This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2329* 10 11 37.23 +15 39 01.7 11.0 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7329,10.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2329 10.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2329* 10 20 10.92 +10 30 38.3 12.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7329,12.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2329 12.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2329* 11 02 03.39 +10 35 55.4 13.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7329,13.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2329 13.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2329* 11 05 15.44 +08 51 33.2 13.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7329,13.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2329 13.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2329* 11 05 21.05 +10 44 16.6 14.2 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7329,14.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2329 14.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2329* 10 12 49.08 +17 47 15.1 14.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7329,14.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2329 14.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2329* 11 03 14.65 +10 28 51.7 14.7 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7329,14.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2329 14.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.87067979 18.01.2026 08:53:36.734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
First image: 2461058.87067979 18.01.2026 08:53:36.734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Last image: 2461146.73324141 16.04.2026 05:35:42.058 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6712
Objects passed selection criteria: 6706
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6280
Average stars matched: 6058.75 (96.4769 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112260 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 15 18:49:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-18-ga9a0ae89
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 00:45:01 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.87067979 18.01.2026 08:53:36.734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
First image: 2461058.87067979 18.01.2026 08:53:36.734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Last image: 2461146.73324141 16.04.2026 05:35:42.058 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 49
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.29
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 16 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 35980
Objects passed selection criteria: 35868
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 34036.2
Average stars matched: 32512.5 (95.5232 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 136176 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 15 18:49:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-18-ga9a0ae89
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 00:46:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461146.73249438
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits'
wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:00.041 +13:59:48.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:04.885 +13:59:50.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.041 +13:59:48.07
Second-epoch image center 10:40:04.885 +13:59:50.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0196 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:02.613 +13:59:07.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.041 +13:59:48.07
Second-epoch image center 10:40:02.613 +13:59:07.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0154 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:40:04.885 +13:59:50.60
Second-epoch second image center 10:40:02.613 +13:59:07.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01520 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fGdnKoGtE5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fLEjQcyayQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits &> /tmp/tmp.K9UPV8HhAB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ju5zYTr1wC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6443 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.6604 to 168.1630 deg, Dec +8.4830 to +19.3311 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.6604 to 168.1630 deg, Dec 8.4830 to 19.3311 deg
Loaded 4341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3437 out of 3596 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3596 out of 6443 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.884591
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.884591
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
2.1 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
15.4 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.fGdnKoGtE5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=439, passed=6443
Got 6443 stars (including 5991 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6443 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 875 stars left (next iteration limit 962)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fLEjQcyayQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=445, passed=6432
Got 6432 stars (including 5975 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6432 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 871 stars left (next iteration limit 958)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.K9UPV8HhAB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=384, passed=6245
Got 6245 stars (including 5852 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6245 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 851 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6082 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6083 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6083 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 865 stars left (next iteration limit 951)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Ju5zYTr1wC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=391, passed=6168
Got 6168 stars (including 5768 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6168 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6016 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 866 stars left (next iteration limit 952)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20420.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20420_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
Preparing report for the candidate 20420_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20572_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 20572_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:10:14.77 +16:46:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:11:37.23 +15:39:01.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:00.041 +13:59:48.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:04.885 +13:59:50.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.041 +13:59:48.07
Second-epoch image center 10:40:04.885 +13:59:50.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0196 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:02.613 +13:59:07.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.041 +13:59:48.07
Second-epoch image center 10:40:02.613 +13:59:07.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0154 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:40:04.885 +13:59:50.60
Second-epoch second image center 10:40:02.613 +13:59:07.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01520 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mzyRP3Ci1v
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5NsD7bfahl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CBUpt7bVXr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZpwZMnBNCg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 34456 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.5870 to 168.1630 deg, Dec +8.4530 to +19.3311 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.5870 to 168.1630 deg, Dec 8.4530 to 19.3311 deg
Loaded 4366 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3318 out of 3641 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3641 out of 34456 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.780204
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.780204
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.29
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.49
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.49
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 38 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
1.9 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
15.5 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.mzyRP3Ci1v (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1356, passed=34443
Got 34443 stars (including 33015 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34443 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33682 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 875 stars left (next iteration limit 962)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5NsD7bfahl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1357, passed=34514
Got 34514 stars (including 33102 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34514 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33690 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33689 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 878 stars left (next iteration limit 965)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CBUpt7bVXr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1223, passed=33951
Got 33951 stars (including 32681 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33951 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.1 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33051 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.1 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33053 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33053 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 872 stars left (next iteration limit 959)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZpwZMnBNCg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1324, passed=34165
Got 34165 stars (including 32785 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34165 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.1 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33395 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.1 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33396 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33396 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 868 stars left (next iteration limit 954)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-34-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_003646_TTUQ1b1x1_32113_JfagW076/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52288.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52291.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52294.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52296.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52736.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53512.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53580.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53683.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53717.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53724.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53738.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53798.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53854.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53865.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53874.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out53841.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52564.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52773.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53011.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53273.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53553.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53601.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52288_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 52288_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:11:06.61 +18:04:45.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.180 3971967720773464704 167.77684582700 +18.07863697099 15.1848 15.1273 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.180#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52291_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 52291_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:31:33.60 +17:06:41.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.85)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.892 3889803067961054720 157.88969961475 +17.11097642661 15.1446 14.5392 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.892#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52294_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 52294_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:38:48.32 +19:05:29.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.537 3986965506053181440 159.70070385745 +19.09179458449 14.9262 14.4462 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.537#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52296_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 52296_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:09:28.91 +15:47:27.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.42, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.40)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52297_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 52297_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:51:42.70 +18:46:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52298_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 52298_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:03:55.62 +15:01:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52369_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 52369_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:11:37.22 +15:39:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52564_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
Preparing report for the candidate 52564_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52736_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 52736_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:57:47.26 +15:37:58.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.26, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.24)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.875 3969359365659752832 164.44716814469 +15.63296517131 13.4625 12.8510 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.875#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52773_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
Preparing report for the candidate 52773_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52792_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 52792_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:59:20.22 +08:48:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52908_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 52908_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:28:21.59 +15:46:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53011_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
Preparing report for the candidate 53011_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53171_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53171_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:56:59.76 +15:30:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53246_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53246_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:55:50.15 +09:56:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53273_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
Preparing report for the candidate 53273_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53426_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53426_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:14:59.26 +12:33:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53473_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53473_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53512_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53512_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:00:15.07 +11:28:18.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.140 3871457858185505664 165.06388712044 +11.47147656622 14.7613 14.1143 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.140#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53553_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
Preparing report for the candidate 53553_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53569_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53569_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:16:38.55 +12:34:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53580_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53580_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:10:38.88 +15:49:54.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.76, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.74)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.481 621745551738081792 152.66241961466 +15.83178192418 15.2120 14.5991 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.481#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53601_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
Preparing report for the candidate 53601_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53683_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53683_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:27:56.35 +14:16:23.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.664 3887327242652495488 156.98498193217 +14.27328425495 15.0296 14.3660 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.664#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53711_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53711_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:38:40.88 +16:45:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53715_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53715_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:25:36.90 +18:44:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53717_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53717_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:20:01.17 +09:34:28.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.95)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53724_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53724_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:28:22.63 +13:33:28.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.367 3884190610856856576 157.09439636976 +13.55802130812 14.9389 14.3103 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.367#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53734_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53734_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:57:45.55 +09:23:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53738_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53738_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:54:16.51 +18:13:49.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.92, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.90)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.175 3983096908750637312 163.56909418451 +18.23028983829 15.5195 15.0024 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.175#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53798_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53798_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:11:24.63 +14:06:49.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.846 3968394273623801344 167.85259246075 +14.11346146578 15.0332 14.5864 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.846#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53841_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53841_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:01:51.11 +16:36:28.6 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.79)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53854_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53854_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:06:45.18 +11:27:34.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.92, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.90)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.399 3964575601020591104 166.68819986078 +11.45956736606 15.0987 14.5425 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.399#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53863_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53863_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:02:57.37 +16:45:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53865_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53865_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:32:21.17 +18:05:36.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.918 3890720644773707136 158.08770057100 +18.09235776308 15.1617 14.5388 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.918#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53874_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53874_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:00:16.41 +13:56:56.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.342 3968849402718117888 165.06800196769 +13.94917252713 15.0482 14.3705 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.342#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53876_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53876_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:54:40.13 +18:23:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08490_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 08490_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-35-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks