This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 14.0985* 04 15 32.04 +33 49 33.9 13.1 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0745 Per,2461144.5985,13.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0745 Per 20260414.0985 13.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 14.0985* 04 15 53.11 +41 37 07.4 13.5 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J063.9718+41.6188,2461144.5985,13.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J063.9718+41.6188 20260414.0985 13.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 14.0985* 04 28 30.55 +41 15 00.2 14.2 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461144.5985,14.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260414.0985 14.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.59692772 12.02.2026 02:19:24.555 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
First image: 2461083.59692772 12.02.2026 02:19:24.555 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Last image: 2461144.59879135 14.04.2026 02:22:05.573 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 17488
Objects passed selection criteria: 17399
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12519
Average stars matched: 12154.8 (97.0904 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 122368 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 21:24:10 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.59692772 12.02.2026 02:19:24.555 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
First image: 2461083.59692772 12.02.2026 02:19:24.555 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Last image: 2461144.59879135 14.04.2026 02:22:05.573 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 114
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 35 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 132380
Objects passed selection criteria: 132089
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 101228
Average stars matched: 97426 (96.2439 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1961552 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 21:27:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461144.59814460
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits'
wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits'
wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:21:49.659 +38:00:02.98
Second-epoch image center 04:21:50.167 +37:59:55.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0027 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:21:49.659 +38:00:02.98
Second-epoch image center 04:21:49.811 +37:59:40.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0063 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:21:50.167 +37:59:55.33
Second-epoch second image center 04:21:49.811 +37:59:40.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00428 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YOqIChfxRm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits &> /tmp/tmp.57AevebpQw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jqBnygwRPh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits &> /tmp/tmp.maShdIyQwr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits and wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits and wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits and wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits) and catalog (wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 18830 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 54.9680 to 76.3320 deg, Dec +32.2038 to +43.3213 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 54.9680 to 76.3320 deg, Dec 32.2038 to 43.3213 deg
Loaded 9186 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6363 out of 7115 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7115 out of 18830 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.972881
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.972881
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
2.0 pix Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
2.2 pix fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
2.2 pix fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
15.5 mag. Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.YOqIChfxRm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1807, passed=18830
Got 18830 stars (including 16990 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18830 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18389 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits -region wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.57AevebpQw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1869, passed=18776
Got 18776 stars (including 16879 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18776 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits -region wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jqBnygwRPh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=493, passed=6363
Got 6363 stars (including 5856 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6363 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6250 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.maShdIyQwr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=484, passed=6495
Got 6495 stars (including 5997 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6392 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6392 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6392 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Per-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Per-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:21:49.659 +38:00:02.98
Second-epoch image center 04:21:50.167 +37:59:55.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0027 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:21:49.659 +38:00:02.98
Second-epoch image center 04:21:49.811 +37:59:40.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0063 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:21:50.167 +37:59:55.33
Second-epoch second image center 04:21:49.811 +37:59:40.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00428 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SFFW6iFGNA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AtVWb66eET
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Dw9urt92TF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1V69Nj62mq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits and wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits and wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits and wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits) and catalog (wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 145138 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 54.9680 to 76.3546 deg, Dec +32.1479 to +43.3235 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 54.9680 to 76.3546 deg, Dec 32.1479 to 43.3235 deg
Loaded 9259 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5279 out of 7192 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7192 out of 145138 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.835078
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.835078
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 102 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
1.8 pix Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
2.0 pix fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
2.0 pix fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
15.6 mag. Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.SFFW6iFGNA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=15711, passed=145113
Got 145113 stars (including 129125 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 145113 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 141858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 141857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 141856 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits -region wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AtVWb66eET (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits' -> 'wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=37, blended=15921, passed=145724
Got 145724 stars (including 129496 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 145724 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 142056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 142057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 142057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits -region wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Dw9urt92TF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=3429, passed=57966
Got 57966 stars (including 54403 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57966 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1V69Nj62mq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=3459, passed=59453
Got 59453 stars (including 55857 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59453 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58580 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58580 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits -region wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-19-24_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0025.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/wcs_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-20-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-21-09_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Per-05-Q1b1x1_212301_TTUQ1b1x1_15885_OfY0pBq3/wcs_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Per-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out168848.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out168868.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out168869.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out168876.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out168877.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out168885.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out168897.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out169431.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out169436.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out169511.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out169519.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out169528.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out169536.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out169659.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out169747.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out169529.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out169819.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out170097.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168837_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168837_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:53.89 +41:32:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168842_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168842_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:01:50.09 +43:05:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168844_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168844_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:10.54 +33:28:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168848_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168848_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:22.96 +34:02:40.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.310 170788004436923648 062.34602691110 +34.04434735732 13.8206 13.0120 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.310#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168851_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168851_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:29.19 +41:35:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168852_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168852_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:58:16.91 +42:33:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168856_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168856_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:40.43 +38:31:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168858_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168858_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:29.13 +35:05:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168859_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168859_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:08.99 +41:34:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168860_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168860_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:50.41 +40:59:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168862_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168862_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:01.52 +36:03:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168865_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168865_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:42.40 +33:32:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168866_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168866_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:32.73 +42:14:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168867_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168867_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:16:18.17 +40:58:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168868_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168868_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:07.87 +38:09:05.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.36)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168869_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168869_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:03.06 +42:12:41.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.080 204054720870745600 069.76343057193 +42.21127323420 13.4241 12.5179 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.080#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168876_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168876_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:13.49 +36:25:10.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.11, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.09)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.926 225264957301685632 061.55633264198 +36.41940186018 13.0422 12.2295 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.926#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168877_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168877_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:14:13.77 +33:56:51.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.589 175993607876614912 063.55756925847 +33.94752768395 13.1043 12.5073 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.589#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168878_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168878_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:04.92 +42:15:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168880_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168880_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:14:21.56 +43:05:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168881_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168881_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:23.78 +42:39:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168883_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168883_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:21.72 +33:30:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168885_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168885_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:37.19 +39:59:38.