This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 6045466055990618496,2461143.7988,11.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 6045466055990618496 20260413.2988 11.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1550 Sco,2461143.7988,12.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1550 Sco 20260413.2988 12.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J160706-2610.9,2461143.7988,12.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J160706-2610.9 20260413.2988 12.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J163424.82-255827.8,2461143.7988,12.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J163424.82-255827.8 20260413.2988 12.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
SSS_J155051.1-273220,2461143.7988,12.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
SSS_J155051.1-273220 20260413.2988 12.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J162207.99-274652.6,2461143.7988,12.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J162207.99-274652.6 20260413.2988 12.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461098.96517225 27.02.2026 11:09:40.882 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
First image: 2461098.96517225 27.02.2026 11:09:40.882 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Last image: 2461143.79910047 13.04.2026 07:10:32.281 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.21
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5720
Objects passed selection criteria: 5710
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5055.5
Average stars matched: 4925.25 (97.4236 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112540 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 02:18:21 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461098.96517225 27.02.2026 11:09:40.882 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
First image: 2461098.96517225 27.02.2026 11:09:40.882 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Last image: 2461143.79910047 13.04.2026 07:10:32.281 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 76
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.88
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 17 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 58259
Objects passed selection criteria: 58165
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 48208.2
Average stars matched: 46639 (96.7449 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 165184 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 02:21:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461143.79846905
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits'
wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:16.444 -25:59:35.75
Second-epoch image center 16:19:26.829 -25:58:57.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0403 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:16.444 -25:59:35.75
Second-epoch image center 16:19:25.789 -25:59:43.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0351 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:19:26.829 -25:58:57.11
Second-epoch second image center 16:19:25.789 -25:59:43.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01335 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KiukpAYiLn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HJ5XmxqRaO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mFv44THl0A
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kPjsIGoOhq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8752 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.6487 to 253.8106 deg, Dec -31.3044 to -20.4499 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.6487 to 253.8106 deg, Dec -31.3044 to -20.4499 deg
Loaded 8190 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5578 out of 5823 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5823 out of 8752 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.788280
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.788280
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.21
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.58
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
2.2 pix Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
3.0 pix fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits
2.9 pix fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
14.6 mag. Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.KiukpAYiLn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=696, passed=8752
Got 8752 stars (including 8042 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8752 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8526 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8526 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8526 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HJ5XmxqRaO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=689, passed=8852
Got 8852 stars (including 8148 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8852 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8676 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8673 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8672 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mFv44THl0A (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=272, passed=4979
Got 4979 stars (including 4702 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4979 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kPjsIGoOhq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=320, passed=5057
Got 5057 stars (including 4737 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5057 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20464_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 20464_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:24:09.34 -28:22:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20484_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 20484_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:40.37 -22:53:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03020_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 03020_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:12.86 -28:34:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:16.444 -25:59:35.75
Second-epoch image center 16:19:26.829 -25:58:57.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0403 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:16.444 -25:59:35.75
Second-epoch image center 16:19:25.789 -25:59:43.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0351 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:19:26.829 -25:58:57.11
Second-epoch second image center 16:19:25.789 -25:59:43.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01335 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SfKONMIMcX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XqbrWc7ZE7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits &> /tmp/tmp.V2OIXWV4hc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KguufWCwom
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 85371 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.5879 to 253.8599 deg, Dec -31.3044 to -20.3796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.5879 to 253.8599 deg, Dec -31.3044 to -20.3796 deg
Loaded 8263 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6163 out of 6991 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6991 out of 85371 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.596036
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.596036
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.88
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.72
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.72
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 57 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
2.0 pix Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
2.7 pix fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
14.7 mag. Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.SfKONMIMcX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=4769, passed=85367
Got 85367 stars (including 80428 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 85367 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XqbrWc7ZE7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=4773, passed=84610
Got 84610 stars (including 79676 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84610 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.V2OIXWV4hc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1976, passed=37324
Got 37324 stars (including 35304 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36555 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KguufWCwom (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=2185, passed=40055
Got 40055 stars (including 37823 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40055 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-09-40_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0010.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-10-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-09-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0459.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_021120_TTUQ2b1x1_847_09UFimw8/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101103.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101104.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101106.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101109.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101111.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101380.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101476.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101496.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101231.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32178.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33921.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34665.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out48506.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51249.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101102_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101102_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:20:16.31 -22:23:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101103_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101103_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:06:55.91 -21:48:22.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.216 6243696148356630912 241.73260426445 -21.80643913884 13.3139 12.2726 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.216#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101104_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101104_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:35:35.81 -25:22:55.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.10)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101106_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101106_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:15:46.25 -27:42:13.