This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSV 3801,2461144.7248,10.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSV 3801 20260414.2248 10.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 14.2248* 08 12 28.21 +62 36 22.7 13.6 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
SU UMa,2461144.7248,13.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
SU UMa 20260414.2248 13.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.80421227 18.01.2026 07:17:53.940 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
First image: 2461058.80421227 18.01.2026 07:17:53.940 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Last image: 2461144.72523943 14.04.2026 05:24:10.687 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10275
Objects passed selection criteria: 10254
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8905.5
Average stars matched: 8603.75 (96.6116 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115208 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Apr 14 00:25:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.80421227 18.01.2026 07:17:53.940 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
First image: 2461058.80421227 18.01.2026 07:17:53.940 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Last image: 2461144.72523943 14.04.2026 05:24:10.687 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 47
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 16 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 57695
Objects passed selection criteria: 57563
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 51353.5
Average stars matched: 49413.8 (96.2228 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 154452 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Apr 14 00:26:48 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461144.72442279
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits'
wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:34:18.347 +61:59:25.26
Second-epoch image center 08:34:34.149 +62:01:50.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0509 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:34:18.347 +61:59:25.26
Second-epoch image center 08:34:37.414 +62:01:19.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0490 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:34:34.149 +62:01:50.84
Second-epoch second image center 08:34:37.414 +62:01:19.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01070 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ALLTkV4ycs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rTa3JP2Z5Z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZivBpSsp3h
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JUpbELBb5R
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10194 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 108.5096 to 146.7055 deg, Dec +55.2467 to +67.4856 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 108.5096 to 146.7055 deg, Dec 55.2467 to 67.4856 deg
Loaded 9150 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5376 out of 5663 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5663 out of 10194 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.887651
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.887651
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
2.1 pix UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
15.4 mag. UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
15.0 mag. fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
15.0 mag. fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ALLTkV4ycs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=690, passed=10194
Got 10194 stars (including 9494 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10194 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10078 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -region wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rTa3JP2Z5Z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=650, passed=10104
Got 10104 stars (including 9445 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10104 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits -region wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZivBpSsp3h (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=508, passed=7754
Got 7754 stars (including 7237 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7754 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7669 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7669 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JUpbELBb5R (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=504, passed=7776
Got 7776 stars (including 7262 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7776 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21135.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out01435.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20482_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 20482_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:24:50.27 +64:09:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20568_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 20568_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:46:00.22 +65:22:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21135_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 21135_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:41.29 +61:43:55.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.49)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.606 1087751148326952320 115.92207288243 +61.73197117123 12.2703 11.5441 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.606#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01435_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
Preparing report for the candidate 01435_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
07:55:51.23 +57:11:57.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:34:18.347 +61:59:25.26
Second-epoch image center 08:34:34.149 +62:01:50.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0509 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:34:18.347 +61:59:25.26
Second-epoch image center 08:34:37.414 +62:01:19.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0490 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:34:34.149 +62:01:50.84
Second-epoch second image center 08:34:37.414 +62:01:19.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01070 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4BXo94rTiI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8ZlsX1UVP1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6LQeU6DTVY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Tezhn8Y3kj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 58796 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 108.4472 to 147.1669 deg, Dec +55.1866 to +67.4856 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 108.4472 to 147.1669 deg, Dec 55.1866 to 67.4856 deg
Loaded 9296 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4999 out of 5721 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5721 out of 58796 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.773401
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.773401
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 40 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
2.0 pix UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
2.0 pix fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.0 pix fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
15.5 mag. UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
15.1 mag. fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
15.1 mag. fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.4BXo94rTiI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=3141, passed=58769
Got 58769 stars (including 55527 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58769 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58221 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58221 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58221 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -region wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8ZlsX1UVP1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2993, passed=56415
Got 56415 stars (including 53334 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56415 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits -region wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6LQeU6DTVY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=2260, passed=45800
Got 45800 stars (including 43459 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 45800 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Tezhn8Y3kj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=2283, passed=45933
Got 45933 stars (including 43563 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 45933 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-17-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_01-06-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-23-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_002501_TTUQ1b1x1_12974_QAyHgGSr/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out71944.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out71968.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out71970.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out71971.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out71976.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out71977.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out71979.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out73876.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out73959.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74047.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74844.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74859.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74966.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out75190.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out75232.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out75286.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out75543.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out75547.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out75587.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out75603.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out75708.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out75785.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71944_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 71944_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:32:25.74 +66:51:04.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.800 1093509363736694656 128.10777941325 +66.85103295063 15.0551 14.5218 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.800#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71953_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 71953_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:17:52.13 +58:09:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71968_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 71968_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:34:53.44 +60:31:34.