This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3041110662626252800,2461144.6117,13.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3041110662626252800 20260414.1117 13.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3033962462657500672,2461144.6117,12.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3033962462657500672 20260414.1117 12.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3030440829993339648,2461144.6117,12.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3030440829993339648 20260414.1117 12.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J115.0083-07.5175,2461144.6117,13.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J115.0083-07.5175 20260414.1117 13.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J116.5780-12.3964,2461144.6117,13.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J116.5780-12.3964 20260414.1117 13.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J113.0087-11.5979,2461144.6117,13.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J113.0087-11.5979 20260414.1117 13.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3040313310536706048,2461144.6117,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3040313310536706048 20260414.1117 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
FX Pup,2461144.6117,10.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
FX Pup 20260414.1117 10.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J072705-0909.1,2461144.6117,12.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J072705-0909.1 20260414.1117 12.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 15354934,2461144.6117,12.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 15354934 20260414.1117 12.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J073641-1018.7,2461144.6117,10.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J073641-1018.7 20260414.1117 10.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
GDS_J0727582-133621,2461144.6117,12.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
GDS_J0727582-133621 20260414.1117 12.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0730324-131023,2461144.6117,12.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0730324-131023 20260414.1117 12.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J073741.10-060738.1,2461144.6117,13.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J073741.10-060738.1 20260414.1117 13.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.60652544 20.03.2026 02:33:13.798 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
First image: 2461119.60652544 20.03.2026 02:33:13.798 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Last image: 2461144.61199285 14.04.2026 02:41:06.182 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.08
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 25432
Objects passed selection criteria: 25317
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 18297.2
Average stars matched: 17021.8 (93.029 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 127984 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 21:45:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.60652544 20.03.2026 02:33:13.798 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
First image: 2461119.60652544 20.03.2026 02:33:13.798 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Last image: 2461144.61199285 14.04.2026 02:41:06.182 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 122
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 95 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 178162
Objects passed selection criteria: 177642
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 130662
Average stars matched: 120952 (92.5693 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1928424 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 21:50:33 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461144.61133278
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits'
wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits'
wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits'
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:42:46.255 -09:59:55.21
Second-epoch image center 07:42:53.527 -10:00:00.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0299 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:42:46.255 -09:59:55.21
Second-epoch image center 07:42:50.921 -10:00:02.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0193 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:42:53.527 -10:00:00.51
Second-epoch second image center 07:42:50.921 -10:00:02.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01071 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9l3uOb1YIV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Lan0Ly15ce
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E6vLyYQ54W
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kuHvXHldZM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29086 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 107.5371 to 123.6872 deg, Dec -15.2912 to -4.5931 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 107.5371 to 123.6872 deg, Dec -15.2912 to -4.5931 deg
Loaded 24807 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 16796 out of 18331 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18331 out of 29086 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.871895
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.871895
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.08
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.79
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.79
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
2.5 pix Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
3.0 pix fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits
2.9 pix fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
14.8 mag. Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.9l3uOb1YIV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2950, passed=29086
Got 29086 stars (including 26116 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29086 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28557 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28559 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28559 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits -region wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Lan0Ly15ce (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2922, passed=28978
Got 28978 stars (including 26039 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28978 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28372 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28371 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28371 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits -region wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.E6vLyYQ54W (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1254, passed=15642
Got 15642 stars (including 14378 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15642 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013010 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010408 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.89"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15424 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.90"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15424 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.90"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15424 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.98"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kuHvXHldZM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1258, passed=15586
Got 15586 stars (including 14323 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15586 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.83"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.85"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15389 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.85"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15389 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.93"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Mon-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out34330.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34330_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 34330_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:59:33.17 -07:13:27.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.64, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.62)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.583 3042963958190915072 119.88891835653 -07.22414052715 11.0565 10.0428 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.583#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20988_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 20988_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:23.76 -07:56:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06663_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 06663_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:25.05 -13:18:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Mon-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:42:46.255 -09:59:55.21
Second-epoch image center 07:42:53.527 -10:00:00.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0299 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:42:46.255 -09:59:55.21
Second-epoch image center 07:42:50.921 -10:00:02.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0193 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:42:53.527 -10:00:00.51
Second-epoch second image center 07:42:50.921 -10:00:02.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01071 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nHMg8KXIAk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits &> /tmp/tmp.S7j0wX24dU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lCgCg8umiv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lqWrEp5pVb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 203060 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 107.5165 to 123.6907 deg, Dec -15.2923 to -4.5813 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 107.5165 to 123.6907 deg, Dec -15.2923 to -4.5813 deg
Loaded 24871 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14449 out of 20775 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 20775 out of 203060 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.677319
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.677319
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 94 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
2.3 pix Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
2.8 pix fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits
2.8 pix fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
14.9 mag. Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.nHMg8KXIAk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=54, blended=31232, passed=203006
Got 203006 stars (including 171558 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 203006 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 200552 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 200555 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 200555 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits -region wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.S7j0wX24dU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=62, blended=31956, passed=205869
Got 205869 stars (including 173699 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 205869 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204667 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits -region wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lCgCg8umiv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=13132, passed=102384
Got 102384 stars (including 89165 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 102384 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013010 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010408 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 101366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 101368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 101368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lqWrEp5pVb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=12481, passed=101167
