NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Leo-06-Q2b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 3000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 2000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Leo-06-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-06-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-06-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 924247 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 924247 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits_preview.png'
Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits

renamed 'Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits_preview.png'
Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 532.6367 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 471.1419 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1341.9990 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 336.1298 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1346.2732 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 331.9432 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.51954 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.013 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 15.0600004196167 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 14.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-13T04:47:37.8620760' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-13T09:47:37.8620760' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61143.4080771063 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-13T09:47:47.7632597' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61143.4081917014 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 173.331515380608 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 13.9998988784764 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.6952777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 272.526666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.68844135587069 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 33 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20322 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20322 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 15.0600004196167 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 15.0600004196167 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 8.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 67.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.39 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 14.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 42.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 18.401472 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 15.801264 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/d_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits :) Spent 0.724151 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/d_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37165.080609 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23810.0, right_median=27365.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 14.9899997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 14.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-13T04:48:27.1811856' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-13T09:48:27.1811856' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61143.4086479284 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-13T09:48:37.0839241' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61143.4087625346 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 173.331515398232 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 13.9998988611156 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.5225 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 272.639166666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.70867950134011 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 33 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20322 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20322 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 14.9899997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 14.9899997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 8.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 67.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.39 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 14.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 42.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 18.401472 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 15.801264 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/d_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits :) Spent 0.831483 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/d_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37165.080609 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23810.0, right_median=27365.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits


fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461143.90819285 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits' wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits' The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 Second-epoch image center 11:33:19.685 +13:59:30.99 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0105 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 Second-epoch image center 11:33:19.895 +13:59:25.54 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0117 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 11:33:19.685 +13:59:30.99 Second-epoch second image center 11:33:19.895 +13:59:25.54 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00174 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dg3hw5lgJB Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ABA8KFdASw Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rspg0lihQE Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qShhVtLBCP Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec +8.4844 to +19.3112 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec 8.4844 to 19.3112 deg Loaded 3827 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2957 out of 3146 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3146 out of 5845 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.909359 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.909359 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Magnitude calibration plot:

____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 2.2 pix Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 3.4 pix fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits 3.5 pix fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.3 mag. Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 15.3 mag. Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 13.0 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits 12.6 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.6 (SNR ) 10.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.dg3hw5lgJB (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=451, passed=5845 Got 5845 stars (including 5387 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5754 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5755 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5755 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.ABA8KFdASw (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=436, passed=5851 Got 5851 stars (including 5411 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5851 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5764 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5763 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5763 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.rspg0lihQE (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=154, passed=1944 Got 1944 stars (including 1788 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1944 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1876 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1874 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1874 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60" Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.qShhVtLBCP (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=155, passed=1906 Got 1906 stars (including 1750 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1906 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1832 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1831 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1831 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59" Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits Last image: 2461143.90819285 13.04.2026 09:47:37.862 UTC ERROR running VaST on the field Leo-06-Q2b1x1 (wrong field? clouds? very bad focus? -- transient_factory_test31.txt) ____ VaST output ____ --==VaST 1.0rc90==-- Parsing command line arguments... opt 'r': assuming no rotation larger than 15.0 degrees! opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor opt '5': 4.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius! opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching! opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source! opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted! opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope) opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag! WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars. opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done! opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually! opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored! INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found. This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file. Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC)... OK Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files. Done with cleaning! VaST was started with the following command line: ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits Preparing to process 4 input FITS images... ######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ######## transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search! transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search! transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!! transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3 transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars transient search mode: not discarding large sources ################ Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 3322.0 3744.0 3324.0 3746.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 4624.0 4621.0 4626.0 4623.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 6875.0 5527.0 6877.0 5529.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Setting the fixed star match radius of 4.00 pix We have 4 images to process. SExtractor catalog cache: restored Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits catalog from cache SExtractor catalog cache: restored Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits catalog from cache The number of processor cores determined from /proc/cpuinfo is 24. Running SExtractor in 4 parallel threads... Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user Parent process says: we are done fork()ing. Waiting for thread 3 to finish... autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 3322.0 3744.0 3324.0 3746.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 4624.0 4621.0 4626.0 4623.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 6875.0 5527.0 6877.0 5529.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 3322.0 3744.0 3324.0 3746.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 4624.0 4621.0 4626.0 4623.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 6875.0 5527.0 6877.0 5529.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 6.5,6.5,5.8,7.1,7.8,8.4 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 6.5,6.5,5.9,7.2,7.8,8.5 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits Waiting for thread 2 to finish... Waiting for thread 1 to finish... Done with SExtractor! TIMING SExtractor: 6 seconds Matching stars between images! No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine. Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-02-22T08:09:59.0130541 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-02-22T08:09:59.0130541 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-02-22T08:09:59.013 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits Exposure 20 sec, 22.02.2026 08:09:59.013 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461093.84038209 mid. exp. The reference image star 7501.569 20.498 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 7499.097 16.117 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8203.435 13.585 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8110.402 12.389 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 9386.523 11.892 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8687.492 8.180 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8282.580 7.220 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8136.303 5.436 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8990.118 4.444 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 9173.315 2.183 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more reference image stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 24186, (24186 good for image matching) * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 15 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 5758 * rejected close to frame edge: 107 * rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>5.0 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 23 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied. get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.28 Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -7.3 (5.0 sigma detection) The simple faintest star detection limit= -6.6 80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -7.8 Selected detection limit= -7.8 Final detection limit= -7.8 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0) Parameter box for transient search: 10.05.0 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 18 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 24196 * detected, using 500/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000951, number_of_ambiguous_matches=23 refining the coordinate transformation... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000951, number_of_ambiguous_matches=23 22518 * matched, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000951, number_of_ambiguous_matches=23 22518 * matched (2nd iteration). fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000951, number_of_ambiguous_matches=23 22518 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 0.003 24196 stars detected, 22518 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 21575, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 21575 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 21573 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = -0.00000*X_pix +0.00000*Y_pix +0.00051 Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)... Computing robust linear magnitude calibration. Used 20401 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.28 25864 objects stored in memory (400000 max.) Magnitude calibration is performed successfully! Saving observations to the cache... OK memory: 115756 kB used, 128444 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-04-13T09:47:37.8620760 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-04-13T09:47:37.8620760 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-04-13T09:47:37.862 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-47-37_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0533.fits The star 9196.426 20.138 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8207.987 19.092 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8204.515 18.662 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9065.447 10.048 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9061.516 11.041 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9062.001 7.558 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7640.782 8.061 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7773.853 4.246 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7718.831 2.049 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8598.931 34.205 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 7159 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 1 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 1209 * rejected close to frame edge: 29 * rejected as being too small (<1.6 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>6.5 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 58 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 7159 * detected, using 147/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000077, number_of_ambiguous_matches=2 refining the coordinate transformation... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000077, number_of_ambiguous_matches=2 4469 * matched, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000077, number_of_ambiguous_matches=2 4469 * matched (2nd iteration). fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000077, number_of_ambiguous_matches=2 4469 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 179.512 7159 stars detected, 4469 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 4081, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 4081 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 3987 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = 0.00023*X_pix +0.00009*Y_pix -1.24576 ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_B * Y_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG Used 3987 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.84  ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image.  25864 objects stored in memory (400000 max.) memory: 111796 kB used, 128444 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM processed 3 of 4 images ( 75.