This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461143.8779,10.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260413.3779 10.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461143.8779,12.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260413.3779 12.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4112501417225287168,2461143.8779,13.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4112501417225287168 20260413.3779 13.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J164622.24-295625.5,2461143.8779,12.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J164622.24-295625.5 20260413.3779 12.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
LP Oph,2461143.8779,12.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
LP Oph 20260413.3779 12.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DN Sco,2461143.8779,12.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DN Sco 20260413.3779 12.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461143.8779,12.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260413.3779 12.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
IW Oph,2461143.8779,12.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
IW Oph 20260413.3779 12.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J170102.04-283857.8,2461143.8779,12.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J170102.04-283857.8 20260413.3779 12.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J171427.25-240000.2,2461143.8779,12.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J171427.25-240000.2 20260413.3779 12.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J170722.22-240448.4,2461143.8779,12.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J170722.22-240448.4 20260413.3779 12.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461099.00968565 27.02.2026 12:13:46.840 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
First image: 2461099.00968565 27.02.2026 12:13:46.840 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Last image: 2461143.87814942 13.04.2026 09:04:22.110 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.37
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7177
Objects passed selection criteria: 7168
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6112.75
Average stars matched: 5952.5 (97.3784 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113988 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 04:07:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461099.00968565 27.02.2026 12:13:46.840 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
First image: 2461099.00968565 27.02.2026 12:13:46.840 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Last image: 2461143.87814942 13.04.2026 09:04:22.110 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 122
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.03
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 25 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 104521
Objects passed selection criteria: 104347
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 84999.8
Average stars matched: 81375.8 (95.7365 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1884460 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 04:09:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461143.87756545
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:48.675 -26:00:08.00
Second-epoch image center 17:16:57.884 -26:00:06.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0345 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:48.675 -26:00:08.00
Second-epoch image center 17:16:58.882 -26:00:14.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0383 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:16:57.884 -26:00:06.39
Second-epoch second image center 17:16:58.882 -26:00:14.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00440 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jtWI06Bel6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits &> /tmp/tmp.25boy2R4ow
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VoxUkdGbf1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pgZC7c5gTP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10772 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.0068 to 268.2094 deg, Dec -31.3083 to -20.4292 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.0068 to 268.2094 deg, Dec -31.3083 to -20.4292 deg
Loaded 11388 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7042 out of 7452 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7452 out of 10772 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.815328
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.815328
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.37
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.45
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
2.1 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
2.8 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits
2.9 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.4 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
14.4 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.jtWI06Bel6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=949, passed=10772
Got 10772 stars (including 9801 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10772 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 922 stars left (next iteration limit 1014)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.25boy2R4ow (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=936, passed=10621
Got 10621 stars (including 9668 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10621 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10335 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10336 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10336 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 919 stars left (next iteration limit 1012)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VoxUkdGbf1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=293, passed=5669
Got 5669 stars (including 5374 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5669 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5559 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5559 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5559 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79"
Excluding outliers - 921 stars left (next iteration limit 1013)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pgZC7c5gTP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=339, passed=5953
Got 5953 stars (including 5612 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5953 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5817 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5817 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5817 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
Excluding outliers - 921 stars left (next iteration limit 1013)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20574.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20574_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
Preparing report for the candidate 20574_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07146_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 07146_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:56.20 -25:10:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06085_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 06085_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:49.87 -26:39:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:48:42.37 -29:48:17.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:48.675 -26:00:08.00
Second-epoch image center 17:16:57.884 -26:00:06.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0345 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:48.675 -26:00:08.00
Second-epoch image center 17:16:58.882 -26:00:14.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0383 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:16:57.884 -26:00:06.39
Second-epoch second image center 17:16:58.882 -26:00:14.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00440 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eGqh7VEd2K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kbv1QhlR1g
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Tc2bphcrne
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2rYxr074Fd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 143168 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.9656 to 268.2487 deg, Dec -31.3138 to -20.3822 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.9656 to 268.2487 deg, Dec -31.3138 to -20.3822 deg
Loaded 11498 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8059 out of 9812 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9812 out of 143168 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.596166
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.596166
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.03
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.57
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 92 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
1.8 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
14.6 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 13.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.eGqh7VEd2K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=11615, passed=143155
Got 143155 stars (including 131260 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 143155 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140509 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140510 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140510 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kbv1QhlR1g (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=11364, passed=142792
Got 142792 stars (including 131150 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 142792 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140429 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Tc2bphcrne (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=3511, passed=60441
Got 60441 stars (including 56864 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60441 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59195 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59197 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59196 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 924 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2rYxr074Fd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=3851, passed=62916
Got 62916 stars (including 58990 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61493 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Excluding outliers - 924 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-03-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_040505_TTUQ2b1x1_14420_qpiXy6XW/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out158104.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166754.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166757.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166766.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166772.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167253.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167299.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167337.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167342.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167363.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167384.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167386.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167400.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167418.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167424.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167432.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167449.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167452.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167458.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out129721.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out130787.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out132834.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out154127.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out167012.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out167464.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out25497.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out38905.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out40033.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72820.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166754_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 166754_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:19.29 -22:00:57.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.604 4126190856699502592 254.33014889776 -22.01546808853 13.3895 12.3774 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.604#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166757_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 166757_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:43.06 -26:01:19.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.36)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166766_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 166766_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:50.39 -27:41:53.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.13, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.11)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.338 4108709102909847680 256.45998233462 -27.69839695892 12.8353 12.2534 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.338#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166772_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 166772_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:10.26 -25:07:53.8 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.93)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166787_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 166787_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:50.56 -22:12:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166818_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 166818_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:42.31 -29:48:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166852_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 166852_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166890_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 166890_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166971_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 166971_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:46.52 -27:53:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167011_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167011_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167012_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
Preparing report for the candidate 167012_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167032_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167032_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:36.35 -29:05:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167050_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167050_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:24.03 -23:22:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167108_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167108_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:11.48 -23:31:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167134_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167134_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167141_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167141_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:29.30 -26:11:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167155_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167155_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:18.40 -28:11:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167167_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167167_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167176_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167176_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:30.49 -26:45:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167200_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167200_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:50.81 -22:10:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167209_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167209_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167215_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167215_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:10.13 -30:03:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167216_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167216_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:50.83 -26:29:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167231_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167231_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:58.80 -28:33:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167253_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167253_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:52.89 -26:24:06.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.89)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167274_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167274_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:17.48 -24:10:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167299_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167299_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:49.54 -29:21:22.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.670 6029840690189924992 255.70598017326 -29.35662672596 11.6146 10.1816 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.670#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167301_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167301_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:01.95 -25:40:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167304_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167304_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:03.02 -24:59:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167311_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167311_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:14.40 -25:42:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167312_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167312_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:52.81 -23:45:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167317_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167317_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:26.75 -29:10:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167337_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167337_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:56.72 -23:32:34.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.13, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.11)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.769 4112894119021157504 257.48643090473 -23.54407078190 13.2549 12.3489 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.769#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167340_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167340_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:44.55 -24:49:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167342_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167342_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:24.52 -24:13:26.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.05, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.03)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.816 4113491978456939520 256.10203231108 -24.22419072397 12.7645 11.8333 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.816#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167363_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167363_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:55.34 -22:43:36.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.14, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.12)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.602 4114691403893397376 259.73096157569 -22.72697068660 13.2749 11.8002 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.602#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167373_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167373_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:32.15 -22:38:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167375_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167375_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:36.54 -26:21:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167377_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167377_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:15.45 -26:10:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167384_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167384_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:09.64 -22:44:45.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.25, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.23)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.895 4115209587411101056 257.78963973182 -22.74614649948 13.4760 11.8117 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.895#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167386_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167386_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:52.77 -27:57:51.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.23, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.21)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.401 6033084730446485504 252.71912244293 -27.96411179579 12.6091 11.4200 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.401#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167397_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167397_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:11.17 -23:58:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167400_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167400_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:22.62 -29:20:48.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.09, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.07)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.215 6029849555005617408 255.34357467775 -29.34668175361 12.8310 11.6823 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.215#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167401_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167401_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:54.81 -25:40:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167418_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167418_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:30.41 -25:12:48.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.886 4109488411773478784 258.12619304357 -25.21315014948 12.7292 11.5789 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.886#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167424_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167424_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:44.86 -23:00:38.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.913 4115177804650346240 257.43635180613 -23.01061194357 12.0947 10.4977 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.913#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167428_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167428_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167432_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167432_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:00.64 -22:29:23.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.776 4115310261445128704 258.00213864315 -22.48989968040 12.4777 11.0729 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.776#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167449_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167449_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:12.47 -28:42:11.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.713 6029193318378508032 257.30212991596 -28.70329544976 13.5331 11.8821 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.713#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167452_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167452_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:38.74 -24:27:15.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.343 4112733551617649152 256.16148507603 -24.45470121970 12.9941 11.7608 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.343#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167458_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 167458_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:23.38 -22:56:34.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.171 4114452230082322816 258.09716889578 -22.94333605803 13.5621 12.5149 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.171#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167464_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
Preparing report for the candidate 167464_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33974_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 33974_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:08.63 -28:59:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57059_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 57059_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:35.73 -27:23:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126555_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 126555_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:00.20 -23:42:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17781_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 17781_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:16.74 -29:54:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71997_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 71997_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:49.88 -26:39:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39673_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 39673_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:35.03 -28:33:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60742_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 60742_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:17.46 -27:12:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29161_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 29161_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:21.19 -29:24:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155122_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 155122_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:25.06 -28:26:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78584_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 78584_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:14.93 -26:11:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49148_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 49148_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:32.23 -28:07:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24051_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 24051_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:47.03 -29:29:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121849_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 121849_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:01.80 -23:23:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124624_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 124624_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:01.82 -23:25:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154127_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
Preparing report for the candidate 154127_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45520_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 45520_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:00.11 -28:24:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108912_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 108912_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:07.33 -22:05:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139759_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 139759_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:49.09 -24:29:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25497_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
Preparing report for the candidate 25497_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158104_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 158104_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:09.65 -28:58:26.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.219 6029734033155163648 254.78983515865 -28.97406245659 12.6261 11.4364 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.219#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158009_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 158009_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:49.30 -30:04:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38905_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
Preparing report for the candidate 38905_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66623_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 66623_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:46.04 -26:52:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129721_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
Preparing report for the candidate 129721_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89939_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 89939_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:56.20 -25:10:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92031_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 92031_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:10.93 -25:14:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16931_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 16931_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:03.04 -29:43:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63227_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 63227_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:54.20 -27:19:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72820_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
Preparing report for the candidate 72820_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157265_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 157265_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:19.36 -24:58:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40033_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
Preparing report for the candidate 40033_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46888_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 46888_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:36.87 -28:20:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14036_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 14036_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:13.13 -30:12:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127742_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 127742_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:48.66 -23:36:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43863_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 43863_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:57.61 -28:23:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130787_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
Preparing report for the candidate 130787_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132834_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
Preparing report for the candidate 132834_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26023_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 26023_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:02.57 -29:28:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68045_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 68045_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:31.49 -26:48:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49621_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488
The candidate 49621_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_04-04-22_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0488 did not pass the final checks
