This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2458* 11 41 57.57 +01 33 18.5 9.8 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7458,9.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2458 9.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2458* 12 14 52.76 -04 33 27.2 12.2 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7458,12.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2458 12.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2458* 12 01 50.26 +00 14 58.3 12.5 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7458,12.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2458 12.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2458* 12 28 11.73 -04 18 24.7 12.6 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7458,12.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2458 12.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2458* 12 07 19.37 -02 24 45.2 13.6 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7458,13.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2458 13.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2458* 11 48 56.18 -05 31 12.4 13.6 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7458,13.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2458 13.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2458* 12 22 02.50 +02 14 57.7 14.2 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7458,14.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2458 14.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2458* 12 11 49.17 -02 05 24.0 14.3 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7458,14.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2458 14.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.86218641 22.02.2026 08:41:22.906 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
First image: 2461093.86218641 22.02.2026 08:41:22.906 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Last image: 2461146.74608705 16.04.2026 05:54:11.921 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6111
Objects passed selection criteria: 6105
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5757.25
Average stars matched: 5560.25 (96.5782 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111800 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 15 18:49:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-18-ga9a0ae89
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 00:56:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.86218641 22.02.2026 08:41:22.906 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
First image: 2461093.86218641 22.02.2026 08:41:22.906 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Last image: 2461146.74608705 16.04.2026 05:54:11.921 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 62
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 34315
Objects passed selection criteria: 34214
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 32570.5
Average stars matched: 30827.2 (94.6478 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 135028 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 15 18:49:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-18-ga9a0ae89
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 00:57:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461146.74545726
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits'
wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:59.773 -02:00:02.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.181 -02:00:05.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.773 -02:00:02.82
Second-epoch image center 12:00:03.181 -02:00:05.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0142 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.893 -02:00:27.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.773 -02:00:02.82
Second-epoch image center 12:00:03.893 -02:00:27.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0185 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:03.181 -02:00:05.44
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:03.893 -02:00:27.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00678 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JiPjj6B8bk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iGP2iEfdRx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.psaSyZdOqk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ePxcIKUDui
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5852 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.0998 to 187.9210 deg, Dec -7.2990 to +3.3108 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.0998 to 187.9210 deg, Dec -7.2990 to 3.3108 deg
Loaded 3755 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3122 out of 3271 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3271 out of 5852 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.884713
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.884713
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.14
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.14
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
2.3 pix Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
15.1 mag. Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.JiPjj6B8bk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=443, passed=5852
Got 5852 stars (including 5404 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5852 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5821 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iGP2iEfdRx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=442, passed=5811
Got 5811 stars (including 5362 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5811 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.psaSyZdOqk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=401, passed=5880
Got 5880 stars (including 5471 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5880 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ePxcIKUDui (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=410, passed=5755
Got 5755 stars (including 5337 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5755 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5698 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5698 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5698 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20413.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20464.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20300.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20458.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20300_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
Preparing report for the candidate 20300_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20413_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 20413_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:11:28.36 -02:42:04.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.426 3598355250205055232 182.86828412964 -02.70117887180 11.8944 11.4411 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.426#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20444_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 20444_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:01:13.29 -01:48:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20458_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
Preparing report for the candidate 20458_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20464_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 20464_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:56:02.14 +00:32:53.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.27)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.752 3795316501868265984 179.00899742751 +00.54805732016 12.1469 11.7118 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.752#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
11:41:57.57 +01:33:18.5
12:14:52.76 -04:33:27.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:59.773 -02:00:02.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.181 -02:00:05.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.773 -02:00:02.82
Second-epoch image center 12:00:03.181 -02:00:05.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0142 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.893 -02:00:27.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.773 -02:00:02.82
Second-epoch image center 12:00:03.893 -02:00:27.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0185 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:03.181 -02:00:05.44
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:03.893 -02:00:27.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00678 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits &> /tmp/tmp.N2mhISXD72
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WIrzMM9ZCk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Xn8617MBo6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits &> /tmp/tmp.irkgo9lKed
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 32492 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.0947 to 187.9493 deg, Dec -7.3038 to +3.3170 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.0947 to 187.9493 deg, Dec -7.3038 to 3.3170 deg
Loaded 3770 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3039 out of 3314 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3314 out of 32492 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.752209
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.752209
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 55 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
2.1 pix Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
15.3 mag. Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.N2mhISXD72 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1375, passed=32477
Got 32477 stars (including 31049 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32477 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WIrzMM9ZCk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1376, passed=32472
Got 32472 stars (including 31039 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32472 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32306 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32306 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32306 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Xn8617MBo6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1252, passed=32911