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-04-13T09:48:27.1811856 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-04-13T09:48:27.1811856 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-04-13T09:48:27.181 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_045047_TTUQ2b1x1_25056_1ObQmEoC/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-48-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0534.fits The star 9196.781 19.437 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8204.619 17.837 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8207.552 16.633 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9061.651 6.051 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9062.592 9.975 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9067.035 10.303 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9065.930 7.039 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7641.358 7.072 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7774.210 3.378 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7718.764 1.429 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 6899 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 1 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 5 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 1283 * rejected close to frame edge: 34 * rejected as being too small (<1.6 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>6.5 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 47 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 6899 * detected, using 142/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000155, number_of_ambiguous_matches=4 refining the coordinate transformation... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000155, number_of_ambiguous_matches=4 4245 * matched, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000155, number_of_ambiguous_matches=4 4245 * matched (2nd iteration). fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000155, number_of_ambiguous_matches=4 4245 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 179.508 6899 stars detected, 4245 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 3855, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 3855 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 3839 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = 0.00019*X_pix +0.00007*Y_pix -1.01674 ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_B * Y_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG Used 3839 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.85  ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image.  25864 objects stored in memory (400000 max.) memory: 111796 kB used, 128444 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM processed 4 of 4 images (100.0%) TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds Done with measurements! =) Total number of measurements 48382 (48382 measurements stored in RAM) Freeing up some memory... Sorting the measurements cached in memory... Writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files... TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds The lightcurve files have been written, freeing up more memory... Creating vast_image_details.log ... Writing summary file: vast_summary.log ... OK Selecting the best aperture for each source Aperture with index 0 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 4234 stars Aperture with index 1 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 0 stars Aperture with index 2 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER -0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 6441 stars Aperture with index 3 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 3580 stars Aperture with index 4 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.20*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 2855 stars Aperture with index 5 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.30*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 5408 stars done! =) TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds Computing lightcurve statistics... Will not compute variability indexes for objects having <1 points in lightcurve You may disable this by commenting out the line '#define DROP_LIGHTCURVES_WITH_SMALL_NUMBER_OF_POINTS_FROM_ALL_PLOTS' in src/vast_limits.h an re-compiling VaST with 'make' Computing, please wait a bit ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... vast_lightcurve_statistics.log: 22394 objects, the longest string is 383 bytes. Allocating memory for resorting the file. Variability index idx00_STD is enabled Variability index idx01_wSTD is enabled Variability index idx08_Npts is enabled Variability index idx09_MAD is enabled Variability index idx11_RoMS is enabled Variability index idx12_rCh2 is enabled Variability index idx17_Jtim is enabled Variability index idx18_Ltim is enabled Variability index idx21_eta is enabled Variability index idx23_S_B is enabled Variability index idx25_IQR is enabled Computing the expected values of variability indexes and their scatter as a function of magnitude .......... .......... .......... .......... Wriring the list of candidate variables to vast_autocandidates.log ......................................................................................................................................................... ----***** VaST processing WARNING *****---- You asked VaST to process 4 images, but only 1 were actually matched to the reference one. Please investigate this! ************************************************************** This error might be a bug, but it is far more likely that it is caused by inappropriate input data. A few simple things to check in the diagnostic messages printed above (or the vast*.log files): * How many of the input images are matched? * Does the number of detected stars on each image look reasonable? * Do images have a sufficient overlap of at least about 20 percent? You may run ./sextract_single_image /path/to/my/image/file.fit to see how well VaST detects stars with the current SExtractor settings (star detection settings can be changed in the default.sex configuration file, see various examples in the VaST directory). If you cannot identify the problem, please e-mail Kirill