NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Leo-06-Q2b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 04 16.24340    2461146.74340    13.05    11:38:45.48 +13:00:24.1   3999 3815   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.09    11:38:45.45 +13:00:24.3   4002 3815   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 04 16.2437  2461146.7437  13.07  11:38:45.47 +13:00:24.2
249.06433  67.90174 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 2.8 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
595 Polyxena                -0      0       0  13.2    -0    0
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 04 16.24340    2461146.74340    14.18    11:48:08.26 +17:26:54.7   2609 1132   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.18    11:48:08.28 +17:26:56.7   2612 1132   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 04 16.2437  2461146.7437  14.18  11:48:08.27 +17:26:55.7
243.17082  72.47479 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 2.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
680 Genoveva                -0      0       0  14.4    -0    0
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 04 16.24340    2461146.74340    14.73    11:41:24.77 +11:10:23.1   3618 4930   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.93    11:41:24.70 +11:10:23.7   3620 4929   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 04 16.2437  2461146.7437  14.83  11:41:24.73 +11:10:23.4
253.66855  67.07821 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 2.8 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
857 Glasenappia             -0     -1       1  15.0    -0    0
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 3

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Leo-06-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-06-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-06-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 671889 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 671889 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits_preview.png'
Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits

renamed 'Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits_preview.png'
Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 532.6367 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 471.1419 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 959.2538 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 475.0693 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 959.0812 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 475.0677 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.80095 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 8.94999980926514 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 11.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-16T00:50:20.0807936' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-16T05:50:20.0807936' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61146.2432879629 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-16T05:50:29.9844218' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61146.2434025924 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 173.33164221904 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 14.0000798965308 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 65.1444444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 220.779722222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.10177837302987 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 33 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20345 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20345 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 8.94999980926514 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 8.94999980926514 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= -3.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 35.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 897.6 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 11.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 34.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.100088 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/d_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits :) Spent 0.645825 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/d_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 40671.357813 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=26440.0, right_median=31961.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 8.57999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 11.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-16T00:51:03.6701732' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-16T05:51:03.6701732' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61146.2437924771 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-16T05:51:13.5744529' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61146.2439071066 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 173.331642244934 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 14.0000798791685 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 65.0441666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 221.130277777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.10267202563027 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 33 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20345 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20345 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 8.57999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 8.57999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= -3.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 35.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 897.6 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 11.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 34.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.100088 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/d_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits :) Spent 0.849346 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/d_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 40671.357813 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=26440.0, right_median=31961.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits


fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461146.74340370 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits' wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:33:19.244 +14:00:52.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 Second-epoch image center 11:33:19.244 +14:00:52.01 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0141 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:33:20.340 +14:00:50.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 Second-epoch image center 11:33:20.340 +14:00:50.06 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0124 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 11:33:19.244 +14:00:52.01 Second-epoch second image center 11:33:20.340 +14:00:50.06 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00446 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qo80vpjUxo Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2NOM9SYTrh Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zLPVHujt7T Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hLtojvcBVO Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec +8.4844 to +19.3112 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec 8.4844 to 19.3112 deg Loaded 3827 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2957 out of 3146 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3146 out of 5845 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.909359 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.909359 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Magnitude calibration plot:

____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 2.2 pix Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 2.5 pix fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits 2.5 pix fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.3 mag. Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 15.3 mag. Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 15.3 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits 15.3 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.qo80vpjUxo (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=451, passed=5845 Got 5845 stars (including 5387 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5754 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5755 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5755 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.2NOM9SYTrh (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=436, passed=5851 Got 5851 stars (including 5411 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5851 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5764 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5763 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5763 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.zLPVHujt7T (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=338, passed=5986 Got 5986 stars (including 5643 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5986 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5898 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5896 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5896 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.hLtojvcBVO (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=366, passed=5909 Got 5909 stars (including 5537 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5909 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5805 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5804 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5804 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20456_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 20456_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    10.85    11:25:36.46 +16:28:18.7   5884 1684   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits **** FOUND 11:25:36.47 +16:28:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20993_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 20993_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    12.29    11:24:03.48 +10:29:09.5   6208 5301   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits **** FOUND 11:24:03.48 +10:29:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21020_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 21020_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    12.33    11:35:49.80 +11:23:25.5   4447 4787   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits **** FOUND 11:35:49.77 +11:23:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21043_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 21043_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    12.41    11:26:12.17 +17:39:39.1   5781 0965   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits **** FOUND 11:26:12.19 +17:39:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:33:19.244 +14:00:52.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 Second-epoch image center 11:33:19.244 +14:00:52.01 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0141 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:33:20.340 +14:00:50.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 Second-epoch image center 11:33:20.340 +14:00:50.06 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0124 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 11:33:19.244 +14:00:52.01 Second-epoch second image center 11:33:20.340 +14:00:50.06 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00446 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vLUEcT0hKA Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DDGEsDKTqL Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IIr0nk6AFC Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZoUB2UTog5 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 30089 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec +8.4661 to +19.3314 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec 8.4661 to 19.3314 deg Loaded 3838 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2863 out of 3171 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3171 out of 30089 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.790746 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.790746 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Magnitude calibration plot:

____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 92 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 2.1 pix Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 2.3 pix fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits 2.2 pix fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 15.5 mag. Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 15.5 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits 15.5 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 14.