This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.1613* 04 30 13.42 +29 16 56.9 10.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 153039962614858496,2461143.6613,10.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 153039962614858496 20260413.1613 10.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.1613* 04 30 36.02 +29 29 24.1 10.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 153090196552317824,2461143.6613,10.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 153090196552317824 20260413.1613 10.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.1613* 04 32 59.97 +29 12 31.4 11.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 152839366166976256,2461143.6613,11.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 152839366166976256 20260413.1613 11.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.1613* 04 35 20.43 +28 35 57.2 11.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 152746594872089088,2461143.6613,11.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 152746594872089088 20260413.1613 11.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.1613* 04 35 25.82 +28 45 30.0 11.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 158756461006500480,2461143.6613,11.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 158756461006500480 20260413.1613 11.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.1613* 04 28 54.12 +29 50 41.2 11.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 165124179519810688,2461143.6613,11.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 165124179519810688 20260413.1613 11.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.1613* 04 30 51.09 +29 06 38.3 11.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 153022336069207424,2461143.6613,11.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 153022336069207424 20260413.1613 11.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.1613* 04 31 10.06 +30 13 50.2 11.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 159136406697621120,2461143.6613,11.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 159136406697621120 20260413.1613 11.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.1613* 04 29 04.99 +29 40 36.3 11.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 153110223983220608,2461143.6613,11.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 153110223983220608 20260413.1613 11.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.1613* 04 35 29.50 +28 10 10.4 11.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 151968243719893888,2461143.6613,11.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 151968243719893888 20260413.1613 11.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.1613* 04 34 20.23 +28 54 27.0 11.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 152769379674947712,2461143.6613,11.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 152769379674947712 20260413.1613 11.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.1613* 04 33 42.11 +29 55 02.2 11.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 159087104769230976,2461143.6613,11.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 159087104769230976 20260413.1613 11.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.1613* 04 34 40.76 +29 48 02.9 11.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 159070985755042816,2461143.6613,11.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 159070985755042816 20260413.1613 11.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.1613* 04 34 04.07 +28 24 30.0 11.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 152736978441888000,2461143.6613,11.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 152736978441888000 20260413.1613 11.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.1613* 04 30 31.80 +30 38 41.4 11.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 171191181603225344,2461143.6613,11.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 171191181603225344 20260413.1613 11.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.1613* 04 33 54.18 +28 54 00.3 11.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 152816761754167936,2461143.6613,11.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 152816761754167936 20260413.1613 11.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.1613* 04 28 33.99 +29 55 15.9 11.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J067.1554+29.9237,2461143.6613,11.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J067.1554+29.9237 20260413.1613 11.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.1613* 04 31 01.22 +30 00 30.2 11.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 159125171062457600,2461143.6613,11.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 159125171062457600 20260413.1613 11.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 13.1613* 04 31 44.69 +29 35 12.1 11.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J043144.60+293513.0,2461143.6613,11.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J043144.60+293513.0 20260413.1613 11.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
First image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Last image: 2461143.66159602 13.04.2026 03:52:31.896 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15102
Objects passed selection criteria: 14957
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.1 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.1 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8566.75
Average stars matched: 8276.25 (96.609 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 120368 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 12 22:55:15 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
First image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Last image: 2461143.66159602 13.04.2026 03:52:31.896 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 96
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 124173
Objects passed selection criteria: 123676
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.1 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.1 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 72890.8
Average stars matched: 69475 (95.3139 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2250420 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Apr 12 15:05:06 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-12-g393f88de
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-12)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 12 22:57:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461143.66092522
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 04:59:55.524 +29:59:00.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0234 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 04:59:57.783 +29:58:57.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0179 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:59:55.524 +29:59:00.82
Second-epoch second image center 04:59:57.783 +29:58:57.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00819 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IETC5PauIy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mHJap62IhL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oGMKS0M3FV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits &> /tmp/tmp.o7Z6GH0BEA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16419 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5643 to 84.6649 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.3019 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5643 to 84.6649 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.3019 deg
Loaded 8463 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6027 out of 6737 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6737 out of 16419 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.972082
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.972082
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
1.8 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
11.8 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
11.9 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 11.8 (SNR ) 9.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.IETC5PauIy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1510, passed=16419
Got 16419 stars (including 14877 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16419 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mHJap62IhL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1544, passed=16335
Got 16335 stars (including 14759 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16335 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oGMKS0M3FV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=36, passed=898
Got 898 stars (including 862 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 898 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 813 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 734 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 813 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 810 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 810 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 811 stars left (next iteration limit 892)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.o7Z6GH0BEA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=37, passed=841
Got 841 stars (including 803 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 841 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 754 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 753 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 689 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 753 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 764 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 754 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 753 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 753 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 753 stars left (next iteration limit 828)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21140_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 21140_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:17.83 +27:46:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21150_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 21150_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:43.08 +27:16:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21151_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 21151_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:11.05 +25:44:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04068_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 04068_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:59.76 +33:09:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11761_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 11761_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:38.05 +28:57:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07321_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 07321_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:06.50 +31:26:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11648_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 11648_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:17.08 +28:36:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05409_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 05409_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:43.50 +32:11:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 04:59:55.524 +29:59:00.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0234 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 04:59:57.783 +29:58:57.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0179 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:59:55.524 +29:59:00.82
Second-epoch second image center 04:59:57.783 +29:58:57.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00819 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.artdIaPLDC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5U6atiNnj1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Rh2HF2CyBU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ExPbtEUwoI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 137583 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5579 to 84.6894 deg, Dec +24.3186 to +35.3036 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5579 to 84.6894 deg, Dec 24.3186 to 35.3036 deg
Loaded 8491 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4933 out of 6876 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6876 out of 137583 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825942
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825942
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 73 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.7 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
1.7 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
12.1 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
12.0 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.0 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.artdIaPLDC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=14362, passed=137559
Got 137559 stars (including 122963 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 137559 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5U6atiNnj1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=14447, passed=138047
Got 138047 stars (including 123396 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 138047 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Rh2HF2CyBU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=221, passed=9240
Got 9240 stars (including 8997 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9240 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ExPbtEUwoI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=185, passed=8508
Got 8508 stars (including 8303 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8508 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7783 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-51-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-12_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_225413_TTUQ1b1x1_30362_roxiPhS4/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160919.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160949.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160951.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160962.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160979.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160998.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160999.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161003.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161010.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161012.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161014.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161037.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161054.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161060.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161085.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161143.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161151.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out124500.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out125497.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out129124.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out132284.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out134363.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out136664.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out71194.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78199.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81795.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82846.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out83423.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84013.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out85370.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out86656.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out88329.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out89615.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92659.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out94277.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out95374.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 28s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160898_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 160898_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:25.58 +29:01:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160901_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 160901_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:17.83 +27:46:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160911_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 160911_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:11.05 +25:44:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160913_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 160913_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:43.08 +27:16:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160919_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 160919_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:50.46 +27:11:47.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN= 9.37, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=10.35)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.649 151803836666634624 067.70973501897 +27.19660754736 8.3938 7.2389 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.649#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160940_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 160940_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:54.62 +25:34:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160944_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 160944_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:19.00 +27:50:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160949_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 160949_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:16.77 +27:27:17.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.06, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.04)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.410 152577033860005888 067.31975312429 +27.45477012088 9.7680 8.9887 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.410#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160951_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 160951_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:05.69 +25:26:00.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.05, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.03)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.770 148026258311139968 068.77348182471 +25.43339555046 9.1922 7.9522 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.770#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160962_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 160962_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:49.45 +28:56:05.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.25)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.281 152946126167768320 066.45603667140 +28.93493904011 10.1921 9.8259 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.281#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160966_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 160966_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:45.35 +28:16:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160972_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 160972_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:44.60 +25:53:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160979_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 160979_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:46.92 +26:24:25.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.851 151330389535843968 067.94528687931 +26.40711179567 9.4166 8.3207 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.851#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160982_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 160982_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:59.51 +25:43:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160987_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 160987_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:40.15 +25:18:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160996_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 160996_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:46.83 +25:24:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160998_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 160998_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:55.91 +25:21:33.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.51)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.265 148001377564680576 068.73293401895 +25.35968411838 10.0380 9.0287 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.265#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160999_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 160999_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:33.02 +28:26:57.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.61)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.669 152916508075102592 066.38765584824 +28.44939685260 10.3483 9.7062 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.669#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161003_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 161003_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:57.36 +25:37:09.