Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 04 16.2144  2461146.7144  13.43  10:04:45.45 +18:47:09.7
216.19276  50.91712 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 0.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
161 Athor                   -2     -0       2  13.9    -0    0
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits


fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits


fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits  wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits -crosshair 5485.56201 5107.42725 image    wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits -crosshair 5485.84619 5106.85400 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 04 16.21438 10 04 45.45 +18 47 09.7          13.4 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 04 16.21413 10 04 45.47 +18 47 09.6          13.4 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 04 16.21464 10 04 45.42 +18 47 09.8          13.4 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 04 16.2144*  10 04 45.45 +18 47 09.7  13.4 U             Leo       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7144,13.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2144 13.43CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 04 16.2144  2461146.7144  13.59  10:29:38.85 +25:01:11.0
208.60161  58.19427 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 0.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
508 Princetonia             -2      0       2  13.8     0    0
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits


fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits


fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits  wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits -crosshair 1969.28345 1346.61487 image    wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits -crosshair 1969.53638 1346.00732 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 04 16.21438 10 29 38.85 +25 01 11.0          13.6 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 04 16.21413 10 29 38.86 +25 01 10.8          13.5 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 04 16.21464 10 29 38.83 +25 01 11.3          13.6 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 04 16.2144*  10 29 38.85 +25 01 11.0  13.6 U             Leo       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7144,13.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2144 13.59CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 04 16.2144  2461146.7144  14.55  10:12:49.24 +17:47:11.5
218.79691  52.34911 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 0.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
909 Ulla                    -1      0       1  14.9    -0    0
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits


fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits


fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits  wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits -crosshair 4338.25537 5736.42822 image    wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits -crosshair 4338.21436 5735.73291 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 04 16.21438 10 12 49.24 +17 47 11.5          14.6 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 04 16.21413 10 12 49.19 +17 47 11.1          14.4 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 04 16.21464 10 12 49.28 +17 47 12.0          14.7 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 04 16.2144*  10 12 49.24 +17 47 11.5  14.6 U             Leo       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7144,14.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2144 14.55CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 04 16.2144  2461146.7144  14.66  09:56:53.21 +20:05:24.9
213.30433  49.59999 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 0.8 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
380 Fiducia                 -2     -0       2  14.8     0    0
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits


fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits


fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits  wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits -crosshair 6583.71191 4283.94434 image    wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits -crosshair 6583.92578 4283.16064 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 04 16.21438 09 56 53.21 +20 05 24.9          14.7 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 04 16.21413 09 56 53.22 +20 05 24.3          14.7 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 04 16.21464 09 56 53.19 +20 05 25.4          14.6 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 04 16.2144*  09 56 53.21 +20 05 24.9  14.7 U             Leo       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7144,14.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2144 14.66CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 04 16.2144  2461146.7144  13.86  10:15:47.95 +20:36:39.1
214.76491  53.97111 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 0.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
361 Bononia                 -0     -2       2  14.3    -0    0
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits


Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits


fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits


fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs   wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits -crosshair 5812.82324 2419.15430 image    wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -crosshair 5815.43652 2415.14624 image    wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits -crosshair 3896.41919 4028.46655 image    wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits -crosshair 3896.67676 4028.02686 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 04 16.21438 10 15 47.95 +20 36 39.1          13.9 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 04 16.21413 10 15 47.98 +20 36 39.6          13.8 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 04 16.21464 10 15 47.93 +20 36 38.5          13.9 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 04 16.2144*  10 15 47.95 +20 36 39.1  13.9 U             Leo       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7144,13.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2144 13.86CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461093.76950778 22.02.2026 06:27:55.472   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461093.76950778 22.02.2026 06:27:55.472   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last  image: 2461146.71463728 16.04.2026 05:08:54.661   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.53
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  6854
Objects passed selection criteria:  6828
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    3.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    3.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 5288.75
Average stars matched: 4855.75 (91.8128 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   112104 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Wed Apr 15 18:49:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-18-ga9a0ae89
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Thu Apr 16 00:17:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461093.76950778 22.02.2026 06:27:55.472   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461093.76950778 22.02.2026 06:27:55.472   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last  image: 2461146.71463728 16.04.2026 05:08:54.661   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 144
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  35208
Objects passed selection criteria:  35077
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.1    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.1    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 28138.2
Average stars matched: 25732 (91.4485 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   133988 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Wed Apr 15 18:49:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-18-ga9a0ae89
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Thu Apr 16 00:18:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Leo-02-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-02-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-02-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 689426 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 689426 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits_preview.png'

Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits


renamed 'Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits_preview.png'

Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 488.6927
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 511.6087
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 957.5625
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 512.2302
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 958.2144
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 512.4055
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.95944
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.fit
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                 -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     10.3900003433228 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 14.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-16T00:08:10.6248042' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-16T05:08:10.6248042' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61146.2140118517 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-16T05:08:20.5253200' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61146.2141264468 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                 -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     152.305223988446 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     21.9997771700514 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     63.5530555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     250.289722222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.11653963922865 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Leo-02'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 09 14'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+22 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20352 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20352 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     10.3900003433228 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     10.3900003433228 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 -4.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 26.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               897.49 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 14.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 30.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             1.800144 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             1.100088 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit
CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/d_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits :)

Spent 0.496914 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/d_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 40671.357813
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=26440.0, right_median=31961.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                 -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     10.6000003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 14.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-16T00:08:54.6610795' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-16T05:08:54.6610795' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61146.2145215394 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-16T05:09:04.5598901' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61146.2146360995 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                 -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     152.305224030725 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =      21.999777153799 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     63.4088888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     250.494722222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.11793918685115 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Leo-02'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 09 14'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+22 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20352 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20352 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     10.6000003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     10.6000003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 -4.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 26.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               897.49 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 14.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 30.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             1.800144 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             1.100088 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit
CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/d_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits :)

Spent 0.505524 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/d_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 40671.357813
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=26440.0, right_median=31961.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits



fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461146.71412759
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.7'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:07.513 +22:03:31.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:23.057 +21:58:17.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:09:07.513 +22:03:31.11
Second-epoch image center 10:09:23.057 +21:58:17.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1059 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:23.126 +21:58:13.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:09:07.513 +22:03:31.11
Second-epoch image center 10:09:23.126 +21:58:13.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1068 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  10:09:23.057 +21:58:17.13
Second-epoch second image center 10:09:23.126 +21:58:13.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00092 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00092 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.d7zZHXwIET
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aZAwlIzRIt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Om7CPhPfSG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.P2O2Nk7SCM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat 
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7416 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.6263 to 161.4713 deg, Dec +15.9835 to +27.7570 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.6263 to 161.4713 deg, Dec 15.9835 to 27.7570 deg
Loaded 5159 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3609 out of 3783 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3783 out of 7416 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.939489
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.939489
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.41

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.41

Magnitude calibration plot:


____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.4 pix  Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
 2.4 pix  Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
 2.5 pix  fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
 2.5 pix  fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.4 mag.  Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
 15.4 mag.  Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
 15.2 mag.  fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
 15.2 mag.  fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.2 (SNR )  12.3 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.d7zZHXwIET (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=459, passed=7416
Got 7416 stars (including 6953 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7416 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 529 to 590 (Dec 16.0 to 27.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 529 to 590 (Dec 16.0 to 27.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 
Excluding outliers - 901 stars left (next iteration limit 991)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.aZAwlIzRIt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=475, passed=7467
Got 7467 stars (including 6987 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7467 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 529 to 590 (Dec 16.0 to 27.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 529 to 590 (Dec 16.0 to 27.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Excluding outliers - 898 stars left (next iteration limit 987)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Om7CPhPfSG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=399, passed=6535
Got 6535 stars (including 6133 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6535 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6433 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6433 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 
Excluding outliers - 903 stars left (next iteration limit 994)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.P2O2Nk7SCM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=412, passed=6553
Got 6553 stars (including 6139 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6553 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6439 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6438 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6435 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 
Excluding outliers - 901 stars left (next iteration limit 992)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21448.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21448_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 21448_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    12.53    09:59:58.56 +21:14:59.7   6121 3597   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

**** FOUND  09:59:58.57 +21:14:60.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.52, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.50)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.417  629454429623625088 149.99400010127 +21.24989094562 12.6121 12.1594 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.417#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.7'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:07.513 +22:03:31.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:23.057 +21:58:17.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:09:07.513 +22:03:31.11
Second-epoch image center 10:09:23.057 +21:58:17.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1059 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:23.126 +21:58:13.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:09:07.513 +22:03:31.11
Second-epoch image center 10:09:23.126 +21:58:13.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1068 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  10:09:23.057 +21:58:17.13
Second-epoch second image center 10:09:23.126 +21:58:13.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00092 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00092 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.U4PyPQuXRp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.u70yYXbsUg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9a7gVxGfoS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.f22gLpa8Ty
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat 
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 36419 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.6171 to 161.4713 deg, Dec +15.9835 to +27.7791 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.6171 to 161.4713 deg, Dec 15.9835 to 27.7791 deg
Loaded 5179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3446 out of 3795 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3795 out of 36419 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.820111
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.820111
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.58

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.58

Magnitude calibration plot:


____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 94 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.3 pix  Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
 2.3 pix  Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.6 mag.  Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
 15.6 mag.  Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
 15.5 mag.  fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
 15.5 mag.  fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.5 (SNR )  14.8 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.U4PyPQuXRp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=1750, passed=36394
Got 36394 stars (including 34600 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36394 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 529 to 590 (Dec 16.0 to 27.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35738 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 529 to 590 (Dec 16.0 to 27.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35738 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35738 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 
Excluding outliers - 897 stars left (next iteration limit 986)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.u70yYXbsUg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1825, passed=36174
Got 36174 stars (including 34311 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36174 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 529 to 590 (Dec 16.0 to 27.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35506 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 529 to 590 (Dec 16.0 to 27.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35506 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35507 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Excluding outliers - 891 stars left (next iteration limit 981)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9a7gVxGfoS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=1467, passed=33957
Got 33957 stars (including 32432 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33957 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33323 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33323 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" 
Excluding outliers - 900 stars left (next iteration limit 990)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.f22gLpa8Ty (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=1487, passed=34004
Got 34004 stars (including 32467 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34004 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" 
Excluding outliers - 897 stars left (next iteration limit 986)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-27-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-28-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out51987.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out13809.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54239.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54491.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56427.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56760.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51986_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 51986_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.60    10:07:09.46 +17:46:08.0   5155 5733   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

**** FOUND  10:07:09.38 +17:46:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51987_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 51987_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.72    09:51:27.64 +24:23:56.6   7236 1642   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

**** FOUND  09:51:27.61 +24:23:56.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.079  643010828173659648 147.86560416380 +24.39873321085 14.7809 14.2194 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.079#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52587_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 52587_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    11.87    09:52:16.22 +24:33:59.8   7119 1546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52901_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 52901_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    12.44    09:53:23.78 +25:30:31.7   6939 0981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53217_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 53217_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    12.88    09:51:32.71 +24:49:31.4   7212 1384   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

**** FOUND  09:51:32.69 +24:49:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53219_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 53219_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    12.56    10:15:56.54 +18:29:19.3   3885 5314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53336_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 53336_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    12.80    10:19:47.77 +22:26:33.8   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53493_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 53493_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    13.10    09:52:57.64 +25:11:47.6   7007 1168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53565_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 53565_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    13.19    10:02:17.81 +25:50:52.6   5714 0824   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53631_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 53631_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    13.13    09:57:26.59 +21:21:30.2   6476 3519   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53907_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 53907_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    12.91    10:23:37.68 +18:02:48.4   2777 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53952_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 53952_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    13.28    09:50:50.52 +21:43:48.5   7398 3255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54096_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 54096_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    13.29    10:30:26.70 +25:39:36.7   1865 0953   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54203_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 54203_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    13.29    10:14:14.31 +17:54:37.8   4133 5663   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54239_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
Preparing report for the candidate 54239_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54307_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 54307_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    13.55    09:54:11.08 +22:49:18.1   6899 2616   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54372_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 54372_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    13.62    09:57:55.64 +20:42:38.8   6422 3913   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54447_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 54447_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    13.50    10:17:15.59 +18:21:23.3   3696 5396   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54491_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
Preparing report for the candidate 54491_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54512_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 54512_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    13.37    10:21:08.48 +19:51:30.5   3139 4487   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54577_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 54577_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    13.63    10:16:47.30 +21:41:27.7   3753 3376   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54578_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 54578_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    13.72    10:00:00.51 +21:15:25.5   6117 3593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

**** FOUND  10:00:00.47 +21:15:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54631_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 54631_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    13.60    10:28:55.25 +25:47:02.9   2076 0882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54640_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 54640_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    13.57    10:17:11.15 +18:55:51.2   3705 5047   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54722_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 54722_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    13.72    09:54:38.81 +18:16:24.7   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54798_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 54798_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    13.81    10:00:14.60 +18:02:16.7   6148 5544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54811_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 54811_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    13.65    10:11:56.18 +18:01:05.9   4464 5593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54843_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 54843_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    13.55    10:27:01.88 +22:09:03.5   2313 3094   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54861_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 54861_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    13.94    09:53:58.72 +22:16:49.1   6941 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54920_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 54920_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    13.91    10:05:18.09 +24:37:24.4   5322 1579   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54970_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 54970_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    13.73    10:27:31.80 +21:29:52.9   2238 3489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54976_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 54976_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    13.73    10:15:55.73 +22:34:18.1   3870 2843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55033_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 55033_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    13.80    10:11:54.52 +24:44:10.9   4413 1528   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55095_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 55095_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    13.72    10:08:18.57 +19:18:31.8   4971 4801   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55142_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 55142_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    13.92    09:56:10.43 +25:46:10.4   6552 0840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55146_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 55146_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    13.71    10:26:07.54 +20:52:03.4   2433 3873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55167_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 55167_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.14    09:51:37.11 +19:23:55.2   7355 4673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55171_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 55171_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    13.85    10:05:35.40 +18:57:42.6   5364 5003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55350_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 55350_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.07    10:21:09.98 +25:53:28.5   3140 0831   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55535_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 55535_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.11    09:58:53.07 +20:55:24.9   6282 3789   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55593_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 55593_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.46    09:59:15.42 +22:12:02.2   6203 3019   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55635_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 55635_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.09    10:19:46.62 +25:45:22.6   3330 0914   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55646_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 55646_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.21    10:08:54.79 +22:30:36.0   4849 2868   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55721_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 55721_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.02    10:00:07.26 +20:14:24.5   6121 4208   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55724_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 55724_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.19    10:09:35.32 +21:35:46.9   4765 3421   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

**** FOUND  10:09:35.31 +21:35:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55742_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 55742_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.13    10:17:59.16 +20:39:02.0   3587 4006   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55757_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 55757_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.32    10:04:47.21 +19:32:00.6   5470 4654   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55762_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 55762_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.43    10:09:28.81 +22:08:05.4   4774 3096   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55796_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 55796_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    13.97    10:21:05.59 +26:06:40.4   3150 0697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55893_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 55893_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.22    10:00:26.35 +17:58:30.7   6121 5583   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55924_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 55924_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.45    09:53:58.81 +25:45:47.5   6852 0830   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

**** FOUND  09:53:58.77 +25:45:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55963_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 55963_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.03    10:15:44.04 +19:24:22.9   3911 4757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56059_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 56059_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.47    10:27:01.51 +24:55:59.8   2332 1405   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

**** FOUND  10:27:01.53 +24:56:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56061_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 56061_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.59    09:52:37.89 +23:55:04.8   7086 1942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

**** FOUND  09:52:37.90 +23:55:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56107_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 56107_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.25    10:13:28.81 +24:45:01.1   4197 1522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56165_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 56165_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.24    09:55:31.70 +19:27:30.1   6793 4659   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56223_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 56223_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.58    10:16:17.59 +25:04:10.9   3809 1331   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56285_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 56285_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.78    09:49:57.84 +23:22:38.8   7473 2251   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56304_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 56304_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.61    09:52:34.43 +19:10:44.9   7224 4812   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56307_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 56307_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.34    10:26:43.10 +23:55:04.4   2368 2023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56330_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 56330_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.87    10:02:32.65 +24:55:27.7   5696 1386   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56344_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 56344_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.52    09:52:16.20 +19:05:25.8   7270 4864   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

**** FOUND  09:52:16.18 +19:05:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56350_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 56350_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.68    09:49:38.24 +24:57:23.5   7472 1290   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56423_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 56423_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.28    10:19:40.62 +17:57:09.3   3348 5644   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56427_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
Preparing report for the candidate 56427_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56437_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 56437_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.24    10:24:28.02 +21:40:09.5   2672 3389   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56444_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 56444_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.32    10:10:20.11 +19:18:26.9   4682 4807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56523_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 56523_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.62    09:59:43.81 +21:29:33.8   6151 3449   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56561_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 56561_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.81    09:51:05.83 +23:53:56.9   7300 1943   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

**** FOUND  09:51:05.85 +23:53:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56700_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 56700_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.69    10:05:15.83 +25:15:23.4   5318 1195   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56702_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 56702_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.78    09:58:18.01 +24:02:06.0   6298 1905   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

**** FOUND  09:58:17.95 +24:02:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56724_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 56724_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.67    10:22:48.69 +20:42:58.8   2903 3967   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56760_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
Preparing report for the candidate 56760_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56771_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 56771_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.41    10:16:56.58 +21:28:34.2   3732 3506   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56777_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 56777_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.77    10:28:04.59 +24:04:22.8   2180 1926   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56907_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 56907_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.65    10:23:15.26 +18:19:50.8   2832 5415   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56918_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 56918_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.73    10:19:57.58 +25:45:22.1   3305 0914   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56946_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 56946_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.31    10:19:19.61 +21:56:23.4   3396 3227   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56994_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 56994_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.38    10:14:37.81 +18:22:30.9   4074 5381   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57000_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 57000_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.74    10:20:40.12 +24:58:45.6   3208 1386   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57032_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 57032_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.97    09:56:10.34 +20:40:46.6   6671 3923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

**** FOUND  09:56:10.31 +20:40:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57119_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 57119_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.66    10:13:45.23 +26:15:57.9   4149 0601   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

**** FOUND  10:13:45.21 +26:15:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57156_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 57156_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.76    10:15:18.51 +21:52:19.9   3960 3265   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57172_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 57172_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.47    10:24:26.29 +22:37:43.5   2680 2808   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57288_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 57288_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.71    10:00:31.09 +21:20:41.1   6043 3542   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57356_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 57356_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    15.06    10:13:41.25 +26:11:20.4   4159 0648   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

**** FOUND  10:13:41.24 +26:11:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57519_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 57519_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    15.03    10:09:55.63 +20:36:12.1   4727 4022   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57791_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 57791_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.78    10:24:14.49 +23:00:31.8   2709 2578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57809_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 57809_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.96    10:20:57.83 +23:39:12.7   3167 2190   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57859_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 57859_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.94    10:13:48.93 +22:55:10.8   4163 2630   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

**** FOUND  10:13:48.95 +22:55:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57878_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 57878_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.67    10:21:52.54 +25:02:08.0   3042 1351   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57908_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 57908_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.64    10:22:01.21 +20:32:42.0   3015 4071   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13809_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
Preparing report for the candidate 13809_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18350_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 18350_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 16.21464    2461146.71464    14.19    09:57:52.49 +22:11:15.3   6397 3020   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_001246_TTUQ2b1x1_31617_5Jfdrog8/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-08-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 15s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:15:47.95 +20:36:39.1
10:04:45.45 +18:47:09.7
10:29:38.85 +25:01:11.0
10:12:49.24 +17:47:11.5
09:56:53.21 +20:05:24.9
########### Completed Leo-02-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
10:04:45.45 +18:47:09.7
10:29:38.85 +25:01:11.0
10:12:49.24 +17:47:11.5
09:56:53.21 +20:05:24.9
10:15:47.95 +20:36:39.1
###################################################################################
10:04:45.45 +18:47:09.7  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
10:29:38.85 +25:01:11.0  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
10:12:49.24 +17:47:11.5  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
09:56:53.21 +20:05:24.9  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
10:15:47.95 +20:36:39.1  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO   ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
09:59:58.57 +21:14:60.0
09:51:27.61 +24:23:56.4
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461146.71412759 -observatory V36
00:08:25.12 -01:56:27.8 Mercury (0.0mag)
03:09:41.52 +17:56:15.9 Venus (-3.9mag)
00:18:27.02 +00:55:54.3 Mars (1.2mag)
07:12:43.64 +22:46:04.2 Jupiter (-2.1mag)
00:29:16.61 +00:49:34.5 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:47:44.51 +19:47:37.2 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:10:52.09 -00:15:11.7 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:45.84 -22:52:36.4 Pluto (14.5mag)
00:26:35.37 +05:11:40.3 Moon (-8.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Apr 16 00:17 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461146.71412759:
07:12:47.53 +22:45:58.4 Io (5.8mag)
07:12:50.92 +22:45:51.0 Europa (5.9mag)
07:12:59.69 +22:45:26.3 Ganymede (5.4mag)
07:13:19.02 +22:44:51.5 Callisto (6.6mag)
07:16:03.33 +22:33:35.8 Himalia (15.3mag)
07:12:39.84 +22:46:12.1 Thebe (16.2mag)
07:16:14.99 +23:03:48.3 Elara (17.3mag)
07:11:37.41 +23:25:57.8 Pasiphae (17.4mag)
07:21:03.07 +22:44:06.8 Carme (18.5mag)
00:29:16.75 +00:50:01.1 Titan (8.8mag)
00:29:15.62 +00:49:37.7 Rhea (10.1mag)
00:28:56.26 +00:49:41.9 Iapetus (11.5mag)
00:29:24.17 +00:49:55.2 Hyperion (14.8mag)
