This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 14.1018* 04 55 20.91 +24 57 47.6 11.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461144.6018,11.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260414.1018 11.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 14.1018* 05 32 56.77 +26 19 06.2 12.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461144.6018,12.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260414.1018 12.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461144.6018,13.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260414.1018 13.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 14.1018* 04 51 32.30 +27 28 01.7 12.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461144.6018,12.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260414.1018 12.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
First image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Last image: 2461144.60217909 14.04.2026 02:26:58.273 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15285
Objects passed selection criteria: 15227
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11968.5
Average stars matched: 11628.8 (97.1613 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 120364 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 21:29:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
First image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Last image: 2461144.60217909 14.04.2026 02:26:58.273 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 86
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 38 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 125691
Objects passed selection criteria: 125408
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 102767
Average stars matched: 98960.8 (96.2965 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1955508 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 21:31:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461144.60135269
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 05:00:13.869 +30:00:03.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0469 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 05:00:13.307 +29:59:33.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0448 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:13.869 +30:00:03.26
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:13.307 +29:59:33.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00847 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lbjShFXaKT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Lfc3P7mnrH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eic74cRppK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits &> /tmp/tmp.llVwG5ioMp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16419 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5643 to 84.6649 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.3019 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5643 to 84.6649 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.3019 deg
Loaded 8463 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6027 out of 6737 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6737 out of 16419 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.972082
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.972082
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
1.8 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.lbjShFXaKT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1510, passed=16419
Got 16419 stars (including 14877 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16419 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Lfc3P7mnrH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1544, passed=16335
Got 16335 stars (including 14759 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16335 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eic74cRppK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=559, passed=7752
Got 7752 stars (including 7178 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7752 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7407 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.llVwG5ioMp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=559, passed=7711
Got 7711 stars (including 7139 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7711 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7369 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7371 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7371 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21305_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 21305_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.49 +31:18:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06267_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 06267_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.26 +32:10:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 05:00:13.869 +30:00:03.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0469 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 05:00:13.307 +29:59:33.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0448 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:13.869 +30:00:03.26
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:13.307 +29:59:33.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00847 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qBPV9cnChJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iFjzj1D7XY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.t97FCJJpqw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits &> /tmp/tmp.W8JWbFctby
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 137583 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5579 to 84.6894 deg, Dec +24.3186 to +35.3036 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5579 to 84.6894 deg, Dec 24.3186 to 35.3036 deg
Loaded 8491 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4933 out of 6876 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6876 out of 137583 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825942
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825942
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 82 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.7 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
1.7 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.0 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
2.0 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.qBPV9cnChJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=14362, passed=137559
Got 137559 stars (including 122963 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 137559 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iFjzj1D7XY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=14447, passed=138047
Got 138047 stars (including 123396 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 138047 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.t97FCJJpqw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=4604, passed=69243
Got 69243 stars (including 64523 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1046)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.W8JWbFctby (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=4724, passed=69323
Got 69323 stars (including 64459 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69323 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66710 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-25-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_212800_TTUQ1b1x1_14406_1koL60DG/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160898.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160907.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160908.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160917.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160935.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160937.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160939.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160943.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160945.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160948.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160949.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160951.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160954.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160962.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160971.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161475.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161556.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161628.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161639.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161696.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161717.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161818.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161857.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162009.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162068.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162189.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162273.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162299.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out117783.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out161170.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out161273.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out161766.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160898_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 160898_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:46.19 +32:30:57.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.64)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.789 160609069380931328 075.19169993455 +32.51564614045 14.7402 13.8991 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.789#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160907_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 160907_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:59.20 +29:24:23.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.17, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.15)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.411 158276214943714944 071.49707943843 +29.40623329850 14.4915 13.5478 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.411#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160908_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 160908_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:42.03 +27:40:05.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.25, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.23)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.215 154129372480014464 074.42547379827 +27.66791954646 13.8095 12.8416 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.215#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160909_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 160909_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:00.50 +29:52:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160917_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 160917_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:18.50 +28:19:19.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.10)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160922_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 160922_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:41.61 +32:01:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160925_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 160925_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:05.99 +27:03:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160935_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 160935_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:54.65 +30:38:43.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.69)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160937_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 160937_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:11.30 +30:25:22.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.894 159905622456432640 073.04755222599 +30.42233283955 13.5903 12.8116 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.894#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160939_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 160939_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:27.34 +30:21:34.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.001 180158111245944320 078.86444823324 +30.35926919922 13.5727 12.6431 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.001#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160940_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 160940_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:25.00 +29:02:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160941_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 160941_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:22.58 +28:33:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160943_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 160943_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:50.85 +29:38:08.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.398 3446496785851166208 080.46224900339 +29.63553760154 13.9532 13.4189 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.398#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160945_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 160945_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:54.39 +28:06:32.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.72, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.70)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.434 154218123683934208 074.47738403413 +28.10890600473 13.7084 13.0166 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.434#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160948_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 160948_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:44.94 +33:01:18.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.59)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160949_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 160949_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:59.32 +29:19:12.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.170 3446427138661843968 080.74691005731 +29.31990309979 13.9154 13.2682 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.170#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160951_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 160951_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:38.29 +32:24:04.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.67, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.65)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.434 3448932990083291136 082.15996723933 +32.40107792449 14.0321 13.4716 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.434#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160953_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 160953_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:21.35 +30:09:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160954_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 160954_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:00.36 +32:23:42.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.027 3448053419438425472 084.25247676334 +32.39489232386 13.4076 12.7825 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.027#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160957_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 160957_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:45.50 +28:44:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160961_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 160961_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:45.95 +28:46:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160962_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 160962_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:16.88 +34:38:38.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.15, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.13)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.027 182806830461845120 080.57034348337 +34.64365938266 13.2136 12.5984 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.027#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160964_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 160964_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:09.80 +33:15:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160965_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 160965_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:03.61 +26:37:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160966_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 160966_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:37.52 +26:55:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160968_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 160968_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:07.76 +32:41:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160970_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 160970_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:32.83 +26:01:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160971_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 160971_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:04.54 +29:46:45.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.279 159062228318740480 068.26882742948 +29.77938702239 10.9321 9.9620 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.279#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161110_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161110_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.61 +34:09:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161154_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161154_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.27 +34:07:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 161170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161264_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161264_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:25.45 +34:49:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161273_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 161273_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161280_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161280_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:32.27 +28:37:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161296_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161296_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.64 +34:23:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161330_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161330_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:59.38 +32:21:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161349_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161349_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:43.71 +28:19:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161411_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161411_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:26.82 +26:55:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161412_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161412_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:10.18 +34:24:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161415_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161415_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:21.95 +28:31:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161475_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161475_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:57.14 +34:10:22.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.10, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.08)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.576 3449193956594814848 082.98818483701 +34.17283607032 13.1885 12.6766 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.576#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161510_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161510_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:36.02 +34:06:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161548_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161548_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:17.49 +32:33:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161556_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161556_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:18.49 +31:53:37.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.05, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.03)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.559 172300726273722624 066.57689667450 +31.89336248813 13.1458 12.2480 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.559#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161578_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161578_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:35.35 +34:07:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161588_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161588_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:19.57 +33:12:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161628_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161628_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:05.72 +32:29:43.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.14, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.12)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.113 171691184515688192 067.52407373356 +32.49472698787 13.1844 12.5018 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.113#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161639_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161639_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:18.84 +29:47:15.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.34, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.32)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.360 158401902866571264 072.07844184694 +29.78766965032 13.0647 12.2921 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.360#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161664_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161664_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:01.25 +33:48:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161696_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161696_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:35.18 +32:47:23.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.59, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.57)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.084 3448828334618381440 083.89668592803 +32.78917750674 13.7606 13.2156 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.084#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161710_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161710_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:17.82 +33:11:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161717_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161717_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:10.55 +34:12:35.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.618 182169770847782784 078.29468046207 +34.20944608585 13.6596 13.0759 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.618#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161741_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161741_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:20.12 +31:44:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161746_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161746_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:17.65 +29:45:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161754_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161754_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:31.70 +30:49:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161763_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161763_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:34.77 +33:55:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161766_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 161766_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161771_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161771_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:23.14 +33:52:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161818_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161818_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:58.50 +32:57:23.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.61)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.935 181090806343606400 078.99482011537 +32.95601551494 13.7126 13.1137 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.935#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161830_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161830_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:28.94 +29:39:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161857_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161857_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:28.21 +33:36:24.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.442 181779375500827392 077.11758358150 +33.60697885921 13.5115 12.5417 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.442#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161870_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161870_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:16.36 +32:24:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161899_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161899_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:26.79 +30:56:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161904_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161904_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:19.60 +33:23:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161907_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 161907_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:38.18 +25:25:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162009_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 162009_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:36.31 +30:30:18.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.986 159214922995904768 069.15222845641 +30.50438090248 13.9526 13.2650 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.986#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162042_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 162042_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:21.29 +32:55:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162068_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 162068_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:32.17 +35:00:12.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.654 185302726152838528 076.88540077124 +35.00281500033 14.0546 13.1076 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.654#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162077_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 162077_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:04.88 +32:02:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162086_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 162086_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:24.06 +31:04:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162145_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 162145_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:38.07 +31:15:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162189_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 162189_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:09.52 +31:24:58.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.16, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.14)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162273_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 162273_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:11.74 +34:12:28.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.27)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.313 161756375404501376 074.29932863736 +34.20775873345 14.1605 13.3187 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.313#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162299_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 162299_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:06.44 +35:10:07.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.22, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.20)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.469 186063897435670656 074.02753194612 +35.16842560342 14.3523 13.6041 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.469#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162333_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 162333_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:49.12 +33:30:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162346_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 162346_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:51.51 +32:23:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46474_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 46474_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:40.13 +32:11:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33755_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 33755_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:00.54 +32:53:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61547_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 61547_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.58 +31:18:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47553_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 47553_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.25 +32:10:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117783_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 117783_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119951_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 119951_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-26-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks