This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461143.8026,12.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260413.3026 12.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461143.8026,13.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260413.3026 13.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.3026* 17 25 09.61 -12 04 09.6 13.1 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4141812236863708160,2461143.8026,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4141812236863708160 20260413.3026 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461143.8026,14.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260413.3026 14.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461099.01326235 27.02.2026 12:18:55.867 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
First image: 2461099.01326235 27.02.2026 12:18:55.867 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Last image: 2461143.80296935 13.04.2026 07:16:06.552 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 13
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.16
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4300
Objects passed selection criteria: 4293
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3958.25
Average stars matched: 3884.75 (98.1431 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 110924 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 02:24:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461099.01326235 27.02.2026 12:18:55.867 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
First image: 2461099.01326235 27.02.2026 12:18:55.867 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Last image: 2461143.80296935 13.04.2026 07:16:06.552 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 165
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 17 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 44337
Objects passed selection criteria: 44264
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 39602
Average stars matched: 38279.2 (96.6599 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 150420 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 02:25:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461143.80227970
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits'
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits'
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:33.337 -10:00:14.71
Second-epoch image center 17:08:45.822 -09:58:38.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0578 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:33.337 -10:00:14.71
Second-epoch image center 17:08:48.268 -09:58:14.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0697 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:45.822 -09:58:38.76
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:48.268 -09:58:14.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01205 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EReVi7cnDt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits &> /tmp/tmp.a1mbOjfOzJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vqCC6NBRmZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cr1z4w6MDr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6291 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0335 to 265.1596 deg, Dec -15.2758 to -4.6406 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0335 to 265.1596 deg, Dec -15.2758 to -4.6406 deg
Loaded 4109 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3268 out of 3414 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3414 out of 6291 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.964209
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.964209
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.16
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
2.4 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
2.7 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits
2.7 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
14.8 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.EReVi7cnDt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=458, passed=6287
Got 6287 stars (including 5821 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6287 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.a1mbOjfOzJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=388, passed=6127
Got 6127 stars (including 5735 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6127 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5999 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5998 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5998 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vqCC6NBRmZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=285, passed=4598
Got 4598 stars (including 4311 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4598 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4564 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4563 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4563 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cr1z4w6MDr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=283, passed=4524
Got 4524 stars (including 4239 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4524 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4479 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20244.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20188_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 20188_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:57.00 -12:12:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20211_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 20211_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:31.52 -11:47:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20213_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 20213_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:10.83 -10:28:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20223_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 20223_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:19.69 -06:38:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20224_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 20224_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:05.06 -09:57:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20232_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 20232_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:53.41 -10:37:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20242_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 20242_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:30.50 -10:59:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20243_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 20243_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:31.55 -13:46:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20244_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 20244_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:16.54 -11:11:44.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.593 4142712049683991168 257.06875984242 -11.19586450944 10.5553 9.2346 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.593#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20260_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 20260_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:28.68 -07:52:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03859_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 03859_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:52.09 -09:32:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:33.337 -10:00:14.71
Second-epoch image center 17:08:45.822 -09:58:38.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0578 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:33.337 -10:00:14.71
Second-epoch image center 17:08:48.268 -09:58:14.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0697 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:45.822 -09:58:38.76
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:48.268 -09:58:14.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01205 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WkriD8FxYE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9l9NO2Po9W
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jYxkKKzcpm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eBVZ6aAv2p
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 64679 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 248.9951 to 265.1706 deg, Dec -15.2833 to -4.6303 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 248.9951 to 265.1706 deg, Dec -15.2833 to -4.6303 deg
Loaded 4125 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3192 out of 3626 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3626 out of 64679 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.739902
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.739902
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 108 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
2.1 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.WkriD8FxYE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=5, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=3753, passed=64663
Got 64663 stars (including 60806 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64663 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63713 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9l9NO2Po9W (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=3159, passed=61397
Got 61397 stars (including 58163 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61397 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60548 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60549 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60548 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jYxkKKzcpm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=2073, passed=38648
Got 38648 stars (including 36541 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38648 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38249 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38249 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38249 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eBVZ6aAv2p (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=2026, passed=37883
Got 37883 stars (including 35802 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37883 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37636 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37635 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37635 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-15-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0465.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_021651_TTUQ2b1x1_32365_Pwc5DuTI/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out78858.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out78928.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out78964.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79005.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79031.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79047.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79061.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79066.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79082.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79099.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79132.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79168.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79173.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79185.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79246.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79320.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79325.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79348.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79371.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78672.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78822.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78843.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out79001.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78586_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78586_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:05.12 -07:55:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78587_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78587_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:28.67 -06:40:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78590_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78590_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:44.48 -05:55:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78594_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78594_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:18.09 -06:32:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78596_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78596_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:01.80 -08:47:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78605_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78605_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:24.88 -07:56:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78617_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78617_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:27.15 -06:23:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78655_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78655_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:46.85 -12:43:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78672_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
Preparing report for the candidate 78672_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78686_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78686_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:59.21 -14:03:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78716_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78716_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:55.16 -10:10:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78726_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78726_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:25.78 -10:50:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78758_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78758_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:21.15 -08:49:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78759_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78759_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:41.96 -08:56:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78770_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78770_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:40.75 -09:15:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78787_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78787_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:52.60 -08:58:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78795_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78795_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:03.71 -07:33:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78803_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78803_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:12.15 -07:32:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78820_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78820_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:13.13 -11:20:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78822_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
Preparing report for the candidate 78822_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78828_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78828_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:00.74 -07:07:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78830_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78830_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:11.77 -06:46:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78834_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78834_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:07.05 -05:56:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78843_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
Preparing report for the candidate 78843_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78846_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78846_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:28.17 -13:23:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78852_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78852_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:24.55 -12:50:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78855_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78855_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:33.06 -09:06:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78858_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78858_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:13.43 -10:37:02.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.49)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.380 4335119575157792256 255.05514658203 -10.61675529058 12.0323 10.1045 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.380#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78863_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78863_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:29.58 -12:43:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78867_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78867_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:03.32 -07:07:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78890_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78890_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:56.40 -07:46:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78912_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78912_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:30.38 -09:15:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78928_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78928_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:06.70 -12:27:00.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.79)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.787 4333655777289160320 252.02746472995 -12.45042167503 12.5140 11.0942 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.787#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78944_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78944_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:21.17 -08:16:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78951_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78951_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:37.59 -08:12:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78957_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78957_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:13.72 -05:54:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78958_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78958_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:50.95 -06:05:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78964_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78964_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:16.49 -13:16:49.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.60)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78990_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78990_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:36.99 -06:35:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78999_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 78999_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:12.87 -09:59:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79001_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
Preparing report for the candidate 79001_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79002_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79002_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:32.90 -09:10:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79005_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79005_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:59.55 -07:39:32.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.23, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.21)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.816 4339880524930190720 254.24734690553 -07.65900734790 12.5866 11.0970 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.816#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79023_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79023_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:14.40 -06:30:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79030_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79030_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:54.81 -08:25:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79031_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79031_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:39.04 -08:12:17.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.26, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.24)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.912 4339787517414733696 254.41294700325 -08.20523070986 14.2571 13.6026 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.912#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79044_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79044_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:04.69 -08:16:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79046_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79046_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:46.11 -07:55:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79047_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79047_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:01.90 -08:37:08.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.611 4339536141568108800 252.75821036411 -08.61947926106 14.2800 13.5343 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.611#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79061_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79061_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:55.29 -06:22:30.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.554 4352879196206962304 251.22969528513 -06.37535576379 13.9444 12.9471 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.554#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79066_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79066_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:37.97 -07:10:36.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.51)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.046 4340672658634057216 251.65828392036 -07.17652479010 14.4031 13.7226 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.046#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79069_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79069_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:29.51 -06:39:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79070_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79070_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:34.52 -06:53:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79077_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79077_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:08.61 -06:31:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79082_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79082_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:54.62 -07:23:59.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.38)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.809 4340087581010206592 253.72749912245 -07.39998636849 14.1605 13.2290 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.809#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79083_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79083_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:15.77 -09:33:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79084_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79084_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:14.26 -06:10:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79091_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79091_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:48.77 -06:00:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79092_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79092_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:00.78 -06:38:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79093_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79093_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:18.91 -10:43:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79099_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79099_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:32.27 -06:57:21.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.51)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.640 4340776425043464960 251.88462094137 -06.95607453202 14.2548 13.4261 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.640#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79100_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79100_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:27.72 -06:06:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79101_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79101_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:13.54 -06:09:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79110_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79110_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:02.35 -06:21:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79126_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79126_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:09.23 -09:32:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79132_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79132_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:30.20 -08:14:25.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.051 4339786967658918912 254.37600091010 -08.24065700583 14.3426 13.5842 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.051#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79154_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79154_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:03.41 -06:10:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79157_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79157_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:33.26 -08:13:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79165_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79165_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:26.48 -05:58:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79168_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79168_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:54.45 -07:02:08.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.262 4340171109534855168 253.97714326543 -07.03592242567 14.1798 13.4645 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.262#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79173_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79173_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:13.04 -05:44:54.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.42, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.40)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.696 4365132944062378880 254.30408808273 -05.74895852089 14.0215 13.1921 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.696#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79177_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79177_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:58.14 -08:46:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79181_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79181_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:29.30 -05:55:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79185_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79185_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:56.11 -05:58:52.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.49)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79209_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79209_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:29.13 -05:51:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79211_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79211_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:48.47 -06:15:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79216_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79216_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:33.03 -07:12:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79222_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79222_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:08.14 -05:48:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79232_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79232_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:10.96 -07:49:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79246_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79246_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:54.79 -05:45:12.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.64, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.62)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.244 4364394106608769408 254.97803413919 -05.75373181370 14.1184 13.1785 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.244#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79256_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79256_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:42.71 -09:35:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79283_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79283_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:44.69 -06:20:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79311_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79311_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:55.36 -06:08:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79320_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79320_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:27.42 -06:34:43.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.64, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.62)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.135 4364073014853803392 255.61414256323 -06.57893556861 14.6269 13.9214 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.135#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79325_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79325_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:21.34 -06:50:03.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.454 4364009792935111936 255.83890343038 -06.83406891943 14.4297 13.6462 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.454#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79348_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79348_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:58.98 -08:10:07.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.37, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.35)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.160 4359869925498747392 257.74590062577 -08.16895223647 14.2213 13.2534 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.160#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79358_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79358_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:01.76 -08:53:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79371_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 79371_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:39.73 -09:20:21.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.175 4339229377823758080 253.41556727079 -09.33934729366 14.2316 13.3333 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.175#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38227_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 38227_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:05.03 -09:57:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75144_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 75144_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:12.94 -12:51:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59756_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 59756_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:52.43 -07:54:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34174_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 34174_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:44.44 -10:40:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32237_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 32237_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:30.49 -10:59:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35099_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 35099_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:10.86 -10:28:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28198_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 28198_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:09.08 -11:33:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22755_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 22755_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:24.51 -12:14:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22747_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 22747_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:57.00 -12:12:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40753_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 40753_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:00.58 -09:33:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36413_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 36413_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:14.01 -10:18:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40045_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 40045_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:52.10 -09:32:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34578_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 34578_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:46.51 -10:37:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48929_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 48929_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:54.31 -06:24:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25148_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 25148_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:31.52 -11:47:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25116_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 25116_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:39.49 -11:38:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19815_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 19815_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:16.77 -12:34:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38705_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 38705_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:23.20 -09:55:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50662_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 50662_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:19.68 -06:38:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31248_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466
The candidate 31248_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-16-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0466 did not pass the final checks