This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2499* 12 05 22.73 +18 15 34.0 12.7 U Com 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7499,12.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2499 12.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2499* 11 38 45.21 +13 00 23.4 13.0 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7499,13.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2499 13.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2499* 11 02 02.95 +10 35 57.3 13.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7499,13.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2499 13.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2499* 11 48 07.95 +17 26 55.6 14.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7499,14.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2499 14.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2499* 11 05 20.70 +10 44 17.8 14.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7499,14.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2499 14.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2499* 11 29 32.58 +09 26 18.3 14.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7499,14.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2499 14.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2499* 11 03 14.17 +10 28 53.4 14.7 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7499,14.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2499 14.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2499* 11 41 24.43 +11 10 24.8 14.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7499,14.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2499 14.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.84038209 22.02.2026 08:09:59.013 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461093.84038209 22.02.2026 08:09:59.013 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461146.75149356 16.04.2026 06:01:59.044 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6217
Objects passed selection criteria: 6212
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5817.5
Average stars matched: 5607.5 (96.3902 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111860 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 15 18:49:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-18-ga9a0ae89
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 01:04:11 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.84038209 22.02.2026 08:09:59.013 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461093.84038209 22.02.2026 08:09:59.013 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461146.75149356 16.04.2026 06:01:59.044 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 53
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 31588
Objects passed selection criteria: 31504
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 29844
Average stars matched: 28409.5 (95.1933 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 132688 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 15 18:49:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-18-ga9a0ae89
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 01:04:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461146.74826611
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:20.209 +13:58:53.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86
Second-epoch image center 11:33:20.209 +13:58:53.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0203 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:23.406 +13:58:09.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86
Second-epoch image center 11:33:23.406 +13:58:09.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0342 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:33:20.209 +13:58:53.15
Second-epoch second image center 11:33:23.406 +13:58:09.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01775 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6tH0s0ASsm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MuU4eGq6er
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6nGpzQUCnp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q2P8XFTkTF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec +8.4844 to +19.3112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec 8.4844 to 19.3112 deg
Loaded 3827 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2957 out of 3146 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3146 out of 5845 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.909359
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.909359
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.2 pix Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.3 mag. Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.6tH0s0ASsm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=451, passed=5845
Got 5845 stars (including 5387 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5755 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5755 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MuU4eGq6er (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=436, passed=5851
Got 5851 stars (including 5411 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5851 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5764 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6nGpzQUCnp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=373, passed=5860
Got 5860 stars (including 5480 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5860 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Q2P8XFTkTF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=371, passed=5840
Got 5840 stars (including 5464 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5840 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20492.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20502.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20473_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 20473_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:24:03.47 +10:29:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20492_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 20492_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:35:49.76 +11:23:25.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.35, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.33)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.799 3916392493230971392 173.95754514959 +11.39055085982 12.1335 11.5093 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.799#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20499_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 20499_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:26:12.19 +17:39:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20502_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 20502_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:39:38.26 +16:33:09.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.329 3973037339429406080 174.90950222766 +16.55251525019 12.3100 11.9282 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.329#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:20.209 +13:58:53.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86
Second-epoch image center 11:33:20.209 +13:58:53.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0203 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:23.406 +13:58:09.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86
Second-epoch image center 11:33:23.406 +13:58:09.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0342 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:33:20.209 +13:58:53.15
Second-epoch second image center 11:33:23.406 +13:58:09.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01775 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5w4uSGIRRV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2ePWw8gR0p
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits &> /tmp/tmp.L7cHDdoDF2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7jQJtkIehK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 30089 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec +8.4661 to +19.3314 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec 8.4661 to 19.3314 deg
Loaded 3838 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2863 out of 3171 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3171 out of 30089 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.790746
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.790746
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 40 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.1 pix Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.5 mag. Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 14.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.5w4uSGIRRV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1260, passed=30074
Got 30074 stars (including 28759 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30074 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2ePWw8gR0p (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1200, passed=30099
Got 30099 stars (including 28847 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30099 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29751 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29752 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29752 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.L7cHDdoDF2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1207, passed=29806
Got 29806 stars (including 28538 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29806 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.1 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29200 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.1 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29197 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29197 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7jQJtkIehK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1181, passed=30314
Got 30314 stars (including 29082 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30314 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.1 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29605 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.1 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29605 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29606 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-57-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_010301_TTUQ1b1x1_27641_gKd9qep3/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52117.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52911.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53147.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53178.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53244.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53255.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53287.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53329.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53335.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53362.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53394.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53407.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53413.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53429.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53433.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53517.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53522.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53532.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53590.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53601.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out52934.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out53471.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out53494.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out53557.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52416.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52490.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52605.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52873.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52998.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53154.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53168.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53503.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52115_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 52115_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:44:43.62 +12:06:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52117_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 52117_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:22.50 +13:29:58.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.39)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52118_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 52118_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:05:23.13 +17:39:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52416_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 52416_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52490_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 52490_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52605_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 52605_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52810_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 52810_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:23.70 +16:05:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52873_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 52873_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52911_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 52911_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:09:39.18 +13:17:27.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.11, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.09)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.373 3965232387420132352 167.41330775042 +13.29140494084 14.2063 13.7117 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.373#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52934_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 52934_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:14.92 +09:08:54.9 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.11, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.09)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52952_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 52952_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:50:19.70 +10:24:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52998_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 52998_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53147_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53147_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:01:37.05 +17:20:02.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.55, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.53)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.865 3926611697897596288 180.40302192644 +17.33371326642 14.5029 13.5283 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.865#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53154_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 53154_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53168_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 53168_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53178_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53178_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:37:28.74 +18:08:19.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.976 3974003913229386368 174.36997826986 +18.13847608298 14.4386 13.8194 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.976#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53244_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53244_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:58:07.00 +10:06:54.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.490 3918220328233483776 179.52920156609 +10.11527052372 14.7889 14.2852 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.490#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53255_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53255_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:01:10.20 +08:53:50.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.79)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.481 3900019493783745280 180.29208605297 +08.89723200415 14.7934 14.1842 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.481#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53256_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53256_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:27:56.30 +12:00:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53287_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53287_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:41:25.98 +12:15:57.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.58, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.56)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.190 3916793952414226688 175.35842265530 +12.26628425232 14.6592 13.8507 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.190#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53305_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53305_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:54.67 +16:41:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53326_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53326_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:46:02.04 +12:19:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53329_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53329_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:58:32.53 +09:34:07.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.242 3912123879855291264 179.63557198928 +09.56886588740 14.7153 14.0875 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.242#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53335_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53335_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:50:59.76 +15:29:19.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.87)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.927 3924489915333613184 177.74873293807 +15.48869735585 14.6718 13.8574 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.927#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53362_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53362_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:47:46.16 +08:48:09.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.76, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.74)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.852 3911871267057863808 176.94241160433 +08.80289025080 14.7420 14.0888 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.852#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53394_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53394_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:32:02.92 +18:25:35.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.751 3977248640762195584 173.01232062363 +18.42598060041 15.0093 14.5668 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.751#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53407_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53407_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:55:29.93 +11:02:26.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.189 3918517986647148544 178.87473863925 +11.04065120438 14.7451 14.1699 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.189#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53413_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53413_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:19:41.61 +18:00:10.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.197 3971790179710095616 169.92302554788 +18.00282272264 14.8672 14.2866 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.197#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53429_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53429_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:59:36.50 +09:09:33.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.650 3900088213260428032 179.90278933138 +09.15912452665 15.0026 14.4670 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.650#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53433_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53433_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:24:41.29 +10:18:04.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.182 3915415302271706624 171.17265552533 +10.30105914829 15.0641 14.3933 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.182#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53471_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53471_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:48:02.98 +18:38:58.3 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.84)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53494_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53494_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:52:36.28 +13:11:54.2 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.84)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53503_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 53503_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53517_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53517_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:53:06.20 +11:12:10.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.132 3919328979551509760 178.27581788473 +11.20311969991 15.1126 14.6030 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.132#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53522_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53522_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:42:36.45 +09:34:48.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.234 3912831037629861120 175.65186728118 +09.57990718620 15.1558 14.4858 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.234#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53532_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53532_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:57:04.49 +10:35:58.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.292 3918441089552715008 179.26853479448 +10.59992697833 14.9891 14.4304 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.292#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53557_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53557_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:36:10.05 +10:03:20.4 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.97)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53590_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53590_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:52:54.07 +14:10:06.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.940 3923491421336466048 178.22502788678 +14.16838590309 14.9361 14.2838 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.940#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53601_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53601_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:54:25.31 +13:04:18.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.574 3919813829819385472 178.60536192030 +13.07178793036 14.9075 14.3289 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.574#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28948_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 28948_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_01-01-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
