This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J220343.79+630515.2,2461144.8452,12.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J220343.79+630515.2 20260414.3452 12.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461144.8452,12.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260414.3452 12.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0643 Cep,2461144.8452,10.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0643 Cep 20260414.3452 10.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1194 Cep,2461144.8452,12.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1194 Cep 20260414.3452 12.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J221627.70+625451.4,2461144.8452,12.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J221627.70+625451.4 20260414.3452 12.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J220137.36+590710.2,2461144.8452,12.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J220137.36+590710.2 20260414.3452 12.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 14.3452* 23 14 58.18 +59 04 09.5 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J231458.50+590409.4,2461144.8452,12.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J231458.50+590409.4 20260414.3452 12.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J220808.78+603509.3,2461144.8452,12.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J220808.78+603509.3 20260414.3452 12.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461036.56341723 27.12.2025 01:31:09.249 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
First image: 2461036.56341723 27.12.2025 01:31:09.249 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Last image: 2461144.84553083 14.04.2026 08:17:23.864 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.96
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 21575
Objects passed selection criteria: 21449
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13821.8
Average stars matched: 13457.8 (97.3665 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 125876 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Apr 14 03:19:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461036.56341723 27.12.2025 01:31:09.249 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
First image: 2461036.56341723 27.12.2025 01:31:09.249 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Last image: 2461144.84553083 14.04.2026 08:17:23.864 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 161
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 24 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 140175
Objects passed selection criteria: 139807
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 100514
Average stars matched: 96640.5 (96.1461 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1969276 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Apr 14 03:21:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461144.84482770
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits'
wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits'
wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 22:17:12.996 +61:59:51.53
Second-epoch image center 22:16:53.636 +62:02:09.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0538 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 22:17:12.996 +61:59:51.53
Second-epoch image center 22:16:51.255 +62:01:57.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0551 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 22:16:53.636 +62:02:09.11
Second-epoch second image center 22:16:51.255 +62:01:57.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00564 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.U1aOLvIwM0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BZn5YQbTCU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5oGnrHuJJQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vBShp84iwL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23118 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 315.7073 to 354.1441 deg, Dec +55.2957 to +67.4335 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 315.7073 to 354.1441 deg, Dec 55.2957 to 67.4335 deg
Loaded 22214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12109 out of 13517 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13517 out of 23118 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.934899
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.934899
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.96
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.5 pix Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
15.0 mag. Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
13.0 mag. fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
12.9 mag. fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.9 (SNR ) 10.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.U1aOLvIwM0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2806, passed=23118
Got 23118 stars (including 20294 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23118 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BZn5YQbTCU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits' -> 'wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2771, passed=23041
Got 23041 stars (including 20252 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23041 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits -region wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5oGnrHuJJQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=314, passed=5191
Got 5191 stars (including 4869 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5191 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013093 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010474 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits -region wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vBShp84iwL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=250, passed=4301
Got 4301 stars (including 4047 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4301 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013093 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010474 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4116 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4116 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits -region wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cep-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31374_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 31374_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:08:34.24 +59:17:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18654_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 18654_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:08:15.71 +56:18:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cep-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 22:17:12.996 +61:59:51.53
Second-epoch image center 22:16:53.636 +62:02:09.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0538 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 22:17:12.996 +61:59:51.53
Second-epoch image center 22:16:51.255 +62:01:57.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0551 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 22:16:53.636 +62:02:09.11
Second-epoch second image center 22:16:51.255 +62:01:57.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00564 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SZM9EO0P77
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VxL7MjVuaC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.O59cZtUFdq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NZhxrvRM6T
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 155230 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 315.5738 to 354.2886 deg, Dec +55.2954 to +67.4335 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 315.5738 to 354.2886 deg, Dec 55.2954 to 67.4335 deg
Loaded 22342 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9754 out of 14239 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14239 out of 155230 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.768314
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.768314
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 142 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.3 pix Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
15.1 mag. Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.SZM9EO0P77 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=62, blended=23238, passed=155168
Got 155168 stars (including 131677 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 155168 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150595 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150595 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VxL7MjVuaC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits' -> 'wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=68, blended=23273, passed=154721
Got 154721 stars (including 131182 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 154721 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 149644 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 149643 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 149642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits -region wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.O59cZtUFdq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2576, passed=51750
Got 51750 stars (including 49073 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51750 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013093 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010474 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits -region wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NZhxrvRM6T (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=2155, passed=43531
Got 43531 stars (including 41283 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43531 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013093 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010474 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41221 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41222 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41221 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits -region wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/wcs_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-31-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-16-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0229.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_031816_TTUQ1b1x1_24947_lyzxZt7F/wcs_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cep-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166648.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out179647.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out179648.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out179682.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out179685.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out179696.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out179915.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out179974.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out180082.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out180086.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out180111.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out180137.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out180161.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out180206.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out180264.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101105.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out136075.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out137892.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out180172.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out47139.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51072.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out85288.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87428.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 17s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179626_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179626_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:06:51.58 +62:58:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179636_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179636_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:08:48.05 +59:33:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179639_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179639_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:06:31.93 +57:40:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179647_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179647_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:05:31.92 +57:56:54.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.80)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179648_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179648_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:58:02.13 +58:14:15.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.02)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.607 2199391080858930688 329.50853482610 +58.23801992829 13.7291 13.2166 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.607#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179667_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179667_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:44:17.21 +57:15:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179668_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179668_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:43:34.25 +58:15:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179671_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179671_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:55:15.51 +56:35:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179673_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179673_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:43:51.50 +58:10:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179676_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179676_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:18:46.97 +63:18:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179678_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179678_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:51:38.27 +57:05:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179681_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179681_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:08:54.05 +56:44:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179682_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179682_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:53:22.67 +57:37:49.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.22, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.20)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179685_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179685_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:22:08.20 +56:56:00.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.24, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.22)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.154 2006327971583046272 335.53503973193 +56.93372316375 12.4714 12.0663 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.154#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179690_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179690_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:29:53.00 +60:37:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179695_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179695_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:06:31.01 +62:54:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179696_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179696_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:32:30.23 +62:29:06.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.373 2202113506007694464 338.12583875427 +62.48533759781 11.1310 10.5397 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.373#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179699_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179699_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:13:50.70 +59:49:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179701_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179701_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:11:00.34 +60:34:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179702_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179702_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:59:38.07 +56:20:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179706_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179706_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:18:25.10 +63:13:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179707_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179707_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:08:34.22 +59:17:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179710_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179710_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:29:09.29 +58:24:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179741_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179741_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179752_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179752_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179762_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179762_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:43:48.62 +58:48:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179763_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179763_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179766_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179766_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:07:14.51 +60:49:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179768_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179768_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179781_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179781_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179787_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179787_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:47:18.69 +58:29:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179793_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179793_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179799_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179799_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:47:11.70 +60:40:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179803_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179803_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:50:47.31 +58:55:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179808_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179808_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:45:11.74 +61:08:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179810_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179810_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:53:40.45 +62:35:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179812_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179812_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:43:55.73 +58:48:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179821_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179821_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:54:21.00 +59:27:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179824_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179824_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179827_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179827_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:25:24.83 +60:37:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179840_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179840_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:04:01.50 +59:47:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179844_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179844_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:56:33.69 +62:15:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179845_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179845_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:09:38.19 +63:02:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179852_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179852_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:24:56.85 +62:18:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179853_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179853_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:16:54.87 +60:26:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179863_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179863_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:56:13.45 +58:53:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179867_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179867_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:56:37.18 +62:14:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179876_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179876_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:47:50.17 +60:57:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179883_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179883_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:01:05.04 +59:26:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179891_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179891_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:02:13.32 +58:01:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179893_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179893_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:27:10.60 +59:38:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179900_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179900_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:08:11.07 +62:27:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179903_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179903_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:38:51.15 +57:27:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179914_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179914_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:08:01.83 +64:04:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179915_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179915_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:22:09.55 +61:21:23.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.61)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.779 2014158487228119552 350.54009854250 +61.35654756388 11.0587 9.8322 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.779#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179921_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179921_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:49:19.43 +66:48:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179926_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179926_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:11:37.80 +61:36:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179931_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179931_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:39:16.21 +57:42:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179943_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179943_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:53:52.85 +62:38:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179944_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179944_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:18:10.57 +62:46:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179945_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179945_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:31:26.27 +60:54:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179948_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179948_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:08:40.49 +62:06:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179953_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179953_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:24:12.66 +57:46:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179958_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179958_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:04:32.24 +61:23:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179959_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179959_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179962_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179962_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:57:00.50 +57:40:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179969_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179969_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:18:58.76 +63:18:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179974_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179974_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:50:43.71 +58:51:57.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.685 2202588185798812032 327.68187976797 +58.86647829369 12.9497 12.3890 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.685#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179976_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179976_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:08:05.61 +61:07:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179978_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179978_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:01:56.18 +57:58:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179984_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179984_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:53:22.96 +57:57:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179986_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179986_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:05:16.75 +60:02:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179987_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179987_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:11:03.80 +57:57:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179999_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 179999_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:05:32.40 +63:35:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180001_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180001_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:29:10.96 +61:26:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180015_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180015_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:53:51.83 +57:02:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180023_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180023_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:54:08.45 +62:37:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180024_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180024_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:48:02.03 +61:16:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180026_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180026_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:44:39.86 +58:12:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180030_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180030_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:30:16.31 +64:17:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180046_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180046_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:43:47.35 +63:37:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180047_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180047_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180049_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180049_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:24:05.75 +56:53:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180051_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180051_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:05:05.13 +58:45:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180053_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180053_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:47:43.78 +63:52:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180055_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180055_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:54:25.04 +56:21:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180065_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180065_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:08:25.62 +64:10:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180067_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180067_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:37:54.41 +62:03:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180070_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180070_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:01:42.01 +57:39:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180073_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180073_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:25:45.41 +62:36:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180080_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180080_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:49:07.76 +61:14:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180082_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180082_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:24:40.11 +64:52:11.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.64)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.705 2220496103467379584 321.16954532295 +64.86992085898 12.3992 11.9119 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.705#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180086_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180086_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:50:41.70 +58:38:43.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.714 2202393671008424832 327.67299705895 +58.64606077992 13.2386 12.6717 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.714#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180087_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180087_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:08:22.19 +60:16:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180104_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180104_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:27:31.42 +62:20:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180108_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180108_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:46:56.76 +62:32:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180110_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180110_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:11:05.77 +60:34:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180111_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180111_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:05:31.40 +62:41:49.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.983 2205728872039914624 331.38164904426 +62.69823560602 13.3728 12.4910 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.983#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180136_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180136_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:02:08.98 +59:37:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180137_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180137_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:47:48.36 +60:57:42.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.937 2203848466636903424 326.95111084057 +60.96219814754 13.0941 12.3496 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.937#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180144_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180144_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:30:40.66 +57:12:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180147_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180147_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:52:27.35 +58:21:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180161_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180161_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:53:38.57 +60:59:40.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.80)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.493 2204022395634276096 328.41123530828 +60.99566602486 13.5447 12.6376 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.493#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180172_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
Preparing report for the candidate 180172_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180186_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180186_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:08:01.37 +61:36:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180201_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180201_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:04:27.01 +58:37:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180206_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180206_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:29:20.45 +59:03:14.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.957 2200236674018717952 337.33577299536 +59.05476845915 12.8884 12.3031 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.957#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180211_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180211_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:07:17.14 +62:03:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180217_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180217_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:07:26.52 +60:41:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180223_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180223_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:48:34.97 +60:33:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180225_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180225_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:59:15.29 +59:50:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180233_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180233_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:47:08.77 +60:40:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180238_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180238_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:43:16.14 +62:09:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180240_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180240_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:59:42.18 +61:03:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180242_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180242_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:13:25.65 +62:30:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180248_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180248_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:52:14.90 +59:08:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180264_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180264_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:07:58.05 +61:00:43.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.412 2203101760808394368 331.99338441038 +61.01292759844 13.5680 13.1758 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.412#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180277_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180277_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:03:12.93 +60:26:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180298_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180298_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:08:35.16 +62:23:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180302_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180302_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:46:57.09 +64:35:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180305_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180305_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:52:05.65 +57:17:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180307_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180307_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:10:24.34 +57:58:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180314_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180314_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180337_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180337_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180340_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180340_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:42:01.79 +57:51:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180344_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180344_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180367_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180367_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:52:13.50 +60:19:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180375_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180375_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:05:22.43 +60:02:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180386_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 180386_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:05:19.29 +62:31:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47139_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
Preparing report for the candidate 47139_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149470_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 149470_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:48:35.86 +57:23:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137892_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
Preparing report for the candidate 137892_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110571_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 110571_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:05:27.08 +57:07:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101105_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
Preparing report for the candidate 101105_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104012_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 104012_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:40:06.13 +59:35:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51072_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
Preparing report for the candidate 51072_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136075_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
Preparing report for the candidate 136075_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89156_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 89156_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:53:45.88 +60:32:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139973_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 139973_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:49:16.87 +58:35:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85288_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
Preparing report for the candidate 85288_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87428_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
Preparing report for the candidate 87428_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166648_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230
The candidate 166648_fd_Cep-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_03-17-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0230 did not pass the final checks
