This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
YZ Cnc,2461143.7295,11.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
YZ Cnc 20260413.2295 11.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461143.7295,12.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260413.2295 12.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461143.7295,14.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260413.2295 14.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
YZ Cnc,2461143.7295,11.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
YZ Cnc 20260413.2295 11.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.71692514 12.02.2026 05:12:12.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
First image: 2461083.71692514 12.02.2026 05:12:12.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Last image: 2461143.72979350 13.04.2026 05:30:44.158 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14102
Objects passed selection criteria: 14075
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12179
Average stars matched: 11852 (97.3151 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 118604 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 00:33:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.71692514 12.02.2026 05:12:12.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
First image: 2461083.71692514 12.02.2026 05:12:12.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Last image: 2461143.72979350 13.04.2026 05:30:44.158 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 54
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 24 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 88694
Objects passed selection criteria: 88477
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 78285.2
Average stars matched: 75512.5 (96.4581 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1877988 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 13 00:34:47 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461143.72911469
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65
Second-epoch image center 07:59:57.434 +30:02:44.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0478 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65
Second-epoch image center 08:00:00.434 +30:02:45.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0473 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:59:57.434 +30:02:44.65
Second-epoch second image center 08:00:00.434 +30:02:45.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01083 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UmoewIAWBM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wnIsDhIaPo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4TDbMJx1la
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LHzuJnBLsR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14371 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.1895 to 129.2995 deg, Dec +24.1558 to +35.3509 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.1895 to 129.2995 deg, Dec 24.1558 to 35.3509 deg
Loaded 9871 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7216 out of 7782 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7782 out of 14371 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.912020
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.912020
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
1.9 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.UmoewIAWBM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1108, passed=14371
Got 14371 stars (including 13247 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14371 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14189 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14187 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14175 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wnIsDhIaPo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1133, passed=14315
Got 14315 stars (including 13161 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14143 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14142 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14132 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4TDbMJx1la (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=666, passed=10321
Got 10321 stars (including 9635 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10321 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10237 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10236 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10236 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LHzuJnBLsR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=639, passed=10000
Got 10000 stars (including 9343 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10000 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20694_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 20694_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:24:48.05 +30:11:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20695_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 20695_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:23.44 +26:33:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21002_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
Preparing report for the candidate 21002_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21214_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 21214_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:07:17.03 +33:15:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12811_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 12811_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:14.04 +33:22:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06746_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 06746_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:11.04 +29:09:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65
Second-epoch image center 07:59:57.434 +30:02:44.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0478 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65
Second-epoch image center 08:00:00.434 +30:02:45.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0473 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:59:57.434 +30:02:44.65
Second-epoch second image center 08:00:00.434 +30:02:45.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01083 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rdhEg2CSwW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XQe3Hd8U22
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nVpTbW9Sxs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PjFIlCXk66
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 92293 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.1895 to 129.3003 deg, Dec +24.1558 to +35.3693 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.1895 to 129.3003 deg, Dec 24.1558 to 35.3693 deg
Loaded 9883 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6521 out of 7921 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7921 out of 92293 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.781221
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.781221
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 53 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
1.8 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.0 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
2.0 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
15.6 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.rdhEg2CSwW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=6631, passed=92272
Got 92272 stars (including 85483 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 92272 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XQe3Hd8U22 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=37, blended=6656, passed=92132
Got 92132 stars (including 85329 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 92132 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nVpTbW9Sxs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=3741, passed=66491
Got 66491 stars (including 62639 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66491 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65996 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PjFIlCXk66 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=3536, passed=64314
Got 64314 stars (including 60676 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64314 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-29-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-13_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_003143_TTUQ1b1x1_20100_LH3iEvP4/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109312.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109319.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out110610.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out111052.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out111683.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112209.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112550.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112578.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112693.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112709.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out112417.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out110284.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out111334.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109309_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 109309_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:07.15 +31:19:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109311_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 109311_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:05.85 +34:59:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109312_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 109312_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:58:51.27 +33:49:46.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.80)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109317_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 109317_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:42:38.53 +33:13:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109318_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 109318_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:57:12.64 +32:52:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109319_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 109319_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:11:16.84 +31:53:27.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.58)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.615 901883831548192768 122.81992307357 +31.89049073271 14.5326 13.9313 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.615#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109322_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 109322_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:12:52.76 +27:29:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109330_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 109330_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:22:33.65 +25:30:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109337_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 109337_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:23.08 +25:38:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109338_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 109338_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:08.04 +30:48:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109339_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 109339_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:23:52.62 +30:20:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109340_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 109340_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:12.54 +29:33:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109342_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 109342_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:31:52.20 +33:13:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109349_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 109349_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:44.62 +34:38:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109351_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 109351_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:21:36.41 +27:55:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109544_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 109544_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:52.11 +31:52:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109876_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 109876_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:23.76 +27:43:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110005_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 110005_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:37.15 +32:14:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110160_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 110160_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:48.87 +31:51:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110284_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
Preparing report for the candidate 110284_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110366_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 110366_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:30.08 +35:02:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110610_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 110610_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:54:56.10 +35:13:01.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.967 906637462695055872 118.73387977871 +35.21691979064 13.2387 12.6177 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.967#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110688_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 110688_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:17.76 +29:14:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110855_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 110855_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:34:06.23 +30:58:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110901_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 110901_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:06.81 +27:56:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110920_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 110920_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:32:53.00 +31:03:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111052_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 111052_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:33.73 +30:50:12.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.705 879846697949042048 113.39087433570 +30.83608281636 13.6356 12.9612 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.705#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111177_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 111177_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:35:11.11 +31:36:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111190_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 111190_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:35.18 +30:18:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111240_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 111240_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:02.18 +31:46:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111334_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
Preparing report for the candidate 111334_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111336_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 111336_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:10.67 +32:11:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111350_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 111350_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:09.41 +32:59:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111381_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 111381_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:55:58.46 +32:57:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111512_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 111512_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:54:34.25 +26:10:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111535_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 111535_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:24.17 +34:11:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111540_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 111540_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:23.18 +31:15:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111546_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 111546_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:33.99 +27:31:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111569_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 111569_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:34.66 +30:36:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111683_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 111683_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:36:50.32 +33:37:27.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.383 711093241001844352 129.20968118119 +33.62449462183 14.5767 14.0660 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.383#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111809_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 111809_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:02.27 +27:17:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112172_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 112172_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:28:37.77 +28:46:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112209_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 112209_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:55:32.35 +34:11:33.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.38)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.009 882340836997670912 118.88539477630 +34.19199614893 14.6912 14.1829 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.009#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112321_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 112321_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:21.73 +35:02:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112417_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 112417_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:18.13 +32:32:43.7 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.55)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112428_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 112428_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:29.65 +35:07:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112550_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 112550_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:44.92 +33:04:56.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.83, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.81)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.833 710840387686664960 127.43708043324 +33.08222462952 14.8364 14.1330 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.833#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112578_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 112578_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:22.02 +29:38:59.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.938 879066113413907840 115.84134863226 +29.64956206146 14.7266 13.8447 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.938#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112693_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 112693_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:57:10.42 +30:00:11.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.090 877406744208912768 119.29366365981 +30.00306344893 15.0873 14.5384 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.090#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112709_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 112709_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:50:41.35 +30:35:43.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.509 880542379573308928 117.67264448617 +30.59515549071 15.0963 14.6218 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.509#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30129_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
Preparing report for the candidate 30129_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44359_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 44359_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:11.04 +29:09:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69850_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 69850_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-30-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks