This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0725233-075609,2461144.6935,11.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0725233-075609 20260414.1935 11.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3031740761976741248,2461144.6935,12.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3031740761976741248 20260414.1935 12.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J073351-1116.8,2461144.6935,12.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J073351-1116.8 20260414.1935 12.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J111.3849-07.7400,2461144.6935,12.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J111.3849-07.7400 20260414.1935 12.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J115.2512-07.3281,2461144.6935,13.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J115.2512-07.3281 20260414.1935 13.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J113.2918-07.6968,2461144.6935,13.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J113.2918-07.6968 20260414.1935 13.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
EF Pup,2461144.6935,10.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
EF Pup 20260414.1935 10.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461144.6935,12.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260414.1935 12.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J111.6646-13.7457,2461144.6935,12.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J111.6646-13.7457 20260414.1935 12.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
GDS_J0725159-130519,2461144.6935,12.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
GDS_J0725159-130519 20260414.1935 12.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J072535-0716.8,2461144.6935,11.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J072535-0716.8 20260414.1935 11.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J072530.19-063157.2,2461144.6935,11.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J072530.19-063157.2 20260414.1935 11.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J072702-1016.9,2461144.6935,11.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J072702-1016.9 20260414.1935 11.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 15328233,2461144.6935,12.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 15328233 20260414.1935 12.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
KN Mon,2461144.6935,10.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
KN Mon 20260414.1935 10.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J073033.65-082906.6,2461144.6935,13.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J073033.65-082906.6 20260414.1935 13.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.60652544 20.03.2026 02:33:13.798 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
First image: 2461119.60652544 20.03.2026 02:33:13.798 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Last image: 2461144.69382396 14.04.2026 04:38:56.390 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.08
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 25721
Objects passed selection criteria: 25601
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 18771
Average stars matched: 17429.5 (92.8533 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 127984 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 23:41:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.60652544 20.03.2026 02:33:13.798 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
First image: 2461119.60652544 20.03.2026 02:33:13.798 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Last image: 2461144.69382396 14.04.2026 04:38:56.390 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 137
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 62 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 180702
Objects passed selection criteria: 180145
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 133820
Average stars matched: 123387 (92.2035 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1993956 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 23:45:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461144.69316243
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits'
wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits'
wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits'
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:42:46.255 -09:59:55.21
Second-epoch image center 07:42:51.188 -09:59:49.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0203 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:42:46.255 -09:59:55.21
Second-epoch image center 07:42:53.499 -09:59:34.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0303 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:42:51.188 -09:59:49.40
Second-epoch second image center 07:42:53.499 -09:59:34.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01036 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits &> /tmp/tmp.04ieQLSeiw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dmJg6QgspL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XQtqVISTKL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qKHvbhEYhv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29086 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 107.5371 to 123.6872 deg, Dec -15.2912 to -4.5931 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 107.5371 to 123.6872 deg, Dec -15.2912 to -4.5931 deg
Loaded 24807 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 16796 out of 18331 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18331 out of 29086 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.871895
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.871895
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.08
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.79
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.79
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
2.5 pix Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
2.7 pix fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits
2.8 pix fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
14.8 mag. Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.04ieQLSeiw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2950, passed=29086
Got 29086 stars (including 26116 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29086 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28557 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28559 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28559 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits -region wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dmJg6QgspL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2922, passed=28978
Got 28978 stars (including 26039 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28978 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28372 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28371 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28371 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits -region wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XQtqVISTKL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1120, passed=16711
Got 16711 stars (including 15578 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16711 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16599 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16599 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16599 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qKHvbhEYhv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=963, passed=16538
Got 16538 stars (including 15565 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16538 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16380 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16381 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16381 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Mon-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20988.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31595_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 31595_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:31.41 -13:54:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33760_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 33760_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:05.59 -05:46:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34569_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 34569_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:15.02 -09:51:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34834_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 34834_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:51.37 -11:16:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10980_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 10980_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:02.03 -11:47:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14999_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 14999_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:40.97 -10:18:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20988_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
Preparing report for the candidate 20988_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06663_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 06663_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:24.84 -13:18:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Mon-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
07:25:23.71 -07:56:06.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:42:46.255 -09:59:55.21
Second-epoch image center 07:42:51.188 -09:59:49.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0203 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:42:46.255 -09:59:55.21
Second-epoch image center 07:42:53.499 -09:59:34.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0303 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:42:51.188 -09:59:49.40
Second-epoch second image center 07:42:53.499 -09:59:34.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01036 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F2wt5xTYm1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits &> /tmp/tmp.W1rNWHK4Zy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits &> /tmp/tmp.N26f935Io7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QazI6o5ayZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 203060 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 107.5165 to 123.6907 deg, Dec -15.2923 to -4.5813 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 107.5165 to 123.6907 deg, Dec -15.2923 to -4.5813 deg
Loaded 24871 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14449 out of 20775 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 20775 out of 203060 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.677319
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.677319
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 95 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
2.3 pix Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
2.5 pix fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits
2.8 pix fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
14.9 mag. Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.F2wt5xTYm1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=54, blended=31232, passed=203006
Got 203006 stars (including 171558 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 203006 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 200552 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 200555 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 200555 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits -region wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.W1rNWHK4Zy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=62, blended=31956, passed=205869
Got 205869 stars (including 173699 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 205869 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204667 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits -region wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.N26f935Io7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=12807, passed=110618
Got 110618 stars (including 97717 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 110618 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109810 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109810 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QazI6o5ayZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=11352, passed=103960
Got 103960 stars (including 92509 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 103960 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 103044 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 103044 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 103044 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0760.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_233942_TTUQ2b1x1_23609_WbTRBzNF/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Mon-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out19112.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out229953.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out229985.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out249176.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out137346.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out180087.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out185185.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out193101.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out199678.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out229974.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out229986.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out243543.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out246882.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out27232.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out38855.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out40416.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57623.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91425.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99551.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 17s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229949_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 229949_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:04.45 -12:09:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229953_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 229953_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:42.90 -12:01:49.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.15, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.13)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229974_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
Preparing report for the candidate 229974_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229980_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 229980_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:34.00 -07:00:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229985_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 229985_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:21.00 -12:32:21.1 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.52, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.50)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229986_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
Preparing report for the candidate 229986_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229987_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 229987_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:50.56 -14:02:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229992_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 229992_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:58:42.01 -14:03:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229994_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 229994_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:58:31.68 -11:22:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229996_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 229996_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:50.93 -07:05:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229998_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 229998_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:53.35 -11:27:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230002_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 230002_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230003_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 230003_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:12.55 -06:11:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230009_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 230009_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:04.33 -05:44:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230014_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 230014_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:31.40 -13:54:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232507_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 232507_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:31.69 -06:20:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234101_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 234101_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:57.06 -06:44:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234576_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 234576_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:26.79 -07:34:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235707_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 235707_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:41.07 -08:12:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236260_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 236260_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:42:34.46 -05:45:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236362_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 236362_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.83 -08:40:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237322_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 237322_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:24.15 -09:51:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237595_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 237595_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:35.03 -14:06:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238183_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 238183_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:56.27 -08:08:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238444_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 238444_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:08.90 -09:31:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239440_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 239440_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:12.03 -08:20:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 240098_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 240098_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:08.96 -08:03:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 240156_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 240156_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:27.98 -11:45:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 240759_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 240759_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:44:05.77 -06:34:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 240797_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 240797_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:54:04.35 -10:35:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 241055_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 241055_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:27.70 -09:18:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 241716_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 241716_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:03.44 -09:05:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 241861_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 241861_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:47.82 -13:55:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242269_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 242269_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:21.57 -06:53:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242372_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 242372_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:07.62 -08:02:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243387_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 243387_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:52.07 -07:59:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243475_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 243475_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:35.09 -12:49:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243543_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
Preparing report for the candidate 243543_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243661_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 243661_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:48.97 -09:25:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243683_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 243683_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:57:10.34 -13:24:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243704_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 243704_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:55:54.95 -09:48:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243749_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 243749_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:53.73 -09:47:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243841_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 243841_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:03.99 -06:20:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243902_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 243902_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:51.17 -07:17:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244017_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 244017_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:35.13 -08:39:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244282_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 244282_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:17.23 -05:56:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244458_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 244458_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:01.64 -07:30:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244591_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 244591_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:32.82 -13:18:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244963_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 244963_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:16.36 -06:34:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245004_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 245004_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:54.96 -07:49:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245592_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 245592_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:04.14 -06:48:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245727_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 245727_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:50:06.57 -12:20:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245839_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 245839_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:55.60 -07:59:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245891_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 245891_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:28.46 -11:03:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245947_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 245947_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:42.15 -09:18:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245969_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 245969_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:44:23.41 -09:32:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245994_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 245994_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:33.38 -10:09:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246024_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 246024_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:45.50 -10:38:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246161_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 246161_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:01.41 -07:39:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246822_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 246822_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:30.70 -08:02:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246882_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
Preparing report for the candidate 246882_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247539_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 247539_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:52.16 -07:38:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247758_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 247758_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:40.20 -10:21:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249176_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 249176_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:16.21 -05:49:03.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.64)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.573 3055932835280629504 115.81798084079 -05.81765638103 13.7118 13.0086 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.573#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199678_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
Preparing report for the candidate 199678_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57623_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
Preparing report for the candidate 57623_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185185_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
Preparing report for the candidate 185185_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69516_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 69516_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:02.04 -11:47:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123498_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 123498_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:04.66 -09:09:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135147_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 135147_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:57.51 -08:41:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27232_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
Preparing report for the candidate 27232_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40416_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
Preparing report for the candidate 40416_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175581_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 175581_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:38.50 -06:19:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110090_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 110090_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:15.05 -09:51:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148988_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 148988_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:13.28 -07:52:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114067_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 114067_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:15.27 -09:39:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86833_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 86833_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:12.45 -10:54:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193101_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
Preparing report for the candidate 193101_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180087_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
Preparing report for the candidate 180087_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38305_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 38305_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:24.80 -13:18:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24056_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 24056_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:52.06 -14:02:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99551_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
Preparing report for the candidate 99551_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59602_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 59602_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:06.30 -12:13:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101036_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 101036_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:40.98 -10:18:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30909_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 30909_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:58.18 -13:36:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145806_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 145806_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:26.76 -08:01:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38855_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
Preparing report for the candidate 38855_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19112_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 19112_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:25.94 -14:11:01.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.34, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.32)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.670 3031743442036170752 112.10823318680 -14.18424603905 12.2666 11.8076 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.670#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91425_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
Preparing report for the candidate 91425_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39408_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 39408_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:32.40 -13:10:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79500_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 79500_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:51.38 -11:16:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137346_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
Preparing report for the candidate 137346_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 215173_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 215173_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:18.51 -14:08:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32792_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 32792_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:36.78 -13:29:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147777_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761
The candidate 147777_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_23-38-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0761 did not pass the final checks
