######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 3000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 2000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMa-14-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-14-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-14-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 891200 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 891200 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits_preview.png'
UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits

renamed 'UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits_preview.png'
UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1078.9689
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 512.1541
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1213.9012
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 374.8897
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1223.0710
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 370.0255
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.12506
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.013
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 14.3900003433228 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 14.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-13T05:18:23.1545449' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-13T10:18:23.1545449' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61143.4294346529 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-13T10:18:33.0572502' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61143.4295492708 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 179.996691840131 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 29.9996521870383 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 28.3783333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 288.631111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.09705715274867 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-14' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20322 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20322 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 14.3900003433228 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 14.3900003433228 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 9.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 73.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.09 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 14.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 16.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 14.801184 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 8.300664 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit
CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/d_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits :)
Spent 0.518125 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/d_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37165.080609
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23810.0, right_median=27365.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 14.5600004196167 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 14.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-13T05:19:31.5195477' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-13T10:19:31.5195477' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61143.4302259143 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-13T10:19:41.4226953' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61143.4303405322 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 179.996691858211 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 29.9996521449924 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 28.1491666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 288.751111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.11257853409325 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-14' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20322 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20322 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 14.5600004196167 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 14.5600004196167 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 9.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 73.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.09 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 14.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 16.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 14.801184 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 8.300664 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit
CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/d_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits :)
Spent 0.530132 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/d_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37165.080609
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23810.0, right_median=27365.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits

fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461143.92955039
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits'
wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits'
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:24.339 +29:57:20.67
Second-epoch image center 12:00:08.678 +29:59:07.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0638 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:24.339 +29:57:20.67
Second-epoch image center 12:00:06.108 +29:58:43.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0698 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:08.678 +29:59:07.04
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:06.108 +29:58:43.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01128 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jYfQfht7t2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KWYDKyN3cA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DbB38U9rLK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits &> /tmp/tmp.G9DcIt28Of
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits and wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits and wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits and wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 4543 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 170.7249 to 189.6721 deg, Dec +24.3968 to +35.1988 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 170.7249 to 189.6721 deg, Dec 24.3968 to 35.1988 deg
Loaded 3773 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2796 out of 2854 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2854 out of 4543 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.971091
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.971091
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.96
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.01
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.01
Magnitude calibration plot:

____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
2.4 pix UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
3.1 pix fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
3.1 pix fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
15.0 mag. UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
13.5 mag. fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
13.6 mag. fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.jYfQfht7t2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=286, passed=4543
Got 4543 stars (including 4251 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4543 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 627 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4507 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 627 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4508 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4508 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits -region wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KWYDKyN3cA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=292, passed=4534
Got 4534 stars (including 4235 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4534 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 627 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 627 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits -region wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DbB38U9rLK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=199, passed=2663
Got 2663 stars (including 2462 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2663 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2636 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2637 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2637 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.G9DcIt28Of (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=187, passed=2584
Got 2584 stars (including 2396 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2584 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2539 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2539 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2539 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-14-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-14-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:24.339 +29:57:20.67
Second-epoch image center 12:00:08.678 +29:59:07.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0638 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:24.339 +29:57:20.67
Second-epoch image center 12:00:06.108 +29:58:43.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0698 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:08.678 +29:59:07.04
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:06.108 +29:58:43.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01128 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dKsimNXLLZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yEOduXFw22
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zLq3ioBDdS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zvcfRMvayQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits and wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits and wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits and wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 21628 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 170.6653 to 189.6720 deg, Dec +24.3960 to +35.2243 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 170.6653 to 189.6720 deg, Dec 24.3960 to 35.2243 deg
Loaded 3794 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2800 out of 2949 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2949 out of 21628 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.849551
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.849551
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.71
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.14
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.14
Magnitude calibration plot:

____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
2.4 pix UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
3.0 pix fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
3.1 pix fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
15.1 mag. UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
14.1 mag. fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
13.9 mag. fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.dKsimNXLLZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=852, passed=21624
Got 21624 stars (including 20742 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21624 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21536 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21533 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21533 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits -region wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yEOduXFw22 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=856, passed=21614
Got 21614 stars (including 20730 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21614 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21526 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21527 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21527 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits -region wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zLq3ioBDdS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=804, passed=11941
Got 11941 stars (including 11128 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11941 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zvcfRMvayQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=803, passed=11513
Got 11513 stars (including 10697 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11513 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11356 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11356 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11356 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-13-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0096.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/wcs_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_02-14-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0097.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-18-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0563.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-14-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32751_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564
The candidate 32751_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 13.43034 | 2461143.93034 | 12.61 | 12:19:28.09 +26:36:32.9 | 2192 5227 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits |
**** FOUND 12:19:28.14 +26:36:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32825_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564
The candidate 32825_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 13.43034 | 2461143.93034 | 12.44 | 12:11:55.10 +25:50:48.9 | 3214 5705 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits |
**** FOUND 12:11:55.08 +25:50:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33788_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564
The candidate 33788_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 13.43034 | 2461143.93034 | 13.25 | 12:03:17.24 +29:05:55.9 | 4376 3732 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits |
**** FOUND 12:03:17.20 +29:05:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05155_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564
The candidate 05155_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 04 13.43034 | 2461143.93034 | 12.46 | 12:10:15.89 +27:25:53.3 | 3447 4743 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits |
**** FOUND 12:10:15.92 +27:25:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17394_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564
The candidate 17394_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 04 13.43034 | 2461143.93034 | 6.56 | 11:38:32.34 +33:37:32.3 | 7481 0872 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits |
**** FOUND 11:38:32.34 +33:37:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20905_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564
The candidate 20905_fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 04 13.43034 | 2461143.93034 | 6.59 | 11:41:33.63 +31:44:46.3 | 7159 2038 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_052020_TTUQ2b1x1_2426_yaV0JtGM/fd_UMa-14-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-19-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0564.fits |
**** FOUND 11:41:33.63 +31:44:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-14-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-14-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461143.92955039 -observatory V36
23:54:01.44 -03:24:38.7 Mercury (0.1mag)
02:56:08.13 +16:52:12.4 Venus (-3.9mag)
00:10:32.48 +00:03:38.0 Mars (1.2mag)
07:11:29.82 +22:48:03.7 Jupiter (-2.1mag)
00:28:02.01 +00:41:48.3 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:47:09.70 +19:45:45.2 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:10:30.16 -00:17:30.3 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:38.20 -22:52:30.2 Pluto (14.5mag)
22:14:01.54 -12:28:46.3 Moon (-9.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Apr 13 06:04 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461143.92955039:
07:11:29.66 +22:48:01.3 Io (5.8mag)
07:11:41.73 +22:47:37.5 Europa (5.9mag)
07:11:25.68 +22:48:19.3 Ganymede (5.3mag)
07:11:48.76 +22:47:33.8 Callisto (6.6mag)
07:14:56.69 +22:36:54.2 Himalia (15.3mag)
07:11:27.62 +22:48:06.4 Thebe (16.2mag)
07:15:04.69 +23:06:52.3 Elara (17.3mag)
07:10:12.24 +23:29:24.7 Pasiphae (17.4mag)
07:19:52.93 +22:45:49.5 Carme (18.5mag)
00:28:12.09 +00:41:59.2 Titan (8.8mag)
00:28:07.58 +00:41:54.1 Rhea (10.1mag)
00:27:46.75 +00:42:22.2 Iapetus (11.5mag)
00:28:16.49 +00:41:52.7 Hyperion (14.8mag)
00:29:40.92 +00:50:53.1 Phoebe (16.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Apr 13 06:04 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461143.92955039:
15:25:26.73 -14:25:18.1 JWST
11:26:18.07 +50:22:56.1 Chandra
19:43:56.23 +10:28:40.8 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Apr 13 06:04 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461143.92955039 -observatory V36
-> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180]
18:50:54.13 -28:37:49.6 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:04:54.70 -69:47:04.6 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:31:54.25 +31:25:12.5 17.2mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:30:39.71 +10:14:32.4 17.6mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:09:31.65 +29:07:42.7 17.0mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
04:26:15.10 +25:58:05.1 16.0mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:02:53.83 +31:59:58.0 16.2mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:30:42.04 -00:25:38.8 17.3mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:54:18.95 +18:18:57.5 17.5mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:41:29.30 -11:33:33.0 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
09:08:51.59 -12:17:50.9 17.6mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS)
21:51:35.36 +62:45:29.5 17.5mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
19:21:21.00 -03:41:32.7 14.2mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
21:37:01.39 +85:33:28.9 17.8mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:16:45.82 +63:31:31.6 17.1mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
05:07:42.28 +17:25:37.9 10.9mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
16:20:54.19 +05:58:07.9 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:20:03.88 +14:34:48.5 14.6mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
03:24:04.31 -22:46:44.3 16.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:14:32.90 +45:56:03.5 17.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
13:49:30.70 +43:43:04.2 15.1mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
03:21:14.82 -25:48:50.6 17.8mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS)
23:23:46.52 +19:17:57.2 8.9mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:55:13.94 +02:51:18.7 17.4mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
03:05:13.93 +02:56:06.8 12.4mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS)
23:52:14.66 +36:44:16.5 14.5mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
18:37:55.62 -09:51:22.3 12.0mag 10P/Tempel
15:03:45.09 +03:28:14.5 13.8mag 24P/Schaumasse
11:03:30.36 -01:36:36.3 15.7mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
18:00:08.74 -09:42:22.4 17.9mag 40P/Vaisala
10:37:42.82 -04:18:24.3 16.9mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
01:44:41.95 +17:02:54.9 17.2mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
07:06:03.05 +37:33:44.9 17.0mag 63P/Wild
23:25:46.18 -11:45:39.4 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
03:56:24.89 +20:21:50.2 15.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
00:59:54.17 +07:43:21.8 14.4mag 78P/Gehrels
22:55:11.16 -10:09:04.0 14.6mag 88P/Howell
02:03:09.26 +19:57:10.7 15.1mag 93P/Lovas
04:49:59.34 +32:08:54.8 16.2mag 123P/West-Hartley
08:25:23.14 +39:32:47.1 16.2mag 124P/Mrkos
02:29:15.13 +14:04:56.4 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
02:42:30.06 +14:10:39.1 17.5mag 131P/Mueller
01:12:43.22 +12:20:11.7 10.8mag 141P/Machholz
01:21:59.67 +03:54:30.0 10.8mag 141P-A/Machholz
00:08:33.25 -00:04:58.4 13.1mag 141P-D/Machholz
01:52:05.38 +05:39:25.8 17.8mag 141P-I/Machholz
00:55:13.10 -02:49:03.2 15.1mag 162P/SidingSpring
10:29:12.52 +31:00:52.4 18.0mag 164P/Christensen
06:31:46.24 +24:19:23.9 18.0mag 198P/ODAS
14:55:59.82 -00:20:22.4 17.6mag 210P/Christensen
21:31:20.24 -12:04:09.8 17.6mag 218P/LINEAR
17:15:50.45 -14:14:27.9 16.1mag 235P/LINEAR
05:28:56.87 +34:29:55.5 16.7mag 240P/NEAT
07:37:15.31 -05:26:53.9 17.7mag 242P/Spahr
22:10:29.27 -21:39:26.1 18.0mag 260P/McNaught
15:43:37.14 +06:49:09.3 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
07:33:13.93 +21:21:24.3 17.6mag 450P/LONEOS
05:32:08.25 +45:10:58.4 17.5mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K Apr 13 06:04 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.48
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74
06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48
11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95
10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53
20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83
06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93
07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78
19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2
04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS
11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2
07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8
16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12
13:01:19.46 +15:42:15.50 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.34 -0.18
09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06
03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00 SN2026evh 2026-03-12.05 17.29
06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10 AT2026ffp 2026-03-12.16 0.37
14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50 AT2026fij 2026-03-12.05 15.97
10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10 SN 2026exe 2026-03-11.78 16.48
18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00 SN2026ess 2026-03-12.37 17.37
13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80 AT2026ewa 2026-03-12.42 16.77
15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20 ASASSN-26bp 2026-03-11.92 13.33
13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20 AT2024cmo 2026-03-11.12 16.29
13:06:01.97 -15:50:14.40 AT2026fdy 2026-03-10.33 16.68
11:30:09.70 -47:26:45.00 ASASSN-26bn 2026-03-10.3 15.14
05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40 (= Gaia 2026-03-9.09 14.32
03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70 ASASSN-26bm 2026-03-8.04 15.22
04:31:00.53 -68:29:50.20 ASASSN-26bl 2026-03-7.9 10.26
16:18:17.61 +41:25:11.40 SN 2026dkf 2026-03-6.31 16.7
13:45:00.35 +61:16:50.90 SN 2026ejl 2026-03-6.41 -0.66
09:27:45.33 -37:49:33.00 ASASSN-26bk 2026-03-2.06 13.58
20:22:01.20 +23:47:47.30 ASASSN-26bi 2026-02-28.51 15.86
11:16:22.10 +29:26:22.80 AT2026enm 2026-02-28.39 16.88
08:05:59.83 -48:39:35.60 ASASSN-26bh 2026-02-26.05 14.64
13:24:27.02 -45:57:01.40 ASASSN-26bg 2026-02-26.35 15.28
17:27:50.95 -68:28:46.40 ASASSN-26bf 2026-02-26.3 16.28
18:03:39.29 +19:58:46.30 ASASSN-26be 2026-02-25.56 14.95
17:40:18.19 +07:20:59.60 SN 2026crm 2026-02-24.34 16.9
18:38:36.11 -79:28:58.40 ASASSN-26bb 2026-02-24.36 16.11
17:43:29.75 +11:24:00.60 ASASSN-26bc 2026-02-23.37 -3.37
16:59:41.08 -80:01:51.20 ASASSN-26bd 2026-02-23.3 14.38
11:23:31.77 -08:39:15.40 SN2026cff 2026-02-23.15 -1.08
14:55:17.39 -05:56:05.30 SN2026dmk 2026-02-23.22 -0.76
12:28:15.19 +44:27:20.80 SN2026cjz 2026-02-23.47 15.62
12:12:29.55 -02:40:43.30 AT2026dsk 2026-02-23.4 17.21
09:21:05.29 +06:11:42.80 SN2026chr 2026-02-23.1 17.39
16:05:38.61 +18:06:07.40 SN 2026dsy 2026-02-23.36 17.15
04:55:50.66 -29:52:57.70 SN 2026dpg 2026-02-23.11 15.75
04:21:28.18 -53:22:54.40 AT2026drl 2026-02-21.03 17.31
11:50:37.32 +55:21:13.70 SN 2026dix 2026-02-21.43 16.39
16:21:19.69 -63:47:29.40 ASASSN-26az 2026-02-21.03 17.02
02:45:30.93 -54:17:43.10 SN 2026cju 2026-02-21.04 17.54
01:58:40.68 +47:34:50.10 ASASSN-26av 2026-02-21.09 15.97
18:35:53.01 -42:31:38.90 ASASSN-26aw 2026-02-21.12 15.89
11:40:18.88 -39:45:09.20 ASASSN-26ax 2026-02-21.08 15.73
02:26:23.52 -51:42:29.80 ASASSN-26ay 2026-02-21.04 13.93
08:46:07.66 +01:17:43.90 ASASSN-26ba 2026-02-20.23 15.43
14:15:47.49 -48:05:16.60 SN2026dez 2026-02-19.31 15.91
17:25:53.90 -23:28:31.50 ASASSN-26au 2026-02-18.33 15.82
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K Apr 13 06:04 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:52.23 +41:01:44.7 PNV J00425223+4101447 2026-01-19.5505 18.74Cmag
09:54:46.47 +69:06:31.7 PNV J09544647+6906317 2026-01-26.8081 19.3mag
18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9 TCP J18085199-2616219 2026-01-31.8519 12.2mag
08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1 TCP J08011102-0343141 2026-02-08.8090 15.10Cmag
05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5 TCP J05191540-0204515 2026-02-13.4306 14.5mag
10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9 TCP J10524126+3640089 2026-02-17.6065 17.4mag
05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1 TCP J05505081+3622451 2026-02-17.5511 15.7mag
00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag
00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag
17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag
09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K Apr 13 06:04 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
10:17:25.370 -00:10:30.61 AT 2026isu 2026-04-04.63 22.08
13:00:56.300 +04:05:19.28 AT 2026ist 2026-03-27.76 21.96
13:30:34.720 +01:37:57.52 AT 2026iss 2026-03-24.90 22.44
13:15:51.420 +01:05:21.68 AT 2026isr 2026-03-23.82 22.65
10:13:53.630 +05:15:26.71 AT 2026isq 2026-03-23.63 22.63
13:46:10.060 +01:20:22.93 AT 2026isp 2026-03-08.91 20.81
10:37:05.160 -01:41:10.54 AT 2026iso 2026-02-05.76 20.81
14:04:58.698 +08:42:54.25 AT 2026isn 2026-04-07.34 19.61
17:07:59.639 +03:14:36.58 AT 2026ism 2026-04-07.44 19.9709
12:35:03.843 +16:11:04.99 AT 2026isl 2026-04-07.25 20.1748
12:18:45.074 +08:22:57.24 AT 2026isk 2026-04-07.25 19.4891
18:56:30.261 +78:17:13.39 AT 2026isj 2026-03-27.43 20.1324
19:03:47.920 +77:35:41.47 AT 2026isi 2026-04-07.45 19.3393
12:30:44.663 -02:08:00.62 AT 2026ish 2026-03-28.50 19.51
13:14:05.683 -16:32:12.44 AT 2026isg 2026-04-07.51 19.32
19:24:27.622 +59:09:12.86 AT 2026isf 2026-03-22.52 20.4885
16:04:49.647 +18:09:53.48 AT 2026ise 2026-04-05.40 19.9772
10:37:43.207 -02:42:01.74 AT 2026isd 2026-03-25.48 20.07
16:35:34.990 +26:38:38.36 AT 2026isc 2026-04-07.19 19.39
09:57:36.948 -43:21:35.60 AT 2026isb 2026-04-05.43 19.8
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Apr 13 06:04 tns_transients_list.txt