This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461144.8328,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260414.3328 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J175026-1810.7,2461144.8328,11.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J175026-1810.7 20260414.3328 11.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 14.3328* 17 55 41.62 -15 24 30.8 12.2 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J175542-1524.4,2461144.8328,12.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J175542-1524.4 20260414.3328 12.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J180026.92-170431.4,2461144.8328,12.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J180026.92-170431.4 20260414.3328 12.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J173850.50-174448.9,2461144.8328,12.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J173850.50-174448.9 20260414.3328 12.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461144.8328,12.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260414.3328 12.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 14.3328* 17 25 42.24 -14 14 59.8 12.5 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
SV Ser,2461144.8328,12.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
SV Ser 20260414.3328 12.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 16629841,2461144.8328,12.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 16629841 20260414.3328 12.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 14.3328* 17 27 45.60 -14 08 43.5 12.9 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J172745.55-140841.8,2461144.8328,12.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J172745.55-140841.8 20260414.3328 12.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J174125-1731.7,2461144.8328,12.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J174125-1731.7 20260414.3328 12.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J174837.87-180456.8,2461144.8328,12.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J174837.87-180456.8 20260414.3328 12.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J173749.35-205152.0,2461144.8328,12.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J173749.35-205152.0 20260414.3328 12.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J173050-1927.9,2461144.8328,11.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J173050-1927.9 20260414.3328 11.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
FK Sgr,2461144.8328,12.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
FK Sgr 20260414.3328 12.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 14.3328* 17 44 10.80 -14 56 08.4 11.6 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
UV Ser,2461144.8328,11.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
UV Ser 20260414.3328 11.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J175237.05-161337.6,2461144.8328,12.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J175237.05-161337.6 20260414.3328 12.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V2948 Oph,2461144.8328,12.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V2948 Oph 20260414.3328 12.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J180454.99-161758.4,2461144.8328,12.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J180454.99-161758.4 20260414.3328 12.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J263.5542-16.4621,2461144.8328,12.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J263.5542-16.4621 20260414.3328 12.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1916 Oph,2461144.8328,11.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1916 Oph 20260414.3328 11.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 14.3328* 18 02 28.34 -15 32 09.5 12.5 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J180228.53-153206.4,2461144.8328,12.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J180228.53-153206.4 20260414.3328 12.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J172918.71-211921.8,2461144.8328,12.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J172918.71-211921.8 20260414.3328 12.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J174114.85-200156.3,2461144.8328,12.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J174114.85-200156.3 20260414.3328 12.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V3005 Oph,2461144.8328,12.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V3005 Oph 20260414.3328 12.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461099.00589001 27.02.2026 12:08:18.897 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
First image: 2461099.00589001 27.02.2026 12:08:18.897 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Last image: 2461144.83315337 14.04.2026 07:59:34.451 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.23
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8719
Objects passed selection criteria: 8686
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6555.25
Average stars matched: 6379.5 (97.3189 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 116244 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Apr 14 03:02:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461099.00589001 27.02.2026 12:08:18.897 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
First image: 2461099.00589001 27.02.2026 12:08:18.897 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Last image: 2461144.83315337 14.04.2026 07:59:34.451 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 158
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.87
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 35 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 124634
Objects passed selection criteria: 124295
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 93008.8
Average stars matched: 88494 (95.1459 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1903456 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Apr 14 03:06:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461144.83245772
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:46:18.174 -18:00:45.70
Second-epoch image center 17:46:37.667 -17:57:53.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0909 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:46:18.174 -18:00:45.70
Second-epoch image center 17:46:34.791 -17:58:37.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0749 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:46:37.667 -17:57:53.50
Second-epoch second image center 17:46:34.791 -17:58:37.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01667 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.R9Dyyr90bW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ES9j45woNt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits &> /tmp/tmp.olyHd5UA5O
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ACo4i17ere
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 15752 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 258.0365 to 275.0296 deg, Dec -23.3066 to -12.5656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 258.0365 to 275.0296 deg, Dec -23.3066 to -12.5656 deg
Loaded 14544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9713 out of 10414 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10414 out of 15752 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.846952
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.846952
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.62
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.62
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
2.7 pix fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits
2.7 pix fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
14.6 mag. Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.R9Dyyr90bW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1456, passed=15752
Got 15752 stars (including 14271 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15752 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 914 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ES9j45woNt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1474, passed=15602
Got 15602 stars (including 14101 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15602 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14410 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14411 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits -region wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.olyHd5UA5O (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=314, passed=4970
Got 4970 stars (including 4653 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4970 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.2 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4814 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.83"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.2 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.85"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.93"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ACo4i17ere (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=301, passed=4962
Got 4962 stars (including 4658 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.2 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.84"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.85"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.2 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.87"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.95"
Excluding outliers - 918 stars left (next iteration limit 1009)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:46:18.174 -18:00:45.70
Second-epoch image center 17:46:37.667 -17:57:53.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0909 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:46:18.174 -18:00:45.70
Second-epoch image center 17:46:34.791 -17:58:37.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0749 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:46:37.667 -17:57:53.50
Second-epoch second image center 17:46:34.791 -17:58:37.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01667 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AMDSPTIkef
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9YFBDzguw3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1VW7127MVV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8pHqQF1Gre
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 179796 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 258.0045 to 275.0499 deg, Dec -23.3098 to -12.5486 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 258.0045 to 275.0499 deg, Dec -23.3098 to -12.5486 deg
Loaded 14601 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9967 out of 12785 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12785 out of 179796 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.613163
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.613163
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.87
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.74
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.74
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 112 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
1.9 pix Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
14.7 mag. Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.AMDSPTIkef (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=17851, passed=179768
Got 179768 stars (including 161620 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 179768 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 169691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 169693 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 169691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 919 stars left (next iteration limit 1012)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9YFBDzguw3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=17987, passed=181054
Got 181054 stars (including 162799 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 181054 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 168413 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 168414 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 168413 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 921 stars left (next iteration limit 1013)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits -region wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1VW7127MVV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=3360, passed=52882
Got 52882 stars (including 49485 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52882 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51701 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Excluding outliers - 909 stars left (next iteration limit 1001)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8pHqQF1Gre (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=3273, passed=52676
Got 52676 stars (including 49340 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52676 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51774 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51774 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-58-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0858.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_030028_TTUQ2b1x1_1890_XoeMi1S3/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207384.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207387.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207392.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207420.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207510.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207552.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207639.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207728.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out104017.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out105300.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out117094.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out121494.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out123338.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out125524.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out130409.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out139301.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out142153.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out169548.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out178698.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out207637.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out25181.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32855.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33957.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out46000.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53720.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55097.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81568.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81673.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82886.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out90085.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out95175.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99272.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 10s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207376_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207376_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207384_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207384_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:21.71 -17:44:20.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.80)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207387_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207387_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:47:43.09 -15:59:21.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.84, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.82)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207392_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207392_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:11.45 -14:13:56.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.85)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.774 4137554687330693760 263.04744856007 -14.23204860538 12.8154 11.9400 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.774#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207400_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207400_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:42.75 -15:50:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207401_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207401_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207402_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207402_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:37.96 -13:45:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207404_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207404_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:01.31 -14:15:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207410_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207410_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:34.58 -20:44:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207420_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207420_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:22.76 -16:30:54.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.84, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.82)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.874 4124584642048618880 262.09488926651 -16.51495777421 11.4138 10.3650 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.874#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207422_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207422_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:34.75 -21:43:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207470_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207470_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:26.71 -15:24:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207483_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207483_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:30.69 -16:24:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207491_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207491_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:35.73 -16:44:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207496_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207496_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:59.57 -17:21:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207510_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207510_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:07.40 -18:30:00.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.06, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.04)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.912 4134480658995348736 259.78008280418 -18.49883603132 12.1877 11.1195 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.912#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207521_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207521_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:59.49 -14:03:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207537_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207537_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:27:00.76 -18:23:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207548_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207548_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:56.97 -15:44:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207551_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207551_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:52.32 -17:46:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207552_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207552_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:31.28 -18:06:10.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.34, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.32)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.994 4134509246298243968 259.88015100128 -18.10264623500 12.5246 11.7286 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.994#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207569_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207569_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:14.58 -14:20:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207582_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207582_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:14.69 -18:35:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207588_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207588_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:09.40 -20:30:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207595_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207595_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:25.69 -16:13:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207618_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207618_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:42:39.71 -19:31:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207620_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207620_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:37.72 -16:00:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207630_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207630_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:55.89 -15:21:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207631_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207631_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:32.98 -20:22:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207632_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207632_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:10.45 -20:13:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207637_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
Preparing report for the candidate 207637_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207639_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207639_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:27:02.47 -16:06:31.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.746 4136671435916137216 261.75971982579 -16.10916787183 12.8401 12.0443 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.746#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207641_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207641_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:38.43 -14:39:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207651_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207651_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:26.05 -15:09:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207668_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207668_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:42:06.09 -13:57:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207676_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207676_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:42:10.34 -15:43:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207680_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207680_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:12.84 -15:19:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207682_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207682_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:39.15 -14:42:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207696_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207696_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:49.45 -14:16:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207704_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207704_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:54.06 -14:31:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207711_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207711_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:56.80 -19:10:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207724_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207724_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:34.53 -19:42:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207728_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207728_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:56.01 -15:23:30.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.142 4145258724854873856 270.98408876499 -15.39066517845 13.3164 11.1781 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.142#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207751_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207751_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:16.22 -17:20:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207759_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207759_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:40:16.40 -15:05:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207760_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207760_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:32.05 -15:08:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207763_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207763_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:34.23 -18:07:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207770_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 207770_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:40.60 -15:16:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81673_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
Preparing report for the candidate 81673_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139301_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
Preparing report for the candidate 139301_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39240_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 39240_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:01.22 -20:28:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105300_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
Preparing report for the candidate 105300_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90085_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
Preparing report for the candidate 90085_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104017_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
Preparing report for the candidate 104017_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137883_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 137883_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:05.06 -15:20:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146508_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 146508_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:49.08 -15:40:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73233_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 73233_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:28.46 -18:28:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146870_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 146870_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:23.01 -15:40:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149124_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 149124_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:02.93 -15:52:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130409_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
Preparing report for the candidate 130409_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25679_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 25679_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:58.13 -21:11:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99272_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
Preparing report for the candidate 99272_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49659_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 49659_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:39.70 -19:39:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169548_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
Preparing report for the candidate 169548_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175775_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 175775_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:15.21 -14:38:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148752_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 148752_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:43.88 -15:52:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170707_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 170707_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:27.28 -14:22:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95175_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
Preparing report for the candidate 95175_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 206047_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 206047_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:44.08 -18:54:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82886_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
Preparing report for the candidate 82886_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44480_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 44480_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:49.49 -19:58:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44393_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 44393_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:05.95 -20:06:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113772_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 113772_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:12.53 -16:39:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85879_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 85879_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:14.98 -17:56:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32855_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
Preparing report for the candidate 32855_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191635_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 191635_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:33.95 -18:31:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21013_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 21013_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:53.03 -21:37:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53720_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
Preparing report for the candidate 53720_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191137_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 191137_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:56.45 -19:47:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164079_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 164079_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:56.14 -13:52:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125524_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
Preparing report for the candidate 125524_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197176_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 197176_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:17.13 -16:53:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136842_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 136842_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:00.64 -15:16:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111310_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 111310_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:11.43 -16:47:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190960_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 190960_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:56.18 -19:19:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197021_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 197021_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:42.38 -14:55:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178698_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
Preparing report for the candidate 178698_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123338_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
Preparing report for the candidate 123338_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132539_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 132539_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:04.57 -15:03:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55097_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
Preparing report for the candidate 55097_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146470_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 146470_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:17.11 -15:45:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121494_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
Preparing report for the candidate 121494_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120701_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 120701_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:42:00.42 -16:20:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117094_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
Preparing report for the candidate 117094_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33957_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
Preparing report for the candidate 33957_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142153_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
Preparing report for the candidate 142153_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113067_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 113067_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:20.57 -16:41:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90291_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 90291_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:56.41 -17:40:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136162_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 136162_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:47.30 -15:06:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108346_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 108346_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:33.04 -16:45:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162656_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 162656_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:30.63 -13:45:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25181_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
Preparing report for the candidate 25181_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49619_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 49619_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:07.89 -19:36:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137785_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 137785_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:09.85 -15:19:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86018_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 86018_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137734_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 137734_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:11.63 -15:20:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46000_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
Preparing report for the candidate 46000_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81568_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
Preparing report for the candidate 81568_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142858_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 142858_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:09.56 -15:34:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142924_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 142924_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:20.17 -15:27:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70901_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 70901_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:39.76 -18:34:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63043_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859
The candidate 63043_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-14_02-59-34_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0859 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:51.47 -18:49:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 2s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 23s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
17:28:13.63 -17:02:44.1
18:00:26.84 -17:04:37.9
17:34:12.99 -16:27:44.8
18:04:54.58 -16:18:01.0
17:52:37.02 -16:13:37.9
17:45:48.02 -16:07:13.5
17:25:42.24 -14:14:59.8
17:55:41.62 -15:24:30.8
18:02:28.34 -15:32:09.5
17:27:45.60 -14:08:43.5
17:44:10.80 -14:56:08.4
17:23:23.02 -18:15:00.3
17:29:18.62 -21:19:22.6
17:37:49.52 -20:51:50.6
17:20:59.07 -20:38:47.0
17:41:14.83 -20:01:56.6
17:30:50.03 -19:27:55.1
17:29:40.92 -19:22:01.9
17:36:59.43 -18:06:27.6
17:50:25.62 -18:10:39.9
17:48:37.78 -18:04:57.2
17:38:50.69 -17:44:51.3
17:41:24.92 -17:31:46.8
17:57:13.69 -17:22:55.0
########### Completed Sgr-01-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
17:23:23.02 -18:15:00.3
17:50:25.62 -18:10:39.9
17:55:41.62 -15:24:30.8
18:00:26.84 -17:04:37.9
17:38:50.69 -17:44:51.3
17:28:13.63 -17:02:44.1
17:25:42.24 -14:14:59.8
17:57:13.69 -17:22:55.0
17:27:45.60 -14:08:43.5
17:41:24.92 -17:31:46.8
17:48:37.78 -18:04:57.2
17:37:49.52 -20:51:50.6
17:30:50.03 -19:27:55.1
17:45:48.02 -16:07:13.5
17:44:10.80 -14:56:08.4
17:52:37.02 -16:13:37.9
17:29:40.92 -19:22:01.9
18:04:54.58 -16:18:01.0
17:34:12.99 -16:27:44.8
17:20:59.07 -20:38:47.0
18:02:28.34 -15:32:09.5
17:29:18.62 -21:19:22.6
17:41:14.83 -20:01:56.6
17:36:59.43 -18:06:27.6
###################################################################################
17:23:23.02 -18:15:00.3 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
17:50:25.62 -18:10:39.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:55:41.62 -15:24:30.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:00:26.84 -17:04:37.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:38:50.69 -17:44:51.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:28:13.63 -17:02:44.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:25:42.24 -14:14:59.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:57:13.69 -17:22:55.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:27:45.60 -14:08:43.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:41:24.92 -17:31:46.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:48:37.78 -18:04:57.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:37:49.52 -20:51:50.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:30:50.03 -19:27:55.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:45:48.02 -16:07:13.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:44:10.80 -14:56:08.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:52:37.02 -16:13:37.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:29:40.92 -19:22:01.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:04:54.58 -16:18:01.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:34:12.99 -16:27:44.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:20:59.07 -20:38:47.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:02:28.34 -15:32:09.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:29:18.62 -21:19:22.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:41:14.83 -20:01:56.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:36:59.43 -18:06:27.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
17:20:59.07 -20:38:47.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:25:42.24 -14:14:59.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:27:45.60 -14:08:43.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:28:13.63 -17:02:44.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:29:18.62 -21:19:22.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:29:40.92 -19:22:01.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:30:50.03 -19:27:55.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:34:12.99 -16:27:44.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:36:59.43 -18:06:27.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:37:49.52 -20:51:50.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:38:50.69 -17:44:51.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:41:14.83 -20:01:56.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:41:24.92 -17:31:46.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:44:10.80 -14:56:08.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:45:48.02 -16:07:13.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:48:37.78 -18:04:57.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:50:25.62 -18:10:39.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:52:37.02 -16:13:37.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:55:41.62 -15:24:30.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:57:13.69 -17:22:55.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:00:26.84 -17:04:37.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:02:28.34 -15:32:09.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:04:54.58 -16:18:01.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
17:20:59.07 -20:38:47.0 -- a known variable star
17:25:42.24 -14:14:59.8 -- a known variable star
17:27:45.60 -14:08:43.5 -- a known variable star
17:28:13.63 -17:02:44.1 -- a known variable star
17:29:18.62 -21:19:22.6 -- a known variable star
17:29:40.92 -19:22:01.9 -- a known variable star
17:30:50.03 -19:27:55.1 -- a known variable star
17:34:12.99 -16:27:44.8 -- a known variable star
17:36:59.43 -18:06:27.6 -- a known variable star
17:37:49.52 -20:51:50.6 -- a known variable star
17:38:50.69 -17:44:51.3 -- a known variable star
17:41:14.83 -20:01:56.6 -- a known variable star
17:41:24.92 -17:31:46.8 -- a known variable star
17:44:10.80 -14:56:08.4 -- a known variable star
17:45:48.02 -16:07:13.5 -- a known variable star
17:48:37.78 -18:04:57.2 -- a known variable star
17:50:25.62 -18:10:39.9 -- a known variable star
17:52:37.02 -16:13:37.9 -- a known variable star
17:55:41.62 -15:24:30.8 -- a known variable star
17:57:13.69 -17:22:55.0 -- a known variable star
18:00:26.84 -17:04:37.9 -- a known variable star
18:02:28.34 -15:32:09.5 -- a known variable star
18:04:54.58 -16:18:01.0 -- a known variable star
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
23 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
17:20:59.07 -20:38:47.0
17:25:42.24 -14:14:59.8
17:27:45.60 -14:08:43.5
17:28:13.63 -17:02:44.1
17:29:18.62 -21:19:22.6
17:29:40.92 -19:22:01.9
17:30:50.03 -19:27:55.1
17:34:12.99 -16:27:44.8
17:36:59.43 -18:06:27.6
17:37:49.52 -20:51:50.6
17:38:50.69 -17:44:51.3
17:41:14.83 -20:01:56.6
17:41:24.92 -17:31:46.8
17:44:10.80 -14:56:08.4
17:45:48.02 -16:07:13.5
17:48:37.78 -18:04:57.2
17:50:25.62 -18:10:39.9
17:52:37.02 -16:13:37.9
17:55:41.62 -15:24:30.8
17:57:13.69 -17:22:55.0
18:00:26.84 -17:04:37.9
18:02:28.34 -15:32:09.5
18:04:54.58 -16:18:01.0
17:53:21.71 -17:44:20.7
17:47:43.09 -15:59:21.6
17:32:11.45 -14:13:56.9
17:28:22.76 -16:30:54.7
17:19:07.40 -18:30:00.0
17:19:31.28 -18:06:10.3
17:27:02.47 -16:06:31.1
18:03:56.01 -15:23:30.9
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461144.83245772 -observatory V36
23:58:36.51 -02:57:05.7 Mercury (0.1mag)
03:00:30.91 +17:13:20.8 Venus (-3.9mag)
00:13:06.42 +00:20:36.0 Mars (1.2mag)
07:11:53.19 +22:47:26.2 Jupiter (-2.1mag)
00:28:26.26 +00:44:20.1 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:47:20.89 +19:46:21.3 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:10:37.30 -00:16:45.1 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:40.77 -22:52:31.8 Pluto (14.5mag)
22:56:59.92 -06:59:12.4 Moon (-9.1mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Apr 14 03:02 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461144.83245772:
07:11:54.10 +22:47:26.9 Io (5.8mag)
07:11:48.44 +22:47:33.4 Europa (5.9mag)
07:12:04.19 +22:47:09.6 Ganymede (5.3mag)
07:12:20.91 +22:46:36.1 Callisto (6.6mag)
07:15:17.78 +22:35:50.7 Himalia (15.3mag)
07:11:51.97 +22:47:30.9 Thebe (16.2mag)
07:15:26.99 +23:05:54.3 Elara (17.3mag)
07:10:39.28 +23:28:18.8 Pasiphae (17.4mag)
07:20:15.11 +22:45:17.5 Carme (18.5mag)
00:28:33.72 +00:44:37.4 Titan (8.8mag)
00:28:27.33 +00:44:35.1 Rhea (10.1mag)
00:28:09.26 +00:44:45.5 Iapetus (11.5mag)
00:28:39.23 +00:44:30.0 Hyperion (14.8mag)
00:30:04.47 +00:53:19.1 Phoebe (16.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Apr 14 03:02 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461144.83245772:
15:30:16.26 -15:05:52.4 JWST
17:19:18.31 +42:59:30.4 Chandra
08:30:15.49 -46:44:53.7 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Apr 14 03:02 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461144.83245772 -observatory V36
-> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180]
18:51:18.31 -28:40:55.4 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:05:32.73 -69:44:27.9 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:32:05.42 +31:25:33.8 17.2mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:30:35.45 +10:20:59.7 17.6mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:09:46.63 +29:09:47.7 17.1mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
04:27:17.80 +25:59:34.5 16.0mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:03:04.27 +32:00:24.5 16.2mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:30:49.41 -00:19:49.2 17.3mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:54:07.16 +18:23:32.3 17.5mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:41:12.49 -11:32:45.7 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
09:08:25.08 -12:09:03.7 17.6mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS)
21:52:31.71 +62:48:34.2 17.5mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
19:20:37.07 -03:42:20.9 14.2mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
21:35:38.86 +85:40:52.3 17.8mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:17:08.42 +63:31:13.8 17.1mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
05:09:40.72 +17:44:39.4 10.9mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
16:20:20.42 +06:07:01.6 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:20:20.23 +14:49:21.8 14.6mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
03:24:52.49 -22:38:23.7 16.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:15:18.14 +45:42:23.1 17.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
13:45:45.51 +44:22:08.7 15.1mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
03:22:39.04 -25:57:08.4 17.8mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS)
23:29:55.52 +19:06:17.3 8.8mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:54:50.41 +02:54:39.8 17.4mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
03:13:38.85 +02:48:50.0 12.8mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS)
23:54:50.30 +36:54:35.0 14.5mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
18:39:41.39 -09:48:30.4 11.9mag 10P/Tempel
15:02:33.09 +03:22:51.7 13.8mag 24P/Schaumasse
11:03:15.13 -01:34:48.7 15.7mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
18:00:27.51 -09:40:19.2 17.9mag 40P/Vaisala
10:37:38.68 -04:13:56.8 16.9mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
01:46:05.64 +17:12:11.3 17.2mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
07:07:41.60 +37:22:12.6 17.0mag 63P/Wild
23:26:55.74 -11:39:05.4 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
03:58:48.18 +20:40:46.5 15.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
01:01:53.50 +07:54:02.8 14.3mag 78P/Gehrels
22:57:56.76 -09:53:03.6 14.6mag 88P/Howell
02:05:41.36 +20:11:47.8 15.1mag 93P/Lovas
04:51:40.09 +32:11:53.3 16.2mag 123P/West-Hartley
08:26:24.65 +39:07:48.0 16.2mag 124P/Mrkos
02:30:38.46 +14:11:01.4 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
02:44:16.06 +14:17:21.1 17.5mag 131P/Mueller
01:17:25.34 +12:39:29.5 10.7mag 141P/Machholz
01:26:34.84 +04:14:52.1 10.7mag 141P-A/Machholz
00:12:41.10 +00:13:10.0 13.0mag 141P-D/Machholz
01:56:45.92 +06:00:05.2 17.8mag 141P-I/Machholz
00:57:43.84 -02:21:52.1 15.1mag 162P/SidingSpring
10:29:04.50 +30:56:40.6 18.0mag 164P/Christensen
06:33:26.95 +24:17:37.5 18.0mag 198P/ODAS
14:54:23.69 -00:14:30.7 17.6mag 210P/Christensen
21:34:00.23 -11:51:03.3 17.6mag 218P/LINEAR
17:16:07.49 -14:08:01.0 16.1mag 235P/LINEAR
05:30:53.04 +34:34:14.9 16.7mag 240P/NEAT
07:37:40.79 -05:20:54.4 17.7mag 242P/Spahr
22:12:44.61 -21:25:17.8 17.9mag 260P/McNaught
15:43:17.21 +06:52:48.5 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
07:33:33.68 +21:21:37.7 17.7mag 450P/LONEOS
05:33:26.52 +45:07:48.1 17.5mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K Apr 14 03:02 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.48
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74
06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48
11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95
10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53
20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83
06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93
07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78
19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2
04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS
11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2
07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8
16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12
13:01:19.46 +15:42:15.50 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.34 -0.18
09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06
03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00 SN2026evh 2026-03-12.05 17.29
06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10 AT2026ffp 2026-03-12.16 0.37
14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50 AT2026fij 2026-03-12.05 15.97
10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10 SN 2026exe 2026-03-11.78 16.48
18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00 SN2026ess 2026-03-12.37 17.37
13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80 AT2026ewa 2026-03-12.42 16.77
15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20 ASASSN-26bp 2026-03-11.92 13.33
13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20 AT2024cmo 2026-03-11.12 16.29
13:06:01.97 -15:50:14.40 AT2026fdy 2026-03-10.33 16.68
11:30:09.70 -47:26:45.00 ASASSN-26bn 2026-03-10.3 15.14
05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40 (= Gaia 2026-03-9.09 14.32
03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70 ASASSN-26bm 2026-03-8.04 15.22
04:31:00.53 -68:29:50.20 ASASSN-26bl 2026-03-7.9 10.26
16:18:17.61 +41:25:11.40 SN 2026dkf 2026-03-6.31 16.7
13:45:00.35 +61:16:50.90 SN 2026ejl 2026-03-6.41 -0.66
09:27:45.33 -37:49:33.00 ASASSN-26bk 2026-03-2.06 13.58
20:22:01.20 +23:47:47.30 ASASSN-26bi 2026-02-28.51 15.86
11:16:22.10 +29:26:22.80 AT2026enm 2026-02-28.39 16.88
08:05:59.83 -48:39:35.60 ASASSN-26bh 2026-02-26.05 14.64
13:24:27.02 -45:57:01.40 ASASSN-26bg 2026-02-26.35 15.28
17:27:50.95 -68:28:46.40 ASASSN-26bf 2026-02-26.3 16.28
18:03:39.29 +19:58:46.30 ASASSN-26be 2026-02-25.56 14.95
17:40:18.19 +07:20:59.60 SN 2026crm 2026-02-24.34 16.9
18:38:36.11 -79:28:58.40 ASASSN-26bb 2026-02-24.36 16.11
17:43:29.75 +11:24:00.60 ASASSN-26bc 2026-02-23.37 -3.37
16:59:41.08 -80:01:51.20 ASASSN-26bd 2026-02-23.3 14.38
11:23:31.77 -08:39:15.40 SN2026cff 2026-02-23.15 -1.08
14:55:17.39 -05:56:05.30 SN2026dmk 2026-02-23.22 -0.76
12:28:15.19 +44:27:20.80 SN2026cjz 2026-02-23.47 15.62
12:12:29.55 -02:40:43.30 AT2026dsk 2026-02-23.4 17.21
09:21:05.29 +06:11:42.80 SN2026chr 2026-02-23.1 17.39
16:05:38.61 +18:06:07.40 SN 2026dsy 2026-02-23.36 17.15
04:55:50.66 -29:52:57.70 SN 2026dpg 2026-02-23.11 15.75
04:21:28.18 -53:22:54.40 AT2026drl 2026-02-21.03 17.31
11:50:37.32 +55:21:13.70 SN 2026dix 2026-02-21.43 16.39
16:21:19.69 -63:47:29.40 ASASSN-26az 2026-02-21.03 17.02
02:45:30.93 -54:17:43.10 SN 2026cju 2026-02-21.04 17.54
01:58:40.68 +47:34:50.10 ASASSN-26av 2026-02-21.09 15.97
18:35:53.01 -42:31:38.90 ASASSN-26aw 2026-02-21.12 15.89
11:40:18.88 -39:45:09.20 ASASSN-26ax 2026-02-21.08 15.73
02:26:23.52 -51:42:29.80 ASASSN-26ay 2026-02-21.04 13.93
08:46:07.66 +01:17:43.90 ASASSN-26ba 2026-02-20.23 15.43
14:15:47.49 -48:05:16.60 SN2026dez 2026-02-19.31 15.91
17:25:53.90 -23:28:31.50 ASASSN-26au 2026-02-18.33 15.82
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K Apr 14 03:02 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:52.23 +41:01:44.7 PNV J00425223+4101447 2026-01-19.5505 18.74Cmag
09:54:46.47 +69:06:31.7 PNV J09544647+6906317 2026-01-26.8081 19.3mag
18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9 TCP J18085199-2616219 2026-01-31.8519 12.2mag
08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1 TCP J08011102-0343141 2026-02-08.8090 15.10Cmag
05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5 TCP J05191540-0204515 2026-02-13.4306 14.5mag
10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9 TCP J10524126+3640089 2026-02-17.6065 17.4mag
05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1 TCP J05505081+3622451 2026-02-17.5511 15.7mag
00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag
00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag
17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag
09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K Apr 14 03:02 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
17:08:01.002 +67:05:08.73 AT 2026ivq 2026-04-04.49 19.4548
18:36:22.696 +81:45:06.35 AT 2026ivp 2026-03-27.51 20.7475
15:19:48.489 -05:00:11.22 AT 2026ivo 2026-03-27.48 21.2654
15:56:56.656 +27:09:01.74 AT 2026ivn 2026-04-04.38 19.6722
13:56:43.855 -19:49:48.79 AT 2026ivm 2026-04-07.40 19.7776
09:53:53.828 +01:43:05.64 AT 2026ivl 2026-04-07.17 22.04
11:56:09.924 +23:56:19.29 AT 2026ivk 2026-04-07.91 18.97
09:57:07.898 +44:06:56.68 AT 2026ivj 2026-03-30.18 19.5868
11:56:46.937 +30:48:49.43 AT 2026ivi 2026-04-07.29 20.1063
12:16:21.919 +30:21:04.60 AT 2026ivh 2026-04-07.29 19.651
09:11:45.682 +30:03:32.51 AT 2026ivg 2026-04-04.17 19.5142
09:55:25.809 -27:42:27.02 AT 2026ivf 2026-04-08.21 18.51
09:46:07.094 +07:14:13.61 AT 2026ive 2026-04-08.15 19.9446
09:29:29.340 -01:21:08.51 AT 2026ivd 2026-04-05.15 19.4593
09:53:27.521 +16:01:50.20 AT 2026ivc 2026-04-07.17 20.1328
10:57:27.283 +18:19:29.99 AT 2026ivb 2026-04-07.87 19.71
12:50:08.105 +01:17:40.78 AT 2026iva 2026-04-07.89 19.96
10:38:31.370 -04:47:42.62 AT 2026iuz 2026-04-07.85 18.9
13:03:44.252 +20:35:06.20 AT 2026iuy 2026-04-06.96 19.7
13:53:33.216 -46:24:12.81 AT 2026iux 2026-04-07.63 19.83
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Apr 14 03:02 tns_transients_list.txt