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.vLUEcT0hKA (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1260, passed=30074 Got 30074 stars (including 28759 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30074 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29780 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29780 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29780 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.DDGEsDKTqL (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1200, passed=30101 Got 30101 stars (including 28849 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30101 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29753 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29753 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29753 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.IIr0nk6AFC (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1141, passed=28194 Got 28194 stars (including 27021 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28194 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27881 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27880 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27880 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.ZoUB2UTog5 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1136, passed=28919 Got 28919 stars (including 27750 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28919 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28499 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28497 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28497 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-50-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0200.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out51688.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out56030.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53050.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54716.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55748.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51687_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 51687_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    15.02    11:37:57.21 +12:51:25.1   4122 3904   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits **** FOUND 11:37:57.23 +12:51:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51688_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 51688_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    15.07    11:24:49.88 +11:47:22.2   6071 4513   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits **** FOUND 11:24:49.83 +11:47:22.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.551 3963907063591562624 171.20718791280 +11.78963268969 15.2533 14.7458 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.551#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51689_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 51689_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    15.03    11:27:21.87 +10:08:20.8   5720 5523   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51693_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 51693_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.44    11:26:20.01 +10:18:14.9   5871 5419   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits **** FOUND 11:26:20.03 +10:18:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51925_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 51925_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    10.63    11:51:51.43 +12:13:13.3   2065 4304   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52752_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 52752_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    12.70    11:39:39.44 +10:32:04.6   3885 5314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52875_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 52875_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    12.97    11:43:16.59 +14:29:34.7   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52878_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 52878_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    12.88    11:42:50.48 +13:59:22.1   3396 3227   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52935_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 52935_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.07    11:15:56.21 +12:49:01.6   7370 3852   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits **** FOUND 11:15:56.21 +12:49:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53011_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 53011_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.11    11:17:46.94 +17:15:39.6   7007 1168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53050_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 Preparing report for the candidate 53050_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53087_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 53087_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.16    11:21:54.30 +13:24:47.5   6476 3519   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53153_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 53153_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.11    11:26:38.49 +17:53:44.6   5714 0824   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53309_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 53309_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.22    11:47:05.18 +10:06:12.7   2777 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53346_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 53346_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.23    11:15:36.12 +13:48:00.2   7398 3255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53388_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 53388_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.36    11:18:56.39 +10:11:21.9   6978 5461   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits **** FOUND 11:18:56.38 +10:11:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53562_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 53562_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.49    11:18:50.43 +14:52:58.1   6899 2616   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53641_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 53641_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.42    11:38:01.22 +09:57:18.1   4133 5663   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53661_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 53661_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.87    11:35:44.20 +16:46:48.4   4413 1528   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53680_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 53680_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.47    11:17:05.93 +16:37:57.9   7119 1546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53713_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 53713_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.58    11:44:38.01 +11:54:38.4   3139 4487   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53728_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 53728_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.37    11:40:50.98 +10:58:40.5   3705 5047   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53754_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 53754_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.61    11:22:20.89 +12:45:53.4   6422 3913   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53879_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 53879_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.55    11:40:55.85 +10:24:12.9   3696 5396   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53938_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 53938_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.61    11:40:25.16 +13:44:16.0   3753 3376   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53974_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 53974_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.69    11:18:12.54 +17:34:20.0   6939 0981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54015_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54015_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.87    11:19:06.46 +10:20:02.7   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54017_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54017_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.85    11:24:30.17 +10:05:17.5   6148 5544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54073_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54073_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.81    11:39:35.03 +14:37:04.1   3870 2843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54085_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54085_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.86    11:29:28.07 +16:40:07.3   5322 1579   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54101_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54101_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.90    11:18:37.58 +14:20:33.0   6941 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54108_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54108_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.71    11:35:47.76 +10:03:42.5   4464 5593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54185_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54185_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.76    11:50:42.17 +13:33:49.1   2238 3489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54196_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54196_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.96    11:32:17.87 +11:21:08.3   4971 4801   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54216_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54216_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.78    11:50:11.82 +14:12:54.8   2313 3094   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54225_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54225_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.85    11:20:50.88 +17:49:36.7   6552 0840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54226_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54226_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.96    11:31:23.66 +16:05:34.2   5050 1934   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits **** FOUND 11:31:23.69 +16:05:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54254_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54254_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.84    11:49:23.08 +12:55:47.3   2433 3873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54272_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54272_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.01    11:29:40.60 +11:00:23.9   5364 5003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54409_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54409_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.87    11:39:26.62 +11:27:07.2   3911 4757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54445_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54445_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.04    11:50:39.97 +11:01:55.3   2241 5026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54466_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54466_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.22    11:16:14.18 +11:28:00.0   7355 4673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54472_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54472_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.27    11:24:41.43 +10:01:30.6   6121 5583   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54487_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54487_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.13    11:24:26.36 +12:17:26.2   6121 4208   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54501_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54501_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.09    11:43:10.48 +17:48:23.6   3330 0914   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54547_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54547_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.10    11:41:14.56 +09:54:17.3   3652 5700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54577_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54577_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.12    11:22:20.62 +14:14:31.4   6397 3020   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54603_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54603_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.20    11:33:25.74 +14:10:41.1   4774 3096   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54649_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54649_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.37    11:49:49.28 +15:58:53.2   2368 2023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54716_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 Preparing report for the candidate 54716_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54739_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54739_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.19    11:51:24.65 +10:12:09.0   2128 5532   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54752_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54752_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.00    11:32:53.35 +14:33:12.2   4849 2868   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54768_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54768_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.14    11:23:16.30 +12:58:33.4   6282 3789   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54828_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54828_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.26    11:37:13.63 +16:47:40.8   4197 1522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54832_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54832_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.26    11:23:39.92 +14:15:10.2   6203 3019   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54852_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54852_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.14    11:51:09.68 +11:46:56.1   2168 4570   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54855_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54855_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.37    11:14:37.28 +17:01:47.4   7472 1290   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54879_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54879_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.23    11:47:45.92 +13:43:39.8   2672 3389   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54993_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54993_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.94    11:44:29.09 +17:56:37.0   3140 0831   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54996_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 54996_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.21    11:44:24.58 +18:09:48.6   3150 0697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55032_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 55032_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.61    11:14:50.91 +15:26:59.8   7473 2251   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55090_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 55090_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.32    11:20:00.10 +11:31:01.5   6793 4659   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55160_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 55160_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.36    11:41:35.13 +12:41:54.6   3587 4006   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55202_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 55202_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.31    11:40:34.26 +13:31:22.9   3732 3506   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55210_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 55210_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.36    11:46:21.85 +13:30:54.4   2879 3517   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55279_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 55279_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.50    11:38:23.62 +10:25:12.7   4074 5381   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55426_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 55426_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.66    11:29:54.59 +16:41:28.5   5258 1567   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits **** FOUND 11:29:54.63 +16:41:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55445_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 55445_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.24    11:46:42.99 +10:23:12.6   2832 5415   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55446_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 55446_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.47    11:50:19.23 +11:20:02.9   2293 4842   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55453_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 55453_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.58    11:16:13.80 +14:45:11.8   7285 2681   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55462_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 55462_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.40    11:39:53.43 +17:06:57.9   3809 1331   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55468_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 55468_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.45    11:34:14.90 +11:21:02.5   4682 4807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55476_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 55476_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.52    11:27:56.35 +12:00:13.1   5608 4394   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits **** FOUND 11:27:56.32 +12:00:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55547_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 55547_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.66    11:24:50.83 +13:23:40.6   6043 3542   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55590_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 55590_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.66    11:39:00.04 +13:55:04.0   3960 3265   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55643_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 55643_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.64    11:41:25.82 +12:15:57.3   3612 4268   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits **** FOUND 11:41:25.90 +12:15:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55714_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 55714_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.28    11:47:42.12 +14:41:13.6   2680 2808   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55748_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 Preparing report for the candidate 55748_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55779_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 55779_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.40    11:29:26.39 +17:18:06.1   5318 1195   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55911_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 55911_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.85    11:23:08.33 +12:50:04.3   6304 3874   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55917_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 55917_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.63    11:44:02.42 +17:01:51.4   3208 1386   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55928_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 55928_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.57    11:26:51.43 +16:58:18.6   5696 1386   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55969_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 55969_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.75    11:46:02.03 +12:19:59.1   2930 4233   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits **** FOUND 11:46:02.09 +12:19:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55972_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 55972_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.68    11:43:20.85 +17:48:23.9   3305 0914   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56017_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 56017_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.56    11:19:56.41 +13:35:44.6   6762 3400   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56030_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 56030_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.87    11:19:41.66 +18:00:09.8   6716 0727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits **** FOUND 11:19:41.62 +18:00:09.