This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 14.1793* 10 32 37.84 +01 48 47.5 12.2 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461144.6793,12.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260414.1793 12.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 14.1793* 10 40 30.78 +00 30 14.9 13.7 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461144.6793,13.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260414.1793 13.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 14.1793* 10 44 00.25 -04 36 33.2 14.3 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461144.6793,14.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260414.1793 14.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.90489140 18.01.2026 09:42:52.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
First image: 2461058.90489140 18.01.2026 09:42:52.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Last image: 2461144.67967948 14.04.2026 04:18:34.307 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.70
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7706
Objects passed selection criteria: 7698
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7050
Average stars matched: 6882.75 (97.6277 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113264 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 23:20:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.90489140 18.01.2026 09:42:52.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
First image: 2461058.90489140 18.01.2026 09:42:52.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Last image: 2461144.67967948 14.04.2026 04:18:34.307 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 108
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 13 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 41500
Objects passed selection criteria: 41403
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 39146.8
Average stars matched: 37687.5 (96.2724 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 140676 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 23:21:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461144.67899869
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits'
wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits'
wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits'
wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:03.829 -01:59:47.05
Second-epoch image center 10:17:07.915 -01:58:20.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0294 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:03.829 -01:59:47.05
Second-epoch image center 10:17:07.294 -01:58:05.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0317 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:17:07.915 -01:58:20.59
Second-epoch second image center 10:17:07.294 -01:58:05.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00498 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits &> /tmp/tmp.d3VsJzEjBr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits &> /tmp/tmp.V07xMNgAQr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TbyEegpcNt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Cz3ZxEQaSY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits and wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits and wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits and wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7808 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.3749 to 162.2183 deg, Dec -7.3004 to +3.3307 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.3749 to 162.2183 deg, Dec -7.3004 to 3.3307 deg
Loaded 4796 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4045 out of 4187 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4187 out of 7808 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.873667
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.873667
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.70
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.17
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.17
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
2.3 pix Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
15.2 mag. Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.d3VsJzEjBr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=466, passed=7808
Got 7808 stars (including 7337 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7808 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7570 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7573 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7573 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits -region wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.V07xMNgAQr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=461, passed=7862
Got 7862 stars (including 7394 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7862 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7613 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7616 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7616 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits -region wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TbyEegpcNt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=390, passed=6388
Got 6388 stars (including 5991 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6388 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6238 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6238 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Cz3ZxEQaSY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=395, passed=6354
Got 6354 stars (including 5952 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6354 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6187 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6188 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6188 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sex-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20606.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20502_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 20502_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:25:43.91 +01:28:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20544_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 20544_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:57:22.31 -02:32:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20606_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
Preparing report for the candidate 20606_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07164_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 07164_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:23:30.92 -07:05:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02522_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 02522_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:34:56.02 -00:20:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sex-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:32:37.84 +01:48:47.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:03.829 -01:59:47.05
Second-epoch image center 10:17:07.915 -01:58:20.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0294 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:03.829 -01:59:47.05
Second-epoch image center 10:17:07.294 -01:58:05.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0317 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:17:07.915 -01:58:20.59
Second-epoch second image center 10:17:07.294 -01:58:05.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00498 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q7ZCthF2FH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits &> /tmp/tmp.W0ndUqM80N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6IHbvicuEV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xD9lB57znC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits and wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits and wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits and wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 40923 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.3591 to 162.2194 deg, Dec -7.3040 to +3.3307 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.3591 to 162.2194 deg, Dec -7.3040 to 3.3307 deg
Loaded 4799 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3845 out of 4239 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4239 out of 40923 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.755743
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.755743
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 105 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
2.3 pix Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
2.1 pix fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
2.0 pix fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
15.3 mag. Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Q7ZCthF2FH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1914, passed=40911
Got 40911 stars (including 38933 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40911 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39819 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39821 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39821 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 929 stars left (next iteration limit 1021)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits -region wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.W0ndUqM80N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1902, passed=40634
Got 40634 stars (including 38663 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40634 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39578 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39579 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39579 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits -region wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6IHbvicuEV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1394, passed=37930
Got 37930 stars (including 36472 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37930 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37205 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37203 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xD9lB57znC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1492, passed=38229
Got 38229 stars (including 36686 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38229 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37378 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37378 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37378 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 923 stars left (next iteration limit 1015)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-42-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/wcs_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-43-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0454.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-17-35_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0111.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_231931_TTUQ1b1x1_15526_attgz792/wcs_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sex-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52832.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53722.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53865.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53884.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53963.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53982.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53989.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54052.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54058.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54067.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out54073.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53324.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53652.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52611_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52611_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:01:17.93 +01:33:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52612_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52612_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:15:47.65 +00:59:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52615_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52615_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:09:45.60 -02:48:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52619_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52619_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:08:12.31 -01:06:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52620_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52620_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:12:14.17 -03:47:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52621_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52621_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:57:49.82 +00:53:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52622_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52622_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:04:36.20 -05:20:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52623_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52623_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:16:38.22 +02:58:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52625_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52625_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:56:43.17 -04:04:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52626_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52626_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:17:12.77 -03:25:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52680_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52680_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:48:17.86 +02:26:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52698_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52698_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52743_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52743_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:25:43.92 +01:28:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52784_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52784_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52799_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52799_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52804_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52804_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52812_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52812_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52832_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52832_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:28:13.01 -04:49:08.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.03, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.01)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.508 3779279059625065728 157.05434427631 -04.81896066623 11.9282 11.1220 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.508#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52843_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52843_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:32:37.85 +01:48:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52847_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52847_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:08:28.95 -03:29:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52848_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52848_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52869_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52869_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:07:40.11 +00:53:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52879_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52879_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:09:25.09 +01:55:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52892_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52892_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52903_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52903_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:57:43.25 +01:55:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52906_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52906_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:13:44.15 -05:12:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52934_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52934_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52947_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52947_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52958_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52958_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52969_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52969_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52978_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 52978_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:14:30.48 -01:08:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53080_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53080_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53140_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53140_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:20:55.73 +01:55:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53157_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53157_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:04:12.62 -00:02:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53182_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53182_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53188_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53188_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:54:07.35 -03:32:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53238_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53238_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:57:20.32 +01:12:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53306_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53306_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:16:45.96 -03:07:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53320_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53320_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53324_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
Preparing report for the candidate 53324_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53335_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53335_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:18:18.85 -01:13:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53404_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53404_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53413_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53413_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:00:23.97 +00:03:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53416_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53416_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:10:19.24 -05:01:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53420_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53420_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:27:39.26 -00:56:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53421_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53421_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:01:36.06 +01:07:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53438_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53438_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:59:32.61 -01:10:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53439_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53439_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:12:43.82 +02:12:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53472_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53472_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:50:27.94 -01:26:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53531_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53531_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:57:12.33 -04:12:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53549_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53549_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:00:01.15 -00:01:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53564_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53564_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:02:19.04 -05:46:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53571_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53571_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:14:57.75 +00:50:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53590_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53590_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:55:57.01 -00:07:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53595_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53595_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:30:31.82 -02:43:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53606_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53606_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:34:03.55 +02:48:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53614_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53614_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:22:46.21 +02:24:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53652_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
Preparing report for the candidate 53652_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53661_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53661_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:57:16.51 +00:56:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53664_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53664_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:04:12.69 -01:12:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53672_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53672_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:05:33.90 -04:59:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53719_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53719_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:12:45.99 -07:00:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53722_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53722_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:04:59.59 -03:24:17.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.33, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.31)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.440 3828450873181840128 151.24915528211 -03.40524533038 15.0447 14.4527 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.440#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53730_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53730_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:57:41.50 -00:24:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53778_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53778_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:18:17.72 -01:11:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53801_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53801_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53804_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53804_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:01:33.38 -02:27:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53825_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53825_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:15:14.73 +01:02:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53846_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53846_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:49:11.19 -03:38:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53854_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53854_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:05:10.68 -04:52:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53865_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53865_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:03:35.41 -06:02:03.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.579 3773818648658591232 150.89721890715 -06.03389562934 14.7575 14.3003 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.579#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53875_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53875_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:11:08.64 +02:55:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53884_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53884_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:59:42.60 +02:54:25.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.70, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.68)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.108 3836452431613778176 149.92754092720 +02.90683370973 14.9006 14.4016 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.108#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53888_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53888_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:49:29.34 +00:17:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53897_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53897_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:57:53.04 -06:33:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53910_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53910_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53916_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53916_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53936_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53936_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:00:33.00 +01:39:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53943_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53943_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:51:40.73 +02:25:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53944_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53944_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53946_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53946_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:58:58.53 +02:51:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53948_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53948_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:07:05.80 +00:25:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53963_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53963_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:17:33.15 +02:40:39.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.507 3859608077775396096 154.38836121028 +02.67715418582 14.7049 14.1481 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.507#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53966_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53966_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:11:42.89 -06:53:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53982_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53982_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:16:21.76 -04:37:54.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.277 3779895374547305088 154.09060470771 -04.63187920747 14.6933 14.1894 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.277#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53989_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53989_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:56:40.60 +00:49:53.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.83, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.81)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.255 3834367963726032256 149.16923007215 +00.83141259551 14.7518 14.0304 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.255#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53991_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53991_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:57:41.80 +02:55:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53996_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53996_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53997_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 53997_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:09:46.58 +01:06:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54013_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 54013_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:36:20.17 +00:24:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54017_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 54017_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:00:11.35 -05:04:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54031_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 54031_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:58:16.42 +00:10:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54040_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 54040_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:00:20.49 +01:35:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54052_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 54052_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:26:30.62 -05:47:25.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.078 3776110168329793280 156.62729066862 -05.79054169456 14.6980 14.0994 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.078#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54053_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 54053_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:59:33.90 -03:11:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54058_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 54058_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:55:44.13 -02:23:05.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.833 3826559266505443712 148.93410626865 -02.38492609162 14.7867 14.3312 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.833#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54059_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 54059_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:58:22.48 -00:24:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54061_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 54061_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:19:48.28 +01:44:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54063_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 54063_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:02:36.28 +03:04:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54065_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 54065_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:51:12.59 +00:27:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54067_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 54067_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:09:31.30 -02:33:11.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.651 3828977367452744704 152.38053788999 -02.55321753572 14.8624 14.1571 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.651#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54073_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 54073_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:26:54.66 -00:32:27.2 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.84, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.82)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21480_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 21480_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:57:22.34 -02:32:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12839_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 12839_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:34:56.02 -00:20:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24442_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112
The candidate 24442_fd_Sex-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_23-18-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0112 did not pass the final checks