This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 14.1037* 05 48 25.17 +19 24 47.9 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461144.6037,12.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260414.1037 12.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 14.1037* 05 41 44.70 +21 22 24.8 11.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461144.6037,11.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260414.1037 11.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 14.1037* 05 36 22.94 +22 17 32.3 13.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461144.6037,12.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260414.1037 12.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 14.1037* 05 49 13.04 +19 14 24.3 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461144.6037,13.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260414.1037 13.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 14.1037* 05 22 03.35 +23 24 10.3 12.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J052203.20+232411.4,2461144.6037,12.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J052203.20+232411.4 20260414.1037 12.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.62137122 11.02.2026 02:54:36.473 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
First image: 2461082.62137122 11.02.2026 02:54:36.473 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Last image: 2461144.60401865 14.04.2026 02:29:37.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 18340
Objects passed selection criteria: 18279
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13226.8
Average stars matched: 11830.8 (89.4456 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 121716 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 21:37:04 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.62137122 11.02.2026 02:54:36.473 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
First image: 2461082.62137122 11.02.2026 02:54:36.473 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Last image: 2461144.60401865 14.04.2026 02:29:37.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 206
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 50 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 134453
Objects passed selection criteria: 134131
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 97409.8
Average stars matched: 87513 (89.8401 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1954292 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 21:39:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461144.60347546
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits'
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.616 +22:00:01.42
Second-epoch image center 05:32:27.830 +22:03:52.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0717 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.616 +22:00:01.42
Second-epoch image center 05:32:27.662 +22:03:52.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0713 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:27.830 +22:03:52.88
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:27.662 +22:03:52.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00067 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00067 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MJWQvfQSfm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BWUoqbaVMR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UZjGBSov5Z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yJLdcfQE4L
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23525 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.1682 to 91.6910 deg, Dec +16.3328 to +27.3474 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.1682 to 91.6910 deg, Dec 16.3328 to 27.3474 deg
Loaded 12326 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9058 out of 10254 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10254 out of 23525 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.945337
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.945337
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
2.3 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
15.3 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.MJWQvfQSfm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2582, passed=23525
Got 23525 stars (including 20915 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23525 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22051 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22047 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22047 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BWUoqbaVMR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh: line 129: echo: write error: Broken pipe
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2595, passed=23514
Got 23514 stars (including 20891 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23514 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22179 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 926 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UZjGBSov5Z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=930, passed=12283
Got 12283 stars (including 11345 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12283 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11815 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11817 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1021)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yJLdcfQE4L (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=923, passed=12493
Got 12493 stars (including 11564 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12493 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12007 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12003 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12003 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34355_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 34355_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30860_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 30860_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.39 +17:54:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18021_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 18021_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:58.47 +24:44:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04457_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 04457_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:00.44 +18:21:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.616 +22:00:01.42
Second-epoch image center 05:32:27.830 +22:03:52.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0717 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.616 +22:00:01.42
Second-epoch image center 05:32:27.662 +22:03:52.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0713 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:27.830 +22:03:52.88
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:27.662 +22:03:52.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00067 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00067 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits &> /tmp/tmp.83ptGuI2R4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VfWRoEsLo5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits &> /tmp/tmp.d0qD6IdKiF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NGI7LCoWyt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 163644 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.1103 to 91.6919 deg, Dec +16.3196 to +27.3524 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.1103 to 91.6919 deg, Dec 16.3196 to 27.3524 deg
Loaded 12375 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7170 out of 10499 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10499 out of 163644 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.769457
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.769457
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 178 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.83ptGuI2R4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=55, blended=21410, passed=163589
Got 163589 stars (including 141908 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 163589 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154540 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VfWRoEsLo5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=54, blended=21418, passed=163772
Got 163772 stars (including 142086 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 163772 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154755 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154755 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 929 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.d0qD6IdKiF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=7121, passed=79715
Got 79715 stars (including 72507 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 79715 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76028 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76028 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NGI7LCoWyt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=7314, passed=79898
Got 79898 stars (including 72494 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 79898 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76282 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76281 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Excluding outliers - 925 stars left (next iteration limit 1018)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-28-50_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0638.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_213103_TTUQ2b1x1_15178_M6uGgttB/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out185133.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out185134.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out185145.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out185154.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out185170.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out200709.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out201101.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out206693.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out109160.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out185185.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out188356.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out196254.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out201791.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185133_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 185133_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:50.80 +18:52:48.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.05, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.03)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.345 3399175042342913920 085.71202591587 +18.87863810026 13.8654 13.3337 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.345#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185134_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 185134_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:14.09 +21:46:34.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.83)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185136_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 185136_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185145_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 185145_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:39.39 +18:11:16.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.11, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.09)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.870 3398141535772444160 087.91466357214 +18.18785550337 13.8110 12.9309 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.870#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185148_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 185148_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:02.55 +18:09:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185154_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 185154_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:33.47 +19:03:41.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.79)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185157_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 185157_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185161_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 185161_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185164_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 185164_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:59.66 +20:34:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185170_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 185170_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:28.68 +22:06:59.1 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.32, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.30)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185171_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 185171_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185175_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 185175_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185178_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 185178_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185181_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 185181_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:40.11 +18:57:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185183_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 185183_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185184_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 185184_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185185_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
Preparing report for the candidate 185185_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185187_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 185187_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:30.01 +20:34:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185190_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 185190_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:27.26 +20:47:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185191_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 185191_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185193_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 185193_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:49.02 +20:33:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187547_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 187547_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188356_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
Preparing report for the candidate 188356_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188679_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 188679_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190595_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 190595_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:03.67 +20:44:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190693_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 190693_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.07 +22:38:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191323_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 191323_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191645_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 191645_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:35.98 +23:46:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191700_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 191700_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:12.70 +18:24:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191772_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 191772_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:21.61 +18:36:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191774_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 191774_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:04.20 +24:54:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192167_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 192167_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192482_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 192482_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:44.87 +23:44:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192550_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 192550_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193203_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 193203_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:08.83 +20:03:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193304_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 193304_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193427_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 193427_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:54.78 +23:41:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193777_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 193777_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:00.57 +20:46:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193882_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 193882_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:30.83 +18:25:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194081_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 194081_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194088_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 194088_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:50.17 +21:18:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194232_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 194232_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:39.98 +18:13:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194350_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 194350_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194438_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 194438_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194546_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 194546_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:46.87 +21:22:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194801_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 194801_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.72 +19:34:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194842_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 194842_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194911_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 194911_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:11.19 +18:40:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194989_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 194989_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:40.09 +20:11:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195011_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 195011_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:54.18 +26:05:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195024_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 195024_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:02.94 +20:17:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195237_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 195237_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:54.61 +19:28:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195541_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 195541_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:52.26 +21:18:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195582_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 195582_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:11.34 +19:48:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195879_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 195879_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:03.83 +19:09:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195902_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 195902_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195926_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 195926_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196009_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 196009_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:42.16 +23:00:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196120_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 196120_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:32.57 +23:52:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196185_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 196185_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:49.39 +18:34:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196217_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 196217_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:03.96 +24:38:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196254_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
Preparing report for the candidate 196254_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196400_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 196400_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:29.09 +18:44:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196492_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 196492_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:21.72 +21:11:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196693_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 196693_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197151_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 197151_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:50.97 +20:15:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197435_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 197435_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:18.89 +21:12:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197712_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 197712_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197760_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 197760_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:05.62 +23:11:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198013_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 198013_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:24.95 +18:03:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198133_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 198133_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198228_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 198228_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:36.99 +25:25:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198256_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 198256_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198485_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 198485_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:17.26 +20:45:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198516_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 198516_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.77 +19:32:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198533_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 198533_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:57.94 +24:13:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198554_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 198554_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:00.22 +24:57:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198766_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 198766_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198772_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 198772_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:53.42 +18:32:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199287_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 199287_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:36.47 +22:27:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199557_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 199557_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199628_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 199628_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:31.69 +20:45:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199855_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 199855_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199912_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 199912_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:27.69 +18:02:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200311_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 200311_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:12.90 +20:07:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200322_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 200322_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200348_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 200348_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200391_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 200391_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:02.31 +24:22:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200491_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 200491_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:41.19 +20:56:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200565_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 200565_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:13.62 +25:22:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200640_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 200640_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:52.37 +23:20:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200663_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 200663_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200690_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 200690_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:27.43 +21:47:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200709_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 200709_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:43.28 +26:18:23.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.416 3441334574460711680 085.68011973700 +26.30574560020 13.5567 13.1835 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.416#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200827_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 200827_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:29.72 +21:46:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200935_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 200935_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201025_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 201025_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:58.17 +23:53:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201026_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 201026_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201101_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 201101_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:37.89 +18:57:26.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.581 3397912940431641088 084.15767096641 +18.95847987654 13.6675 13.0726 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.581#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201121_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 201121_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201146_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 201146_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201336_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 201336_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201504_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 201504_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201578_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 201578_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:21.76 +24:21:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201791_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
Preparing report for the candidate 201791_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201867_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 201867_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202010_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 202010_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202042_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 202042_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:10.18 +19:41:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202109_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 202109_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:15.64 +18:46:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202239_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 202239_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:37.42 +22:22:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202240_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 202240_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202367_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 202367_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:54.76 +20:33:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202489_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 202489_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202533_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 202533_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:09.38 +22:09:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202572_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 202572_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202817_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 202817_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:00.44 +19:34:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203110_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 203110_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:44.68 +21:12:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203179_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 203179_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.62 +22:39:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203201_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 203201_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203390_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 203390_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:22.38 +23:21:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203467_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 203467_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203515_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 203515_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203650_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 203650_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203663_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 203663_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:37.28 +23:37:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204144_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 204144_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:24.98 +23:07:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204601_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 204601_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204634_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 204634_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:53.31 +22:13:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204640_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 204640_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:20.97 +24:22:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204729_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 204729_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:36.28 +19:12:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204816_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 204816_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:36.95 +25:18:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204855_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 204855_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204942_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 204942_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:44.70 +18:59:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205184_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 205184_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205408_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 205408_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:12.51 +20:42:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205431_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 205431_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:08.05 +19:33:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205552_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 205552_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205961_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 205961_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:54.17 +19:27:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 206220_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 206220_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 206402_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 206402_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:31.16 +19:46:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 206425_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 206425_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 206670_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 206670_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 206691_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 206691_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:34.48 +21:24:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 206693_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 206693_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:06.15 +20:34:47.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.298 3402604419107764352 084.52619070033 +20.58069200497 14.3597 13.7505 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.298#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 206715_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 206715_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:30.95 +20:47:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 206891_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 206891_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:08.30 +22:06:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 206913_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 206913_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:44.36 +20:13:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 206958_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 206958_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:39.24 +20:14:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207011_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 207011_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:08.37 +20:02:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207221_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 207221_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207483_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 207483_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207614_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 207614_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:50.78 +22:02:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207884_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 207884_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:51.94 +23:51:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208247_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 208247_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:49.77 +25:55:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209119_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 209119_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:30.34 +22:05:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209464_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 209464_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.55 +21:39:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209706_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 209706_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209941_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 209941_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146579_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 146579_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:19.20 +23:53:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111963_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 111963_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:59.05 +23:30:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27303_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 27303_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18303_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 18303_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:21.42 +17:53:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18025_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 18025_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.39 +17:54:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59475_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 59475_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:15.40 +20:28:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128052_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 128052_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:59.03 +25:08:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81521_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 81521_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:53.67 +21:35:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56342_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 56342_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56165_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 56165_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136732_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 136732_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:42.87 +24:38:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46547_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 46547_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:12.57 +19:30:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131291_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 131291_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:04.29 +25:01:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136341_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 136341_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:58.47 +24:44:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59246_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 59246_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.36 +20:22:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77701_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 77701_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:28.59 +21:23:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174837_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 174837_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:41.60 +23:34:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98863_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 98863_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:25.38 +22:44:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29777_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 29777_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:00.49 +18:21:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174400_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639
The candidate 174400_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-29-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0639 did not pass the final checks