This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461143.9247,10.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260413.4247 10.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461143.9247,11.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260413.4247 11.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4181985539880389760,2461143.9247,13.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4181985539880389760 20260413.4247 13.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V5843 Sgr,2461143.9247,11.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V5843 Sgr 20260413.4247 11.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V2089 Sgr,2461143.9247,11.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V2089 Sgr 20260413.4247 11.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J190413.85-211936.5,2461143.9247,12.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J190413.85-211936.5 20260413.4247 12.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J194442-2158.4,2461143.9247,11.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J194442-2158.4 20260413.4247 11.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461118.99455619 19.03.2026 11:51:59.655 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
First image: 2461118.99455619 19.03.2026 11:51:59.655 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Last image: 2461143.92510212 13.04.2026 10:11:58.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.53
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10916
Objects passed selection criteria: 10894
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8609.75
Average stars matched: 7909.25 (91.8639 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 116792 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 05:31:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461118.99455619 19.03.2026 11:51:59.655 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
First image: 2461118.99455619 19.03.2026 11:51:59.655 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Last image: 2461143.92510212 13.04.2026 10:11:58.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 75
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.21
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 33 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 100931
Objects passed selection criteria: 100811
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 88367.8
Average stars matched: 78181.5 (88.4729 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1938400 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 05:33:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461143.92435101
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits'
wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits'
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:33:22.678 -18:00:40.27
Second-epoch image center 19:33:16.904 -17:59:05.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0348 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:33:22.678 -18:00:40.27
Second-epoch image center 19:33:14.304 -17:58:52.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0447 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:33:16.904 -17:59:05.89
Second-epoch second image center 19:33:14.304 -17:58:52.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01095 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits &> /tmp/tmp.H84f0nCMB3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MtDwLxEi3Y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OJXKN7XnHd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits &> /tmp/tmp.I6WkkLoTe0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11017 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 284.7685 to 301.7245 deg, Dec -23.3021 to -12.5136 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 284.7685 to 301.7245 deg, Dec -23.3021 to -12.5136 deg
Loaded 13778 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8233 out of 8546 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8546 out of 11017 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.784657
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.784657
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.25
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.25
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
2.0 pix Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
14.6 mag. Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.H84f0nCMB3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=800, passed=11017
Got 11017 stars (including 10207 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11017 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10657 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10657 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -region wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MtDwLxEi3Y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1081, passed=13469
Got 13469 stars (including 12369 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13469 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13040 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13040 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits -region wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OJXKN7XnHd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=245, passed=5041
Got 5041 stars (including 4791 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5041 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.I6WkkLoTe0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=258, passed=5116
Got 5116 stars (including 4848 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5116 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1046)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22777.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22704_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 22704_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:50.10 -20:59:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22709_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 22709_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:31.48 -18:01:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22777_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
Preparing report for the candidate 22777_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01564_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 01564_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:27.03 -21:33:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
19:19:55.53 -19:07:30.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:33:22.678 -18:00:40.27
Second-epoch image center 19:33:16.904 -17:59:05.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0348 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:33:22.678 -18:00:40.27
Second-epoch image center 19:33:14.304 -17:58:52.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0447 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:33:16.904 -17:59:05.89
Second-epoch second image center 19:33:14.304 -17:58:52.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01095 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KOTD484WWZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gJcycPnNvg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Gx621fsJPQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pcQxKh4mrm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 101850 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 284.7602 to 301.7245 deg, Dec -23.3064 to -12.5129 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 284.7602 to 301.7245 deg, Dec -23.3064 to -12.5129 deg
Loaded 13790 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10156 out of 11996 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11996 out of 101850 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.561987
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.561987
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.21
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.35
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.35
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 75 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
2.0 pix Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
2.3 pix fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.4 mag. Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
14.7 mag. Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.KOTD484WWZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=8404, passed=101836
Got 101836 stars (including 93308 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 101836 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -region wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gJcycPnNvg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=12676, passed=138124
Got 138124 stars (including 125221 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 138124 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134051 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134051 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits -region wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Gx621fsJPQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=2248, passed=56930
Got 56930 stars (including 54601 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56930 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pcQxKh4mrm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2366, passed=59035
Got 59035 stars (including 56571 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59035 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56206 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56204 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56205 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/wcs_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-10-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_051259_TTUQ1b1x1_12761_gVNo9ezI/wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out117718.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out120624.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out150953.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out150962.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out150984.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out150985.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out150988.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out151376.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out151505.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out151603.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out151614.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out151618.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out151733.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out151743.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out151816.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out151883.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out151893.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out151894.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out151954.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out151965.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out152008.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out152022.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out152070.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out152080.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out152129.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out152161.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out10464.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out13586.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151333.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out152311.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out28042.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91182.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 22s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150950_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 150950_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150953_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 150953_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:04.25 -18:09:29.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.02, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.00)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.461 4084439788846120320 290.01771670179 -18.15829437735 13.3268 12.5686 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.461#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150957_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 150957_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:50.91 -18:49:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150962_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 150962_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:43.01 -17:34:50.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.96)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150973_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 150973_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:14:05.96 -20:17:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150974_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 150974_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:30:22.78 -16:47:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150975_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 150975_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:00:06.41 -19:58:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150981_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 150981_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:35.31 -19:12:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150984_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 150984_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:26.11 -19:58:38.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.637 4082468738152224768 286.35942223752 -19.97773602841 12.7950 12.3372 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.637#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150985_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 150985_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:43.42 -20:57:08.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.39)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150986_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 150986_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:27:09.22 -20:50:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150988_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 150988_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:06:13.12 -15:49:50.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.502 4089028944238565760 286.55482540097 -15.83038946740 12.1809 10.2973 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.502#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150990_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 150990_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:06:53.37 -13:32:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151122_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151122_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:55.52 -19:07:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151198_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151198_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:43.07 -18:55:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151333_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
Preparing report for the candidate 151333_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151353_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151353_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:14:01.91 -12:37:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151360_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151360_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:21.98 -12:34:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151376_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151376_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:52.05 -13:14:24.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.34, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.32)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.536 4197589602762056704 286.96616462006 -13.24035633778 11.7811 11.0076 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.536#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151415_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151415_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:52.34 -18:57:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151505_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151505_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:51.98 -15:11:19.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.163 4182091883270375296 294.96627885063 -15.18899561508 11.9603 11.1699 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.163#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151512_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151512_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:14:01.35 -14:01:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151516_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151516_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:00:45.71 -19:38:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151524_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151524_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:47.78 -16:04:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151533_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151533_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:36.63 -15:57:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151571_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151571_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:07.42 -14:49:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151590_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151590_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:22:00.70 -18:34:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151603_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151603_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:18:07.51 -18:52:42.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.33, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.31)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.368 4084282932334862464 289.53094271012 -18.87852159095 12.8322 11.9678 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.368#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151614_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151614_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:12.88 -21:03:27.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.28, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.26)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.198 4082806292525786368 289.30278393796 -21.05725123138 12.3309 11.6330 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.198#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151618_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151618_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:33.44 -15:16:13.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.688 4101128275112581888 285.88916402255 -15.27040052034 12.4513 11.5160 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.688#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151639_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151639_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:31:00.17 -21:18:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151676_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151676_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:17.96 -16:20:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151700_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151700_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:14.32 -12:36:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151733_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151733_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:05.03 -15:56:01.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.56, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.54)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.669 4183978198555787136 289.77113422948 -15.93514700722 12.8430 12.1448 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.669#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151743_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151743_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:00.08 -17:29:52.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.75, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.73)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.651 4087862534192282240 287.49957380629 -17.49772850821 12.9309 12.4265 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.651#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151773_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151773_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:11:56.68 -14:41:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151778_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151778_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:59.94 -21:49:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151785_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151785_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:38.39 -17:18:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151791_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151791_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:28:51.34 -16:07:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151801_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151801_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:01.97 -17:06:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151816_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151816_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:14:07.51 -14:04:07.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.780 4185431821654022272 288.53124025769 -14.06800705218 13.1563 12.3541 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.780#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151883_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151883_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:04.25 -17:42:06.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.457 4180519439902637568 291.26766706229 -17.70206939287 13.3484 12.8334 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.457#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151893_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151893_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:03.12 -15:55:59.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.72, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.70)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.592 4183978267275267328 289.76226111804 -15.93336653058 12.6041 11.8650 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.592#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151894_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151894_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:25.63 -16:03:23.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.983 4183949302015193728 289.35611753498 -16.05551979971 13.0042 12.2310 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.983#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151904_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151904_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:00.88 -20:12:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151954_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151954_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:35.80 -16:20:51.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.06, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.04)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.809 4088048523454645504 288.89949795025 -16.34716625579 13.4489 12.6533 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.809#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151965_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 151965_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:58:09.54 -14:57:49.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.799 6878230184261814144 299.53932237188 -14.96346890342 12.3885 11.8785 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.799#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152000_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 152000_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:21.73 -21:14:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152008_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 152008_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:35:39.87 -20:46:05.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.56, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.54)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.046 6772287836579168512 293.91588299748 -20.76823785105 12.2109 11.4665 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.046#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152022_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 152022_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:37.88 -19:48:34.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.09, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.07)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.209 4085453774782257792 285.40742213487 -19.80921832925 13.2265 12.7636 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.209#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152023_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 152023_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:26.26 -18:52:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152035_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 152035_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:24:45.11 -18:37:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152036_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 152036_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:18:52.50 -19:43:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152047_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 152047_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:41.14 -17:21:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152055_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 152055_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:42.87 -16:47:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152070_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 152070_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:33:47.32 -15:50:10.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.758 4181211548114677632 293.44611500359 -15.83698947437 13.4632 12.5686 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.758#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152080_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 152080_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:23:07.64 -18:59:43.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.70, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.68)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.434 4083572205450330112 290.78220569899 -18.99588284536 12.9103 12.2738 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.434#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152129_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 152129_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:10.79 -16:53:29.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.70, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.68)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.585 4180104030668837504 294.79436617504 -16.89057003801 12.8365 12.0094 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.585#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152159_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 152159_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:22:52.62 -18:00:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152161_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 152161_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:36.96 -17:19:17.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.125 4180756109780338688 290.40402108792 -17.32183953636 13.4656 11.3721 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.125#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152311_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
Preparing report for the candidate 152311_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117718_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 117718_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:30.72 -17:45:29.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.64)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.214 4084697860535638912 289.37735434313 -17.75815089823 12.9446 11.7156 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.214#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48852_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 48852_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:31.48 -18:01:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91182_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
Preparing report for the candidate 91182_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28042_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
Preparing report for the candidate 28042_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12226_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 12226_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:27.03 -21:33:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69265_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 69265_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:48:47.68 -13:39:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120624_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 120624_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:11:02.03 -19:43:11.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.551 4083936345657195264 287.75800288965 -19.71987328419 12.4263 11.0704 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.551#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113769_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 113769_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:22.60 -17:11:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53276_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 53276_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03408_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 03408_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:33:55.49 -22:49:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112358_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 112358_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:18.45 -19:10:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117129_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186
The candidate 117129_fd_Sgr-03-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_05-11-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0186 did not pass the final checks