This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 5544108648009257728,2461144.5941,8.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 5544108648009257728 20260414.0941 8.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 5544108648009257728,2461144.5941,8.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 5544108648009257728 20260414.0941 8.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J081829-2956.3,2461144.5941,9.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J081829-2956.3 20260414.0941 9.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J083729-3120.5,2461144.5941,9.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J083729-3120.5 20260414.0941 9.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J083200-3158.7,2461144.5941,9.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J083200-3158.7 20260414.0941 9.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0544 Pup,2461144.5941,9.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0544 Pup 20260414.0941 9.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J083413-3431.0,2461144.5941,9.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J083413-3431.0 20260414.0941 9.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J082522-3546.4,2461144.5941,9.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J082522-3546.4 20260414.0941 9.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J080432-3321.5,2461144.5941,9.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J080432-3321.5 20260414.0941 9.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
AS Pup,2461144.5941,7.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
AS Pup 20260414.0941 7.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0519 Pup,2461144.5941,9.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0519 Pup 20260414.0941 9.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J081559-3617.1,2461144.5941,9.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J081559-3617.1 20260414.0941 9.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0515 Pup,2461144.5941,9.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0515 Pup 20260414.0941 9.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461098.68188793 27.02.2026 04:21:45.117 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
First image: 2461098.68188793 27.02.2026 04:21:45.117 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Last image: 2461144.59443859 14.04.2026 02:15:49.494 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 27
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.75
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 11479
Objects passed selection criteria: 11417
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6638.25
Average stars matched: 6307.25 (95.0137 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 117080 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 21:28:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
ERROR running VaST on the field Pup-04-Q2b1x1 (wrong field? clouds? very bad focus?)
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461144.59372127
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits'
wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits'
wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits'
wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits'
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:20:51.804 -34:00:31.57
Second-epoch image center 08:20:52.023 -34:03:44.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0535 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:20:51.804 -34:00:31.57
Second-epoch image center 08:20:49.658 -34:03:47.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0550 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:20:52.023 -34:03:44.00
Second-epoch second image center 08:20:49.658 -34:03:47.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00823 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JX8oXCw8VH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8coW9tl3tB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ixLykPjDxb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits &> /tmp/tmp.k3ca7xdQfd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits and wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits and wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits and wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits) and catalog (wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14227 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 115.2058 to 135.1879 deg, Dec -39.2743 to -28.4214 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 115.2058 to 135.1879 deg, Dec -39.2743 to -28.4214 deg
Loaded 25973 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11225 out of 11650 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11650 out of 14227 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.751658
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.751658
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.75
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.00
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.00
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 25 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
2.4 pix Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
7.7 pix fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits
7.3 pix fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.0 mag. Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
14.0 mag. Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
11.9 mag. fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits
12.1 mag. fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 11.9 (SNR ) 9.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.JX8oXCw8VH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits' -> 'wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1102, passed=14227
Got 14227 stars (including 13111 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14227 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.86"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.89"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.90"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.04"
Excluding outliers - 918 stars left (next iteration limit 1009)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits -region wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8coW9tl3tB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits' -> 'wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1158, passed=14201
Got 14201 stars (including 13036 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14201 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.90"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.90"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.91"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.05"
Excluding outliers - 921 stars left (next iteration limit 1012)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits -region wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ixLykPjDxb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=380, passed=1917
Got 1917 stars (including 1537 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1917 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013004 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010403 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1799 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.68"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.77"
Excluding outliers - 908 stars left (next iteration limit 996)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits -region wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.k3ca7xdQfd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=581, passed=2203
Got 2203 stars (including 1622 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2203 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013004 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010403 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2054 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.64"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.76"
Excluding outliers - 918 stars left (next iteration limit 1008)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits -region wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/wcs_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/wcs_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Pup-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21116.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out01196.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out03617.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04258.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out05796.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07252.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08237.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08393.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out09265.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out09913.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out10126.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out12531.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20831.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20847.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20673_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
The candidate 20673_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:02:01.82 -31:08:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20790_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
The candidate 20790_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:13:21.88 -36:18:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20831_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
Preparing report for the candidate 20831_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20847_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
Preparing report for the candidate 20847_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21116_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
The candidate 21116_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:17:05.35 -34:35:26.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN= 9.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=10.38)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.961 5546346394694738944 124.27117490208 -34.59014553042 9.9295 8.3864 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.961#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12531_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
Preparing report for the candidate 12531_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10126_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
Preparing report for the candidate 10126_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09265_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
Preparing report for the candidate 09265_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03328_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
The candidate 03328_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:36:48.52 -36:27:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08393_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
Preparing report for the candidate 08393_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05796_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
Preparing report for the candidate 05796_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04258_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
Preparing report for the candidate 04258_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07252_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
Preparing report for the candidate 07252_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10035_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
The candidate 10035_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:17:05.50 -31:26:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01196_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
Preparing report for the candidate 01196_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08237_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
Preparing report for the candidate 08237_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03617_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
Preparing report for the candidate 03617_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07681_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
The candidate 07681_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:21:23.19 -33:03:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09913_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
Preparing report for the candidate 09913_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08922_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
The candidate 08922_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:30:28.64 -32:09:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04045_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
The candidate 04045_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:13:29.37 -35:54:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03076_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
The candidate 03076_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:18:33.06 -36:39:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03491_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
The candidate 03491_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:13:58.24 -36:19:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04667_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
The candidate 04667_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:40:05.96 -35:18:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08022_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627
The candidate 08022_fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:04:16.41 -32:40:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 22s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Pup-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
08:09:40.33 -38:10:20.9
08:15:59.58 -36:16:59.0
08:25:21.98 -35:46:20.3
08:34:12.42 -34:30:56.0
08:04:32.73 -33:21:41.3
08:07:03.97 -32:38:47.6
08:16:13.76 -32:35:08.6
08:31:59.48 -31:58:39.1
08:03:42.95 -31:26:49.6
08:37:29.02 -31:20:36.0
08:18:29.06 -29:56:18.0
08:07:42.15 -37:25:45.5
08:07:41.68 -37:25:47.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits
Last image: 2461144.59372127 14.04.2026 02:14:47.518 UTC
ERROR running VaST on the field Pup-04-Q2b1x1 (wrong field? clouds? very bad focus? -- transient_factory_test31.txt)
____ VaST output ____
--==VaST 1.0rc90==--
Parsing command line arguments...
opt 'r': assuming no rotation larger than 15.0 degrees!
opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor
opt '5': 4.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius!
opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching!
opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source!
opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted!
opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope)
opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag!
WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars.
opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done!
opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually!
opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored!
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images
Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ...
Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found.
This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file.
Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp)... OK
Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor
Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files.
Done with cleaning!
VaST was started with the following command line:
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits
Preparing to process 4 input FITS images...
######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ########
transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search!
transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search!
transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit
transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!!
transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3
transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars
transient search mode: not discarding large sources
################
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 3322.0 3744.0 3324.0 3746.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 4624.0 4621.0 4626.0 4623.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 6875.0 5527.0 6877.0 5529.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Setting the fixed star match radius of 4.00 pix
We have 4 images to process.
SExtractor catalog cache: restored Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits catalog from cache
SExtractor catalog cache: restored Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits catalog from cache
The number of processor cores determined from /proc/cpuinfo is 24.
Running SExtractor in 4 parallel threads...
Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-22-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Parent process says: we are done fork()ing.
Waiting for thread 3 to finish...
The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits
The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits
The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits
_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 3322.0 3744.0 3324.0 3746.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 3322.0 3744.0 3324.0 3746.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 4624.0 4621.0 4626.0 4623.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 4624.0 4621.0 4626.0 4623.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 6875.0 5527.0 6877.0 5529.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 6875.0 5527.0 6877.0 5529.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 9.0,9.0,8.1,9.9,10.8,11.7 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 7.2,7.2,6.5,7.9,8.7,9.4 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits
Waiting for thread 2 to finish...
Waiting for thread 1 to finish...
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits
Done with SExtractor!
TIMING SExtractor: 9 seconds
Matching stars between images!
No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine.
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-02-27T04:21:45.1176367
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-02-27T04:21:45.1176367
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-02-27T04:21:45.117
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-26_22-21-45_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Exposure 20 sec, 27.02.2026 04:21:45.117 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461098.68188793 mid. exp.
The reference image star 8153.583 32.502 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8685.614 28.602 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8531.990 24.501 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8062.375 24.381 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8604.276 21.539 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8540.699 19.667 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8390.152 17.102 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 7889.069 13.513 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8399.423 15.172 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 7860.629 11.538 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more reference image stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 100251, (100251 good for image matching)
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 6
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 14534
* rejected close to frame edge: 367
* rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>4.8 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 236
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied.
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -8.40
Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -8.4 (5.0 sigma detection)
The simple faintest star detection limit= -7.8
80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -8.9
Selected detection limit= -8.9
Final detection limit= -8.9 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0)
Parameter box for transient search: 10.04.7 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 207
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
103094 * detected, using 514/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.008061, number_of_ambiguous_matches=831
refining the coordinate transformation... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.008070, number_of_ambiguous_matches=832
92126 * matched, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.008070, number_of_ambiguous_matches=832
92126 * matched (2nd iteration). fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.008070, number_of_ambiguous_matches=832
92126 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
rotation [degrees] = -0.005
103094 stars detected, 92126 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 81995, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 81995 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 81992 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
delta_m = -0.00000*X_pix +0.00000*Y_pix -0.00192
Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)...
Computing robust linear magnitude calibration.
Used 78291 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -8.38
111219 objects stored in memory (400000 max.)
Magnitude calibration is performed successfully!
Saving observations to the cache... OK
memory: 169192 kB used, 194788 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
Total number of measurements 203345 (203345 measurements stored in RAM)
sorting the measurements cached in memory,
writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files...
processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%)
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-04-14T02:14:47.5185646
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-04-14T02:14:47.5185646
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-04-14T02:14:47.518
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-14-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0626.fits
The star 7972.447 41.301 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 9545.657 35.913 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 9270.345 33.539 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 9265.011 32.459 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8963.844 29.279 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8166.706 29.379 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7951.026 23.326 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7949.619 22.977 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7804.401 22.426 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8466.409 14.641 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 10081
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 2
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 4
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 1714
* rejected close to frame edge: 57
* rejected as being too small (<2.2 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>9.0 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 745
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
10081 * detected, using 100/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001286, number_of_ambiguous_matches=143
refining the coordinate transformation... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001277, number_of_ambiguous_matches=142
6959 * matched, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001277, number_of_ambiguous_matches=142
6959 * matched (2nd iteration). fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001277, number_of_ambiguous_matches=142
6959 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
rotation [degrees] = -178.353
10081 stars detected, 6959 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 4939, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 4939 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 4386 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
delta_m = 0.00010*X_pix +0.00018*Y_pix -0.76305
ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_B * Y_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG
Used 4386 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -9.08
[01;31m ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image. [33;00m
111219 objects stored in memory (400000 max.)
memory: 1857472 kB used, 2192708 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
processed 3 of 4 images ( 75.0%)
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-04-14T02:15:49.4943715
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-04-14T02:15:49.4943715
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-04-14T02:15:49.494
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_212500_TTUQ2b1x1_28250_4NcAqJUp/fd_Pup-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_21-15-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0627.fits
The star 8072.913 37.102 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 9543.924 36.517 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 9261.953 31.937 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8767.094 31.481 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8758.088 32.182 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8958.256 28.482 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7750.882 27.448 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8349.013 21.953 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8346.364 21.339 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7947.476 22.673 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 12442
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 1
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 0
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 2212
* rejected close to frame edge: 63
* rejected as being too small (<1.8 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>7.2 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 1593
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
12442 * detected, using 100/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001924, number_of_ambiguous_matches=214
refining the coordinate transformation... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.002140, number_of_ambiguous_matches=238
8672 * matched, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.002140, number_of_ambiguous_matches=238
8674 * matched (2nd iteration). fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.002140, number_of_ambiguous_matches=238
8674 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
rotation [degrees] = -178.377
12442 stars detected, 8674 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 6247, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 6247 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 5517 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
delta_m = 0.00009*X_pix +0.00017*Y_pix -0.72943
ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_B * Y_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG
Used 5517 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -8.81
[01;31m ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image. [33;00m
111219 objects stored in memory (400000 max.)
memory: 1858528 kB used, 2192708 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
processed 4 of 4 images (100.0%)
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 3 seconds
Done with measurements! =)
Total number of measurements 203345 (0 measurements stored in RAM)
Freeing up some memory... Sorting the measurements cached in memory...
Writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files...
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
The lightcurve files have been written, freeing up more memory...
Creating vast_image_details.log ...
Writing summary file: vast_summary.log ... OK
Selecting the best aperture for each source
Aperture with index 0 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 20578 stars
Aperture with index 1 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 0 stars
Aperture with index 2 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER -0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 24438 stars
Aperture with index 3 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 14039 stars
Aperture with index 4 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.20*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 11427 stars
Aperture with index 5 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.30*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 21644 stars
done! =)
TIMING select_aperture: 3 seconds
Computing lightcurve statistics... Will not compute variability indexes for objects having <1 points in lightcurve
You may disable this by commenting out the line '#define DROP_LIGHTCURVES_WITH_SMALL_NUMBER_OF_POINTS_FROM_ALL_PLOTS' in src/vast_limits.h an re-compiling VaST with 'make'
Computing, please wait a bit
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
vast_lightcurve_statistics.log: 91800 objects, the longest string is 384 bytes.
Allocating memory for resorting the file.
Variability index idx00_STD is enabled
Variability index idx01_wSTD is enabled
Variability index idx08_Npts is enabled
Variability index idx09_MAD is enabled
Variability index idx11_RoMS is enabled
Variability index idx12_rCh2 is enabled
Variability index idx17_Jtim is enabled
Variability index idx18_Ltim is enabled
Variability index idx21_eta is enabled
Variability index idx23_S_B is enabled
Variability index idx25_IQR is enabled
Computing the expected values of variability indexes and their scatter as a function of magnitude
..........
..........
..........
..........
Wriring the list of candidate variables to vast_autocandidates.log ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
----***** VaST processing WARNING *****----
You asked VaST to process 4 images, but only 1 were actually matched to the reference one.
Please investigate this!
**************************************************************
This error might be a bug, but it is far more likely that it is caused by
inappropriate input data. A few simple things to check in the diagnostic
messages printed above (or the vast*.log files):
* How many of the input images are matched?
* Does the number of detected stars on each image look reasonable?
* Do images have a sufficient overlap of at least about 20 percent?
You may run
./sextract_single_image /path/to/my/image/file.fit
to see how well VaST detects stars with the current SExtractor settings
(star detection settings can be changed in the default.sex configuration
file, see various examples in the VaST directory).
If you cannot identify the problem, please e-mail Kirill Sokolovsky
Please try to describe the problem in details and, if possible, attach vast_summary.log
file and a few example images. If the images are too big to be sent by e-mail, please
upload them through a web-form http://scan.sai.msu.ru/upload/
**************************************************************
Low percentage of matched images - we'll declare this an unsuccessful VaST run (exit code 1)
_____________________
########### Completed Pup-04-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
08:07:42.15 -37:25:45.5
08:07:41.68 -37:25:47.6
08:18:29.06 -29:56:18.0
08:37:29.02 -31:20:36.0
08:31:59.48 -31:58:39.1
08:16:13.76 -32:35:08.6
08:34:12.42 -34:30:56.0
08:25:21.98 -35:46:20.3
08:04:32.73 -33:21:41.3
08:09:40.33 -38:10:20.9
08:07:03.97 -32:38:47.6
08:15:59.58 -36:16:59.0
08:03:42.95 -31:26:49.6
###################################################################################
08:07:42.15 -37:25:45.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
08:07:41.68 -37:25:47.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
08:18:29.06 -29:56:18.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
08:37:29.02 -31:20:36.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
08:31:59.48 -31:58:39.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
08:16:13.76 -32:35:08.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
08:34:12.42 -34:30:56.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
08:25:21.98 -35:46:20.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
08:04:32.73 -33:21:41.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
08:09:40.33 -38:10:20.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
08:07:03.97 -32:38:47.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
08:15:59.58 -36:16:59.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
08:03:42.95 -31:26:49.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
08:03:42.95 -31:26:49.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
08:04:32.73 -33:21:41.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
08:07:03.97 -32:38:47.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
08:07:41.68 -37:25:47.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
08:07:42.15 -37:25:45.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
08:09:40.33 -38:10:20.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
08:15:59.58 -36:16:59.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
08:16:13.76 -32:35:08.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
08:18:29.06 -29:56:18.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
08:25:21.98 -35:46:20.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
08:31:59.48 -31:58:39.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
08:34:12.42 -34:30:56.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
08:37:29.02 -31:20:36.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
08:03:42.95 -31:26:49.6 -- a known variable star
08:04:32.73 -33:21:41.3 -- a known variable star
08:07:03.97 -32:38:47.6 -- a known variable star
08:07:41.68 -37:25:47.6 -- not a known variable star
08:07:42.15 -37:25:45.5 -- not a known variable star
08:09:40.33 -38:10:20.9 -- a known variable star
08:15:59.58 -36:16:59.0 -- a known variable star
08:16:13.76 -32:35:08.6 -- a known variable star
08:18:29.06 -29:56:18.0 -- a known variable star
08:25:21.98 -35:46:20.3 -- a known variable star
08:31:59.48 -31:58:39.1 -- a known variable star
08:34:12.42 -34:30:56.0 -- a known variable star
08:37:29.02 -31:20:36.0 -- a known variable star
Found 2 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
13 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
08:03:42.95 -31:26:49.6
08:04:32.73 -33:21:41.3
08:07:03.97 -32:38:47.6
08:07:41.68 -37:25:47.6
08:07:42.15 -37:25:45.5
08:09:40.33 -38:10:20.9
08:15:59.58 -36:16:59.0
08:16:13.76 -32:35:08.6
08:18:29.06 -29:56:18.0
08:25:21.98 -35:46:20.3
08:31:59.48 -31:58:39.1
08:34:12.42 -34:30:56.0
08:37:29.02 -31:20:36.0
08:17:05.35 -34:35:26.7
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461144.59372127 -observatory V36
23:57:22.62 -03:04:28.7 Mercury (0.1mag)
02:59:21.01 +17:07:49.0 Venus (-3.9mag)
00:12:25.41 +00:16:06.9 Mars (1.2mag)
07:11:47.03 +22:47:37.0 Jupiter (-2.1mag)
00:28:19.79 +00:43:40.0 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:47:17.92 +19:46:11.9 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:10:35.39 -00:16:57.0 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:40.07 -22:52:31.3 Pluto (14.5mag)
22:41:15.76 -08:25:07.3 Moon (-9.2mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Apr 13 21:28 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461144.59372127:
07:11:41.77 +22:47:49.5 Io (5.8mag)
07:11:47.44 +22:47:33.0 Europa (5.9mag)
07:11:54.29 +22:47:28.7 Ganymede (5.3mag)
07:12:12.67 +22:46:51.8 Callisto (6.6mag)
07:15:12.20 +22:36:08.3 Himalia (15.3mag)
07:11:45.16 +22:47:38.8 Thebe (16.2mag)
07:15:21.10 +23:06:10.5 Elara (17.3mag)
07:10:32.13 +23:28:37.2 Pasiphae (17.4mag)
07:20:09.25 +22:45:26.8 Carme (18.5mag)
00:28:28.02 +00:43:55.7 Titan (8.8mag)
00:28:22.37 +00:43:53.2 Rhea (10.1mag)
00:28:03.24 +00:44:07.7 Iapetus (11.5mag)
00:28:33.23 +00:43:48.5 Hyperion (14.8mag)
00:29:58.18 +00:52:40.5 Phoebe (16.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Apr 13 21:28 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461144.59372127:
15:29:47.18 -14:51:27.5 JWST
16:51:23.08 +45:00:55.8 Chandra
07:48:21.44 -31:46:57.6 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Apr 13 21:28 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461144.59372127 -observatory V36
-> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180]
18:51:11.95 -28:40:04.5 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:05:22.60 -69:45:09.9 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:32:02.43 +31:25:28.6 17.2mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:30:36.65 +10:19:17.1 17.6mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:09:42.58 +29:09:14.3 17.1mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
04:27:01.14 +25:59:11.8 16.0mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:03:01.57 +32:00:18.5 16.2mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:30:47.48 -00:21:21.4 17.3mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:54:10.30 +18:22:19.2 17.5mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:41:17.04 -11:32:57.9 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
09:08:32.12 -12:11:23.0 17.6mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS)
21:52:16.65 +62:47:44.2 17.5mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
19:20:48.75 -03:42:07.7 14.2mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
21:36:00.32 +85:38:53.6 17.8mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:17:02.35 +63:31:20.3 17.1mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
05:09:09.44 +17:39:42.0 10.9mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
16:20:29.45 +06:04:40.3 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:20:15.87 +14:45:30.0 14.6mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
03:24:39.64 -22:40:36.4 16.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:15:06.10 +45:46:01.2 17.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
13:46:45.74 +44:11:56.7 15.1mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
03:22:16.53 -25:54:57.6 17.8mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS)
23:28:12.69 +19:09:37.1 8.8mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:54:56.77 +02:53:46.7 17.4mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
03:11:27.84 +02:50:41.5 12.7mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS)
23:54:08.90 +36:51:52.5 14.5mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
18:39:13.33 -09:49:14.6 11.9mag 10P/Tempel
15:02:52.86 +03:24:17.2 13.8mag 24P/Schaumasse
11:03:19.25 -01:35:17.0 15.7mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
18:00:22.69 -09:40:50.6 17.9mag 40P/Vaisala
10:37:39.99 -04:15:07.2 16.9mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
01:45:43.34 +17:09:44.7 17.2mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
07:07:15.61 +37:25:18.9 17.0mag 63P/Wild
23:26:37.19 -11:40:49.3 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
03:58:10.05 +20:35:48.4 15.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
01:01:21.71 +07:51:13.6 14.3mag 78P/Gehrels
22:57:12.70 -09:57:17.3 14.6mag 88P/Howell
02:05:00.84 +20:07:57.1 15.1mag 93P/Lovas
04:51:13.30 +32:11:08.2 16.2mag 123P/West-Hartley
08:26:08.65 +39:14:28.0 16.2mag 124P/Mrkos
02:30:16.27 +14:09:25.4 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
02:43:47.86 +14:15:35.6 17.5mag 131P/Mueller
01:16:10.23 +12:34:25.5 10.7mag 141P/Machholz
01:25:21.62 +04:09:29.2 10.7mag 141P-A/Machholz
00:11:35.01 +00:08:21.5 13.0mag 141P-D/Machholz
01:55:31.35 +05:54:38.3 17.8mag 141P-I/Machholz
00:57:03.66 -02:29:03.7 15.1mag 162P/SidingSpring
10:29:06.82 +30:57:48.7 18.0mag 164P/Christensen
06:33:00.36 +24:18:07.9 18.0mag 198P/ODAS
14:54:49.50 -00:16:02.8 17.6mag 210P/Christensen
21:33:17.65 -11:54:30.2 17.6mag 218P/LINEAR
17:16:03.25 -14:09:41.7 16.1mag 235P/LINEAR
05:30:22.24 +34:33:09.3 16.7mag 240P/NEAT
07:37:34.06 -05:22:29.2 17.7mag 242P/Spahr
22:12:08.51 -21:29:02.1 17.9mag 260P/McNaught
15:43:22.65 +06:51:50.5 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
07:33:28.45 +21:21:35.0 17.7mag 450P/LONEOS
05:33:05.77 +45:08:40.2 17.5mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K Apr 13 21:28 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.48
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74
06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48
11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95
10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53
20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83
06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93
07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78
19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2
04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS
11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2
07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8
16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12
13:01:19.46 +15:42:15.50 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.34 -0.18
09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06
03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00 SN2026evh 2026-03-12.05 17.29
06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10 AT2026ffp 2026-03-12.16 0.37
14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50 AT2026fij 2026-03-12.05 15.97
10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10 SN 2026exe 2026-03-11.78 16.48
18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00 SN2026ess 2026-03-12.37 17.37
13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80 AT2026ewa 2026-03-12.42 16.77
15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20 ASASSN-26bp 2026-03-11.92 13.33
13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20 AT2024cmo 2026-03-11.12 16.29
13:06:01.97 -15:50:14.40 AT2026fdy 2026-03-10.33 16.68
11:30:09.70 -47:26:45.00 ASASSN-26bn 2026-03-10.3 15.14
05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40 (= Gaia 2026-03-9.09 14.32
03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70 ASASSN-26bm 2026-03-8.04 15.22
04:31:00.53 -68:29:50.20 ASASSN-26bl 2026-03-7.9 10.26
16:18:17.61 +41:25:11.40 SN 2026dkf 2026-03-6.31 16.7
13:45:00.35 +61:16:50.90 SN 2026ejl 2026-03-6.41 -0.66
09:27:45.33 -37:49:33.00 ASASSN-26bk 2026-03-2.06 13.58
20:22:01.20 +23:47:47.30 ASASSN-26bi 2026-02-28.51 15.86
11:16:22.10 +29:26:22.80 AT2026enm 2026-02-28.39 16.88
08:05:59.83 -48:39:35.60 ASASSN-26bh 2026-02-26.05 14.64
13:24:27.02 -45:57:01.40 ASASSN-26bg 2026-02-26.35 15.28
17:27:50.95 -68:28:46.40 ASASSN-26bf 2026-02-26.3 16.28
18:03:39.29 +19:58:46.30 ASASSN-26be 2026-02-25.56 14.95
17:40:18.19 +07:20:59.60 SN 2026crm 2026-02-24.34 16.9
18:38:36.11 -79:28:58.40 ASASSN-26bb 2026-02-24.36 16.11
17:43:29.75 +11:24:00.60 ASASSN-26bc 2026-02-23.37 -3.37
16:59:41.08 -80:01:51.20 ASASSN-26bd 2026-02-23.3 14.38
11:23:31.77 -08:39:15.40 SN2026cff 2026-02-23.15 -1.08
14:55:17.39 -05:56:05.30 SN2026dmk 2026-02-23.22 -0.76
12:28:15.19 +44:27:20.80 SN2026cjz 2026-02-23.47 15.62
12:12:29.55 -02:40:43.30 AT2026dsk 2026-02-23.4 17.21
09:21:05.29 +06:11:42.80 SN2026chr 2026-02-23.1 17.39
16:05:38.61 +18:06:07.40 SN 2026dsy 2026-02-23.36 17.15
04:55:50.66 -29:52:57.70 SN 2026dpg 2026-02-23.11 15.75
04:21:28.18 -53:22:54.40 AT2026drl 2026-02-21.03 17.31
11:50:37.32 +55:21:13.70 SN 2026dix 2026-02-21.43 16.39
16:21:19.69 -63:47:29.40 ASASSN-26az 2026-02-21.03 17.02
02:45:30.93 -54:17:43.10 SN 2026cju 2026-02-21.04 17.54
01:58:40.68 +47:34:50.10 ASASSN-26av 2026-02-21.09 15.97
18:35:53.01 -42:31:38.90 ASASSN-26aw 2026-02-21.12 15.89
11:40:18.88 -39:45:09.20 ASASSN-26ax 2026-02-21.08 15.73
02:26:23.52 -51:42:29.80 ASASSN-26ay 2026-02-21.04 13.93
08:46:07.66 +01:17:43.90 ASASSN-26ba 2026-02-20.23 15.43
14:15:47.49 -48:05:16.60 SN2026dez 2026-02-19.31 15.91
17:25:53.90 -23:28:31.50 ASASSN-26au 2026-02-18.33 15.82
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K Apr 13 21:28 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:52.23 +41:01:44.7 PNV J00425223+4101447 2026-01-19.5505 18.74Cmag
09:54:46.47 +69:06:31.7 PNV J09544647+6906317 2026-01-26.8081 19.3mag
18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9 TCP J18085199-2616219 2026-01-31.8519 12.2mag
08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1 TCP J08011102-0343141 2026-02-08.8090 15.10Cmag
05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5 TCP J05191540-0204515 2026-02-13.4306 14.5mag
10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9 TCP J10524126+3640089 2026-02-17.6065 17.4mag
05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1 TCP J05505081+3622451 2026-02-17.5511 15.7mag
00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag
00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag
17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag
09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K Apr 13 21:28 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
12:50:08.105 +01:17:40.78 AT 2026iva 2026-04-07.89 19.96
10:38:31.370 -04:47:42.62 AT 2026iuz 2026-04-07.85 18.9
13:03:44.252 +20:35:06.20 AT 2026iuy 2026-04-06.96 19.7
13:53:33.216 -46:24:12.81 AT 2026iux 2026-04-07.63 19.83
20:29:30.119 -10:56:33.33 AT 2026iuw 2026-03-29.79 19.55
13:31:30.960 -32:00:09.92 AT 2026iuv 2026-04-07.60 18.91
14:00:56.468 -25:06:29.29 AT 2026iuu 2026-04-07.35 18.482
13:27:25.132 +09:30:53.72 AT 2026iut 2026-04-05.33 19.4971
13:57:28.106 -31:36:18.49 AT 2026ius 2026-04-07.61 19.27
09:54:32.050 -01:17:25.84 SN 2026iur 2026-04-07.01 15.9
14:24:08.131 +22:56:14.71 AT 2026iuq 2026-04-07.38 19.91
10:07:28.221 -17:12:04.00 AT 2026iup 2026-04-05.31 20.26
16:21:33.361 +42:39:39.49 AT 2026iuo 2026-04-02.59 20.72
11:27:41.500 -35:48:12.21 AT 2026iun 2026-03-30.51 19.56
13:57:31.503 -10:38:39.68 AT 2026ium 2026-03-29.71 19.95
19:51:44.150 +31:28:49.50 AT 2026iul 2026-04-07.40 15.7
10:01:10.740 +29:37:27.72 AT 2026iuk 2026-04-05.76 21.01
11:10:23.800 +30:53:36.06 AT 2026iuj 2026-04-04.83 20.45
11:10:19.760 +34:35:07.49 AT 2026iui 2026-04-04.79 21
11:03:07.270 +39:55:31.99 AT 2026iuh 2026-04-04.78 20.75
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Apr 13 21:28 tns_transients_list.txt
