This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2115* 10 11 37.30 +15 39 02.1 11.0 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7115,11.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2115 11.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2115* 09 49 06.43 +16 21 21.0 12.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7115,12.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2115 12.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2115* 09 32 09.79 +09 17 25.2 13.0 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7115,12.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2115 12.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2115* 09 37 37.72 +16 52 26.1 13.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7115,13.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2115 13.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2115* 10 07 13.14 +10 07 14.6 14.0 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7115,14.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2115 14.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7115,14.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2115 14.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2115* 10 12 49.33 +17 47 12.3 14.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7115,14.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2115 14.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2115* 09 27 47.02 +14 00 06.5 14.7 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461146.7115,14.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260416.2115 14.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2115* 10 19 18.26 +16 50 38.2 14.7 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461146.7115,14.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260416.2115 14.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 16.2115* 09 23 32.23 +17 16 06.8 14.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461146.7115,14.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260416.2115 14.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.86919819 18.01.2026 08:51:28.724 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
First image: 2461058.86919819 18.01.2026 08:51:28.724 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Last image: 2461146.71180398 16.04.2026 05:04:49.864 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8002
Objects passed selection criteria: 7996
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7542.25
Average stars matched: 7342.75 (97.3549 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113360 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 15 18:49:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-18-ga9a0ae89
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 00:12:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.86919819 18.01.2026 08:51:28.724 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
First image: 2461058.86919819 18.01.2026 08:51:28.724 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Last image: 2461146.71180398 16.04.2026 05:04:49.864 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 292
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 26 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 45214
Objects passed selection criteria: 45080
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 42729.5
Average stars matched: 41113.2 (96.2175 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 143504 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 15 18:49:36 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-18-ga9a0ae89
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 16 00:13:35 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461146.71115971
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:34.262 +13:59:45.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:43.099 +13:58:38.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:34.262 +13:59:45.34
Second-epoch image center 09:46:43.099 +13:58:38.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0402 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:43.840 +13:58:43.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:34.262 +13:59:45.34
Second-epoch image center 09:46:43.840 +13:58:43.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0424 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:46:43.099 +13:58:38.85
Second-epoch second image center 09:46:43.840 +13:58:43.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00321 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits &> /tmp/tmp.StlyYKgJZQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits &> /tmp/tmp.b790pa4I3D
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.d9GY0l59Uq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fr3ctI8j3q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7958 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.3852 to 154.9366 deg, Dec +8.6225 to +19.2659 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.3852 to 154.9366 deg, Dec 8.6225 to 19.2659 deg
Loaded 4773 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3901 out of 4125 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4125 out of 7958 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.893593
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.893593
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
2.1 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
15.4 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.StlyYKgJZQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=534, passed=7958
Got 7958 stars (including 7414 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7958 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7692 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7692 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.b790pa4I3D (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=535, passed=8039
Got 8039 stars (including 7496 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8039 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7745 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7745 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.d9GY0l59Uq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=483, passed=7216
Got 7216 stars (including 6719 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7216 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6998 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6999 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6999 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fr3ctI8j3q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=484, passed=7147
Got 7147 stars (including 6652 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7147 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 914 stars left (next iteration limit 1005)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20459.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20641.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20527.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20459_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 20459_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:15:06.84 +12:30:00.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.28, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.26)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.191 3880874625521522048 153.77862657411 +12.50039035794 12.3683 11.8567 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.191#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20460_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 20460_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:15:09.14 +13:50:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20527_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
Preparing report for the candidate 20527_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20630_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 20630_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:57:57.92 +15:51:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20638_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 20638_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:57:04.05 +13:12:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20641_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 20641_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:43:03.58 +10:19:00.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.356 612591803903942016 145.76491250282 +10.31698758639 13.0147 12.5926 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.356#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20643_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 20643_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:19:25.17 +16:59:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:11:37.30 +15:39:02.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:34.262 +13:59:45.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:43.099 +13:58:38.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:34.262 +13:59:45.34
Second-epoch image center 09:46:43.099 +13:58:38.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0402 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:43.840 +13:58:43.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:34.262 +13:59:45.34
Second-epoch image center 09:46:43.840 +13:58:43.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0424 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:46:43.099 +13:58:38.85
Second-epoch second image center 09:46:43.840 +13:58:43.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00321 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RhNP4AtqBu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Nps9xXmtpv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gcjLFnEnXc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AIUKQFiz0d
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43775 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.3793 to 154.9626 deg, Dec +8.6120 to +19.2857 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.3793 to 154.9626 deg, Dec 8.6120 to 19.2857 deg
Loaded 4796 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3707 out of 4153 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4153 out of 43775 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.782622
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.782622
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 262 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
2.0 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
15.5 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.RhNP4AtqBu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=1969, passed=43753
Got 43753 stars (including 41699 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43753 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42351 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Nps9xXmtpv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1988, passed=43712
Got 43712 stars (including 41658 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43712 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42220 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42219 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 908 stars left (next iteration limit 998)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gcjLFnEnXc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1816, passed=42260
Got 42260 stars (including 40386 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.1 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.1 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AIUKQFiz0d (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1825, passed=42350