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.387 3971790179710095616 169.92302554788 +18.00282272264 14.8672 14.2866 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.387#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56046_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 56046_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.91    11:17:08.76 +11:14:40.6   7224 4812   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56066_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 56066_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.84    11:50:59.71 +15:29:19.6   2196 2321   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits **** FOUND 11:50:59.66 +15:29:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56136_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 56136_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.47    11:46:12.74 +12:46:17.8   2903 3967   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56241_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 56241_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.99    11:39:24.38 +17:24:53.4   3877 1149   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56430_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 56430_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    14.78    11:47:30.02 +15:04:00.5   2709 2578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 28948_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 The candidate 28948_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 04 16.24391    2461146.74391    13.80    11:32:02.52 +15:52:43.6   4958 2065   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_005223_TTUQ2b1x1_11419_UV9orZmi/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-51-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits **** FOUND 11:32:02.54 +15:52:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 11:38:45.47 +13:00:24.2 11:48:08.27 +17:26:55.7 11:41:24.73 +11:10:23.4 ########### Completed Leo-06-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 11:38:45.47 +13:00:24.2 11:48:08.27 +17:26:55.7 11:41:24.73 +11:10:23.4 ################################################################################### 11:38:45.47 +13:00:24.2 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 11:48:08.27 +17:26:55.7 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 11:41:24.73 +11:10:23.4 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 11:24:49.83 +11:47:22.5 11:19:41.62 +18:00:09.8 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461146.74340370 -observatory V36 00:08:34.53 -01:55:29.2 Mercury (0.0mag) 03:09:50.16 +17:56:55.0 Venus (-3.9mag) 00:18:32.05 +00:56:27.2 Mars (1.2mag) 07:12:44.44 +22:46:02.8 Jupiter (-2.1mag) 00:29:17.40 +00:49:39.4 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:47:44.88 +19:47:38.4 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:10:52.33 -00:15:10.3 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:33:45.92 -22:52:36.5 Pluto (14.5mag) 00:28:40.14 +05:23:07.1 Moon (-8.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Apr 16 00:56 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461146.74340370: 07:12:49.03 +22:45:55.4 Io (5.8mag) 07:12:52.23 +22:45:48.4 Europa (5.9mag) 07:13:00.17 +22:45:25.4 Ganymede (5.4mag) 07:13:19.81 +22:44:50.0 Callisto (6.6mag) 07:16:04.05 +22:33:33.6 Himalia (15.3mag) 07:12:40.64 +22:46:11.4 Thebe (16.2mag) 07:16:15.75 +23:03:46.2 Elara (17.3mag) 07:11:38.33 +23:25:55.5 Pasiphae (17.4mag) 07:21:03.83 +22:44:05.5 Carme (18.5mag) 00:29:17.42 +00:50:06.1 Titan (8.8mag) 00:29:16.58 +00:49:42.3 Rhea (10.1mag) 00:28:57.00 +00:49:46.5 Iapetus (11.5mag) 00:29:24.86 +00:50:00.2 Hyperion (14.8mag) 00:30:54.11 +00:58:26.0 Phoebe (16.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Apr 16 00:56 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461146.74340370: 15:39:20.22 -16:27:06.4 JWST 14:34:10.91 +56:08:17.1 Chandra 08:11:40.87 -42:25:40.6 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Apr 16 00:56 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461146.74340370 -observatory V36 -> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180] 18:52:06.19 -28:47:36.1 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:06:54.57 -69:39:01.0 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:32:29.92 +31:26:20.4 17.2mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:30:24.72 +10:34:35.5 17.6mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 23:10:17.36 +29:14:18.7 17.1mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 04:29:31.19 +26:02:41.8 16.0mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:03:28.31 +32:01:08.6 16.2mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:31:06.61 -00:07:38.6 17.3mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:53:40.44 +18:33:10.3 17.6mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:40:35.74 -11:31:05.0 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 09:07:31.36 -11:50:39.2 17.6mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS) 21:54:27.64 +62:55:14.2 17.5mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 19:18:59.36 -03:44:11.6 14.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 21:32:03.30 +85:56:42.7 17.8mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:18:00.63 +63:30:42.4 17.2mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 05:13:47.80 +18:23:19.7 11.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 16:19:07.19 +06:25:49.3 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:20:52.83 +15:20:25.9 14.6mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 03:26:35.22 -22:20:54.5 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:16:55.12 +45:13:50.1 17.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 13:37:49.32 +45:38:54.2 15.2mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 03:25:39.62 -26:14:58.6 17.8mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS) 23:45:36.11 +18:31:38.2 8.5mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 12:54:00.75 +03:01:39.2 17.4mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 03:29:55.13 +02:35:39.3 13.4mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS) 00:00:16.28 +37:15:50.6 14.6mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 18:43:24.65 -09:42:22.1 11.8mag 10P/Tempel 14:59:58.52 +03:11:02.4 14.0mag 24P/Schaumasse 11:02:44.22 -01:31:06.0 15.7mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 18:01:02.00 -09:36:04.6 18.0mag 40P/Vaisala 10:37:33.21 -04:04:46.6 16.9mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 01:49:03.04 +17:31:44.6 17.2mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 07:11:12.72 +36:57:37.2 17.0mag 63P/Wild 23:29:22.10 -11:25:17.8 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 04:03:53.98 +21:20:18.5 15.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 01:06:06.83 +08:16:35.4 14.3mag 78P/Gehrels 23:03:44.50 -09:19:08.9 14.6mag 88P/Howell 02:11:05.39 +20:42:25.5 15.1mag 93P/Lovas 04:55:15.71 +32:18:02.1 16.2mag 123P/West-Hartley 08:28:38.77 +38:14:55.4 16.2mag 124P/Mrkos 02:33:35.53 +14:23:49.5 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 02:48:00.90 +14:31:22.1 17.5mag 131P/Mueller 01:27:26.75 +13:19:20.4 10.6mag 141P/Machholz 01:36:20.45 +04:57:54.3 10.6mag 141P-A/Machholz 00:21:31.18 +00:51:56.3 12.8mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:06:41.35 +06:43:27.5 17.8mag 141P-I/Machholz 01:03:03.50 -01:24:11.9 15.1mag 162P/SidingSpring 14:51:00.03 -00:02:34.8 17.7mag 210P/Christensen 21:39:33.14 -11:23:23.9 17.6mag 218P/LINEAR 17:16:37.70 -13:54:14.8 16.1mag 235P/LINEAR 05:35:00.44 +34:43:01.5 16.8mag 240P/NEAT 07:38:36.78 -05:08:27.0 17.7mag 242P/Spahr 22:17:31.12 -20:54:54.6 17.9mag 260P/McNaught 01:58:41.18 +20:31:18.4 18.0mag 295P/LINEAR 15:42:33.06 +07:00:23.7 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski 07:34:17.34 +21:22:00.3 17.7mag 450P/LONEOS 05:36:13.52 +45:01:06.0 17.5mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K Apr 16 00:56 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 2026-04-12.14 16.96 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.87 -53:16:33.70 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.08 3.93 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31 13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97 06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67 12:20:27.90 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-19.05 16.24 07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74 06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48 11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95 10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53 20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83 06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93 07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78 19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2 04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS 11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2 07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8 16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12 13:01:19.45 +15:42:15.00 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.11 -0.29 09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06 03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00 SN2026evh 2026-03-12.05 17.29 06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10 AT2026ffp 2026-03-12.16 0.37 14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50 AT2026fij 2026-03-12.05 15.97 10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10 SN 2026exe 2026-03-11.78 16.48 18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00 SN2026ess 2026-03-12.37 17.37 13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80 AT2026ewa 2026-03-12.42 16.77 15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20 ASASSN-26bp 2026-03-11.92 13.33 13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20 AT2024cmo 2026-03-11.12 16.29 13:06:01.97 -15:50:14.40 AT2026fdy 2026-03-10.33 16.68 11:30:09.67 -47:26:43.70 ASASSN-26bn 2026-03-10.12 15.2 05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40 (= Gaia 2026-03-9.09 14.32 03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70 ASASSN-26bm 2026-03-8.04 15.22 04:31:00.53 -68:29:50.20 ASASSN-26bl 2026-03-7.9 10.26 16:18:17.61 +41:25:11.40 SN 2026dkf 2026-03-6.31 16.7 13:45:00.35 +61:16:50.90 SN 2026ejl 2026-03-6.41 -0.66 09:27:45.48 -37:49:32.80 ASASSN-26bk 2026-03-2.3 13.11 20:22:01.20 +23:47:47.30 ASASSN-26bi 2026-02-28.51 15.86 11:16:22.10 +29:26:22.80 AT2026enm 2026-02-28.39 16.88 08:05:59.83 -48:39:35.60 ASASSN-26bh 2026-02-26.05 14.64 13:24:27.02 -45:57:01.40 ASASSN-26bg 2026-02-26.35 15.28 17:27:50.95 -68:28:46.40 ASASSN-26bf 2026-02-26.3 16.28 18:03:39.37 +19:58:46.70 ASASSN-26be 2026-02-25.58 14.8 17:40:18.19 +07:20:59.60 SN 2026crm 2026-02-24.34 16.9 18:38:36.11 -79:28:58.40 ASASSN-26bb 2026-02-24.36 16.11 17:43:29.75 +11:24:00.60 ASASSN-26bc 2026-02-23.37 -3.37 16:59:41.08 -80:01:51.20 ASASSN-26bd 2026-02-23.3 14.38 11:23:31.77 -08:39:15.40 SN2026cff 2026-02-23.15 -1.08 14:55:17.39 -05:56:05.30 SN2026dmk 2026-02-23.22 -0.76 12:28:15.19 +44:27:20.80 SN2026cjz 2026-02-23.47 15.62 12:12:29.55 -02:40:43.30 AT2026dsk 2026-02-23.4 17.21 09:21:05.29 +06:11:42.80 SN2026chr 2026-02-23.1 17.39 16:05:38.61 +18:06:07.40 SN 2026dsy 2026-02-23.36 17.15 04:55:50.66 -29:52:57.70 SN 2026dpg 2026-02-23.11 15.75 04:21:28.18 -53:22:54.40 AT2026drl 2026-02-21.03 17.31 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K Apr 16 00:56 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 09:54:46.47 +69:06:31.7 PNV J09544647+6906317 2026-01-26.8081 19.3mag 18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9 TCP J18085199-2616219 2026-01-31.8519 12.2mag 08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1 TCP J08011102-0343141 2026-02-08.8090 15.10Cmag 05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5 TCP J05191540-0204515 2026-02-13.4306 14.5mag 10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9 TCP J10524126+3640089 2026-02-17.6065 17.4mag 05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1 TCP J05505081+3622451 2026-02-17.5511 15.7mag 00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag 00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag 17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag 09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K Apr 16 00:56 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 09:55:01.708 -18:44:01.81 AT 2026iyr 2026-04-08.39 20.35 15:43:29.354 -07:17:19.01 AT 2026iyq 2026-04-07.39 19.6244 13:05:52.366 +54:55:43.46 AT 2026iyp 2026-04-07.29 20.3633 15:52:32.558 +54:28:28.21 AT 2026iyo 2026-04-07.50 19.8736 12:10:51.131 -15:24:05.80 AT 2026iyn 2026-04-07.49 19.8 10:03:32.464 +00:47:38.92 AT 2026iym 2026-04-09.07 21.7842 09:57:46.577 +02:32:54.17 AT 2026iyl 2026-04-09.07 21.1159 12:09:21.288 -14:20:40.69 AT 2026iyk 2026-02-24.42 19.0617 11:32:15.323 +26:34:23.97 AT 2026iyi 2026-04-07.27 20.0038 08:41:36.643 +41:14:51.53 AT 2026iyh 2026-03-18.28 20.5874 11:10:47.748 -02:27:00.61 AT 2026iyg 2026-04-07.26 20.12 11:41:25.329 -11:32:16.55 AT 2026iyf 2026-04-07.25 20.8489 09:58:35.594 -17:44:37.57 AT 2026iye 2026-04-08.19 19.4848 07:48:08.582 +43:35:35.35 AT 2026iyd 2026-04-05.16 19.8382 11:13:43.729 +21:50:31.84 AT 2026iyc 2026-04-05.18 20.0005 08:02:45.458 +40:40:22.73 AT 2026iyb 2026-03-26.18 20.4831 13:05:52.496 +64:22:32.75 AT 2026iya 2026-03-08.94 19.29 05:15:26.423 -02:54:24.54 AT 2026ixz 2026-04-08.14 19.1905 14:04:24.118 +43:40:15.80 AT 2026ixt 2026-04-08.93 19.74 13:12:41.279 +38:05:24.08 AT 2026ixs 2026-04-08.93 20.18 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Apr 16 00:56 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 90 C