This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J113.1343-10.3373,2461144.6092,13.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J113.1343-10.3373 20260414.1092 13.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3047260162440927360,2461144.6092,12.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3047260162440927360 20260414.1092 12.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J111.9139-13.5066,2461144.6092,12.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J111.9139-13.5066 20260414.1092 12.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J112.7207-09.8010,2461144.6092,12.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J112.7207-09.8010 20260414.1092 12.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3053461682898318976,2461144.6092,12.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3053461682898318976 20260414.1092 12.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
GDS_J0728377-094040,2461144.6092,12.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
GDS_J0728377-094040 20260414.1092 12.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0732150-093913,2461144.6092,12.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0732150-093913 20260414.1092 12.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.60652544 20.03.2026 02:33:13.798 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
First image: 2461119.60652544 20.03.2026 02:33:13.798 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Last image: 2461144.60952220 14.04.2026 02:37:32.718 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.08
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 25345
Objects passed selection criteria: 25218
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 18081.2
Average stars matched: 16848.8 (93.1835 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 127984 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 23:35:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.60652544 20.03.2026 02:33:13.798 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
First image: 2461119.60652544 20.03.2026 02:33:13.798 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Last image: 2461144.60952220 14.04.2026 02:37:32.718 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 134
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 55 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 177727
Objects passed selection criteria: 177182
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 129746
Average stars matched: 120185 (92.631 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1993956 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 23:38:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461144.60892293
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits'
wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits'
wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits'
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:42:46.255 -09:59:55.21
Second-epoch image center 07:42:52.160 -10:00:18.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0251 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:42:46.255 -09:59:55.21
Second-epoch image center 07:42:51.290 -10:00:01.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0207 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:42:52.160 -10:00:18.91
Second-epoch second image center 07:42:51.290 -10:00:01.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00593 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EhjFFN5fb2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits &> /tmp/tmp.08aoryVMtD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aZ064Jo4yU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jhTzw7weOB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29086 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 107.5371 to 123.6872 deg, Dec -15.2912 to -4.5931 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 107.5371 to 123.6872 deg, Dec -15.2912 to -4.5931 deg
Loaded 24807 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 16796 out of 18331 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18331 out of 29086 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.871895
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.871895
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.08
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.79
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.79
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
2.5 pix Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
2.9 pix fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits
2.9 pix fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
14.8 mag. Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.EhjFFN5fb2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2950, passed=29086
Got 29086 stars (including 26116 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29086 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28557 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28559 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28559 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits -region wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.08aoryVMtD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2922, passed=28978
Got 28978 stars (including 26039 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28978 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28372 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28371 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28371 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits -region wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.aZ064Jo4yU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1209, passed=15472
Got 15472 stars (including 14253 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15472 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013010 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010408 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15333 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.83"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15335 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.84"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15335 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.92"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jhTzw7weOB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1315, passed=15205
Got 15205 stars (including 13884 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15205 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.90"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15034 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.90"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15036 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.91"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15036 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.98"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Mon-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20988_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 20988_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:23.68 -07:56:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06663_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 06663_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:24.88 -13:18:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Mon-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:42:46.255 -09:59:55.21
Second-epoch image center 07:42:52.160 -10:00:18.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0251 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:42:46.255 -09:59:55.21
Second-epoch image center 07:42:51.290 -10:00:01.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0207 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:42:52.160 -10:00:18.91
Second-epoch second image center 07:42:51.290 -10:00:01.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00593 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JSmoTerm4d
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7FzVg2Fggo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TSqaIZCp5H
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xAWAXAiXyo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 203060 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 107.5165 to 123.6907 deg, Dec -15.2923 to -4.5813 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 107.5165 to 123.6907 deg, Dec -15.2923 to -4.5813 deg
Loaded 24871 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14449 out of 20775 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 20775 out of 203060 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.677319
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.677319
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 101 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
2.3 pix Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
2.8 pix fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits
2.8 pix fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
14.9 mag. Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.JSmoTerm4d (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=54, blended=31232, passed=203006
Got 203006 stars (including 171558 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 203006 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 200552 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 200555 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 200555 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits -region wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7FzVg2Fggo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=62, blended=31956, passed=205869
Got 205869 stars (including 173699 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 205869 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204667 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits -region wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TSqaIZCp5H (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=12279, passed=100398
Got 100398 stars (including 88056 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 100398 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013010 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010408 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99311 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99309 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.83"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xAWAXAiXyo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=12797, passed=100877
Got 100877 stars (including 87992 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 100877 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99518 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99514 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99515 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.84"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/wcs_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_21-34-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-36-40_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0646.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_213901_TTUQ2b1x1_13268_SSo1bc32/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Mon-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out175581.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out229948.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out229949.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out229951.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out229956.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out229985.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out240879.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out242091.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out242798.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out243720.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out244670.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out247614.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out249246.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out246508.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out112906.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out114067.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out229952.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out229971.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out229988.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out241450.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out241939.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229935_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 229935_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:50.05 -09:04:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229945_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 229945_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:03.67 -06:30:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229948_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 229948_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:37.85 -08:22:33.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.31, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.29)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229949_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 229949_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:12.97 -11:11:11.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.34, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.32)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.586 3037414826085302400 117.30452865081 -11.18714765960 13.3819 12.7249 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.586#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229951_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 229951_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:58.75 -09:31:55.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.28, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.26)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.813 3041258581299656192 114.99494597240 -09.53357981220 14.0388 13.6821 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.813#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229952_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
Preparing report for the candidate 229952_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229956_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 229956_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:50:45.58 -11:19:39.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.37, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.35)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.792 3037216153780397952 117.69090775008 -11.32790605883 13.3837 12.8907 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.792#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229958_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 229958_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:34.01 -07:00:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229970_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 229970_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:58.01 -09:31:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229971_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
Preparing report for the candidate 229971_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229974_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 229974_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:50.50 -14:02:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229978_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 229978_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:58:31.73 -11:22:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229985_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 229985_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:31.01 -10:20:35.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.75)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229987_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 229987_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:53.37 -11:27:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229988_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
Preparing report for the candidate 229988_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229989_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 229989_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:14.67 -12:03:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229991_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 229991_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:50.98 -07:05:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229994_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 229994_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:12.53 -06:11:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229998_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 229998_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:33.19 -13:53:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230004_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 230004_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:31.39 -13:54:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234046_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 234046_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:26.81 -07:34:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234584_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 234584_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:56.92 -06:44:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235814_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 235814_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:41.07 -08:12:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236006_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 236006_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.85 -08:40:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236366_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 236366_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:42:34.42 -05:45:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236771_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 236771_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:24.25 -09:51:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237805_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 237805_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:34.99 -14:06:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237989_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 237989_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:56.33 -08:08:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238595_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 238595_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238633_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 238633_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:08.92 -09:31:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238867_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 238867_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:27.78 -09:18:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239106_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 239106_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:27.98 -11:45:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239176_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 239176_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:02.11 -12:10:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239295_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 239295_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:03.45 -09:05:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239609_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 239609_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:12.09 -08:20:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 240573_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 240573_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:08.97 -08:03:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 240734_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 240734_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:21.57 -06:53:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 240879_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 240879_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:55.17 -10:07:46.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.78)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 240904_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 240904_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:47.81 -13:55:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 241369_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 241369_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:12.61 -10:47:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 241450_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
Preparing report for the candidate 241450_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 241598_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 241598_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:54:04.34 -10:35:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 241703_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 241703_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:56.91 -06:50:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 241789_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 241789_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:44:05.79 -06:34:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 241939_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
Preparing report for the candidate 241939_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242023_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 242023_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:57:10.49 -13:24:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242091_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 242091_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:55.35 -10:07:30.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.117 3035345545204325120 112.72947046608 -10.12604822054 13.4698 13.0764 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.117#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242104_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 242104_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242156_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 242156_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:54.13 -06:08:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242285_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 242285_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:07.64 -08:02:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242528_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 242528_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:35.06 -12:49:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242798_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 242798_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:12.75 -12:25:03.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.228 3036675645034454272 116.55241559595 -12.41855954567 12.9034 12.1765 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.228#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242837_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 242837_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:01.14 -11:35:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242870_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 242870_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:25.25 -08:09:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243089_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 243089_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:55:54.90 -09:48:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243517_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 243517_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:42.04 -09:18:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243699_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 243699_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:32.79 -13:18:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243720_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 243720_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:30.16 -06:21:07.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.37, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.35)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.888 3043853531817359104 116.62572314261 -06.35263268100 13.4116 12.9408 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.888#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243832_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 243832_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:49.02 -09:25:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244061_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 244061_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244309_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 244309_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:21.25 -12:24:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244518_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 244518_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:34.20 -06:46:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244670_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 244670_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:47:06.68 -08:32:24.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.186 3041050361283818752 116.77855377525 -08.53961388751 13.4013 12.7089 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.186#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244702_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 244702_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:52.16 -07:59:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244919_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 244919_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:28.48 -11:04:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244997_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 244997_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:50:06.57 -12:20:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245024_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 245024_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:48.53 -08:52:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245416_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 245416_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:53.92 -07:56:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245568_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 245568_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:54:46.85 -11:05:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245586_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 245586_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:05.16 -05:56:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245647_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 245647_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:16.48 -06:34:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246508_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 246508_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:50:18.94 -11:34:34.3 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=13.55, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.53)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246694_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 246694_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246843_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 246843_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:48.29 -09:13:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247092_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 247092_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:50.71 -11:02:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247614_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 247614_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:54.18 -09:50:18.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.58)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.143 3040623819490535424 116.47659616743 -09.83881451881 13.7928 13.2836 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.143#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247740_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 247740_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248137_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 248137_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:30.83 -08:02:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248711_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 248711_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248870_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 248870_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249246_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 249246_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:50:58.54 -11:26:36.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.260 3037193996047109888 117.74327804679 -11.44331430614 14.0749 13.6621 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.260#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249325_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 249325_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249387_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 249387_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49026_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 49026_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:47:00.51 -12:47:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101036_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 101036_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:41.00 -10:18:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145806_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 145806_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:26.83 -08:01:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38305_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 38305_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:25.11 -13:18:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59602_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 59602_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:06.31 -12:13:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110090_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 110090_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:15.07 -09:51:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135147_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 135147_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:57.49 -08:41:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123498_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 123498_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:04.75 -09:09:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175581_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 175581_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:38.49 -06:19:15.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.23, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.21)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.387 3055993342780213504 114.41185599335 -06.32124088555 13.2034 12.6532 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.387#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69516_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 69516_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:02.08 -11:47:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112906_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
Preparing report for the candidate 112906_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148988_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 148988_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:13.40 -07:52:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114067_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
Preparing report for the candidate 114067_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86833_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 86833_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:12.44 -10:54:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39408_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 39408_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:32.38 -13:10:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79500_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 79500_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:51.46 -11:16:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32792_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 32792_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:36.74 -13:29:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147777_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647
The candidate 147777_fd_Mon-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-37-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0647 did not pass the final checks