Sokolovsky Please try to describe the problem in details and, if possible, attach vast_summary.log file and a few example images. If the images are too big to be sent by e-mail, please upload them through a web-form http://scan.sai.msu.ru/upload/ ************************************************************** Low percentage of matched images - we'll declare this an unsuccessful VaST run (exit code 1) _____________________ ########### Completed Leo-06-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461143.90819285 -observatory V36 23:53:54.96 -03:25:17.0 Mercury (0.1mag) 02:56:01.88 +16:51:42.0 Venus (-3.9mag) 00:10:28.82 +00:03:13.9 Mars (1.2mag) 07:11:29.27 +22:48:04.7 Jupiter (-2.1mag) 00:28:01.43 +00:41:44.7 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:47:09.43 +19:45:44.3 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:10:29.99 -00:17:31.3 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:33:38.14 -22:52:30.1 Pluto (14.5mag) 22:13:01.48 -12:34:44.5 Moon (-9.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Apr 13 04:56 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461143.90819285: 07:11:29.69 +22:48:01.0 Io (5.8mag) 07:11:41.34 +22:47:38.2 Europa (5.9mag) 07:11:24.76 +22:48:20.9 Ganymede (5.3mag) 07:11:47.97 +22:47:35.3 Callisto (6.6mag) 07:14:56.19 +22:36:55.7 Himalia (15.3mag) 07:11:27.78 +22:48:05.6 Thebe (16.2mag) 07:15:04.16 +23:06:53.7 Elara (17.3mag) 07:10:11.60 +23:29:26.3 Pasiphae (17.4mag) 07:19:52.40 +22:45:50.2 Carme (18.5mag) 00:28:11.56 +00:41:55.4 Titan (8.8mag) 00:28:07.05 +00:41:50.2 Rhea (10.1mag) 00:27:46.21 +00:42:18.8 Iapetus (11.5mag) 00:28:15.94 +00:41:49.0 Hyperion (14.8mag) 00:29:40.36 +00:50:49.6 Phoebe (16.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Apr 13 04:56 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461143.90819285: 15:25:27.40 -14:24:27.4 JWST 10:58:14.68 +48:15:36.3 Chandra 19:27:31.02 +01:32:28.7 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Apr 13 04:56 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461143.90819285 -observatory V36 -> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180] 18:50:53.56 -28:37:45.1 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:04:53.79 -69:47:08.3 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:31:53.99 +31:25:12.0 17.2mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:30:39.82 +10:14:23.2 17.6mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 23:09:31.29 +29:07:39.7 17.0mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 04:26:13.61 +25:58:03.0 16.0mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:02:53.59 +31:59:57.4 16.2mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:30:41.86 -00:25:47.1 17.3mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:54:19.23 +18:18:51.0 17.5mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:41:29.70 -11:33:34.1 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 09:08:52.23 -12:18:03.4 17.6mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS) 21:51:34.02 +62:45:25.0 17.5mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 19:21:22.04 -03:41:31.6 14.2mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 21:37:03.24 +85:33:18.3 17.8mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:16:45.27 +63:31:32.1 17.1mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 05:07:39.43 +17:25:10.5 10.9mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 16:20:54.99 +05:57:55.3 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:20:03.49 +14:34:27.9 14.6mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 03:24:03.16 -22:46:56.2 16.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:14:31.81 +45:56:23.0 17.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 13:49:36.08 +43:42:07.8 15.1mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 03:21:12.81 -25:48:38.8 17.8mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS) 23:23:38.28 +19:18:11.5 8.9mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 12:55:14.51 +02:51:13.9 17.4mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 03:05:01.55 +02:56:17.7 12.4mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS) 23:52:10.95 +36:44:01.5 14.5mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 18:37:53.17 -09:51:26.3 12.0mag 10P/Tempel 15:03:46.87 +03:28:22.1 13.8mag 24P/Schaumasse 11:03:30.72 -01:36:38.9 15.7mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 18:00:08.32 -09:42:25.3 17.9mag 40P/Vaisala 10:37:42.94 -04:18:30.8 16.9mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 01:44:39.96 +17:02:41.7 17.2mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 07:06:00.69 +37:34:01.4 17.0mag 63P/Wild 23:25:44.52 -11:45:48.7 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 03:56:21.48 +20:21:23.1 15.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 00:59:51.34 +07:43:06.6 14.4mag 78P/Gehrels 22:55:07.23 -10:09:26.6 14.6mag 88P/Howell 02:03:05.65 +19:56:49.8 15.1mag 93P/Lovas 04:49:56.94 +32:08:50.5 16.2mag 123P/West-Hartley 08:25:21.67 +39:33:23.0 16.2mag 124P/Mrkos 02:29:13.14 +14:04:47.8 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 02:42:27.53 +14:10:29.5 17.5mag 131P/Mueller 01:12:36.53 +12:19:44.0 10.8mag 141P/Machholz 01:21:53.14 +03:54:01.1 10.8mag 141P-A/Machholz 00:08:27.39 -00:05:24.1 13.1mag 141P-D/Machholz 01:51:58.72 +05:38:56.4 17.8mag 141P-I/Machholz 00:55:09.52 -02:49:41.7 15.1mag 162P/SidingSpring 10:29:12.72 +31:00:58.5 18.0mag 164P/Christensen 06:31:43.83 +24:19:26.5 18.0mag 198P/ODAS 14:56:02.15 -00:20:30.8 17.6mag 210P/Christensen 21:31:16.45 -12:04:28.3 17.6mag 218P/LINEAR 17:15:50.08 -14:14:36.9 16.1mag 235P/LINEAR 05:28:54.09 +34:29:49.3 16.7mag 240P/NEAT 07:37:14.70 -05:27:02.4 17.7mag 242P/Spahr 22:10:26.07 -21:39:45.9 18.0mag 260P/McNaught 15:43:37.62 +06:49:04.1 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski 07:33:13.46 +21:21:24.0 17.6mag 450P/LONEOS 05:32:06.38 +45:11:03.0 17.5mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K Apr 13 04:56 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.48 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31 13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97 06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67 12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32 07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74 06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48 11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95 10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53 20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83 06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93 07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78 19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2 04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS 11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2 07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8 16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12 13:01:19.46 +15:42:15.50 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.34 -0.18 09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06 03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00 SN2026evh 2026-03-12.05 17.29 06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10 AT2026ffp 2026-03-12.16 0.37 14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50 AT2026fij 2026-03-12.05 15.97 10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10 SN 2026exe 2026-03-11.78 16.48 18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00 SN2026ess 2026-03-12.37 17.37 13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80 AT2026ewa 2026-03-12.42 16.77 15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20 ASASSN-26bp 2026-03-11.92 13.33 13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20 AT2024cmo 2026-03-11.12 16.29 13:06:01.97 -15:50:14.40 AT2026fdy 2026-03-10.33 16.68 11:30:09.70 -47:26:45.00 ASASSN-26bn 2026-03-10.3 15.14 05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40 (= Gaia 2026-03-9.09 14.32 03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70 ASASSN-26bm 2026-03-8.04 15.22 04:31:00.53 -68:29:50.20 ASASSN-26bl 2026-03-7.9 10.26 16:18:17.61 +41:25:11.40 SN 2026dkf 2026-03-6.31 16.7 13:45:00.35 +61:16:50.90 SN 2026ejl 2026-03-6.41 -0.66 09:27:45.33 -37:49:33.00 ASASSN-26bk 2026-03-2.06 13.58 20:22:01.20 +23:47:47.30 ASASSN-26bi 2026-02-28.51 15.86 11:16:22.10 +29:26:22.80 AT2026enm 2026-02-28.39 16.88 08:05:59.83 -48:39:35.60 ASASSN-26bh 2026-02-26.05 14.64 13:24:27.02 -45:57:01.40 ASASSN-26bg 2026-02-26.35 15.28 17:27:50.95 -68:28:46.40 ASASSN-26bf 2026-02-26.3 16.28 18:03:39.29 +19:58:46.30 ASASSN-26be 2026-02-25.56 14.95 17:40:18.19 +07:20:59.60 SN 2026crm 2026-02-24.34 16.9 18:38:36.11 -79:28:58.40 ASASSN-26bb 2026-02-24.36 16.11 17:43:29.75 +11:24:00.60 ASASSN-26bc 2026-02-23.37 -3.37 16:59:41.08 -80:01:51.20 ASASSN-26bd 2026-02-23.3 14.38 11:23:31.77 -08:39:15.40 SN2026cff 2026-02-23.15 -1.08 14:55:17.39 -05:56:05.30 SN2026dmk 2026-02-23.22 -0.76 12:28:15.19 +44:27:20.80 SN2026cjz 2026-02-23.47 15.62 12:12:29.55 -02:40:43.30 AT2026dsk 2026-02-23.4 17.21 09:21:05.29 +06:11:42.80 SN2026chr 2026-02-23.1 17.39 16:05:38.61 +18:06:07.40 SN 2026dsy 2026-02-23.36 17.15 04:55:50.66 -29:52:57.70 SN 2026dpg 2026-02-23.11 15.75 04:21:28.18 -53:22:54.40 AT2026drl 2026-02-21.03 17.31 11:50:37.32 +55:21:13.70 SN 2026dix 2026-02-21.43 16.39 16:21:19.69 -63:47:29.40 ASASSN-26az 2026-02-21.03 17.02 02:45:30.93 -54:17:43.10 SN 2026cju 2026-02-21.04 17.54 01:58:40.68 +47:34:50.10 ASASSN-26av 2026-02-21.09 15.97 18:35:53.01 -42:31:38.90 ASASSN-26aw 2026-02-21.12 15.89 11:40:18.88 -39:45:09.20 ASASSN-26ax 2026-02-21.08 15.73 02:26:23.52 -51:42:29.80 ASASSN-26ay 2026-02-21.04 13.93 08:46:07.66 +01:17:43.90 ASASSN-26ba 2026-02-20.23 15.43 14:15:47.49 -48:05:16.60 SN2026dez 2026-02-19.31 15.91 17:25:53.90 -23:28:31.50 ASASSN-26au 2026-02-18.33 15.82 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K Apr 13 04:56 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:42:52.23 +41:01:44.7 PNV J00425223+4101447 2026-01-19.5505 18.74Cmag 09:54:46.47 +69:06:31.7 PNV J09544647+6906317 2026-01-26.8081 19.3mag 18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9 TCP J18085199-2616219 2026-01-31.8519 12.2mag 08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1 TCP J08011102-0343141 2026-02-08.8090 15.10Cmag 05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5 TCP J05191540-0204515 2026-02-13.4306 14.5mag 10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9 TCP J10524126+3640089 2026-02-17.6065 17.4mag 05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1 TCP J05505081+3622451 2026-02-17.5511 15.7mag 00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag 00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag 17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag 09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K Apr 13 04:56 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 10:17:25.370 -00:10:30.61 AT 2026isu 2026-04-04.63 22.08 13:00:56.300 +04:05:19.28 AT 2026ist 2026-03-27.76 21.96 13:30:34.720 +01:37:57.52 AT 2026iss 2026-03-24.90 22.44 13:15:51.420 +01:05:21.68 AT 2026isr 2026-03-23.82 22.65 10:13:53.630 +05:15:26.71 AT 2026isq 2026-03-23.63 22.63 13:46:10.060 +01:20:22.93 AT 2026isp 2026-03-08.91 20.81 10:37:05.160 -01:41:10.54 AT 2026iso 2026-02-05.76 20.81 14:04:58.698 +08:42:54.25 AT 2026isn 2026-04-07.34 19.61 17:07:59.639 +03:14:36.58 AT 2026ism 2026-04-07.44 19.9709 12:35:03.843 +16:11:04.99 AT 2026isl 2026-04-07.25 20.1748 12:18:45.074 +08:22:57.24 AT 2026isk 2026-04-07.25 19.4891 18:56:30.261 +78:17:13.39 AT 2026isj 2026-03-27.43 20.1324 19:03:47.920 +77:35:41.47 AT 2026isi 2026-04-07.45 19.3393 12:30:44.663 -02:08:00.62 AT 2026ish 2026-03-28.50 19.51 13:14:05.683 -16:32:12.44 AT 2026isg 2026-04-07.51 19.32 19:24:27.622 +59:09:12.86 AT 2026isf 2026-03-22.52 20.4885 16:04:49.647 +18:09:53.48 AT 2026ise 2026-04-05.40 19.9772 10:37:43.207 -02:42:01.74 AT 2026isd 2026-03-25.48 20.07 16:35:34.990 +26:38:38.36 AT 2026isc 2026-04-07.19 19.39 09:57:36.948 -43:21:35.60 AT 2026isb 2026-04-05.43 19.8 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Apr 13 04:56 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 90 C