Got 42350 stars (including 40456 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42350 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.1 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.1 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40995 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40995 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 909 stars left (next iteration limit 999)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-16_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_000546_TTUQ1b1x1_15753_3x8V15VD/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52956.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52957.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52960.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52961.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52962.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52968.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53622.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53624.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53798.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53874.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54135.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54137.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54160.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54173.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54181.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54217.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54235.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54296.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54313.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54315.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54334.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54336.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54372.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54379.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out54156.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out54200.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53166.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53276.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53427.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53646.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53934.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54014.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54057.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54126.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54153.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 26s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52953_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52953_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:06:04.28 +12:35:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52954_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52954_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:44:47.66 +13:28:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52956_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52956_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:17:41.39 +10:17:14.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.72, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.70)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.939 591017019240298112 139.42197503977 +10.28753094678 14.7593 13.8907 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.939#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52957_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52957_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:27:35.42 +16:20:27.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.050 631149777771196928 141.89782011521 +16.34118300856 14.8745 14.1577 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.050#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52960_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52960_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:17:33.76 +13:29:01.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.55, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.53)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.320 606307545195228672 139.39064784156 +13.48352413561 14.6485 14.1950 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.320#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52961_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52961_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:22:42.61 +14:16:47.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.49)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52962_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52962_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:30:37.64 +16:09:58.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.798 619100264201112832 142.65695459445 +16.16595028568 14.7837 14.3021 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.798#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52963_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52963_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:21:11.89 +17:13:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52965_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52965_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:32:10.61 +13:46:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52966_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52966_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:38:03.53 +14:24:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52967_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52967_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:22:27.47 +13:15:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52968_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52968_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:56:19.01 +09:52:51.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.28, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.26)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.702 3879296822040219264 149.07875799966 +09.88119077216 13.4623 12.9610 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.702#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52969_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52969_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:24:41.42 +11:37:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53035_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53035_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:11:37.30 +15:39:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53046_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53046_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53085_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53085_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53093_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53093_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53095_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53095_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53111_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53111_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53123_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53123_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53124_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53124_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:32:28.27 +09:05:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53129_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53129_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53136_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53136_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53152_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53152_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53156_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53156_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53166_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
Preparing report for the candidate 53166_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53181_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53181_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53207_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53207_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53210_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53210_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53225_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53225_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:30:25.82 +12:57:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53236_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53236_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53240_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53240_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53242_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53242_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53263_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53263_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:39:00.87 +14:25:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53276_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
Preparing report for the candidate 53276_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53282_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53282_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53295_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53295_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53317_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53317_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53325_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53325_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:48:01.94 +18:05:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53329_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53329_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53330_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53330_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53340_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53340_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53359_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53359_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53361_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53361_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53363_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53363_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53365_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53365_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53372_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53372_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53381_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53381_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53396_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53396_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53399_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53399_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53403_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53403_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:31:05.18 +11:30:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53407_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53407_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:31:51.15 +17:15:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53408_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53408_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53412_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53412_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53422_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53422_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53423_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53423_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53425_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53425_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53427_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
Preparing report for the candidate 53427_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53431_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53431_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53434_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53434_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53435_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53435_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:04:22.50 +13:37:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53442_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53442_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53444_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53444_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:29:04.07 +17:44:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53451_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53451_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53453_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53453_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53454_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53454_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53455_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53455_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53464_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53464_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53467_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53467_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53470_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53470_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53474_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53474_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:32:04.40 +11:19:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53475_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53475_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53477_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53477_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53481_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53481_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53486_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53486_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53493_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53493_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53496_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53496_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53506_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53506_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53513_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53513_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53523_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53523_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53527_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53527_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53529_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53529_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53532_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53532_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53537_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53537_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53559_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53559_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53561_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53561_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53563_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53563_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53569_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53569_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53571_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53571_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53575_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53575_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53585_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53585_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53592_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53592_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:22:22.78 +17:50:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53596_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53596_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53604_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53604_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:52:12.28 +16:27:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53616_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53616_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53622_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53622_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:08:43.82 +10:39:04.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.979 3880067236093948672 152.18259948843 +10.65092294414 13.8945 13.1481 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.979#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53624_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53624_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:44:02.20 +17:34:01.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.05, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.03)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.965 621018190436799488 146.00929615372 +17.56723796326 13.5267 12.4573 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.965#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53627_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53627_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53635_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53635_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53636_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53636_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53639_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53639_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53646_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
Preparing report for the candidate 53646_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53652_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53652_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:29:04.60 +17:51:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53655_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53655_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53660_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53660_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53668_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53668_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53672_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53672_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:18:40.61 +13:49:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53673_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53673_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53674_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53674_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53679_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53679_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53682_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53682_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53688_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53688_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53695_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53695_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53700_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53700_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53701_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53701_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53704_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53704_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53726_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53726_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53732_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53732_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53737_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53737_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53740_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53740_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53742_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53742_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53746_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53746_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53754_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53754_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53755_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53755_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53756_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53756_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53758_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53758_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53765_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53765_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53769_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53769_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53776_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53776_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:33:10.77 +15:43:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53781_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53781_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53784_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53784_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53787_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53787_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53791_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53791_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53793_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53793_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53797_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53797_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53798_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53798_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:29:08.79 +10:26:00.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.32, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.30)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.356 589382938803326976 142.28662139087 +10.43429344626 14.7712 14.3089 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.356#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53799_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53799_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53801_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53801_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:30:38.60 +17:04:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53809_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53809_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53810_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53810_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53816_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53816_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53823_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53823_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53825_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53825_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53827_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53827_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53831_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53831_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53833_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53833_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53840_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53840_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53846_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53846_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53850_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53850_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53852_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53852_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53853_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53853_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53858_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53858_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53865_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53865_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53866_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53866_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:54:27.10 +09:50:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53872_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53872_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53873_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53873_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53874_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53874_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:11:14.59 +08:57:28.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.931 3876563887105378432 152.81092935258 +08.95840764292 14.5932 14.0178 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.931#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53879_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53879_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53890_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53890_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53893_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53893_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53897_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53897_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53901_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53901_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53906_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53906_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53912_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53912_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53914_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53914_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53916_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53916_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53922_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53922_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53925_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53925_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53931_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53931_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53934_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
Preparing report for the candidate 53934_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53936_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53936_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53938_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53938_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53948_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53948_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:24:51.02 +09:48:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53950_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53950_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53951_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53951_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53954_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53954_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53956_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53956_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53958_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53958_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:39:15.66 +12:26:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53961_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53961_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53971_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53971_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:34:34.27 +16:56:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53979_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53979_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53981_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53981_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:40:35.37 +15:02:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53989_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53989_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53990_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53990_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53995_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53995_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53997_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 53997_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54002_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54002_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54005_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54005_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54013_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54013_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54014_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
Preparing report for the candidate 54014_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54019_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54019_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54022_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54022_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54027_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54027_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54034_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54034_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54035_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54035_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54039_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54039_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54042_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54042_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54043_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54043_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54055_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54055_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:16:41.39 +16:21:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54057_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
Preparing report for the candidate 54057_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54059_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54059_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:34:48.63 +12:14:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54062_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54062_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54070_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54070_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54075_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54075_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54083_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54083_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54084_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54084_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54089_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54089_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54090_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54090_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54107_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54107_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54109_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54109_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54110_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54110_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:29:29.65 +16:52:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54114_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54114_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54122_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54122_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54126_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
Preparing report for the candidate 54126_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54130_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54130_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54135_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54135_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:28:05.25 +12:04:04.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.87)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.881 593208822655356032 142.02161205897 +12.06701987004 15.0321 14.4498 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.881#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54137_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54137_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:25:19.03 +16:10:57.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.988 630783228080879616 141.32975724301 +16.18242568937 14.8233 13.7798 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.988#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54140_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54140_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54149_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54149_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54151_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54151_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54153_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
Preparing report for the candidate 54153_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54156_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54156_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:25:15.27 +10:53:10.8 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.78)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54160_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54160_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:09:18.40 +09:37:24.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.89)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.149 3876840208121342080 152.32675333913 +09.62322037256 14.8656 14.3275 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.149#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54164_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54164_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54167_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54167_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54170_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54170_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54173_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54173_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:27:01.35 +18:39:42.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.945 633954700651659776 141.75563806305 +18.66123755081 14.9172 14.2082 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.945#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54174_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54174_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54181_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54181_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:21:15.87 +16:22:58.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.79)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.926 631023467076022144 140.31637095239 +16.38273066453 14.7892 14.2062 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.926#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54188_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54188_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54194_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54194_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:47:33.95 +14:09:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54199_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54199_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54200_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54200_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:15:47.88 +09:59:38.2 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.85)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54206_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54206_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54211_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54211_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:43:23.25 +12:37:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54212_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54212_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54217_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54217_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:22:15.83 +11:55:17.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.655 592783796987082752 140.56583227322 +11.92152274976 15.0920 14.6204 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.655#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54223_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54223_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54235_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54235_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:22:02.26 +16:38:10.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.921 631052745868476672 140.50960459330 +16.63615157620 15.1656 14.5444 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.921#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54242_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54242_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54247_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54247_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54258_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54258_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54261_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54261_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54262_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54262_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54276_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54276_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:16:05.58 +12:10:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54284_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54284_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54286_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54286_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54289_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54289_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54296_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54296_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:25:18.13 +10:45:59.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.561 592398830478747520 141.32597953098 +10.76604457847 15.2019 14.5994 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.561#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54298_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54298_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54300_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54300_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54313_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54313_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:21:11.26 +11:16:31.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.85)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.990 592719612995865472 140.29703616888 +11.27473756357 14.9208 14.4207 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.990#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54315_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54315_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:46:04.62 +16:29:50.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.872 619734785488956288 146.51895220464 +16.49692652698 15.0369 14.5474 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.872#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54319_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54319_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54334_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54334_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:27:06.54 +13:47:41.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.667 618202611740722176 141.77713846868 +13.79452205123 14.6319 13.7780 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.667#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54336_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54336_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:21:30.67 +09:34:48.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.80)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.962 590724446068369536 140.37789589295 +09.57986436453 14.8291 14.3094 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.962#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54338_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54338_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54347_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54347_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54348_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54348_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54355_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54355_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:20:20.10 +15:53:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54372_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54372_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:19:42.19 +16:29:21.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.332 631774227359756928 139.92605643794 +16.48900879937 15.0596 14.4797 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.332#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54379_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 54379_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-04-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
