Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461144.7233,14.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260414.2233 14.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-02-26.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 3000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 2000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMa-09-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-09-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-09-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 802087 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 802087 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits_preview.png'
UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits

renamed 'UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits_preview.png'
UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 433.5681
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 536.5760
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 984.7657
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 498.3958
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 984.7209
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 498.3363
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.27131
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-02-26.fit
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 20.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-14T00:20:53.7842140' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-14T05:20:53.7842140' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61144.2228447222 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-14T05:21:03.6850523' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61144.2229593173 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 143.996327912623 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 45.9995179844398 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 59.9011111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 304.685555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.15540358165229 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29504 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29504 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 8.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 46.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.51 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 20.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 63.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 27.702216 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 20.50164 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-03-21.fit
CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-03-21.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-03-21.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits :)
Spent 0.520110 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-03-21.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-02-26.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 29235.906676
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=19889.0, right_median=20896.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-02-26.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 20.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-14T00:21:54.0075027' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-14T05:21:54.0075027' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61144.2235417478 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-14T05:22:03.9078332' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61144.2236563312 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 143.996327987163 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 45.9995179512026 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 59.7302777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 304.621388888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.15740425147839 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29504 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29504 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 8.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 46.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.51 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 20.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 63.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 27.702216 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 20.50164 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-03-21.fit
CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-03-21.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-03-21.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits :)
Spent 0.506265 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-03-21.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-02-26.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 29235.906676
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=19889.0, right_median=20896.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-02-26.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits

fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461144.72296046
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits'
wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:35:59.865 +46:00:01.75
Second-epoch image center 09:36:01.151 +45:55:10.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0809 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:35:59.865 +46:00:01.75
Second-epoch image center 09:36:02.920 +45:55:49.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0707 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:36:01.151 +45:55:10.74
Second-epoch second image center 09:36:02.920 +45:55:49.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01189 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xSkMWTLvQD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KFzFDgy5bu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KMtDN8Kv6S
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Y6Vk8uXI0Z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8553 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.9613 to 156.6650 deg, Dec +40.0487 to +51.3367 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.9613 to 156.6650 deg, Dec 40.0487 to 51.3367 deg
Loaded 5231 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3733 out of 3986 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3986 out of 8553 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.925283
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.925283
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Magnitude calibration plot:

____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
2.2 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
15.5 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
15.0 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
15.0 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.xSkMWTLvQD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=613, passed=8553
Got 8553 stars (including 7928 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8553 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KFzFDgy5bu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=607, passed=8478
Got 8478 stars (including 7857 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8478 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8371 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8371 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8371 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KMtDN8Kv6S (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=425, passed=6648
Got 6648 stars (including 6215 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6648 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 648 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 648 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Y6Vk8uXI0Z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=416, passed=6704
Got 6704 stars (including 6281 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6704 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 648 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6637 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 648 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:35:59.865 +46:00:01.75
Second-epoch image center 09:36:01.151 +45:55:10.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0809 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:35:59.865 +46:00:01.75
Second-epoch image center 09:36:02.920 +45:55:49.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0707 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:36:01.151 +45:55:10.74
Second-epoch second image center 09:36:02.920 +45:55:49.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01189 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tpZMi0NRMm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits &> /tmp/tmp.M6CDO5DNQO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tTZ7MzNXgJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9BEG7iHsEq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43399 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.9080 to 156.6649 deg, Dec +39.9553 to +51.3489 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.9080 to 156.6649 deg, Dec 39.9553 to 51.3489 deg
Loaded 5292 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3485 out of 3994 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3994 out of 43399 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.814796
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.814796
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Magnitude calibration plot:

____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 24 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
2.1 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
2.2 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
2.2 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
15.6 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
15.2 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
15.2 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.tpZMi0NRMm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=2286, passed=43372
Got 43372 stars (including 41025 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43372 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.M6CDO5DNQO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=2279, passed=43488
Got 43488 stars (including 41131 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43488 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43006 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43006 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43006 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tTZ7MzNXgJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=1700, passed=35440
Got 35440 stars (including 33691 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35440 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 648 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 648 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9BEG7iHsEq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=1680, passed=35426
Got 35426 stars (including 33688 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35426 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 648 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 648 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-20-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52399.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52954.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52966.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52969.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53101.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53274.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53324.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53326.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53330.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53356.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53421.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52959.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52954_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 52954_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 14.22366 | 2461144.72366 | 14.74 | 09:48:47.16 +48:09:02.1 | 3607 1746 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits |
**** FOUND 09:48:47.20 +48:09:01.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.057 824920457144926720 147.19698285310 +48.14988554594 14.8280 14.1533 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.057#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52959_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162
Preparing report for the candidate 52959_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52965_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 52965_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 14.22366 | 2461144.72366 | 14.30 | 09:25:00.51 +49:22:41.9 | 6016 1177 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits |
**** FOUND 09:25:00.39 +49:22:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52966_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 52966_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 14.22366 | 2461144.72366 | 14.11 | 09:50:14.53 +42:26:52.5 | 3069 5147 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits |
**** FOUND 09:50:14.50 +42:26:50.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.25)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52969_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 52969_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 14.22366 | 2461144.72366 | 14.28 | 09:16:57.68 +41:54:03.1 | 6766 5710 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits |
**** FOUND 09:16:57.73 +41:54:03.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.28, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.26)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.296 816137523902717440 139.24127083491 +41.90116847469 14.6218 14.1262 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.296#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52970_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 52970_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 14.22366 | 2461144.72366 | 13.94 | 09:33:14.50 +43:32:48.3 | 4995 4647 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits |
**** FOUND 09:33:14.61 +43:32:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52973_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 52973_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 14.22366 | 2461144.72366 | 12.81 | 08:53:55.17 +48:22:15.0 | 9135 1728 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits |
**** FOUND 08:53:55.14 +48:22:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53080_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53080_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 14.22366 | 2461144.72366 | 13.04 | 09:34:16.97 +49:03:26.1 | 5094 1327 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits |
**** FOUND 09:34:16.97 +49:03:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53101_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53101_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 14.22366 | 2461144.72366 | 13.36 | 08:53:04.01 +50:11:36.8 | 9150 0611 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits |
**** FOUND 08:53:04.04 +50:11:36.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.33, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.31)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.246 1016715314125001344 133.26693783892 +50.19334700783 13.2323 12.5717 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.246#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53133_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53133_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 14.22366 | 2461144.72366 | 13.48 | 09:04:40.07 +43:03:07.0 | 8137 5006 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits |
**** FOUND 09:04:40.16 +43:03:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53175_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53175_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 14.22366 | 2461144.72366 | 13.90 | 09:46:01.02 +45:53:51.9 | 3747 3126 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits |
**** FOUND 09:46:01.08 +45:53:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53210_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53210_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 14.22366 | 2461144.72366 | 14.16 | 09:30:35.47 +47:50:55.0 | 5419 2076 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits |
**** FOUND 09:30:35.45 +47:50:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53235_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53235_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 14.22366 | 2461144.72366 | 14.14 | 09:21:13.89 +44:48:38.5 | 6323 3941 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits |
**** FOUND 09:21:13.98 +44:48:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53241_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53241_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 14.22366 | 2461144.72366 | 14.27 | 10:06:56.43 +49:21:30.6 | 1910 0765 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits |
**** FOUND 10:06:56.43 +49:21:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53242_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53242_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 14.22366 | 2461144.72366 | 13.94 | 09:35:45.41 +41:04:44.7 | 4619 6119 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits |
**** FOUND 09:35:45.36 +41:04:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53274_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53274_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 14.22366 | 2461144.72366 | 14.29 | 09:01:38.18 +49:19:38.7 | 8327 1191 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits |
**** FOUND 09:01:38.07 +49:19:38.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.27)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.821 1015772826501003520 135.40890208789 +49.32758363542 14.2543 13.7487 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.821#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53324_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53324_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 14.22366 | 2461144.72366 | 14.74 | 09:48:24.86 +49:40:23.1 | 3743 0835 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits |
**** FOUND 09:48:24.93 +49:40:25.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.67, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.65)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.663 826770866494915456 147.10508612242 +49.67426012670 14.8164 14.2923 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.663#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53326_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53326_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 14.22366 | 2461144.72366 | 14.59 | 09:07:27.92 +46:00:15.6 | 7787 3224 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits |
**** FOUND 09:07:27.85 +46:00:15.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.58, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.56)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.573 1009858484735406464 136.86626977767 +46.00443061753 14.5429 13.9628 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.573#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53327_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53327_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 14.22366 | 2461144.72366 | 14.84 | 09:54:10.14 +49:34:57.5 | 3177 0821 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits |
**** FOUND 09:54:10.20 +49:34:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53330_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53330_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 14.22366 | 2461144.72366 | 14.49 | 09:26:28.43 +49:52:25.8 | 5884 0872 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits |
**** FOUND 09:26:28.46 +49:52:25.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.55, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.53)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.132 1018240749068943872 141.61926440793 +49.87324118533 14.7098 14.0036 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.132#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53356_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53356_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 14.22366 | 2461144.72366 | 14.54 | 08:59:52.92 +45:51:55.7 | 8594 3282 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits |
**** FOUND 08:59:52.83 +45:51:56.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.407 1010601960754581760 134.97106802495 +45.86582009667 14.8155 14.3763 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.407#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53421_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 53421_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 14.22366 | 2461144.72366 | 14.79 | 08:52:51.80 +45:59:24.4 | 9338 3166 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits |
**** FOUND 08:52:51.65 +45:59:23.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.85)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.942 1010454248239774464 133.21625248254 +45.98945689385 14.9519 14.4086 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.942#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52399_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 52399_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 04 14.22366 | 2461144.72366 | 14.34 | 10:18:41.31 +46:15:46.6 | 0379 2386 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits |
**** FOUND 10:18:41.25 +46:15:46.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.560 810261733763836032 154.67188954080 +46.26332209113 15.1788 14.7274 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.560#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33324_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162
The candidate 33324_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 04 14.22366 | 2461144.72366 | 10.86 | 09:08:47.99 +42:09:22.7 | 7686 5557 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-14_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_002246_TTUQ1b1x1_31315_mnNnYGWG/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-14_00-21-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits |
**** FOUND 09:08:47.99 +42:09:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 15s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
09:36:14.19 +43:23:09.4
########### Completed UMa-09-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
09:36:14.19 +43:23:09.4
###################################################################################
09:36:14.19 +43:23:09.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
09:36:14.19 +43:23:09.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
09:36:14.19 +43:23:09.4 -- not a known variable star
Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
09:36:14.19 +43:23:09.4
10:18:41.25 +46:15:46.4
09:48:47.20 +48:09:01.5
09:50:14.50 +42:26:50.7
09:16:57.73 +41:54:03.0
08:53:04.04 +50:11:36.1
09:01:38.07 +49:19:38.8
09:48:24.93 +49:40:25.0
09:07:27.85 +46:00:15.9
09:26:28.46 +49:52:25.1
08:59:52.83 +45:51:56.5
08:52:51.65 +45:59:23.4
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461144.72296046 -observatory V36
23:58:02.56 -03:00:29.3 Mercury (0.1mag)
02:59:58.77 +17:10:48.6 Venus (-3.9mag)
00:12:47.60 +00:18:32.6 Mars (1.2mag)
07:11:50.33 +22:47:31.3 Jupiter (-2.1mag)
00:28:23.28 +00:44:01.7 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:47:19.52 +19:46:17.0 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:10:36.42 -00:16:50.5 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:40.45 -22:52:31.5 Pluto (14.5mag)
22:49:57.62 -07:37:24.1 Moon (-9.2mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Apr 14 00:23 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461144.72296046:
07:11:48.20 +22:47:38.0 Io (5.8mag)
07:11:47.90 +22:47:33.3 Europa (5.9mag)
07:11:59.67 +22:47:18.4 Ganymede (5.3mag)
07:12:17.12 +22:46:43.3 Callisto (6.6mag)
07:15:15.19 +22:35:58.9 Himalia (15.3mag)
07:11:46.49 +22:47:39.8 Thebe (16.2mag)
07:15:24.26 +23:06:01.8 Elara (17.3mag)
07:10:35.97 +23:28:27.3 Pasiphae (17.4mag)
07:20:12.39 +22:45:21.9 Carme (18.5mag)
00:28:31.11 +00:44:18.3 Titan (8.8mag)
00:28:25.07 +00:44:16.0 Rhea (10.1mag)
00:28:06.50 +00:44:28.2 Iapetus (11.5mag)
00:28:36.48 +00:44:11.0 Hyperion (14.8mag)
00:30:01.58 +00:53:01.4 Phoebe (16.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Apr 14 00:23 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461144.72296046:
15:30:14.86 -14:59:44.9 JWST
17:10:19.15 +44:01:14.5 Chandra
08:07:05.74 -40:55:39.9 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Apr 14 00:23 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461144.72296046 -observatory V36
-> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180]
18:51:15.45 -28:40:32.0 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:05:28.05 -69:44:47.1 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:32:04.03 +31:25:31.4 17.2mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:30:36.03 +10:20:12.7 17.6mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:09:44.78 +29:09:32.2 17.1mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
04:27:10.13 +25:59:24.1 16.0mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:03:03.01 +32:00:21.9 16.2mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:30:48.51 -00:20:31.5 17.3mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:54:08.62 +18:22:58.8 17.5mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:41:14.60 -11:32:51.3 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
09:08:28.29 -12:10:07.6 17.6mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS)
21:52:24.83 +62:48:10.9 17.5mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
19:20:42.48 -03:42:14.8 14.2mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
21:35:48.98 +85:39:57.5 17.8mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:17:05.57 +63:31:16.8 17.1mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
05:09:26.32 +17:42:23.2 10.9mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
16:20:24.59 +06:05:56.8 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:20:18.26 +14:47:35.4 14.6mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
03:24:46.57 -22:39:24.5 16.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:15:12.57 +45:44:03.0 17.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
13:46:13.21 +44:17:29.9 15.1mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
03:22:28.67 -25:56:08.2 17.8mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS)
23:29:07.97 +19:07:49.6 8.8mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:54:53.33 +02:54:15.5 17.4mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
03:12:38.92 +02:49:40.7 12.7mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS)
23:54:31.32 +36:53:20.1 14.5mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
18:39:28.62 -09:48:50.6 11.9mag 10P/Tempel
15:02:42.30 +03:23:31.1 13.8mag 24P/Schaumasse
11:03:17.01 -01:35:01.7 15.7mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
18:00:25.39 -09:40:33.6 17.9mag 40P/Vaisala
10:37:39.26 -04:14:29.1 16.9mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
01:45:55.39 +17:11:03.9 17.2mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
07:07:29.60 +37:23:38.3 17.0mag 63P/Wild
23:26:47.24 -11:39:53.0 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
03:58:30.63 +20:38:29.7 15.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
01:01:38.90 +07:52:45.1 14.3mag 78P/Gehrels
22:57:36.57 -09:54:59.8 14.6mag 88P/Howell
02:05:22.74 +20:10:01.8 15.1mag 93P/Lovas
04:51:27.75 +32:11:32.5 16.2mag 123P/West-Hartley
08:26:17.21 +39:10:52.0 16.2mag 124P/Mrkos
02:30:28.26 +14:10:17.3 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
02:44:03.10 +14:16:32.7 17.5mag 131P/Mueller
01:16:50.85 +12:37:10.0 10.7mag 141P/Machholz
01:26:01.21 +04:12:23.9 10.7mag 141P-A/Machholz
00:12:10.76 +00:10:57.6 13.0mag 141P-D/Machholz
01:56:11.67 +05:57:35.2 17.8mag 141P-I/Machholz
00:57:25.39 -02:25:10.0 15.1mag 162P/SidingSpring
10:29:05.53 +30:57:12.3 18.0mag 164P/Christensen
06:33:14.69 +24:17:51.5 18.0mag 198P/ODAS
14:54:35.60 -00:15:12.9 17.6mag 210P/Christensen
21:33:40.77 -11:52:37.9 17.6mag 218P/LINEAR
17:16:05.65 -14:08:47.2 16.1mag 235P/LINEAR
05:30:38.85 +34:33:44.8 16.7mag 240P/NEAT
07:37:37.67 -05:21:37.9 17.7mag 242P/Spahr
22:12:28.08 -21:27:00.5 17.9mag 260P/McNaught
15:43:19.74 +06:52:21.9 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
07:33:31.25 +21:21:36.5 17.7mag 450P/LONEOS
05:33:16.96 +45:08:12.0 17.5mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K Apr 14 00:23 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.48
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74
06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48
11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95
10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53
20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83
06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93
07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78
19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2
04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS
11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2
07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8
16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12
13:01:19.46 +15:42:15.50 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.34 -0.18
09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06
03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00 SN2026evh 2026-03-12.05 17.29
06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10 AT2026ffp 2026-03-12.16 0.37
14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50 AT2026fij 2026-03-12.05 15.97
10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10 SN 2026exe 2026-03-11.78 16.48
18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00 SN2026ess 2026-03-12.37 17.37
13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80 AT2026ewa 2026-03-12.42 16.77
15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20 ASASSN-26bp 2026-03-11.92 13.33
13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20 AT2024cmo 2026-03-11.12 16.29
13:06:01.97 -15:50:14.40 AT2026fdy 2026-03-10.33 16.68
11:30:09.70 -47:26:45.00 ASASSN-26bn 2026-03-10.3 15.14
05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40 (= Gaia 2026-03-9.09 14.32
03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70 ASASSN-26bm 2026-03-8.04 15.22
04:31:00.53 -68:29:50.20 ASASSN-26bl 2026-03-7.9 10.26
16:18:17.61 +41:25:11.40 SN 2026dkf 2026-03-6.31 16.7
13:45:00.35 +61:16:50.90 SN 2026ejl 2026-03-6.41 -0.66
09:27:45.33 -37:49:33.00 ASASSN-26bk 2026-03-2.06 13.58
20:22:01.20 +23:47:47.30 ASASSN-26bi 2026-02-28.51 15.86
11:16:22.10 +29:26:22.80 AT2026enm 2026-02-28.39 16.88
08:05:59.83 -48:39:35.60 ASASSN-26bh 2026-02-26.05 14.64
13:24:27.02 -45:57:01.40 ASASSN-26bg 2026-02-26.35 15.28
17:27:50.95 -68:28:46.40 ASASSN-26bf 2026-02-26.3 16.28
18:03:39.29 +19:58:46.30 ASASSN-26be 2026-02-25.56 14.95
17:40:18.19 +07:20:59.60 SN 2026crm 2026-02-24.34 16.9
18:38:36.11 -79:28:58.40 ASASSN-26bb 2026-02-24.36 16.11
17:43:29.75 +11:24:00.60 ASASSN-26bc 2026-02-23.37 -3.37
16:59:41.08 -80:01:51.20 ASASSN-26bd 2026-02-23.3 14.38
11:23:31.77 -08:39:15.40 SN2026cff 2026-02-23.15 -1.08
14:55:17.39 -05:56:05.30 SN2026dmk 2026-02-23.22 -0.76
12:28:15.19 +44:27:20.80 SN2026cjz 2026-02-23.47 15.62
12:12:29.55 -02:40:43.30 AT2026dsk 2026-02-23.4 17.21
09:21:05.29 +06:11:42.80 SN2026chr 2026-02-23.1 17.39
16:05:38.61 +18:06:07.40 SN 2026dsy 2026-02-23.36 17.15
04:55:50.66 -29:52:57.70 SN 2026dpg 2026-02-23.11 15.75
04:21:28.18 -53:22:54.40 AT2026drl 2026-02-21.03 17.31
11:50:37.32 +55:21:13.70 SN 2026dix 2026-02-21.43 16.39
16:21:19.69 -63:47:29.40 ASASSN-26az 2026-02-21.03 17.02
02:45:30.93 -54:17:43.10 SN 2026cju 2026-02-21.04 17.54
01:58:40.68 +47:34:50.10 ASASSN-26av 2026-02-21.09 15.97
18:35:53.01 -42:31:38.90 ASASSN-26aw 2026-02-21.12 15.89
11:40:18.88 -39:45:09.20 ASASSN-26ax 2026-02-21.08 15.73
02:26:23.52 -51:42:29.80 ASASSN-26ay 2026-02-21.04 13.93
08:46:07.66 +01:17:43.90 ASASSN-26ba 2026-02-20.23 15.43
14:15:47.49 -48:05:16.60 SN2026dez 2026-02-19.31 15.91
17:25:53.90 -23:28:31.50 ASASSN-26au 2026-02-18.33 15.82
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K Apr 14 00:23 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:52.23 +41:01:44.7 PNV J00425223+4101447 2026-01-19.5505 18.74Cmag
09:54:46.47 +69:06:31.7 PNV J09544647+6906317 2026-01-26.8081 19.3mag
18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9 TCP J18085199-2616219 2026-01-31.8519 12.2mag
08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1 TCP J08011102-0343141 2026-02-08.8090 15.10Cmag
05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5 TCP J05191540-0204515 2026-02-13.4306 14.5mag
10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9 TCP J10524126+3640089 2026-02-17.6065 17.4mag
05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1 TCP J05505081+3622451 2026-02-17.5511 15.7mag
00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag
00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag
17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag
09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K Apr 14 00:23 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
11:56:46.937 +30:48:49.43 AT 2026ivi 2026-04-07.29 20.1063
12:16:21.919 +30:21:04.60 AT 2026ivh 2026-04-07.29 19.651
09:11:45.682 +30:03:32.51 AT 2026ivg 2026-04-04.17 19.5142
09:55:25.809 -27:42:27.02 AT 2026ivf 2026-04-08.21 18.51
09:46:07.094 +07:14:13.61 AT 2026ive 2026-04-08.15 19.9446
09:29:29.340 -01:21:08.51 AT 2026ivd 2026-04-05.15 19.4593
09:53:27.521 +16:01:50.20 AT 2026ivc 2026-04-07.17 20.1328
10:57:27.283 +18:19:29.99 AT 2026ivb 2026-04-07.87 19.71
12:50:08.105 +01:17:40.78 AT 2026iva 2026-04-07.89 19.96
10:38:31.370 -04:47:42.62 AT 2026iuz 2026-04-07.85 18.9
13:03:44.252 +20:35:06.20 AT 2026iuy 2026-04-06.96 19.7
13:53:33.216 -46:24:12.81 AT 2026iux 2026-04-07.63 19.83
20:29:30.119 -10:56:33.33 AT 2026iuw 2026-03-29.79 19.55
13:31:30.960 -32:00:09.92 AT 2026iuv 2026-04-07.60 18.91
14:00:56.468 -25:06:29.29 AT 2026iuu 2026-04-07.35 18.482
13:27:25.132 +09:30:53.72 AT 2026iut 2026-04-05.33 19.4971
13:57:28.106 -31:36:18.49 AT 2026ius 2026-04-07.61 19.27
09:54:32.050 -01:17:25.84 SN 2026iur 2026-04-07.01 15.9
14:24:08.131 +22:56:14.71 AT 2026iuq 2026-04-07.38 19.91
10:07:28.221 -17:12:04.00 AT 2026iup 2026-04-05.31 20.26
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Apr 14 00:23 tns_transients_list.txt