This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3036844110832428160,2461144.6105,13.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3036844110832428160 20260414.1105 13.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J112.3095-12.2565,2461144.6105,12.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J112.3095-12.2565 20260414.1105 12.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3033253758697026944,2461144.6105,12.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3033253758697026944 20260414.1105 12.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J073958.74-131700.0,2461144.6105,12.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J073958.74-131700.0 20260414.1105 12.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3030440829993339648,2461144.6105,12.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3030440829993339648 20260414.1105 12.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J115.0083-07.5175,2461144.6105,13.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J115.0083-07.5175 20260414.1105 13.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J074317.10-082622.8,2461144.6105,13.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J074317.10-082622.8 20260414.1105 13.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 15354934,2461144.6105,12.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 15354934 20260414.1105 12.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J073741.10-060738.1,2461144.6105,13.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J073741.10-060738.1 20260414.1105 13.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J111.9022-13.4909,2461144.6105,11.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J111.9022-13.4909 20260414.1105 11.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.60652544 20.03.2026 02:33:13.798 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
First image: 2461119.60652544 20.03.2026 02:33:13.798 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Last image: 2461144.61070520 14.04.2026 02:39:14.929 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.08
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 25304
Objects passed selection criteria: 25191
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 18148.5
Average stars matched: 16920.8 (93.235 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 127984 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 21:43:25 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.60652544 20.03.2026 02:33:13.798 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
First image: 2461119.60652544 20.03.2026 02:33:13.798 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Last image: 2461144.61070520 14.04.2026 02:39:14.929 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 148
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 77 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 177552
Objects passed selection criteria: 177014
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 130005
Average stars matched: 120518 (92.7028 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2321640 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 21:47:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461144.61026709
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits'
wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits'
wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits'
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:42:46.255 -09:59:55.21
Second-epoch image center 07:42:53.923 -10:00:29.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0329 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:42:46.255 -09:59:55.21
Second-epoch image center 07:42:53.810 -10:00:29.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0324 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:42:53.923 -10:00:29.62
Second-epoch second image center 07:42:53.810 -10:00:29.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00047 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00047 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CtPhjUZpdQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ViKLw7cjGX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits &> /tmp/tmp.u6QO0bnw3W
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3JsSNC1pI7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29086 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 107.5371 to 123.6872 deg, Dec -15.2912 to -4.5931 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 107.5371 to 123.6872 deg, Dec -15.2912 to -4.5931 deg
Loaded 24807 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 16796 out of 18331 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18331 out of 29086 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.871895
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.871895
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.08
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.79
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.79
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
2.5 pix Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
3.0 pix fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits
3.0 pix fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
14.8 mag. Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.CtPhjUZpdQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2950, passed=29086
Got 29086 stars (including 26116 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29086 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28557 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28559 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28559 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits -region wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ViKLw7cjGX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2922, passed=28978
Got 28978 stars (including 26039 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28978 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28372 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28371 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28371 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits -region wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.u6QO0bnw3W (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1311, passed=15467
Got 15467 stars (including 14150 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15467 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.90"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.88"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.89"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.96"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3JsSNC1pI7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1320, passed=15565
Got 15565 stars (including 14238 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15565 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013010 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010408 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.88"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15393 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.89"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15394 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.89"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15394 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.97"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Mon-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31595_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 31595_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:26.04 -09:17:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31596_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 31596_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20988_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 20988_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:23.67 -07:56:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06663_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 06663_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Mon-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:42:46.255 -09:59:55.21
Second-epoch image center 07:42:53.923 -10:00:29.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0329 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:42:46.255 -09:59:55.21
Second-epoch image center 07:42:53.810 -10:00:29.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0324 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:42:53.923 -10:00:29.62
Second-epoch second image center 07:42:53.810 -10:00:29.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00047 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00047 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Njc30oPB5W
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HXlkkukWgc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zGy9wb4RaD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vkkX6JNEjB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 203060 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 107.5165 to 123.6907 deg, Dec -15.2923 to -4.5813 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 107.5165 to 123.6907 deg, Dec -15.2923 to -4.5813 deg
Loaded 24871 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14449 out of 20775 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 20775 out of 203060 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.677319
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.677319
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 110 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
2.3 pix Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
2.8 pix fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits
2.8 pix fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
14.9 mag. Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Njc30oPB5W (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=54, blended=31232, passed=203006
Got 203006 stars (including 171558 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 203006 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 200552 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 200555 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 200555 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits -region wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HXlkkukWgc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=62, blended=31956, passed=205869
Got 205869 stars (including 173699 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 205869 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204667 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits -region wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zGy9wb4RaD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=12730, passed=100873
Got 100873 stars (including 88069 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 100873 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99799 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99796 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.86"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vkkX6JNEjB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=12996, passed=101660
Got 101660 stars (including 88580 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 101660 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013010 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010408 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 100664 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 100664 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 100664 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.84"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-38-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0648.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_214059_TTUQ2b1x1_13061_OiCVgJCH/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Mon-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out229949.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out229951.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out229983.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out230007.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out230009.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out230017.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out243039.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out244182.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out245781.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out246123.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out244189.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out139659.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out171980.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out229967.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out229987.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out229991.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out229993.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out230016.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out245168.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32792.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out86833.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 23s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 12s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229936_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 229936_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229942_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 229942_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229945_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 229945_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229949_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 229949_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:03.85 -11:22:12.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.34, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.32)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229951_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 229951_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:38.75 -10:41:37.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.35, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.33)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229956_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 229956_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:47:52.07 -13:28:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229965_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 229965_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:49.39 -10:19:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229967_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
Preparing report for the candidate 229967_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229968_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 229968_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:04.49 -06:23:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229981_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 229981_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229983_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 229983_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:39.04 -06:10:56.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.02, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.00)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229984_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 229984_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229987_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