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.22, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.20)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.946 6042290391521174016 243.94209875313 -27.70369241753 12.8222 11.8948 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.946#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101109_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101109_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:19:26.47 -28:20:59.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.80)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101111_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101111_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:27:17.04 -28:38:06.8 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.70, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.68)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101161_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101161_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:35:12.15 -26:28:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101191_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101191_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:22.02 -26:30:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101194_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101194_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:08:02.93 -26:17:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101202_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101202_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:39.76 -26:28:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101203_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101203_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:21.45 -26:31:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101231_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
Preparing report for the candidate 101231_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101241_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101241_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:21:00.18 -25:36:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101244_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101244_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101248_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101248_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:30.41 -26:29:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101262_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101262_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:42.79 -26:54:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101266_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101266_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:24.48 -26:32:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101288_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101288_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:42.36 -26:29:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101292_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101292_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:52.11 -24:29:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101293_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101293_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:57.76 -27:25:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101296_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101296_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:15:19.23 -29:18:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101305_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101305_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:45.34 -23:11:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101308_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101308_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:31:31.12 -26:10:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101332_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101332_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:04:38.50 -24:05:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101354_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101354_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:02.75 -25:08:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101358_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101358_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:35.80 -26:28:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101360_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101360_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:03:53.87 -26:48:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101375_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101375_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:08:01.83 -26:18:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101380_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101380_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:01:28.36 -25:12:48.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.08, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.06)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.638 6235880132518623104 240.36808211244 -25.21422888995 13.3479 12.8540 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.638#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101445_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101445_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:27:16.97 -27:11:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101459_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101459_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:50.42 -28:01:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101476_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101476_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:05:31.00 -23:28:38.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.829 6242311553986202624 241.37863662146 -23.47721365479 12.6217 10.8915 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.829#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101484_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101484_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:31:11.37 -24:39:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101493_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101493_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:36.12 -28:31:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101496_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 101496_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:06:14.41 -21:44:44.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.06, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.04)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.330 6243325716022770432 241.56004323278 -21.74573066092 13.8911 13.1542 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.330#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96014_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 96014_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:53.19 -22:57:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69647_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 69647_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:39.22 -22:56:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76483_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 76483_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:39.24 -22:19:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59113_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 59113_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:57.17 -24:53:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11594_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 11594_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:00:42.44 -29:55:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13364_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 13364_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:16.40 -29:56:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32178_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
Preparing report for the candidate 32178_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36525_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 36525_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:25:44.45 -27:35:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48506_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
Preparing report for the candidate 48506_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41875_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 41875_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:13:31.86 -26:55:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23032_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 23032_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:56.48 -28:56:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57579_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 57579_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:09:51.76 -25:08:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69181_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 69181_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:40.38 -22:53:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51249_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
Preparing report for the candidate 51249_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33479_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 33479_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:31:40.86 -27:54:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28999_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 28999_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:24:09.34 -28:22:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33921_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
Preparing report for the candidate 33921_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79343_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 79343_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:18:05.53 -21:49:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34665_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
Preparing report for the candidate 34665_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67931_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 67931_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:03:35.11 -22:41:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26638_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 26638_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:12.84 -28:34:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71388_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460
The candidate 71388_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-13_02-10-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0460 did not pass the final checks