Got 101167 stars (including 88612 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 101167 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 100002 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 100003 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 100003 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-40-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0650.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214303_TTUQ2b1x1_15341_GYpe31La/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Mon-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out214177.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out229938.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out229942.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out229954.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out229958.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out229962.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out229966.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out229972.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out229976.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out229978.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out229984.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out229992.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out230007.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out230011.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out230012.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out237743.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out240749.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out242218.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out244052.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out244273.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out244626.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out245058.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out247065.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out247392.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out247409.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out247745.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out249037.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out230016.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101036.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out123498.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out171980.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out229957.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out230009.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out230020.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out243591.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out243664.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out244170.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out245504.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30909.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out39408.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out69516.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out86833.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 21s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 9s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229938_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 229938_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:17.32 -09:45:41.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.72, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.70)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.259 3040800497266239616 115.82303532913 -09.76187767236 13.3406 12.5738 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.259#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229939_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 229939_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:49.44 -09:04:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229942_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 229942_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:01.27 -06:21:47.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.52)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229954_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 229954_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:10.18 -07:20:36.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.452 3054735741996729600 111.79233078821 -07.34299459086 13.1180 12.2695 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.452#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229957_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
Preparing report for the candidate 229957_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229958_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 229958_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:04.31 -13:51:31.1 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.50, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.48)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229962_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 229962_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:32.60 -12:26:48.1 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.25)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229966_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 229966_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:53.71 -09:16:27.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.25)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229970_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 229970_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:04.48 -06:23:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229972_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 229972_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:49.74 -09:14:58.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.10)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229976_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 229976_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:01.91 -11:26:09.8 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.10)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229978_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 229978_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:47.77 -11:36:54.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.94)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229984_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 229984_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:47.33 -09:49:55.8 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.94)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229987_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 229987_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:34.08 -07:00:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229988_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 229988_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229989_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 229989_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:50.54 -14:02:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229992_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 229992_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:48.39 -10:23:44.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.03, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.01)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.525 3047285038892446592 111.45155599441 -10.39568452586 13.2855 12.3690 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.525#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230007_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 230007_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:51.03 -07:05:50.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.02)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.660 3043499695231752576 117.96293335376 -07.09765038102 12.8924 12.2071 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.660#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230009_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
Preparing report for the candidate 230009_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230011_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 230011_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:09.31 -11:08:51.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.404 3040092647996122880 115.78975340036 -11.14743805766 13.1739 12.6933 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.404#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230012_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 230012_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:53.42 -11:27:27.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.888 3036270337559757824 120.22361698037 -11.45851504556 13.4350 12.6875 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.888#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230013_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 230013_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:12.44 -06:11:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230016_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 230016_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:26.90 -12:42:07.9 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=12.55, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.53)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230020_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
Preparing report for the candidate 230020_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230023_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 230023_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:59:41.88 -10:43:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230027_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 230027_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:31.39 -13:54:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230028_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 230028_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:57:10.30 -13:23:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234252_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 234252_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:26.83 -07:34:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234536_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 234536_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:56.93 -06:44:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235753_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 235753_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:41.08 -08:12:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235785_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 235785_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:42:34.47 -05:45:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236134_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 236134_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.85 -08:40:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237093_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 237093_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:35.01 -14:06:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237646_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 237646_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:24.21 -09:51:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237743_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 237743_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:56.31 -08:08:16.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.562 3042024219348103424 114.48500403415 -08.13863237455 12.8796 12.5526 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.562#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238536_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 238536_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:27.74 -09:18:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238751_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 238751_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:08.92 -09:31:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239522_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 239522_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:54:04.33 -10:35:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239528_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 239528_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:28.00 -11:45:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239574_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 239574_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:12.03 -08:20:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239593_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 239593_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:02.07 -12:10:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 240345_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 240345_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:03.49 -09:05:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 240568_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 240568_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:44:05.79 -06:34:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 240749_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 240749_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:08.97 -08:03:55.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.03, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.01)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 241539_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 241539_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:21.51 -06:53:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 241869_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 241869_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:47.82 -13:55:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 241911_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 241911_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:53.89 -09:47:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 241928_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 241928_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:51.25 -07:17:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242218_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 242218_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:07.64 -08:02:17.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.20, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.18)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.621 3042619536174587264 118.28228298814 -08.03812811302 13.1821 12.4796 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.621#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242410_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 242410_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:57:10.41 -13:24:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242738_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 242738_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:52.10 -07:59:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243176_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 243176_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:35.01 -12:49:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243231_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 243231_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:55:54.86 -09:48:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243289_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 243289_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:32.62 -13:18:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243591_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
Preparing report for the candidate 243591_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243657_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 243657_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243664_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
Preparing report for the candidate 243664_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244052_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 244052_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:34.15 -06:46:13.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.36)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244170_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
Preparing report for the candidate 244170_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244244_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 244244_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:48.95 -09:25:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244273_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 244273_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:53.86 -07:56:31.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.20, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.18)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.634 3042037619646013952 114.47557108151 -07.94112565066 13.4710 13.1027 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.634#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244626_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 244626_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:39.49 -07:38:52.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.36, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.34)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.473 3042670354227342848 118.41490473253 -07.64735919622 13.9857 13.4295 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.473#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244693_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 244693_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:03.91 -06:20:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245058_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 245058_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:28.49 -11:03:59.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.32, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.30)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.416 3037268625398341248 119.11927553659 -11.06684688084 13.9555 13.4155 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.416#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245177_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 245177_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:39.93 -12:56:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245504_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
Preparing report for the candidate 245504_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245794_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 245794_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:55:32.70 -13:22:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247065_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 247065_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:30.89 -08:02:01.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.56, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.54)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.267 3042596068472822656 117.37866798576 -08.03532366909 13.7924 13.1708 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.267#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247199_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 247199_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:55.66 -07:59:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247392_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 247392_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:36.83 -06:44:48.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.793 3043900157982136192 118.15409523628 -06.74725498023 13.7374 13.2604 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.793#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247409_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 247409_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:47.88 -06:39:58.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.996 3043774848016908160 117.20029307566 -06.66595348309 13.6260 13.0053 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.996#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247745_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 247745_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:50.79 -11:02:14.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.490 3037245638732899712 117.96066051132 -11.03715181006 13.6921 12.8714 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.490#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249037_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 249037_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:51.37 -10:27:19.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.70, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.68)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.808 3037561645246779008 117.96491090129 -10.45615099338 14.4319 13.7117 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.808#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250122_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 250122_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:55.29 -09:49:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 214177_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 214177_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:51.07 -12:10:50.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.19, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.17)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.638 3034435248357910272 111.21212272452 -12.18146483187 12.1622 10.6242 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.638#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135147_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 135147_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:57.49 -08:41:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110090_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 110090_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:15.07 -09:51:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213227_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 213227_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:44:23.49 -09:32:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69516_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
Preparing report for the candidate 69516_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123498_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
Preparing report for the candidate 123498_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148988_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 148988_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:13.42 -07:52:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59602_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 59602_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:06.35 -12:13:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38305_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 38305_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:24.95 -13:18:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114067_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 114067_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:15.49 -09:39:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86833_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
Preparing report for the candidate 86833_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79500_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 79500_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:51.37 -11:16:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101036_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
Preparing report for the candidate 101036_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30909_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
Preparing report for the candidate 30909_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182975_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 182975_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145806_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 145806_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:26.91 -08:01:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49026_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 49026_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:47:00.59 -12:47:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39408_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
Preparing report for the candidate 39408_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171980_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
Preparing report for the candidate 171980_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147777_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651
The candidate 147777_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-41-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0651 did not pass the final checks