Preparing report for the candidate 229987_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229988_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 229988_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229991_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
Preparing report for the candidate 229991_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229993_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
Preparing report for the candidate 229993_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229996_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 229996_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:58:31.71 -11:22:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230003_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 230003_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230007_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 230007_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:28.41 -11:51:14.8 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.64)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230009_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 230009_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:38.35 -11:35:05.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.42, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.40)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230016_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
Preparing report for the candidate 230016_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230017_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 230017_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:59:59.50 -10:45:22.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.699 3038044880608379392 119.99863876242 -10.75595225753 13.0101 12.3516 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.699#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230024_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 230024_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230026_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 230026_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233527_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 233527_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233771_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 233771_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234493_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 234493_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235656_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 235656_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.81 -08:40:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235738_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 235738_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235752_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 235752_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236553_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 236553_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:24.27 -09:51:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237554_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 237554_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237724_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 237724_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237778_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 237778_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237828_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 237828_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238723_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 238723_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:08.93 -09:31:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239010_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 239010_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239013_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 239013_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239088_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 239088_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:03.39 -09:05:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239246_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 239246_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239572_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 239572_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239876_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 239876_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 240274_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 240274_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 240403_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 240403_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:12.55 -06:11:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 240603_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 240603_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 240635_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 240635_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:54:04.29 -10:35:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 241088_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 241088_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 241161_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 241161_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:44:05.78 -06:34:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 241324_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 241324_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:47.90 -13:55:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 241479_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 241479_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 241487_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 241487_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 241517_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 241517_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:53.76 -09:47:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 241721_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 241721_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 241958_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 241958_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242528_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 242528_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:17.34 -05:56:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243039_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 243039_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:07.70 -08:02:18.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.21, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.19)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.026 3042619536174587264 118.28228298814 -08.03812811302 13.1821 12.4796 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.026#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243105_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 243105_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:55:54.80 -09:48:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243121_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 243121_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:52.11 -07:59:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243195_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 243195_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243233_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 243233_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:48.95 -09:25:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243514_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 243514_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243515_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 243515_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243673_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 243673_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243805_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 243805_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244182_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 244182_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:34.22 -06:46:11.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.36)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244189_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 244189_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:45.54 -10:38:51.1 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=13.25, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.23)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244409_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 244409_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244441_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 244441_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:35.01 -12:49:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244449_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 244449_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244652_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 244652_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244725_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 244725_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244802_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 244802_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:57:10.26 -13:24:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245168_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
Preparing report for the candidate 245168_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245781_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 245781_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:25.08 -08:09:30.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.275 3042567240652424448 117.10414845673 -08.15800013575 13.5380 12.8747 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.275#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246123_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 246123_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:33.56 -10:09:35.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.37, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.35)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.325 3040589700270493952 116.39103562634 -10.16004027393 13.6145 13.1118 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.325#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246197_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 246197_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246233_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 246233_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246313_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 246313_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:40.25 -10:21:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246744_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 246744_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246972_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 246972_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247412_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 247412_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247830_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 247830_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248708_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 248708_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248790_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 248790_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:31.42 -11:30:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249153_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 249153_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79500_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 79500_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110090_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 110090_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123498_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 123498_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213227_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 213227_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69516_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 69516_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182772_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 182772_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139659_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
Preparing report for the candidate 139659_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148988_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 148988_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114067_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 114067_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38305_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 38305_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59602_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 59602_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194151_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 194151_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110828_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 110828_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86833_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
Preparing report for the candidate 86833_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183457_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 183457_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24056_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 24056_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:52.07 -14:02:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145806_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 145806_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49026_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 49026_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:47:00.51 -12:47:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39408_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 39408_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101036_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 101036_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38855_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 38855_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137346_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 137346_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171980_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
Preparing report for the candidate 171980_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32792_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
Preparing report for the candidate 32792_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147777_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649
The candidate 147777_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-39-14_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0649 did not pass the final checks
