This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.1618* 05 42 46.50 +02 40 20.8 8.6 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3223331002410221056,2461143.6618,8.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3223331002410221056 20260413.1618 8.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.1618* 05 43 23.93 +02 48 50.0 10.0 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3223339665357493632,2461143.6618,9.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3223339665357493632 20260413.1618 9.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.1618* 05 42 40.23 +02 37 58.4 10.5 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3223330766185769344,2461143.6618,10.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3223330766185769344 20260413.1618 10.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.1618* 05 44 36.94 +02 36 46.0 10.8 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 12359780,2461143.6618,10.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 12359780 20260413.1618 10.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.1618* 05 45 43.89 +09 35 31.6 10.8 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1622 Ori,2461143.6618,10.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1622 Ori 20260413.1618 10.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61820597 22.02.2026 02:50:02.996 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
First image: 2461093.61820597 22.02.2026 02:50:02.996 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Last image: 2461143.66209638 13.04.2026 03:53:15.127 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.03
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 19497
Objects passed selection criteria: 19300
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.1 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.1 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10731.2
Average stars matched: 10456.5 (97.4397 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 124932 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 12 22:55:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61820597 22.02.2026 02:50:02.996 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
First image: 2461093.61820597 22.02.2026 02:50:02.996 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Last image: 2461143.66209638 13.04.2026 03:53:15.127 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 92
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.75
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 102299
Objects passed selection criteria: 101919
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 59836
Average stars matched: 56276.2 (94.0508 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1938376 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 12 22:57:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461143.66150348
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits'
wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits'
wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits'
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:01.229 +05:58:54.85
Second-epoch image center 06:00:02.970 +06:00:16.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0239 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:01.229 +05:58:54.85
Second-epoch image center 06:00:01.485 +06:00:26.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0255 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:02.970 +06:00:16.71
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:01.485 +06:00:26.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00675 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.l1IczcOIhb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CijNT1T8Hu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XmRGAk6uMj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits &> /tmp/tmp.r6KI83ieLG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 570 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
The reference image (wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 24599 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.8299 to 98.3000 deg, Dec +0.1350 to +11.7310 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.8299 to 98.3000 deg, Dec 0.1350 to 11.7310 deg
Loaded 15430 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10580 out of 11377 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11377 out of 24599 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.989016
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.989016
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.03
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.96
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.96
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
3.3 pix Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
3.1 pix Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
2.8 pix fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
2.9 pix fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
15.0 mag. Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
10.4 mag. fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
10.9 mag. fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 10.4 (SNR ) 9.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.l1IczcOIhb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2007, passed=24599
Got 24599 stars (including 22579 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24599 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.1 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.88"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24221 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.86"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.1 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24224 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.86"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24224 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.99"
Excluding outliers - 907 stars left (next iteration limit 997)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CijNT1T8Hu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2250, passed=24635
Got 24635 stars (including 22363 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24635 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.1 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.92"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.86"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.1 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.86"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.96"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits -region wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XmRGAk6uMj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=35, passed=1135
Got 1135 stars (including 1099 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1135 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.91"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1080 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.92"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1081 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.01"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1081 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.04"
Excluding outliers - 862 stars left (next iteration limit 948)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.r6KI83ieLG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=34, passed=1142
Got 1142 stars (including 1106 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1142 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.88"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1086 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.88"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1085 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.94"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1084 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.96"
Excluding outliers - 860 stars left (next iteration limit 947)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ori-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31033.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30980_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 30980_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:59.70 +02:29:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31033_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
Preparing report for the candidate 31033_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ori-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:42:46.50 +02:40:20.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:01.229 +05:58:54.85
Second-epoch image center 06:00:02.970 +06:00:16.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0239 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:01.229 +05:58:54.85
Second-epoch image center 06:00:01.485 +06:00:26.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0255 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:02.970 +06:00:16.71
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:01.485 +06:00:26.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00675 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TtLUZv0ItA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vbM7kkWgTW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gnCgQvjKT8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RoG8ExkA8X
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 122831 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 81.8299 to 98.3294 deg, Dec +0.1228 to +11.7313 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 81.8299 to 98.3294 deg, Dec 0.1228 to 11.7313 deg
Loaded 15474 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9016 out of 11722 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11722 out of 122831 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.840122
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.840122
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.75
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 49 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
3.0 pix Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.7 pix Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
2.8 pix fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
2.9 pix fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
15.1 mag. Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
11.5 mag. fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
11.5 mag. fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 11.5 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.TtLUZv0ItA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=18049, passed=122812
Got 122812 stars (including 104658 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 122812 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.1 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.84"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.1 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.89"
Excluding outliers - 909 stars left (next iteration limit 999)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vbM7kkWgTW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=20673, passed=132109
Got 132109 stars (including 111310 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 132109 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.1 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.87"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.1 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.86"
Excluding outliers - 909 stars left (next iteration limit 999)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits -region wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gnCgQvjKT8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=289, passed=9030
Got 9030 stars (including 8732 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9030 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.86"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8561 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8561 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8561 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.95"
Excluding outliers - 860 stars left (next iteration limit 946)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RoG8ExkA8X (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=298, passed=9148
Got 9148 stars (including 8837 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9148 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.88"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8773 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.93"
Excluding outliers - 861 stars left (next iteration limit 948)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/wcs_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0033.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_225405_TTUQ2b1x1_1198_PUe8ljsC/wcs_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ori-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out146504.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out146523.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out146541.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out146553.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out146571.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out146614.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out146617.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out146670.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out146691.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out146701.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out146737.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out146744.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out146795.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out146837.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out146844.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out146869.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out146893.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out146919.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out146921.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out146949.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out146950.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out146964.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out146986.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out146641.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out146879.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out146983.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22377.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146361_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146361_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:52.82 +08:28:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146362_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146362_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:36.32 +05:47:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146363_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146363_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:26.39 +06:49:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146364_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146364_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:59.69 +02:29:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146393_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146393_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:13.25 +01:42:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146424_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146424_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:41.26 +02:14:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146429_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146429_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:46.47 +02:40:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146461_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146461_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:52.82 +03:33:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146462_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146462_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:00.85 +01:43:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146502_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146502_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146504_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146504_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:18.31 +02:04:01.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN= 9.24, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=10.22)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.055 3220038484775424512 086.82635069507 +02.06734252076 9.1093 8.7852 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.055#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146523_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146523_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:27.50 +02:18:33.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN= 9.32, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=10.30)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.902 3223083204270515968 086.61366043780 +02.30833155954 8.2198 6.8500 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.902#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146541_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146541_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:02.25 +02:12:02.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN= 9.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=10.51)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.122 3223057430171436672 086.50944907944 +02.20110841085 9.3655 9.1092 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.122#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146553_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146553_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:12.12 +01:41:40.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN= 9.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=10.63)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.843 3220011095766915072 086.80040268699 +01.69514144719 9.6381 9.3706 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.843#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146571_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146571_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:36.84 +03:40:54.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN= 9.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=10.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.720 3224206763419887872 085.65366663872 +03.68177797437 8.9961 8.6632 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.720#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146614_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146614_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:30.68 +02:08:38.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN= 9.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=10.87)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.101 3223045752155715200 086.62759941943 +02.14371929127 9.7207 8.9356 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.101#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146617_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146617_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:26.17 +02:10:10.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN= 9.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=10.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.937 3223046022737439232 086.60878759235 +02.16949789364 9.7958 9.0472 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.937#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146641_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
Preparing report for the candidate 146641_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146670_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146670_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:22.33 +03:15:40.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN= 9.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=10.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.183 3223435971409180928 085.59271882176 +03.26198987353 9.7888 9.4073 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.183#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146691_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146691_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:57.46 +02:48:01.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN= 9.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=10.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.983 3223348289651932416 086.23961475301 +02.80011736338 9.8113 9.5054 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.983#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146701_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146701_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:04.77 +02:48:58.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.06, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.04)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146737_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146737_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:29.80 +03:33:13.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN= 9.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=10.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.714 3319527171643133696 085.87397390442 +03.55361835051 9.5847 9.1751 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.714#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146744_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146744_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:06.05 +03:20:05.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.02)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.745 3223429275555059072 086.02505364342 +03.33558006614 9.7358 9.4958 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.745#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146795_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146795_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:23.45 +01:53:36.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.281 3222996514650518144 085.84806405806 +01.89351457276 10.4190 10.1897 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.281#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146837_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146837_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:51.49 +02:18:32.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.383 3223063447420972032 086.46387967418 +02.30889205965 10.3678 9.4184 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.383#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146844_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146844_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:27.60 +02:05:09.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.51)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.094 3223005723060517120 086.11429619614 +02.08533931625 10.4641 9.6323 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.094#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146869_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146869_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:27.83 +02:01:28.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.327 3220037282184583168 086.86559782444 +02.02457832833 10.5614 10.1898 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.327#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146879_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
Preparing report for the candidate 146879_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146893_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146893_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:32.88 +01:48:20.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.775 3220026145332314112 086.63663267456 +01.80605143001 10.5684 10.2607 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.775#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146919_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146919_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:24.50 +02:34:13.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.68, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.66)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.435 3223132922811824000 086.10150821358 +02.56965482146 10.4279 9.4984 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.435#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146921_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146921_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.99 +02:23:35.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.42, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.40)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.974 3223085467717939328 086.73721550825 +02.39328623593 10.2606 9.7984 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.974#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146949_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146949_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:44.05 +02:49:38.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.55, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.53)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.491 3223339974595267328 085.93217780858 +02.82796414269 10.2042 9.1768 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.491#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146950_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146950_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:11.37 +02:02:18.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.878 3223042694139022976 086.54715270442 +02.03794472572 10.7070 9.7643 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.878#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146959_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146959_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:37.93 +01:45:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146964_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146964_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:26.00 +03:10:54.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.55, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.53)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.008 3223379247776002176 086.10835862764 +03.18208440767 10.3963 9.9892 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.008#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146983_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
Preparing report for the candidate 146983_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146986_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 146986_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:01.05 +01:54:49.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.79)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.215 3220034567765292544 086.75385132598 +01.91353773341 10.8452 9.8927 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.215#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22377_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
Preparing report for the candidate 22377_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135634_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 135634_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28092_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 28092_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26141_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 26141_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73479_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 73479_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:58.19 +05:25:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42187_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 42187_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:10.41 +07:24:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119499_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 119499_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:58.27 +04:09:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64666_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 64666_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:00.16 +06:27:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99896_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 99896_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:57.88 +02:29:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16992_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 16992_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:22.88 +09:38:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106737_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 106737_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:26.34 +01:51:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77939_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331
The candidate 77939_fd_Ori-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-12_22-53-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0331 did not pass the final checks