 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28600 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28600 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-21-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0442.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/wcs_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_03-22-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0443.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-04-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_010634_TTUQ2b1x1_2210_BgCcbX3I/wcs_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52061.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52098.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out52076.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out52086.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out52152.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51842.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51857.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51937.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51951.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52011.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51788_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51788_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:59:22.92 +05:00:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51789_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51789_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51790_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51790_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:55:23.50 +04:03:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51791_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51791_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:21:24.31 +02:22:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51799_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51799_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51812_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51812_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51820_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51820_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51829_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51829_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51835_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51835_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51839_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51839_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51842_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 51842_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51845_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51845_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51846_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51846_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51849_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51849_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51851_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51851_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51853_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51853_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51854_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51854_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51857_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 51857_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51860_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51860_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51861_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51861_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51862_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51862_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51864_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51864_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51866_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51866_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51867_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51867_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51868_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51868_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51871_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51871_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51873_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51873_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51875_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51875_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51879_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51879_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51880_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51880_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51881_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51881_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51883_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51883_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51886_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51886_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51890_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51890_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51892_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51892_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51896_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51896_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:58:14.22 +07:32:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51897_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51897_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51900_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51900_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51901_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51901_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51902_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51902_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51903_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51903_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:54:51.27 +07:46:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51905_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51905_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51906_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51906_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51907_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51907_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51908_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51908_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51912_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51912_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51913_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51913_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51918_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51918_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51925_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51925_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51927_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51927_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51928_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51928_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51931_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51931_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51932_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51932_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51933_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51933_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51934_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51934_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51936_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51936_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51937_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 51937_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51941_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51941_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51942_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51942_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51943_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51943_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51948_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51948_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51950_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51950_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51951_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 51951_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51953_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51953_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51962_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51962_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51965_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51965_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51967_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51967_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51969_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51969_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51970_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51970_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:12:01.97 +09:17:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51975_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51975_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51976_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51976_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51978_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51978_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51979_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51979_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51981_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51981_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51982_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51982_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51983_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51983_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51985_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51985_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51987_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51987_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51988_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51988_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51989_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51989_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51994_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51994_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51997_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51997_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51999_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 51999_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52001_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52001_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52003_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52003_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52004_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52004_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52005_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52005_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:50:30.08 +04:21:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52008_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52008_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52010_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52010_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52011_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
Preparing report for the candidate 52011_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52013_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52013_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52015_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52015_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52018_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52018_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52019_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52019_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52020_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52020_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52022_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52022_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52024_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52024_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52025_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52025_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52026_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52026_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52029_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52029_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52031_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52031_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52032_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52032_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52036_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52036_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52042_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52042_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52043_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52043_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52058_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52058_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52060_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52060_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52061_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52061_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:23:19.72 +05:22:24.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.510 3900173665929552256 185.83209455838 +05.37335006547 14.6502 14.1449 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.510#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52069_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52069_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52075_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52075_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52076_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52076_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:24:39.95 +03:18:11.7 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.68, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.66)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52084_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52084_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52085_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52085_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52086_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52086_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:20:18.64 +09:32:43.4 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.71)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52090_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52090_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52093_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52093_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52094_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52094_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52098_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52098_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:47:58.02 +06:14:15.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.461 3897744260628098816 176.99181419495 +06.23750001807 15.0321 14.5561 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.461#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52099_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52099_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52100_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52100_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52102_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52102_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:00:21.08 +09:09:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52106_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52106_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52107_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52107_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:19:37.35 +02:01:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52118_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52118_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52123_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52123_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52129_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52129_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52137_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52137_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52145_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52145_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52149_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52149_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52152_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211
The candidate 52152_fd_Vir-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_01-05-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0211 did not pass the final checks