00:30:53.34 +00:58:21.3 Phoebe (16.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Apr 16 00:17 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461146.71412759:
15:39:18.38 -16:25:21.5 JWST
14:20:55.74 +56:10:09.4 Chandra
08:06:22.77 -40:43:30.0 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Apr 16 00:17 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461146.71412759 -observatory V36
-> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180]
18:52:05.49 -28:47:29.7 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:06:53.30 -69:39:06.1 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:32:29.53 +31:26:19.7 17.2mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:30:24.90 +10:34:23.0 17.6mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:10:16.89 +29:14:14.4 17.1mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
04:29:29.13 +26:02:39.1 16.0mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:03:27.93 +32:01:08.1 16.2mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:31:06.34 -00:07:49.7 17.3mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:53:40.87 +18:33:01.4 17.6mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:40:36.33 -11:31:06.6 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
09:07:32.17 -11:50:56.1 17.6mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS)
21:54:25.87 +62:55:07.8 17.5mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
19:19:00.90 -03:44:09.8 14.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
21:32:06.87 +85:56:27.8 17.8mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:17:59.79 +63:30:43.1 17.2mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
05:13:44.04 +18:22:45.3 11.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
16:19:08.34 +06:25:32.0 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:20:52.34 +15:19:57.1 14.6mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
03:26:33.63 -22:21:10.5 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:16:53.61 +45:14:16.3 17.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
13:37:56.70 +45:37:46.9 15.2mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
03:25:36.81 -26:14:42.2 17.8mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS)
23:45:19.73 +18:32:17.3 8.5mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:54:01.52 +03:01:32.9 17.4mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
03:29:40.98 +02:35:50.2 13.4mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS)
00:00:11.28 +37:15:31.4 14.6mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
18:43:21.22 -09:42:27.6 11.8mag 10P/Tempel
15:00:01.00 +03:11:13.4 14.0mag 24P/Schaumasse
11:02:44.70 -01:31:09.4 15.7mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
18:01:01.52 -09:36:08.3 17.9mag 40P/Vaisala
10:37:33.30 -04:04:54.8 16.9mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
01:49:00.30 +17:31:26.7 17.2mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
07:11:09.48 +36:58:00.3 17.0mag 63P/Wild
23:29:19.84 -11:25:30.4 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
04:03:49.25 +21:19:42.7 15.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
01:06:02.91 +08:16:14.7 14.3mag 78P/Gehrels
23:03:39.15 -09:19:40.0 14.6mag 88P/Howell
02:11:00.37 +20:41:57.7 15.1mag 93P/Lovas
04:55:12.38 +32:17:56.8 16.2mag 123P/West-Hartley
08:28:36.72 +38:15:44.5 16.2mag 124P/Mrkos
02:33:32.79 +14:23:37.9 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
02:47:57.43 +14:31:09.4 17.5mag 131P/Mueller
01:27:17.44 +13:18:44.5 10.6mag 141P/Machholz
01:36:11.40 +04:57:14.8 10.6mag 141P-A/Machholz
00:21:22.95 +00:51:20.5 12.8mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:06:32.17 +06:42:47.9 17.8mag 141P-I/Machholz
01:02:58.56 -01:25:05.0 15.1mag 162P/SidingSpring
14:51:03.21 -00:02:45.4 17.7mag 210P/Christensen
21:39:28.04 -11:23:49.1 17.6mag 218P/LINEAR
17:16:37.31 -13:54:27.3 16.1mag 235P/LINEAR
05:34:56.63 +34:42:54.0 16.8mag 240P/NEAT
07:38:35.91 -05:08:38.3 17.7mag 242P/Spahr
22:17:26.69 -20:55:22.7 17.9mag 260P/McNaught
01:58:37.57 +20:30:52.0 18.0mag 295P/LINEAR
15:42:33.77 +07:00:16.7 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
07:34:16.66 +21:22:00.1 17.7mag 450P/LONEOS
05:36:10.94 +45:01:12.3 17.5mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K Apr 16 00:17 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50  SN2026huo  2026-04-12.14 16.96
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50    2026-04-12.14 16.96
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10  AT2026ixd  2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40  SN2026icy  2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30  SN2026gud  2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90  ASASSN-26cs  2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10  ASASSN-26cr  2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90  AT2026ihl  2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80  AT2026imw  2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50  ASASSN-26cq  2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80  ASASSN-26cp  2026-04-9.29 13.32
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70  SN2026idh  2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40  AT2026imr  2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40  AT2026hei  2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80  AT2026ihm  2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30  AT2026imo  2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80  SN 2026hnn  2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80  ASASSN-26cn  2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30  ASASSN-26co  2026-04-7.15 15.11
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20  AT2026hvw  2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00  ASASSN-26cl  2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40  ASASSN-26cm  2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60  ASASSN-26ck  2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20  AT2026hyy  2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90  ASASSN-26cj  2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40  SN2026gvk  2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20  SN2026gzx  2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70  ASASSN-26ci  2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00  SN2026hkg  2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00  SN2026fin  2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60  ASASSN-26ch  2026-03-28.12 13.14
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00  SN2026fwt  2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20  ASASSN-26ce  2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50  AT2026hiy  2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80  ASASSN-26cg  2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20  SN2026fzb  2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30  ASASSN-26cd  2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70  AT2026gzl  2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50  ASASSN-26cf  2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60  SN 2026evz  2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50  ASASSN-26bx  2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10  ASASSN-26bw  2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80  ASASSN-26ca  2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20  SN 2026fvx  2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60  ASASSN-26bz  2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.87 -53:16:33.70  ASASSN-26cc  2026-03-20.08 3.93
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20  SN 2026fmh  2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50  ASASSN-26cb  2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50  ASASSN-26by  2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60  SN2026fjc  2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20  ASASSN-26bv  2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.90 -45:55:38.40  ASASSN-26bt  2026-03-19.05 16.24
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10  ASASSN-26bu  2026-03-19.19 15.74
06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00  SN 2026eza  2026-03-18.2 17.48
11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90  AT2026fsf  2026-03-18.14 16.95
10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30  SN 2026enn  2026-03-18.13 17.53
20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00  AT 2026ezy  2026-03-18.13 16.83
06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30  ASASSN-26bs  2026-03-18.02 16.93
07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20  ASASSN-26br  2026-03-16.16 16.78
19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40  AT 2023uk  2026-03-16.35 14.2
04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10  AT2026fhw  2026-03-14.06 SDSS
11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10  SN2026drr  2026-03-14.08 0.2
07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90  ASASSN-26bo  2026-03-14.17 13.8
16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40  SN2026ebt  2026-03-12.41 17.12
13:01:19.45 +15:42:15.00  SN2026ehe  2026-03-12.11 -0.29
09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70  SN2026efq  2026-03-12.16 0.06
03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00  SN2026evh  2026-03-12.05 17.29
06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10  AT2026ffp  2026-03-12.16 0.37
14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50  AT2026fij  2026-03-12.05 15.97
10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10  SN 2026exe  2026-03-11.78 16.48
18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00  SN2026ess  2026-03-12.37 17.37
13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80  AT2026ewa  2026-03-12.42 16.77
15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20  ASASSN-26bp  2026-03-11.92 13.33
13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20  AT2024cmo  2026-03-11.12 16.29
13:06:01.97 -15:50:14.40  AT2026fdy  2026-03-10.33 16.68
11:30:09.67 -47:26:43.70  ASASSN-26bn  2026-03-10.12 15.2
05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40  (= Gaia  2026-03-9.09 14.32
03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70  ASASSN-26bm  2026-03-8.04 15.22
04:31:00.53 -68:29:50.20  ASASSN-26bl  2026-03-7.9 10.26
16:18:17.61 +41:25:11.40  SN 2026dkf  2026-03-6.31 16.7
13:45:00.35 +61:16:50.90  SN 2026ejl  2026-03-6.41 -0.66
09:27:45.48 -37:49:32.80  ASASSN-26bk  2026-03-2.3 13.11
20:22:01.20 +23:47:47.30  ASASSN-26bi  2026-02-28.51 15.86
11:16:22.10 +29:26:22.80  AT2026enm  2026-02-28.39 16.88
08:05:59.83 -48:39:35.60  ASASSN-26bh  2026-02-26.05 14.64
13:24:27.02 -45:57:01.40  ASASSN-26bg  2026-02-26.35 15.28
17:27:50.95 -68:28:46.40  ASASSN-26bf  2026-02-26.3 16.28
18:03:39.37 +19:58:46.70  ASASSN-26be  2026-02-25.58 14.8
17:40:18.19 +07:20:59.60  SN 2026crm  2026-02-24.34 16.9
18:38:36.11 -79:28:58.40  ASASSN-26bb  2026-02-24.36 16.11
17:43:29.75 +11:24:00.60  ASASSN-26bc  2026-02-23.37 -3.37
16:59:41.08 -80:01:51.20  ASASSN-26bd  2026-02-23.3 14.38
11:23:31.77 -08:39:15.40  SN2026cff  2026-02-23.15 -1.08
14:55:17.39 -05:56:05.30  SN2026dmk  2026-02-23.22 -0.76
12:28:15.19 +44:27:20.80  SN2026cjz  2026-02-23.47 15.62
12:12:29.55 -02:40:43.30  AT2026dsk  2026-02-23.4 17.21
09:21:05.29 +06:11:42.80  SN2026chr  2026-02-23.1 17.39
16:05:38.61 +18:06:07.40  SN 2026dsy  2026-02-23.36 17.15
04:55:50.66 -29:52:57.70  SN 2026dpg  2026-02-23.11 15.75
04:21:28.18 -53:22:54.40  AT2026drl  2026-02-21.03 17.31
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K Apr 16 00:17 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
09:54:46.47 +69:06:31.7  PNV J09544647+6906317  2026-01-26.8081  19.3mag
18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9  TCP J18085199-2616219  2026-01-31.8519  12.2mag
08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1  TCP J08011102-0343141  2026-02-08.8090  15.10Cmag
05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5  TCP J05191540-0204515  2026-02-13.4306  14.5mag
10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9  TCP J10524126+3640089  2026-02-17.6065  17.4mag
05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1  TCP J05505081+3622451  2026-02-17.5511  15.7mag
00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1  PNV J00425133+4113491  2026-02-20.738  18.3mag
00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4  PNV J00430488+4129414  2026-02-20.5923  18.84Cmag
17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3  TCP J17432974+1124003  2026-02-22.3773  13.6mag
09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7  PNV J09550159+6908427  2026-02-20.893  19.0mag
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1  TCP J07032576-1241401  2026-03-10.4268  15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8  PNV J00423682+4116058  2026-03-12.5744  17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1  TCP J07264579-2745141  2026-03-17.4417  14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7  TCP J17571956-2808147  2026-03-19.7972  14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7  TCP J08460573+1047397  2026-03-21.1936  14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7  PNV J09553883+6905217  2026-04-01.893  19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7  TCP J19324367-2239307  2026-04-05.4395  13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9  TCP J16163603+4452289  2026-04-05.6655  14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4  PNV J00433836+4115324  2026-04-08.079  17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8  TCP J15411168+5918268  2026-04-12.9625  19.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K Apr 16 00:17 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
13:05:52.366 +54:55:43.46  AT 2026iyp  2026-04-07.29 20.3633
15:52:32.558 +54:28:28.21  AT 2026iyo  2026-04-07.50 19.8736
12:10:51.131 -15:24:05.80  AT 2026iyn  2026-04-07.49 19.8
10:03:32.464 +00:47:38.92  AT 2026iym  2026-04-09.07 21.7842
09:57:46.577 +02:32:54.17  AT 2026iyl  2026-04-09.07 21.1159
12:09:21.288 -14:20:40.69  AT 2026iyk  2026-02-24.42 19.0617
11:32:15.323 +26:34:23.97  AT 2026iyi  2026-04-07.27 20.0038
08:41:36.643 +41:14:51.53  AT 2026iyh  2026-03-18.28 20.5874
11:10:47.748 -02:27:00.61  AT 2026iyg  2026-04-07.26 20.12
11:41:25.329 -11:32:16.55  AT 2026iyf  2026-04-07.25 20.8489
09:58:35.594 -17:44:37.57  AT 2026iye  2026-04-08.19 19.4848
07:48:08.582 +43:35:35.35  AT 2026iyd  2026-04-05.16 19.8382
11:13:43.729 +21:50:31.84  AT 2026iyc  2026-04-05.18 20.0005
08:02:45.458 +40:40:22.73  AT 2026iyb  2026-03-26.18 20.4831
13:05:52.496 +64:22:32.75  AT 2026iya  2026-03-08.94 19.29
05:15:26.423 -02:54:24.54  AT 2026ixz  2026-04-08.14 19.1905
14:04:24.118 +43:40:15.80  AT 2026ixt  2026-04-08.93 19.74
13:12:41.279 +38:05:24.08  AT 2026ixs  2026-04-08.93 20.18
13:21:56.843 -04:01:33.33  AT 2026ixr  2026-04-08.90 19.48
12:04:52.343 +69:44:57.80  AT 2026ixq  2026-04-08.89 19.03
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Apr 16 00:17 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Thu Apr 16 00:16:36 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 28s (0.47 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 1s (0.02 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 2s (0.03 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 39s (0.65 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 11 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 2 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 2 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 3 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 23s (0.38 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 0s (0.00 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 4s (0.07 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 2s (0.03 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 1s (0.02 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 3s (0.05 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 15s (0.25 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 46s (0.77 min)
FIELD_Leo-02-Q2b1x1: 96s (1.60 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 112s (1.87 min)
Finished: Thu Apr 16 00:18:28 CDT 2026