Got 32911 stars (including 31602 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32911 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32664 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32664 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.irkgo9lKed (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1359, passed=33452
Got 33452 stars (including 32044 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33452 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33119 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33118 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33118 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 981 stars left (next iteration limit 1079)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-41-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-42-10_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-53-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_005516_TTUQ1b1x1_29552_S0x6DIrR/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52536.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52539.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52785.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53467.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53624.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53643.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53658.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53667.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53714.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53724.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53734.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53741.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53751.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53758.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53766.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53777.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53779.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53791.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53792.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53793.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53803.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53806.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53811.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53813.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53819.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53837.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53842.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53846.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53848.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53853.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53854.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53860.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out53202.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52770.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52804.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53111.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53116.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53427.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53527.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52536_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 52536_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:00:16.02 -02:16:06.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.743 3602319333219882368 180.06654385823 -02.26856875524 14.7583 14.1992 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.743#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52539_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 52539_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:45:53.51 -03:20:24.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.212 3600460299575035520 176.47322444493 -03.34020658588 14.6585 14.0220 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.212#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52563_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 52563_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:41:57.57 +01:33:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52724_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 52724_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:14:52.76 -04:33:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52770_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
Preparing report for the candidate 52770_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52785_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 52785_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:52:39.97 -02:43:04.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.64)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.525 3602046482537759360 178.16696229358 -02.71786237586 12.8654 12.4162 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.525#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52804_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
Preparing report for the candidate 52804_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52888_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 52888_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:03:05.15 -01:38:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52928_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 52928_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:13.64 -05:22:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53020_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53020_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:57:37.44 +01:26:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53111_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
Preparing report for the candidate 53111_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53116_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
Preparing report for the candidate 53116_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53121_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53121_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:47:46.93 -02:55:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53194_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53194_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:48:03.70 +02:22:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53202_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53202_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:46:55.45 -05:11:15.8 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=13.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.85)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53211_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53211_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:34:22.55 +01:44:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53234_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53234_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:39:27.39 +02:51:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53284_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53284_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:11:56.28 -00:28:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53427_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
Preparing report for the candidate 53427_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53467_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53467_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:58:06.96 +00:52:41.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.515 3891403686308951424 179.52891973270 +00.87831281391 14.3899 13.7620 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.515#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53527_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
Preparing report for the candidate 53527_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53604_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53604_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:01:25.89 +02:22:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53624_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53624_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:45:31.64 -00:46:47.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.51)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.592 3794700814011809536 176.38170745680 -00.77978321647 14.8287 14.3667 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.592#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53643_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53643_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:33:55.92 -00:56:30.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.825 3794126284826320640 173.48235844489 -00.94225764771 14.5900 14.0870 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.825#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53658_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53658_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:06:34.65 -05:19:46.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.55, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.53)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.701 3597307209465155712 181.64432995706 -05.32999824668 14.5105 14.0647 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.701#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53660_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53660_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:33:36.99 +02:27:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53667_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53667_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:43:21.23 -06:35:30.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.64, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.62)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.175 3592664178018905856 175.83841961895 -06.59175183645 14.6535 13.8860 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.175#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53714_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53714_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:07:07.90 -02:54:20.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.68, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.66)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.024 3601253356696198016 181.78319964771 -02.90531954040 14.4739 13.5799 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.024#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53724_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53724_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:12:32.66 +00:46:54.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.84, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.82)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.684 3699212661545873280 183.13646703714 +00.78159346467 14.7513 14.1409 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.684#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53726_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53726_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:33:57.84 -05:37:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53734_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53734_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:36:04.27 -04:13:41.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.85)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.510 3792109608702414592 174.01767041893 -04.22814823946 14.8631 14.2220 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.510#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53741_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53741_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:52:22.40 -02:52:37.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.72, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.70)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.552 3601850185351807616 178.09324384784 -02.87706983993 14.7655 14.2572 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.552#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53751_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53751_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:43:51.52 -02:38:57.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.366 3792714992932821504 175.96449682832 -02.64958952496 14.7529 14.2462 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.366#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53758_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53758_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:12:15.50 -01:21:12.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.066 3697671279389796352 183.06441398007 -01.35368735744 15.3323 14.9922 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.066#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53766_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53766_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:06:23.48 +02:14:51.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.884 3891890014045339136 181.59794657382 +02.24739311937 14.5467 13.9789 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.884#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53777_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53777_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:31.42 -02:35:54.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.970 3793455136056931968 172.38091273060 -02.59885288115 14.8653 14.2581 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.970#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53779_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53779_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:36:52.06 -02:27:42.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.76, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.74)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.015 3793342401755543168 174.21715706824 -02.46195329729 14.6844 14.1119 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.015#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53791_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53791_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:36.15 -05:24:34.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.61)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.696 3785744261011538560 172.15051058422 -05.40942716470 14.5948 14.0957 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.696#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53792_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53792_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:47:37.58 -05:18:10.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.413 3598895797608742912 176.90652366517 -05.30279072802 14.7615 14.3002 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.413#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53793_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53793_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:30:26.57 -01:31:39.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.83, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.81)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.534 3793684315511579904 172.61077015750 -01.52774596310 14.9753 14.5223 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.534#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53795_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53795_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:52.86 -05:53:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53803_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53803_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:35:04.77 +02:49:03.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.396 3800187514473830272 173.77026211993 +02.81755419151 14.6491 14.1065 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.396#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53806_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53806_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:39:58.66 +01:36:43.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.626 3799063779229818752 174.99439668099 +01.61222829081 14.7764 13.9439 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.626#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53811_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53811_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:25:15.83 +02:04:38.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.76, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.74)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.064 3700560250485154816 186.31574699717 +02.07701536080 14.5575 13.8031 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.064#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53813_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53813_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:17:32.36 -07:07:11.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.817 3583975184300803840 184.38505278620 -07.11989746105 14.7746 14.0619 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.817#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53819_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53819_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:40:14.82 +02:25:32.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.702 3799736577266839552 175.06180572927 +02.42550759561 14.6465 13.9665 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.702#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53831_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53831_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:21:18.93 +01:26:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53837_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53837_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:36:22.69 -05:35:50.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.353 3593802928467311104 174.09491695971 -05.59737451730 15.0608 14.5697 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.353#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53842_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53842_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:34.57 -03:56:41.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.725 3787123667067837440 172.14428479319 -03.94530198653 15.0006 14.4555 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.725#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53846_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53846_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:38:36.33 -04:27:36.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.694 3792043569285345792 174.65172569340 -04.45990737111 14.9056 14.3026 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.694#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53848_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53848_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:09:26.77 +01:10:26.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.665 3699481079821735808 182.36172368134 +01.17405168963 15.0651 14.5552 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.665#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53853_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53853_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:03:44.57 +01:06:12.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.89)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53854_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53854_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:39:13.88 +01:35:33.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.89)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.716 3799245988922652800 174.80802700520 +01.59270451331 14.9819 14.5059 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.716#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53860_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53860_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:22:45.77 -07:05:39.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.263 3584303148003651072 185.69077882995 -07.09441025657 14.7804 14.1923 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.263#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31991_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 31991_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-54-11_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