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.248 148041887696046336 068.73896511696 +25.61927217429 10.1789 9.0883 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.248#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161005_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 161005_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.67 +34:09:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161010_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 161010_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:27.97 +29:15:22.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.867 164999350589080832 066.36626823090 +29.25636580272 10.0868 8.8832 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.867#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161012_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 161012_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:34.33 +26:27:34.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.099 151148699534856960 068.14195111376 +26.46019722944 10.3973 9.7361 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.099#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161014_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 161014_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:00.21 +28:37:09.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.867 152922933346084096 066.75061501510 +28.61928378952 10.2017 9.0498 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.867#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161018_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 161018_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.51 +34:26:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161037_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 161037_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:00.78 +28:31:34.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.79)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.579 152875104590301440 066.75316271053 +28.52605315749 10.5461 9.6588 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.579#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161050_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 161050_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:11.16 +31:27:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161052_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 161052_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.45 +34:07:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161054_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 161054_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:24.64 +28:56:26.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.464 164955743786013568 066.35271741312 +28.94067642484 10.8008 9.8964 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.464#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161060_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 161060_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:59.33 +28:27:52.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.09, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.07)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.113 152872561969676672 066.74724277658 +28.46454701753 11.1804 10.5198 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.113#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161063_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 161063_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:08.26 +27:54:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161085_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 161085_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:23.11 +28:49:36.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.11, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.09)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.621 152943789707100160 066.34648449897 +28.82684098270 11.0839 10.4177 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.621#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161119_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 161119_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:09.15 +26:41:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161143_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 161143_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:10.38 +25:12:53.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.21, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.19)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.334 147969392944300800 069.04322006067 +25.21468917807 10.9898 9.7793 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.334#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161151_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 161151_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:27.81 +25:27:00.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.17, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.15)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.357 147982484004552704 069.11576598347 +25.45012750128 11.2488 10.3362 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.357#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92659_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 92659_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89615_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 89615_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83635_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 83635_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94277_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 94277_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134363_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 134363_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133823_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 133823_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:57.47 +28:30:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136664_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 136664_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84013_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 84013_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95374_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 95374_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78199_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 78199_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86656_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 86656_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129124_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 129124_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124500_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 124500_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83423_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 83423_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47553_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 47553_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.21 +32:10:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85370_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 85370_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132284_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 132284_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71194_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 71194_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125497_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 125497_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82846_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 82846_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81795_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 81795_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88329_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 88329_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32100_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 32100_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:59.70 +33:09:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39005_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 39005_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:24.16 +32:41:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134083_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 134083_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:19.83 +28:36:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33881_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 33881_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:43.09 +32:44:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25529_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 25529_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:10.44 +33:22:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102227_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 102227_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:23.18 +25:13:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74326_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 74326_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:52.05 +30:21:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93270_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 93270_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:17.07 +28:36:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21327_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 21327_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:00.00 +33:44:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104227_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 104227_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:16.47 +25:08:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18121_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 18121_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:00.83 +33:57:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42636_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 42636_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:43.49 +32:11:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96942_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 96942_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:38.01 +28:57:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72745_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 72745_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:08.23 +30:12:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09589_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 09589_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:48.79 +34:23:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07989_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 07989_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:38.68 +34:28:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56975_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 56975_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-12_22-52-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