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.23, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.21)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.550 1038835254691917568 143.72351116580 +60.52599836994 14.2661 13.7579 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.550#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71970_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 71970_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:04:17.08 +65:32:36.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.753 1044738498262059520 136.07146431328 +65.54327529922 14.0924 13.5578 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.753#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71971_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 71971_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:40.25 +64:55:46.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.939 1091925620317433984 122.66825433751 +64.92943488225 14.0849 13.5950 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.939#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71976_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 71976_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:58:59.32 +66:14:27.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.55, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.53)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.805 1095248928571868544 119.74672214811 +66.24050383851 13.6864 13.2543 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.805#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71977_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 71977_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:34:14.29 +64:13:47.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.239 1064447793945703168 143.55958691434 +64.22960083328 13.4955 12.8704 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.239#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71978_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 71978_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:11.82 +64:42:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71979_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 71979_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:22:10.63 +65:19:47.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.14, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.12)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.528 1067790171854987264 140.54578092543 +65.33004886093 13.0990 12.3923 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.528#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71980_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 71980_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:10:14.42 +61:22:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72065_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 72065_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:46:00.22 +65:22:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72941_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 72941_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:34:24.87 +66:54:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73084_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 73084_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:41:28.14 +61:56:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73091_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 73091_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:37.53 +65:09:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73392_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 73392_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:02.98 +57:05:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73401_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 73401_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:17:46.52 +66:56:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73509_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 73509_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:10.02 +58:34:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73876_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 73876_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:38:32.61 +65:08:03.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.225 1064928314886682880 144.63573333710 +65.13435260765 13.8251 13.2730 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.225#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73959_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 73959_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:04:44.44 +61:41:50.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.510 1042752196146428032 136.18430874284 +61.69732483112 13.9678 13.3824 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.510#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74047_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 74047_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:47:28.87 +57:52:46.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.687 1037368506181036672 131.87091819012 +57.87980174066 13.7966 13.0184 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.687#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74098_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 74098_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:22.27 +65:44:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74125_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 74125_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:29.72 +62:49:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74538_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 74538_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:25:27.67 +66:46:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74623_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 74623_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:43:07.84 +63:17:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74713_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 74713_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:39:36.22 +65:30:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74844_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 74844_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:53:41.40 +64:26:22.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.106 1044571475574346752 133.42199857407 +64.43895633515 14.7117 14.0615 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.106#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74859_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 74859_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:44:42.32 +59:59:58.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.798 1086079585710837888 116.17709296774 +59.99928679134 14.6048 14.0437 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.798#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74966_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 74966_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:58:21.12 +66:45:12.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.51)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.098 1116912228215624832 134.58842274692 +66.75313350697 14.5602 13.8965 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.098#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75190_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 75190_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:14:58.44 +66:27:05.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.832 1068704243974577664 138.74513836493 +66.45182532048 14.6904 14.1399 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.832#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75232_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 75232_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:38:15.98 +65:24:17.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.590 1064952469782732416 144.56609807181 +65.40435717545 14.9439 14.2980 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.590#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75286_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 75286_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:45:44.52 +65:32:42.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.61)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.082 1065001226251543552 146.43679831201 +65.54495305502 14.6609 13.9728 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.082#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75313_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 75313_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:40:53.98 +64:02:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75543_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 75543_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:59:46.27 +62:53:54.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.027 1085326523324345216 119.94157709167 +62.89854861873 15.1108 14.5246 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.027#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75547_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 75547_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:37:41.76 +64:46:29.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.482 1064849356207956992 144.42342644805 +64.77441863468 14.7765 14.1253 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.482#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75587_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 75587_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:11.18 +65:39:45.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.915 1094984221147623168 122.54733920044 +65.66212441334 15.2726 14.7594 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.915#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75603_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 75603_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:15:28.66 +59:38:07.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.659 1038580786469589888 138.86851053954 +59.63557883136 14.4988 13.6835 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.659#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75708_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 75708_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:05:24.58 +64:05:38.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.85)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.124 1043566934263081856 136.35232484052 +64.09369034387 14.6947 14.0322 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.124#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75785_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 75785_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:29:39.00 +62:22:13.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.249 1063990431468176384 142.41000209012 +62.37005157626 15.5785 15.0747 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.249#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34696_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
Preparing report for the candidate 34696_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07290_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164
The candidate 07290_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-24-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164 did not pass the final checks