This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.4392* 00 25 12.85 +52 51 54.8 12.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J006.3096+52.8556,2461143.9392,12.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J006.3096+52.8556 20260413.4392 12.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.4392* 23 58 07.61 +53 10 25.9 13.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461143.9392,13.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260413.4392 13.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.4392* 00 03 22.87 +57 44 54.2 12.8 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
EY Cas,2461143.9392,12.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
EY Cas 20260413.4392 12.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.4392* 00 29 02.14 +52 50 59.9 10.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 1579580,2461143.9392,10.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 1579580 20260413.4392 10.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.4392* 00 16 09.95 +55 24 22.9 12.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J001609.91+552423.8,2461143.9392,12.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J001609.91+552423.8 20260413.4392 12.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.4392* 00 21 10.79 +53 59 23.5 12.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0021110+535925,2461143.9392,11.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0021110+535925 20260413.4392 11.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.4392* 00 13 03.28 +54 09 14.7 12.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0013036+540917,2461143.9392,12.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0013036+540917 20260413.4392 12.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461036.58312155 27.12.2025 01:59:31.702 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461036.58312155 27.12.2025 01:59:31.702 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461143.93954997 13.04.2026 10:32:47.117 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 13
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.96
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 24032
Objects passed selection criteria: 23888
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 15745.5
Average stars matched: 14451.5 (91.7818 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 127200 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 05:35:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461036.58312155 27.12.2025 01:59:31.702 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461036.58312155 27.12.2025 01:59:31.702 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461143.93954997 13.04.2026 10:32:47.117 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 148
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 62 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 166495
Objects passed selection criteria: 166042
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 114391
Average stars matched: 103472 (90.4551 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1919544 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 05:48:21 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461143.93883088
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:01.845 +53:59:35.63
Second-epoch image center 00:00:02.584 +53:59:45.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0033 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:01.845 +53:59:35.63
Second-epoch image center 23:59:58.584 +54:00:22.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0152 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:02.584 +53:59:45.51
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:58.584 +54:00:22.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01415 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.z90pkq55Mm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XgMaTxrXjw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IzQUQNyTxF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BG6MivTn1d
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 30002 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0009 to 359.9993 deg, Dec +47.6490 to +59.3704 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0009 to 359.9993 deg, Dec 47.6490 to 59.3704 deg
Loaded 163379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 15843 out of 17844 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17844 out of 30002 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.958037
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.958037
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.96
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 12 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.5 pix Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.0 mag. Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.z90pkq55Mm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3597, passed=30002
Got 30002 stars (including 26372 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30002 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.5133 through 0 to 15.4425, gap 15.4425 to 345.5133
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29070 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.5133 through 0 to 15.4430, gap 15.4430 to 345.5133
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29067 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XgMaTxrXjw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3594, passed=29935
Got 29935 stars (including 26317 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29935 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4614 through 0 to 15.4602, gap 15.4602 to 345.4614
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4615 through 0 to 15.4618, gap 15.4618 to 345.4615
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28976 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28976 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IzQUQNyTxF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=613, passed=11415
Got 11415 stars (including 10796 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11415 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 929.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 929.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012913 (46.5 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010330 (37.2 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9969 through 0 to 14.9793, gap 14.9793 to 344.9969
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 467 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 372 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.22"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 353 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3738 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9954 through 0 to 14.9879, gap 14.9879 to 344.9954
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 512 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 454 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.02"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 453 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4629 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 4.64"
Excluding outliers - 453 stars left (next iteration limit 388)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BG6MivTn1d (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=572, passed=11042
Got 11042 stars (including 10461 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11042 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013038 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010430 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.8489 through 0 to 14.8447, gap 14.8447 to 344.8489
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.8485 through 0 to 14.8458, gap 14.8458 to 344.8485
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10826 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53238_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 53238_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53476_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 53476_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:15:50.62 +57:32:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53574_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 53574_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54215_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 54215_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (148.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23213_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 23213_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24712_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 24712_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19524_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 19524_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:11:13.47 +52:32:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10312_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 10312_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:03:21.35 +55:40:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04542_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 04542_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:10:48.67 +57:29:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22264_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 22264_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50021_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 50021_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:25:19.65 +54:00:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05310_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 05310_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (108.9") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cas-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:01.845 +53:59:35.63
Second-epoch image center 00:00:02.584 +53:59:45.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0033 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:01.845 +53:59:35.63
Second-epoch image center 23:59:58.584 +54:00:22.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0152 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:02.584 +53:59:45.51
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:58.584 +54:00:22.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01415 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5JWNTGB7pz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fXS0EOkzTs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WcMb1iz55s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3jjc2xn1cX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 205184 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0002 to 359.9998 deg, Dec +47.6490 to +59.3741 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0002 to 359.9998 deg, Dec 47.6490 to 59.3741 deg
Loaded 163418 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11964 out of 18942 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18942 out of 205184 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.778547
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.778547
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.19
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.19
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 130 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.2 pix Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.2 mag. Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 13.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.5JWNTGB7pz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=77, blended=35015, passed=205107
Got 205107 stars (including 169770 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 205107 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4449 through 0 to 15.4823, gap 15.4823 to 345.4449
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 201081 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4447 through 0 to 15.4832, gap 15.4832 to 345.4447
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 201083 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 201083 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fXS0EOkzTs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=66, blended=35112, passed=204979
Got 204979 stars (including 169544 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 204979 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4567 through 0 to 15.5151, gap 15.5151 to 345.4567
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 201021 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4571 through 0 to 15.5171, gap 15.5171 to 345.4571
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 201022 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 201020 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WcMb1iz55s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=6802, passed=81269
Got 81269 stars (including 74385 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 81269 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 929.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 929.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012913 (46.5 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010330 (37.2 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9970 through 0 to 14.9792, gap 14.9792 to 344.9970
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 468 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 367 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 281 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 348 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25249 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.02"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9936 through 0 to 14.9870, gap 14.9870 to 344.9936
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 516 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 442 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.98"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 437 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32174 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 4.77"
Excluding outliers - 437 stars left (next iteration limit 382)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3jjc2xn1cX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=6389, passed=78049
Got 78049 stars (including 71582 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 78049 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013038 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010430 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.8490 through 0 to 14.8452, gap 14.8452 to 344.8490
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.8488 through 0 to 14.8459, gap 14.8459 to 344.8488
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-59-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-00-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-31-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0576.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_053335_TTUQ2b1x1_21549_sXoZbRUr/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out216866.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out230349.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out237381.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out241698.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out242693.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out246351.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out249802.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101024.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101524.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out122390.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out243132.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out251749.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out27016.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72552.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 21s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230332_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 230332_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (138.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230343_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 230343_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230348_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 230348_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (174.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230349_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 230349_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:14:48.28 +52:52:34.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.95)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230350_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 230350_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (58.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230354_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 230354_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (93.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230361_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 230361_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (190.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230366_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 230366_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (202.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230367_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 230367_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (163.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230369_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 230369_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (84.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230373_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 230373_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (153.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230374_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 230374_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:05:09.57 +57:54:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230376_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 230376_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:13:50.34 +55:18:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230378_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 230378_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:06:27.10 +56:30:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232821_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 232821_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235482_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 235482_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (192.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236034_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 236034_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:15:05.93 +52:39:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236047_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 236047_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (99.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236469_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 236469_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:02:38.11 +55:35:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237357_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 237357_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:14:58.23 +53:15:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237381_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 237381_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:55:26.43 +58:05:27.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.08, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.06)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.844 1998366339155374848 358.86150822614 +58.09132726624 11.7831 10.9103 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.844#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237687_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 237687_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:19:43.29 +55:41:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237741_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 237741_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (100.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238042_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 238042_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (98.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238856_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 238856_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:12:15.49 +57:18:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239719_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 239719_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (86.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239765_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 239765_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:24:20.86 +56:59:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239847_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 239847_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:26:29.06 +56:07:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239878_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 239878_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:28:13.18 +55:15:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239947_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 239947_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (87.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 240375_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 240375_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:07:13.98 +54:46:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 240479_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 240479_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (109.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 240524_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 240524_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (87.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 240916_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 240916_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:23:03.88 +55:45:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 241448_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 241448_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:26:04.11 +56:47:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 241698_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 241698_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:59:25.35 +57:41:19.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.61)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.892 1998119567515730944 359.85611928062 +57.68942531892 11.7415 10.4599 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.892#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242316_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 242316_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (240.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242640_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 242640_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (73.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242693_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 242693_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:55:17.05 +58:06:31.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.61)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242813_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 242813_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (126.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242974_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 242974_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:02:40.87 +57:46:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243132_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
Preparing report for the candidate 243132_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243239_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 243239_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:54:36.41 +57:28:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243265_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 243265_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (91.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243336_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 243336_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:54:34.09 +57:30:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243453_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 243453_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:59:19.87 +55:58:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243518_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 243518_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (384.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243641_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 243641_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (212.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243728_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 243728_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (66.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243734_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 243734_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (174.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243890_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 243890_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (88.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243956_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 243956_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:55:02.40 +56:12:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244131_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 244131_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (144.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244440_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 244440_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (183.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244490_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 244490_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (143.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244532_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 244532_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:16:30.23 +53:57:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245193_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 245193_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:26:27.62 +56:05:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245566_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 245566_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (109.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245670_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 245670_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:57:07.02 +55:40:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245864_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 245864_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:55:21.16 +56:30:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246060_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 246060_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:01:28.47 +57:25:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246230_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 246230_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (50.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246351_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 246351_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:05:11.76 +57:46:34.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.879 422654438683652992 001.29939209117 +57.77617961278 13.2247 12.7979 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.879#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246671_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 246671_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:02:36.23 +55:35:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246766_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 246766_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:05:29.42 +56:23:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246946_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 246946_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (168.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247179_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 247179_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (168.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247249_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 247249_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:01:20.43 +53:13:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247367_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 247367_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:56:20.13 +55:11:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248070_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 248070_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (187.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248695_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 248695_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:06:02.98 +55:12:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249094_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 249094_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (128.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249185_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 249185_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (149.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249575_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 249575_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:05:57.71 +53:17:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249802_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 249802_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:00:23.06 +56:51:50.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.19, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.17)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.224 421048773750976256 000.09657259046 +56.86429324344 13.1953 12.6527 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.224#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249808_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 249808_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:00:13.43 +55:43:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249873_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 249873_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (116.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249946_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 249946_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (158.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249990_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 249990_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:13:18.23 +57:11:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250680_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 250680_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:15:19.72 +53:57:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250981_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 250981_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:57:04.12 +55:26:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251062_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 251062_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (92.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251135_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 251135_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (83.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251225_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 251225_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:59:05.91 +53:29:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251450_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 251450_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (57.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251516_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 251516_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (176.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251529_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 251529_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251719_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 251719_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (102.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251749_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
Preparing report for the candidate 251749_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252147_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 252147_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:58:51.88 +54:42:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252552_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 252552_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252560_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 252560_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (136.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252660_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 252660_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (125.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 254026_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 254026_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (119.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 254646_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 254646_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (151.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 254698_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 254698_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (91.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255619_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 255619_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (204.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27214_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 27214_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:09:22.63 +57:39:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175177_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 175177_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (103.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174725_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 174725_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (62.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41118_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 41118_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:02:19.82 +57:02:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30639_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 30639_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:10:48.52 +57:29:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135882_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 135882_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:11:13.11 +52:32:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127308_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 127308_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:26:57.18 +52:36:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71921_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 71921_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:03:21.27 +55:40:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193614_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 193614_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110533_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 110533_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:18:33.17 +53:39:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93676_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 93676_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:21:45.96 +54:19:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65926_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 65926_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (126.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200618_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 200618_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27016_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
Preparing report for the candidate 27016_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122390_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
Preparing report for the candidate 122390_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53700_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 53700_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (88.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81544_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 81544_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:09:14.39 +55:08:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61892_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 61892_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (161.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72552_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
Preparing report for the candidate 72552_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49061_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 49061_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132896_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 132896_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:13:29.95 +52:36:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73098_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 73098_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:04:40.84 +55:32:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217585_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 217585_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:15:50.51 +57:32:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183163_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 183163_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (49.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103508_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 103508_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:28:29.25 +53:43:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115746_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 115746_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146571_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 146571_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 216866_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 216866_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:06:04.26 +51:59:20.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.79)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101524_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
Preparing report for the candidate 101524_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101024_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
Preparing report for the candidate 101024_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138140_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 138140_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:06:42.61 +52:27:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99160_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 99160_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:25:19.35 +54:00:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111302_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577
The candidate 111302_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-32-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0577 did not pass the final checks