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.521 227084580325626496 062.15545385108 +39.99384236289 12.5560 11.4621 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.521#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168889_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168889_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:31.37 +33:17:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168895_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168895_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:14.77 +37:24:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168896_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168896_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:41.43 +33:31:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168897_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168897_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:34.48 +34:52:10.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.23, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.21)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.345 218889915864234624 059.39355262941 +34.86946467223 12.0766 11.2878 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.345#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168898_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168898_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:37.29 +40:40:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168899_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168899_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:14:04.54 +43:01:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168900_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168900_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:52:16.65 +33:35:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168901_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168901_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:01.44 +41:27:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168959_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168959_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168999_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 168999_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:14.21 +42:27:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169042_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169042_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169048_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169048_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169071_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169071_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169093_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169093_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:07.42 +41:50:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169102_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169102_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169119_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169119_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169125_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169125_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169136_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169136_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:03:09.78 +41:55:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169141_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169141_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169188_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169188_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169203_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169203_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169235_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169235_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:11.67 +39:19:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169277_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169277_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:34.99 +40:12:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169282_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169282_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:18.19 +41:03:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169287_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169287_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:20.28 +43:10:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169293_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169293_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:58:46.49 +35:47:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169319_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169319_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:55.61 +41:34:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169321_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169321_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:11.29 +39:24:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169355_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169355_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:31.32 +43:08:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169358_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169358_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169359_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169359_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:10.12 +37:01:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169364_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169364_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:43.41 +41:05:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169375_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169375_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:47.07 +40:02:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169385_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169385_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:48.87 +40:37:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169388_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169388_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169407_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169407_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:33.11 +34:09:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169408_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169408_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:15.60 +41:27:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169426_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169426_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:36.10 +34:06:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169431_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169431_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:03:06.19 +41:54:56.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.763 230485468569946752 060.77570656454 +41.91506994713 12.6172 11.5422 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.763#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169432_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169432_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:41.76 +42:03:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169436_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169436_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:12.53 +40:23:01.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.10, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.08)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169445_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169445_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:35.34 +34:07:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169449_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169449_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:40.18 +38:45:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169508_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169508_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:08.82 +38:58:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169511_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169511_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:23.19 +33:51:36.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.11, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.09)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.612 175766249486016384 064.59714780577 +33.86011000036 13.1075 12.4431 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.612#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169518_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169518_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:55.88 +43:11:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169519_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169519_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:34.76 +40:56:57.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.10, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.08)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.657 230899232838309632 057.14493751898 +40.94935908604 12.8768 11.9102 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.657#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169528_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169528_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:18.23 +41:57:26.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.25)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169529_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 169529_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169536_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169536_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:39.42 +42:07:52.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.14, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.12)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.482 228999070587808256 063.16417408106 +42.13131581957 13.1680 12.5409 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.482#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169552_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169552_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:13.96 +33:08:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169553_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169553_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:45.54 +34:21:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169575_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169575_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:33.07 +33:50:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169581_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169581_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:49.55 +41:11:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169640_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169640_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:25.79 +37:53:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169646_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169646_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169647_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169647_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169659_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169659_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:55.49 +42:46:18.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.56, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.54)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.877 204273734137713792 069.73005417713 +42.77116844259 13.5984 12.8953 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.877#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169702_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169702_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:16.08 +43:01:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169706_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169706_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169733_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169733_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:41.84 +38:47:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169734_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169734_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:29.65 +33:27:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169747_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169747_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:57.33 +42:46:04.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.135 204273558043066624 069.73879433483 +42.76724333309 13.2739 12.3011 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.135#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169751_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169751_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:08.57 +39:55:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169755_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169755_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:23.78 +40:35:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169796_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169796_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:38.31 +37:27:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169812_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169812_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:00.19 +35:43:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169819_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 169819_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169865_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169865_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169952_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169952_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:45.95 +42:16:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169956_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169956_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:25.56 +34:47:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169963_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 169963_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:13.39 +39:57:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170046_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 170046_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:56.97 +35:27:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170071_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 170071_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:47.90 +41:27:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170097_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 170097_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71848_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 71848_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:33.16 +39:06:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48567_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 48567_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:09.15 +40:45:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28944_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 28944_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:32.48 +41:47:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69838_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 69838_fd_Per-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_21-22-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks