This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J284.8991-21.8447,2461143.9189,12.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J284.8991-21.8447 20260413.4189 12.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461143.9189,12.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260413.4189 12.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461143.9189,12.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260413.4189 12.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V2078 Sgr,2461143.9189,11.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V2078 Sgr 20260413.4189 11.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J184920-2742.1,2461143.9189,12.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J184920-2742.1 20260413.4189 12.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J185535-2348.7,2461143.9189,12.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J185535-2348.7 20260413.4189 12.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461125.96625102 26.03.2026 11:11:14.088 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
First image: 2461125.96625102 26.03.2026 11:11:14.088 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Last image: 2461143.91921939 13.04.2026 10:03:30.555 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.49
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8244
Objects passed selection criteria: 8218
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6266
Average stars matched: 6105.5 (97.4386 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114612 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 05:06:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461125.96625102 26.03.2026 11:11:14.088 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
First image: 2461125.96625102 26.03.2026 11:11:14.088 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Last image: 2461143.91921939 13.04.2026 10:03:30.555 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 52
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 27 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 87339
Objects passed selection criteria: 87208
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 68571.8
Average stars matched: 65775.5 (95.9222 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1867040 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 05:08:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461143.91864770
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits'
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:56.571 -25:59:36.82
Second-epoch image center 19:12:20.450 -26:01:34.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0953 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:56.571 -25:59:36.82
Second-epoch image center 19:12:20.977 -26:02:05.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1003 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:20.450 -26:01:34.97
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:20.977 -26:02:05.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00870 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aAjmyv9WrW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9AqRKMs4M2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HEuZfeGafE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FXxeCIicHq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10651 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9134 to 297.0413 deg, Dec -31.2592 to -20.5068 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9134 to 297.0413 deg, Dec -31.2592 to -20.5068 deg
Loaded 13424 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7844 out of 8105 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8105 out of 10651 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.652325
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.652325
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.49
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.16
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.16
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
2.5 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
2.7 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits
2.7 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
14.2 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
13.0 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits
13.0 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.0 (SNR ) 10.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.aAjmyv9WrW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=714, passed=10651
Got 10651 stars (including 9923 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10651 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10493 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10491 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9AqRKMs4M2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=701, passed=10578
Got 10578 stars (including 9862 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10578 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10414 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10413 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HEuZfeGafE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=195, passed=4658
Got 4658 stars (including 4461 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4658 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4604 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4603 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4603 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FXxeCIicHq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=180, passed=4441
Got 4441 stars (including 4258 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4441 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4392 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4393 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4392 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:56.571 -25:59:36.82
Second-epoch image center 19:12:20.450 -26:01:34.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0953 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:56.571 -25:59:36.82
Second-epoch image center 19:12:20.977 -26:02:05.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1003 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:20.450 -26:01:34.97
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:20.977 -26:02:05.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00870 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits &> /tmp/tmp.l3ikyO69mU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ad7iDzugzX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cDqRbjO6M0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits &> /tmp/tmp.skYZzd5J9Y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 108796 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8622 to 297.0498 deg, Dec -31.2698 to -20.5069 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8622 to 297.0498 deg, Dec -31.2698 to -20.5069 deg
Loaded 13477 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9921 out of 11624 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11624 out of 108796 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.409319
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.409319
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.26
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.26
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 34 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
14.3 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.2 (SNR ) 12.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.l3ikyO69mU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=8591, passed=108793
Got 108793 stars (including 100032 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 108793 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 106938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 106939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 106939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ad7iDzugzX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=8843, passed=110133
Got 110133 stars (including 101112 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 110133 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 107867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 107866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 107862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cDqRbjO6M0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=1962, passed=46250
Got 46250 stars (including 44231 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46250 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45770 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45770 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.skYZzd5J9Y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1859, passed=44161
Got 44161 stars (including 42237 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44161 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43764 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-02-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0547.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050420_TTUQ2b1x1_10315_ad6rEXo2/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129415.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129416.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129427.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129754.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129770.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129813.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103884.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out129808.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out129821.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out129823.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out29896.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92745.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129415_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
The candidate 129415_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:24:35.91 -23:05:47.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.69)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129416_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
The candidate 129416_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:13.73 -23:14:00.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.55)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129420_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
The candidate 129420_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:23.32 -26:32:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129427_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
The candidate 129427_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:08.58 -29:48:46.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.02, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.00)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129428_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
The candidate 129428_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:30.55 -24:42:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129541_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
The candidate 129541_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:09.93 -22:33:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129610_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
The candidate 129610_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:45.70 -24:25:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129615_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
The candidate 129615_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:04.40 -23:41:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129639_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
The candidate 129639_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:02.53 -22:34:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129656_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
The candidate 129656_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:12.38 -27:45:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129668_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
The candidate 129668_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:37.67 -22:17:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129707_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
The candidate 129707_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:42.16 -22:09:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129708_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
The candidate 129708_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:16.99 -22:08:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129713_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
The candidate 129713_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:05.60 -22:25:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129734_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
The candidate 129734_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:12.51 -24:52:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129743_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
The candidate 129743_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:14.66 -27:45:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129754_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
The candidate 129754_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:43.63 -27:08:05.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.21, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.19)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.053 6763110384828358912 287.43147255472 -27.13577130348 12.0909 11.5090 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.053#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129756_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
The candidate 129756_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:06.36 -22:43:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129763_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
The candidate 129763_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:53.75 -22:42:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129770_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
The candidate 129770_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:29.21 -29:04:16.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.25)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.333 6761555194346022144 282.37212939088 -29.07175577029 12.5343 12.2050 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.333#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129808_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
Preparing report for the candidate 129808_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129813_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
The candidate 129813_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:59.89 -21:49:57.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.64)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.803 4081077237466494080 288.99998716823 -21.83243963936 12.3661 11.5166 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.803#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129821_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
Preparing report for the candidate 129821_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129823_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
Preparing report for the candidate 129823_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129825_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
The candidate 129825_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:29.17 -27:40:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129828_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
The candidate 129828_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:59.74 -22:17:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129847_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
The candidate 129847_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:57.23 -23:16:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129857_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
The candidate 129857_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:24.74 -23:15:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92745_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
Preparing report for the candidate 92745_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29896_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
Preparing report for the candidate 29896_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72227_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
The candidate 72227_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:42.17 -23:42:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103884_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
Preparing report for the candidate 103884_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53940_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
The candidate 53940_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:57.18 -25:26:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49415_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548
The candidate 49415_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_05-03-30_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0548 did not pass the final checks