This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2133* 11 12 20.57 +01 33 20.8 12.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7133,12.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2133 12.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2133* 11 02 44.64 -01 31 09.5 13.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7133,13.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2133 13.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.90639640 18.01.2026 09:45:02.649 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
First image: 2461058.90639640 18.01.2026 09:45:02.649 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Last image: 2461146.71357755 16.04.2026 05:07:23.100 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6096
Objects passed selection criteria: 6069
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4769
Average stars matched: 4334.25 (90.8838 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111552 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 15 18:49:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-18-ga9a0ae89
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 00:13:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.90639640 18.01.2026 09:45:02.649 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
First image: 2461058.90639640 18.01.2026 09:45:02.649 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Last image: 2461146.71357755 16.04.2026 05:07:23.100 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 122
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 33432
Objects passed selection criteria: 33323
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 27062
Average stars matched: 24628.8 (91.0086 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 133136 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 15 18:49:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-18-ga9a0ae89
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 00:14:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461146.71303339
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits'
wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:34.742 -01:59:53.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:32.652 -01:59:40.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:34.742 -01:59:53.74
Second-epoch image center 11:08:32.652 -01:59:40.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0094 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:33.967 -01:59:30.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:34.742 -01:59:53.74
Second-epoch image center 11:08:33.967 -01:59:30.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0073 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:32.652 -01:59:40.51
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:33.967 -01:59:30.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00618 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PPgRZiF18V
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yjoTROJvnd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xwmwSp3g2X
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sbF8yDzwk9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6399 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2436 to 175.0501 deg, Dec -7.2952 to +3.3133 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2436 to 175.0501 deg, Dec -7.2952 to 3.3133 deg
Loaded 3835 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3238 out of 3372 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3372 out of 6399 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.879752
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.879752
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
2.2 pix Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
2.4 pix fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
2.4 pix fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
15.2 mag. Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.PPgRZiF18V (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=432, passed=6399
Got 6399 stars (including 5960 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6399 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6330 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yjoTROJvnd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=407, passed=6519
Got 6519 stars (including 6107 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6519 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6416 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xwmwSp3g2X (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=413, passed=6210
Got 6210 stars (including 5797 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6210 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sbF8yDzwk9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=438, passed=6113
Got 6113 stars (including 5671 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6113 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21163_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 21163_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:00:24.14 -02:42:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:34.742 -01:59:53.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:32.652 -01:59:40.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:34.742 -01:59:53.74
Second-epoch image center 11:08:32.652 -01:59:40.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0094 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:33.967 -01:59:30.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:34.742 -01:59:53.74
Second-epoch image center 11:08:33.967 -01:59:30.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0073 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:32.652 -01:59:40.51
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:33.967 -01:59:30.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00618 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vLFPIsgb2w
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NiQZOD8Ybp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits &> /tmp/tmp.J6GkAMWr9j
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1e9z6fAHnU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 34371 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2400 to 175.0938 deg, Dec -7.3026 to +3.3144 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2400 to 175.0938 deg, Dec -7.3026 to 3.3144 deg
Loaded 3852 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3086 out of 3398 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3398 out of 34371 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.774901
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.774901
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 78 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
2.2 pix Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
15.3 mag. Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.vLFPIsgb2w (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1404, passed=34365
Got 34365 stars (including 32904 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34365 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NiQZOD8Ybp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1420, passed=33111
Got 33111 stars (including 31640 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33111 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32671 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32673 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32673 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.J6GkAMWr9j (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1489, passed=33228
Got 33228 stars (including 31695 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33228 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1e9z6fAHnU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1524, passed=33863
Got 33863 stars (including 32293 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33863 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33530 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33531 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33531 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-06-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_001049_TTUQ2b1x1_20976_LrdX691l/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out51393.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out51396.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out56427.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out56619.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out56966.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52588.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51393_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 51393_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:13:06.42 -04:03:41.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.80)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.017 3789880589395548800 168.27728023165 -04.06139830224 14.9579 14.4524 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.017#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51396_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 51396_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:59:49.06 -02:17:45.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.224 3801840802004138368 164.95475337616 -02.29589602083 14.5827 14.0045 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.224#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51404_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 51404_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:02:26.10 +00:05:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51406_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 51406_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:25:45.09 +01:31:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51408_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 51408_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:20:24.04 -01:03:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52049_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52049_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52170_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52170_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:06:44.98 +01:57:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52397_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52397_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52588_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
Preparing report for the candidate 52588_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52794_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52794_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52852_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52852_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53018_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 53018_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53239_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 53239_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53341_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 53341_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53463_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 53463_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53501_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 53501_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53557_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
Preparing report for the candidate 53557_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54066_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 54066_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:05:57.98 -05:23:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54161_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 54161_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54164_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 54164_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54171_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 54171_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54346_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 54346_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54375_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 54375_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:05:54.86 +01:12:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54428_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 54428_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54441_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 54441_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54445_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 54445_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54446_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 54446_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54531_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 54531_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54542_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 54542_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:51:36.75 -02:35:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54561_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 54561_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54566_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 54566_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54646_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 54646_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54663_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 54663_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54678_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 54678_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54739_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 54739_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54745_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 54745_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54972_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 54972_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55101_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 55101_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55155_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 55155_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55184_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 55184_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55289_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 55289_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55387_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 55387_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55446_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 55446_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55449_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 55449_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55471_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 55471_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55476_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 55476_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55487_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 55487_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55602_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 55602_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55624_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 55624_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55630_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 55630_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55701_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 55701_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55746_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 55746_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55826_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 55826_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55865_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 55865_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55909_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 55909_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55990_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 55990_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55993_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 55993_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56022_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56022_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:55:07.36 -03:56:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56023_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56023_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56116_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56116_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56248_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56248_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56328_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56328_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:21:05.39 -05:41:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56369_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56369_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56394_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56394_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56427_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56427_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:50:51.72 +01:40:04.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.89)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.253 3808292255199867904 162.71562362015 +01.66761916606 14.8213 14.1675 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.253#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56446_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56446_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56534_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56534_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56552_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56552_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56589_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56589_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:15:12.63 -06:10:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56619_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56619_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:52:01.17 +00:32:08.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.487 3807873650507206400 163.00489610631 +00.53514303656 14.9074 14.3649 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.487#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56700_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56700_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56765_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56765_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56781_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56781_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:09:02.58 +00:06:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56782_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56782_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:06:01.48 +01:39:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56794_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56794_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56814_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56814_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56966_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56966_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:13:36.23 +00:20:28.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.350 3810116070112317056 168.40105523243 +00.34125931659 15.0093 14.3918 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.350#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14520_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 14520_fd_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks