This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
YZ Cnc,2461144.6642,11.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
YZ Cnc 20260414.1642 11.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461144.6642,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260414.1642 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461144.6642,13.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260414.1642 13.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461144.6642,14.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260414.1642 14.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
YZ Cnc,2461144.6642,11.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
YZ Cnc 20260414.1642 11.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.71692514 12.02.2026 05:12:12.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
First image: 2461083.71692514 12.02.2026 05:12:12.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Last image: 2461144.66463530 14.04.2026 03:56:54.490 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14504
Objects passed selection criteria: 14483
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13251.2
Average stars matched: 12855.2 (97.0116 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 118600 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 22:58:48 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.71692514 12.02.2026 05:12:12.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
First image: 2461083.71692514 12.02.2026 05:12:12.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Last image: 2461144.66463530 14.04.2026 03:56:54.490 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 129
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 50 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 92226
Objects passed selection criteria: 91991
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 85222.2
Average stars matched: 81899 (96.1005 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1884460 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 23:00:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461144.66383014
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65
Second-epoch image center 07:59:54.540 +29:54:53.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0861 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65
Second-epoch image center 07:59:57.773 +29:55:21.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0766 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:59:54.540 +29:54:53.72
Second-epoch second image center 07:59:57.773 +29:55:21.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01396 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.g7XhfIKJfw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gbrRb7iaR7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fijOljpfQg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wod9LLOfvH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14371 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.1895 to 129.2995 deg, Dec +24.1558 to +35.3509 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.1895 to 129.2995 deg, Dec 24.1558 to 35.3509 deg
Loaded 9871 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7216 out of 7782 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7782 out of 14371 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.912020
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.912020
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
1.9 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.g7XhfIKJfw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1108, passed=14371
Got 14371 stars (including 13247 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14371 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14189 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14187 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14175 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gbrRb7iaR7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1133, passed=14315
Got 14315 stars (including 13161 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14143 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14142 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14132 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fijOljpfQg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=841, passed=12356
Got 12356 stars (including 11497 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12356 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 628 (Dec 23.9 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12280 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 628 (Dec 23.9 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wod9LLOfvH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=805, passed=12271
Got 12271 stars (including 11448 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12271 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 628 (Dec 23.9 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 628 (Dec 23.9 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20976_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
Preparing report for the candidate 20976_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21250_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 21250_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:57:34.34 +26:51:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21290_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 21290_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:16.34 +32:43:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21300_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 21300_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:56.27 +29:49:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06746_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 06746_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:11.04 +29:09:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12811_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 12811_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:14.01 +33:22:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65
Second-epoch image center 07:59:54.540 +29:54:53.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0861 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65
Second-epoch image center 07:59:57.773 +29:55:21.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0766 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:59:54.540 +29:54:53.72
Second-epoch second image center 07:59:57.773 +29:55:21.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01396 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pWUaq9jIfy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DuI0p3me1E
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bU6fbu9A0b
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ihU5eaZ5lr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 92293 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.1895 to 129.3003 deg, Dec +24.1558 to +35.3693 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.1895 to 129.3003 deg, Dec 24.1558 to 35.3693 deg
Loaded 9883 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6521 out of 7921 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7921 out of 92293 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.781221
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.781221
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 102 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
1.8 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.0 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
2.0 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
15.6 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.pWUaq9jIfy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=6631, passed=92272
Got 92272 stars (including 85483 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 92272 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DuI0p3me1E (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=37, blended=6656, passed=92132
Got 92132 stars (including 85329 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 92132 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bU6fbu9A0b (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=4906, passed=79820
Got 79820 stars (including 74753 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 79820 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 628 (Dec 23.9 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79212 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 628 (Dec 23.9 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79210 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79210 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ihU5eaZ5lr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=4647, passed=78749
Got 78749 stars (including 73971 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 78749 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 23.9 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78121 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 23.9 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78119 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78119 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-55-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_225746_TTUQ1b1x1_12480_cwo1GuEc/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109323.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109329.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109341.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109346.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109348.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109351.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109353.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109359.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109360.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109387.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out111177.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112075.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112313.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112485.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112504.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112542.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112557.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112560.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112590.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112778.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112821.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112906.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112963.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113119.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113123.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113200.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113211.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113221.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113253.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113260.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113275.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113284.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113285.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113336.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113347.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113370.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113374.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113382.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113386.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113437.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113443.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113456.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113485.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113517.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113588.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113606.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out110325.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out111308.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out111745.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109323_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 109323_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:50:15.66 +25:18:27.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.955 873791687416371968 117.56538530946 +25.30732019905 14.9577 14.2920 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.955#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109329_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 109329_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:19:05.02 +27:20:29.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.386 683202479295742336 124.77126195663 +27.34167735877 14.7841 14.2690 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.386#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109332_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 109332_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:08.86 +34:41:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109341_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 109341_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:17:12.25 +30:30:16.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.70, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.68)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.423 708610234508503936 124.30111646024 +30.50473699296 15.2500 14.6432 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.423#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109346_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 109346_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:35.46 +28:16:37.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.59, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.57)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109348_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 109348_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:58:08.57 +32:02:23.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.58)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.121 881051419096893568 119.53539078196 +32.03956561943 14.8132 14.2894 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.121#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109350_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 109350_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:57:11.52 +32:52:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109351_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 109351_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:54:46.30 +33:14:53.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.612 881428860822026112 118.69300756444 +33.24804229639 15.3166 14.7587 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.612#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109353_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 109353_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:22.84 +28:11:59.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.153 872535697242912512 113.59615502759 +28.19998144320 14.7627 13.9184 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.153#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109355_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 109355_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:47.86 +33:27:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109358_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 109358_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109359_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 109359_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:18:45.26 +25:01:43.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.55, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.53)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.584 679320756573391744 124.68851283206 +25.02889912178 14.7197 14.2475 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.584#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109360_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 109360_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:45.32 +32:44:24.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.55)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109364_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 109364_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:42:38.61 +33:13:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109367_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 109367_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:39.69 +32:47:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109378_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 109378_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:46.85 +28:36:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109380_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 109380_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:22:33.65 +25:30:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109382_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 109382_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:37.23 +33:44:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109383_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 109383_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:12:52.80 +27:29:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109385_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 109385_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:23:52.63 +30:20:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109387_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 109387_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:11:47.58 +34:16:15.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.429 902773572676734592 122.94818295415 +34.27078332874 13.7895 13.3503 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.429#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109390_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 109390_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:41.55 +30:29:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109397_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 109397_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:09:58.46 +30:16:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109863_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 109863_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:23.77 +27:43:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109978_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 109978_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:37.18 +32:14:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110273_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 110273_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:48.88 +31:51:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110325_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
Preparing report for the candidate 110325_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110650_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 110650_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:22.37 +25:02:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110889_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 110889_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:17.72 +29:14:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111130_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 111130_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:34:06.24 +30:58:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111177_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 111177_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:42.92 +30:53:34.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.145 879252652433744000 117.17874391943 +30.89269134200 13.7265 13.2712 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.145#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111178_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 111178_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:32:53.03 +31:03:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111234_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 111234_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:33.79 +30:50:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111249_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 111249_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:35:11.14 +31:36:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111277_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 111277_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:21.95 +26:35:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111295_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 111295_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:02:00.76 +34:54:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111308_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
Preparing report for the candidate 111308_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111312_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 111312_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:02.19 +31:46:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111330_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 111330_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:33.98 +27:31:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111460_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 111460_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:23.24 +31:15:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111511_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 111511_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:34.70 +30:36:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111518_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 111518_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:05:31.34 +26:08:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111521_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 111521_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:10.65 +32:11:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111559_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 111559_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:19:12.33 +32:59:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111676_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 111676_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:55:58.64 +32:57:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111713_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 111713_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:26.03 +25:37:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111745_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
Preparing report for the candidate 111745_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111750_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 111750_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:44:06.95 +33:14:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111856_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 111856_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:36.09 +28:26:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111873_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 111873_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:29.18 +25:13:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112008_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 112008_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:13:03.41 +34:00:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112018_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 112018_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:43.25 +30:12:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112070_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 112070_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:14:33.37 +25:57:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112075_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 112075_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:18.22 +28:19:31.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.37, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.35)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.820 878367133256014592 115.82566359220 +28.32472110879 14.3160 13.7525 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.820#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112146_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 112146_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:33:20.90 +29:53:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112185_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 112185_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:12.27 +32:48:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112313_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 112313_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:03.57 +28:28:05.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.738 875700920638838016 117.26510801737 +28.46819013169 14.4573 14.0386 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.738#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112339_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 112339_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:14:42.81 +30:00:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112485_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 112485_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:25.85 +27:43:24.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.705 878227667077770752 115.10762154680 +27.72252933996 14.5322 13.8418 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.705#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112504_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 112504_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:23:14.63 +33:09:42.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.58, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.56)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.053 901549923610217728 125.81014214224 +33.16085511845 15.2729 14.7706 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.053#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112542_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 112542_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:52.41 +33:34:38.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.63)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.996 892784131581163136 113.71856337770 +33.57659930854 14.7047 14.1731 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.996#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112557_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 112557_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:59:57.94 +31:30:55.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.63)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.026 878019550142850432 119.99162136762 +31.51493725474 14.8620 14.4014 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.026#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112560_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 112560_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:09.44 +28:41:05.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.954 873338070149572480 113.53909546807 +28.68496888807 14.6243 14.2126 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.954#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112590_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 112590_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:23.18 +27:33:07.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.154 872837861078919808 111.59623965141 +27.55223881925 14.5600 14.0125 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.154#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112778_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 112778_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:26:26.00 +27:50:15.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.304 707098680898206208 126.60820112313 +27.83721258708 14.7585 14.2641 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.304#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112780_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 112780_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:42:08.75 +34:39:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112821_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 112821_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:23:31.83 +31:22:43.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.278 709094019624618752 125.88269716256 +31.37842814232 14.8515 14.2944 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.278#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112890_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 112890_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:26:23.78 +28:44:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112906_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 112906_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:31:31.60 +28:27:08.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.822 704246513376757376 127.88157022821 +28.45201010192 14.8748 14.3405 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.822#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112963_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 112963_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:00.41 +25:38:22.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.208 871578572371894912 112.50134848690 +25.63978046073 14.7883 14.2979 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.208#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112965_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 112965_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:07:55.53 +27:57:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113070_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 113070_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:54.65 +31:55:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113119_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 113119_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:32:29.73 +27:36:26.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.679 704123539873320832 128.12363047245 +27.60694809536 15.2660 14.8131 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.679#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113123_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 113123_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:18:07.10 +31:15:04.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.83, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.81)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.490 900891213066180864 124.52861179665 +31.25069465050 15.0351 14.5601 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.490#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113200_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 113200_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:33:31.16 +34:13:33.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.360 711372138997710336 128.37962593288 +34.22555215269 14.8954 14.4447 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.360#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113211_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 113211_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:20:19.46 +30:01:10.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.821 708520383792827648 125.08099666172 +30.01931237691 14.8711 14.2950 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.821#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113221_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 113221_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:19.17 +29:15:40.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.338 879376484929715584 114.33022482648 +29.26092690743 14.8475 14.1181 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.338#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113233_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 113233_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:34:21.96 +33:47:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113252_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 113252_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:27:58.47 +32:12:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113253_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 113253_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:33:24.94 +32:33:16.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.829 710654982538568832 128.35330696352 +32.55393331106 15.0680 14.5339 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.829#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113260_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 113260_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:21:27.91 +27:52:08.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.680 683334145812947072 125.36659794579 +27.86838983277 14.8369 14.3867 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.680#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113275_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 113275_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:36.94 +28:42:42.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.197 873477605046655232 111.90445558195 +28.71133620487 15.2097 14.6898 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.197#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113284_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 113284_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:40.87 +28:28:05.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.84, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.82)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.959 873314430649583360 113.67019834695 +28.46780207002 14.7249 14.2645 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.959#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113285_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 113285_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:23:19.74 +26:57:41.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.123 683019822926690048 125.83245855561 +26.96133271385 15.0417 14.5563 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.123#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113292_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 113292_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:31:07.86 +31:55:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113336_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 113336_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:25.67 +34:28:55.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=15.00, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.98)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.652 893842003502846976 112.35745590899 +34.48193295101 15.1417 14.7115 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.652#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113347_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 113347_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:32:33.72 +26:17:16.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.85)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.615 703702839235177088 128.14110406541 +26.28734938279 15.1506 14.5018 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.615#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113370_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 113370_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:14:06.33 +34:35:32.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.79)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.970 902853841322062464 123.52590731277 +34.59188886841 15.1980 14.5850 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.970#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113374_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 113374_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:42.70 +26:00:12.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.706 871672962868505728 112.92858563547 +26.00313200906 14.8491 14.2116 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.706#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113382_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 113382_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:31:23.18 +27:04:27.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.87)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.706 703824129113269376 127.84702335482 +27.07409440868 14.9033 14.3824 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.706#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113386_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 113386_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:34:06.18 +32:39:05.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.864 710662885278374016 128.52592854911 +32.65128518755 15.1816 14.7256 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.864#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113437_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 113437_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:22:40.79 +34:13:35.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.143 903337488998945920 125.67031490663 +34.22629890893 14.9908 14.4642 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.143#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113443_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 113443_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:27:04.19 +31:36:44.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.931 709185176010488320 126.76744398058 +31.61215841142 15.0370 14.4850 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.931#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113456_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 113456_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:07:02.35 +33:56:52.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.616 905381034438414592 121.76030164239 +33.94706109673 15.1464 14.4296 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.616#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113485_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 113485_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:08:30.76 +26:02:44.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.87)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.789 681925259101083904 122.12889463258 +26.04651903929 15.1296 14.5007 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.789#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113517_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 113517_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:50:25.97 +29:36:02.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.449 878916098796923264 117.60850864605 +29.60012182816 14.6758 13.7904 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.449#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113588_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 113588_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:25:04.58 +33:50:39.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.743 903100406804106624 126.26903968763 +33.84382261030 14.8195 14.2210 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.743#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113590_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 113590_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:27:36.33 +27:17:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113606_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 113606_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:13:59.22 +26:49:56.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.89)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.509 682818612298496256 123.49690247592 +26.83270198172 15.0823 14.6006 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.509#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69850_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 69850_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:14.02 +33:22:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44359_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096
The candidate 44359_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_22-56-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0096 did not pass the final checks