######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 3000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 2000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Dra-02-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Dra-02-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Dra-02-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 793251 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 793251 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.png' -> 'transient_report/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits_preview.png'
Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits

renamed 'Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.png' -> 'transient_report/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits_preview.png'
Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 664.6096
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 615.8460
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1174.0173
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 590.1619
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1176.4363
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 594.0444
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.76648
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.007
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 15.2399997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 15.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-10T04:44:49.3338909' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-10T09:44:49.3338909' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61140.4061265392 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-10T09:44:59.2355064' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61140.4062411459 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 299.997324115159 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 77.5000257161781 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 39.8380555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 13.5663888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.55883254121694 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Dra-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '20 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20299 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20299 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 15.2399997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 15.2399997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 82.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.39 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 15.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 37.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 13.701096 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/d_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits :)
Spent 0.620058 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/d_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37165.080609
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23810.0, right_median=27365.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 15.0900001525879 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 15.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-10T04:48:55.8429333' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-10T09:48:55.8429333' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61140.4089796529 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-10T09:49:05.7452157' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61140.4090942708 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 299.997322995606 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 77.5000257482825 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 40.0375 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 13.4416666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.55239394612235 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Dra-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '20 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20355 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20355 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 15.0900001525879 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 15.0900001525879 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 82.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.39 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 15.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 37.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 13.701096 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/d_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits :)
Spent 0.592919 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-02.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/d_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37165.080609
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23810.0, right_median=27365.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits

fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461140.90624228
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits'
wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits'
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:00:00.947 +77:30:25.41
Second-epoch image center 20:00:00.993 +77:30:11.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0038 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:00:00.947 +77:30:25.41
Second-epoch image center 19:59:21.162 +77:28:46.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0452 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:00:00.993 +77:30:11.82
Second-epoch second image center 19:59:21.162 +77:28:46.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.04304 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.u0vz4Bi2zJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tmKjFQJNmY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GjMIsviFgd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pNOipxPovY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 12067 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 252.4096 to 346.4619 deg, Dec +70.4651 to +82.7909 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 252.4096 to 346.4619 deg, Dec 70.4651 to 82.7909 deg
Loaded 14571 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6915 out of 7265 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7265 out of 12067 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.869160
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.869160
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Magnitude calibration plot:

____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
2.4 pix Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
3.5 pix fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
2.6 pix fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
15.1 mag. Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.u0vz4Bi2zJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=797, passed=12067
Got 12067 stars (including 11253 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12067 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits -region wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tmKjFQJNmY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=800, passed=12084
Got 12084 stars (including 11268 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12084 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11833 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GjMIsviFgd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1022, passed=10149
Got 10149 stars (including 9120 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10149 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pNOipxPovY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=630, passed=10342
Got 10342 stars (including 9704 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10342 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 924.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 924.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012836 (46.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010269 (37.0 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 245 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 204 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 198 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2385 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 296 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 272 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.22"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 271 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.31"
Excluding outliers - 271 stars left (next iteration limit 217)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20778_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297
The candidate 20778_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 10.40910 | 2461140.90910 | 12.17 | 18:17:49.71 +77:17:54.2 | 1509 3900 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20838_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297
The candidate 20838_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 10.40910 | 2461140.90910 | 12.41 | 18:27:46.46 +73:12:00.1 | 0786 1476 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20850_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297
The candidate 20850_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 10.40910 | 2461140.90910 | 12.43 | 18:35:43.96 +73:25:34.2 | 1165 1469 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20856_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297
The candidate 20856_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 10.40910 | 2461140.90910 | 12.47 | 18:17:09.31 +75:01:27.8 | 0864 2673 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20877_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297
The candidate 20877_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 10.40910 | 2461140.90910 | 12.53 | 18:51:45.77 +72:38:07.7 | 1671 0774 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20879_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297
The candidate 20879_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 10.40910 | 2461140.90910 | 12.46 | 19:11:04.50 +73:02:48.5 | 2574 0770 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (84.6") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:00:00.947 +77:30:25.41
Second-epoch image center 20:00:00.993 +77:30:11.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0038 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:00:00.947 +77:30:25.41
Second-epoch image center 19:59:21.162 +77:28:46.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0452 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:00:00.993 +77:30:11.82
Second-epoch second image center 19:59:21.162 +77:28:46.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.04304 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qDjxNXJvHU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WYcYb9mK89
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xAtdFN6ErZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Pjbbax6yG2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 74965 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 252.0295 to 346.5832 deg, Dec +70.4215 to +82.7934 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 252.0295 to 346.5832 deg, Dec 70.4215 to 82.7934 deg
Loaded 14717 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6431 out of 7491 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7491 out of 74965 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.711257
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.711257
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Magnitude calibration plot:

____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 12 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
2.1 pix Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
3.3 pix fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
2.1 pix fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
15.3 mag. Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.qDjxNXJvHU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=5016, passed=74949
Got 74949 stars (including 69842 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 74949 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73599 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73600 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73600 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits -region wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WYcYb9mK89 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh: line 129: echo: write error: Broken pipe
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=5096, passed=74368
Got 74368 stars (including 69181 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 74368 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72978 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72978 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xAtdFN6ErZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=5423, passed=46879
Got 46879 stars (including 41422 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46879 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Pjbbax6yG2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=3986, passed=65846
Got 65846 stars (including 61769 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 65846 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 924.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 924.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012836 (46.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010269 (37.0 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 227 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 147 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.94"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 172 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13034 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 273 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 240 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13063 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 238 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17039 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.00"
Excluding outliers - 238 stars left (next iteration limit 189)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-44-49_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0296.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out91264.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89760_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297
The candidate 89760_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 10.40910 | 2461140.90910 | 13.88 | 19:06:32.43 +75:07:16.2 | 2697 2054 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90235_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297
The candidate 90235_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 10.40910 | 2461140.90910 | 12.57 | 20:04:46.33 +73:29:02.4 | 4957 0738 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (236.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90591_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297
The candidate 90591_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 10.40910 | 2461140.90910 | 13.81 | 18:32:52.92 +74:38:21.8 | 1336 2200 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91117_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297
The candidate 91117_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 10.40910 | 2461140.90910 | 14.19 | 18:34:03.81 +75:03:47.7 | 1479 2420 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91164_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297
The candidate 91164_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 10.40910 | 2461140.90910 | 14.52 | 18:00:48.33 +78:28:12.9 | 1367 4787 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91181_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297
The candidate 91181_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 10.40910 | 2461140.90910 | 14.42 | 19:02:22.14 +75:28:38.9 | 2598 2303 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91252_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297
The candidate 91252_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 10.40910 | 2461140.90910 | 14.46 | 18:53:35.09 +72:52:47.0 | 1791 0891 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91264_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297
The candidate 91264_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 10.40910 | 2461140.90910 | 14.59 | 18:04:29.34 +76:25:24.5 | 0843 3649 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits |
**** FOUND 18:04:29.17 +76:25:21.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.944 2269236491850837504 271.12078167406 +76.42184090629 14.5580 14.0682 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.944#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91305_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297
The candidate 91305_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 10.40910 | 2461140.90910 | 14.83 | 19:04:25.52 +81:00:53.5 | 3551 5536 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (80.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91315_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297
The candidate 91315_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 10.40910 | 2461140.90910 | 14.75 | 18:39:24.48 +79:07:32.2 | 2570 4641 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91320_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297
The candidate 91320_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 04 10.40910 | 2461140.90910 | 14.61 | 18:32:05.84 +77:36:47.6 | 2016 3875 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12352_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297
The candidate 12352_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 04 10.40910 | 2461140.90910 | 12.38 | 18:35:49.08 +73:25:45.6 | 1165 1469 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_050353_TTUQ2b1x1_640_9X8FrdB2/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-48-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Dra-02-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
18:04:29.17 +76:25:21.5
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461140.90624228 -observatory V36
23:39:16.12 -04:49:10.0 Mercury (0.2mag)
02:41:33.66 +15:38:56.6 Venus (-3.9mag)
00:01:56.09 -00:53:15.4 Mars (1.2mag)
07:10:15.44 +22:50:02.1 Jupiter (-2.1mag)
00:26:40.35 +00:33:16.1 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:46:32.85 +19:43:46.2 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:10:05.98 -00:20:03.3 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:28.88 -22:52:27.1 Pluto (14.5mag)
19:42:21.06 -25:49:45.5 Moon (-10.3mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Apr 10 05:12 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461140.90624228:
07:10:07.88 +22:50:17.8 Io (5.7mag)
07:10:18.77 +22:49:52.1 Europa (5.9mag)
07:10:10.11 +22:50:05.5 Ganymede (5.3mag)
07:09:56.38 +22:50:47.8 Callisto (6.6mag)
07:13:49.51 +22:40:21.9 Himalia (15.3mag)
07:10:18.53 +22:49:57.2 Thebe (16.2mag)
07:13:53.31 +23:09:55.9 Elara (17.3mag)
07:08:45.49 +23:32:58.0 Pasiphae (17.4mag)
07:18:42.32 +22:47:28.1 Carme (18.5mag)
00:26:50.78 +00:33:07.7 Titan (8.8mag)
00:26:38.08 +00:33:32.0 Rhea (10.1mag)
00:26:31.39 +00:34:17.2 Iapetus (11.5mag)
00:26:54.25 +00:33:05.6 Hyperion (14.8mag)
00:28:21.54 +00:42:39.8 Phoebe (16.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Apr 10 05:12 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461140.90624228:
15:10:12.68 -12:01:53.1 JWST
20:13:29.52 -03:44:37.5 Chandra
08:48:13.63 -49:39:48.1 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Apr 10 05:12 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461140.90624228 -observatory V36
-> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180]
18:49:26.61 -28:27:40.8 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:02:50.33 -69:56:00.2 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:31:18.70 +31:24:03.1 17.2mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:30:50.66 +09:52:47.4 17.6mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:08:39.30 +29:00:55.8 17.0mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
04:22:46.46 +25:53:02.0 15.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:02:23.24 +31:58:05.9 16.2mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:30:20.52 -00:45:29.5 17.3mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:54:54.84 +18:03:29.5 17.5mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:42:23.01 -11:36:08.8 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
09:10:25.56 -12:47:40.6 17.6mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS)
21:48:19.54 +62:35:26.9 17.5mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
19:23:38.16 -03:39:09.6 14.2mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
21:40:23.88 +85:09:09.3 17.8mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:15:39.26 +63:32:45.6 17.1mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
05:00:56.17 +16:18:09.0 10.7mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
16:22:43.67 +05:28:17.0 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:19:05.06 +13:46:38.5 14.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
03:21:24.44 -23:15:02.2 16.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:12:03.50 +46:42:42.8 17.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
14:02:02.47 +41:18:56.6 14.9mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
03:16:37.16 -25:21:36.1 17.8mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS)
23:07:45.01 +19:41:36.1 9.4mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:56:33.10 +02:39:53.4 17.5mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
02:32:49.46 +03:27:13.7 11.1mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS)
23:43:25.63 +36:08:21.6 14.4mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
18:32:01.68 -10:00:44.0 12.2mag 10P/Tempel
15:07:42.27 +03:45:18.3 13.5mag 24P/Schaumasse
11:04:24.31 -01:42:48.3 15.7mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
17:58:55.49 -09:49:25.2 17.8mag 40P/Vaisala
10:38:04.27 -04:33:55.7 16.8mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
01:40:02.05 +16:31:41.5 17.2mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
07:00:38.03 +38:12:06.5 17.0mag 63P/Wild
23:21:51.13 -12:07:51.2 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
03:48:29.82 +19:17:14.3 15.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
00:53:15.98 +07:07:27.0 14.4mag 78P/Gehrels
22:45:50.40 -11:02:29.2 14.6mag 88P/Howell
01:54:43.86 +19:07:33.2 15.1mag 93P/Lovas
04:44:26.51 +31:58:39.8 16.3mag 123P/West-Hartley
08:22:05.83 +40:56:35.3 16.2mag 124P/Mrkos
02:24:37.15 +13:44:24.5 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
02:36:35.69 +13:47:51.5 17.5mag 131P/Mueller
00:57:08.22 +11:13:35.9 10.9mag 141P/Machholz
01:06:45.21 +02:46:19.2 11.0mag 141P-A/Machholz
23:54:55.07 -01:04:46.1 13.5mag 141P-D/Machholz
01:36:29.73 +04:29:42.9 17.9mag 141P-I/Machholz
00:46:49.03 -04:19:44.5 15.2mag 162P/SidingSpring
10:29:47.79 +31:14:08.9 17.9mag 164P/Christensen
06:26:10.20 +24:24:53.6 17.9mag 198P/ODAS
15:01:21.22 -00:40:56.2 17.5mag 210P/Christensen
21:22:12.10 -12:48:06.0 17.5mag 218P/LINEAR
17:14:42.08 -14:35:43.1 16.2mag 235P/LINEAR
05:22:30.32 +34:14:40.1 16.7mag 240P/NEAT
07:35:54.03 -05:47:25.5 17.7mag 242P/Spahr
15:44:40.00 +06:36:37.7 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
07:32:11.57 +21:20:28.8 17.6mag 450P/LONEOS
05:27:48.82 +45:21:38.7 17.5mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K Apr 10 05:12 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.48
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74
06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48
11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95
10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53
20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83
06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93
07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78
19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2
04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS
11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2
07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8
16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12
13:01:19.46 +15:42:15.50 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.34 -0.18
09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06
03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00 SN2026evh 2026-03-12.05 17.29
06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10 AT2026ffp 2026-03-12.16 0.37
14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50 AT2026fij 2026-03-12.05 15.97
10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10 SN 2026exe 2026-03-11.78 16.48
18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00 SN2026ess 2026-03-12.37 17.37
13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80 AT2026ewa 2026-03-12.42 16.77
15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20 ASASSN-26bp 2026-03-11.92 13.33
13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20 AT2024cmo 2026-03-11.12 16.29
13:06:01.97 -15:50:14.40 AT2026fdy 2026-03-10.33 16.68
11:30:09.70 -47:26:45.00 ASASSN-26bn 2026-03-10.3 15.14
05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40 (= Gaia 2026-03-9.09 14.32
03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70 ASASSN-26bm 2026-03-8.04 15.22
04:31:00.53 -68:29:50.20 ASASSN-26bl 2026-03-7.9 10.26
16:18:17.61 +41:25:11.40 SN 2026dkf 2026-03-6.31 16.7
13:45:00.35 +61:16:50.90 SN 2026ejl 2026-03-6.41 -0.66
09:27:45.33 -37:49:33.00 ASASSN-26bk 2026-03-2.06 13.58
20:22:01.20 +23:47:47.30 ASASSN-26bi 2026-02-28.51 15.86
11:16:22.10 +29:26:22.80 AT2026enm 2026-02-28.39 16.88
08:05:59.83 -48:39:35.60 ASASSN-26bh 2026-02-26.05 14.64
13:24:27.02 -45:57:01.40 ASASSN-26bg 2026-02-26.35 15.28
17:27:50.95 -68:28:46.40 ASASSN-26bf 2026-02-26.3 16.28
18:03:39.29 +19:58:46.30 ASASSN-26be 2026-02-25.56 14.95
17:40:18.19 +07:20:59.60 SN 2026crm 2026-02-24.34 16.9
18:38:36.11 -79:28:58.40 ASASSN-26bb 2026-02-24.36 16.11
17:43:29.75 +11:24:00.60 ASASSN-26bc 2026-02-23.37 -3.37
16:59:41.08 -80:01:51.20 ASASSN-26bd 2026-02-23.3 14.38
11:23:31.77 -08:39:15.40 SN2026cff 2026-02-23.15 -1.08
14:55:17.39 -05:56:05.30 SN2026dmk 2026-02-23.22 -0.76
12:28:15.19 +44:27:20.80 SN2026cjz 2026-02-23.47 15.62
12:12:29.55 -02:40:43.30 AT2026dsk 2026-02-23.4 17.21
09:21:05.29 +06:11:42.80 SN2026chr 2026-02-23.1 17.39
16:05:38.61 +18:06:07.40 SN 2026dsy 2026-02-23.36 17.15
04:55:50.66 -29:52:57.70 SN 2026dpg 2026-02-23.11 15.75
04:21:28.18 -53:22:54.40 AT2026drl 2026-02-21.03 17.31
11:50:37.32 +55:21:13.70 SN 2026dix 2026-02-21.43 16.39
16:21:19.69 -63:47:29.40 ASASSN-26az 2026-02-21.03 17.02
02:45:30.93 -54:17:43.10 SN 2026cju 2026-02-21.04 17.54
01:58:40.68 +47:34:50.10 ASASSN-26av 2026-02-21.09 15.97
18:35:53.01 -42:31:38.90 ASASSN-26aw 2026-02-21.12 15.89
11:40:18.88 -39:45:09.20 ASASSN-26ax 2026-02-21.08 15.73
02:26:23.52 -51:42:29.80 ASASSN-26ay 2026-02-21.04 13.93
08:46:07.66 +01:17:43.90 ASASSN-26ba 2026-02-20.23 15.43
14:15:47.49 -48:05:16.60 SN2026dez 2026-02-19.31 15.91
17:25:53.90 -23:28:31.50 ASASSN-26au 2026-02-18.33 15.82
16:07:59.09 -24:00:10.00 SN2026cmv 2026-02-17.28 16.19
18:15:01.25 -37:43:36.70 ASASSN-26at 2026-02-16.36 15.94
13:01:07.22 -11:25:16.10 AT2026bzh 2026-02-12.16 17.22
10:56:29.81 -07:07:25.30 SN 2026bre 2026-02-12.16 17.15
08:55:43.51 -53:26:11.50 ASASSN-26as 2026-02-12.2 16.54
06:33:50.98 -41:46:25.10 ASASSN-26ar 2026-02-12.04 16.42
12:15:22.43 +23:59:39.60 SN2026bzg 2026-02-11.27 16.32
08:01:10.95 -03:43:14.30 AT2026coj 2026-02-9.25 13.73
12:44:00.18 -57:03:46.80 ASASSN-26aq 2026-02-9.18 16
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K Apr 10 05:12 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
06:57:11.19 -17:24:43.9 TCP J06571119-1724439 2026-01-18.5375 14.2mag
00:42:52.23 +41:01:44.7 PNV J00425223+4101447 2026-01-19.5505 18.74Cmag
09:54:46.47 +69:06:31.7 PNV J09544647+6906317 2026-01-26.8081 19.3mag
18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9 TCP J18085199-2616219 2026-01-31.8519 12.2mag
08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1 TCP J08011102-0343141 2026-02-08.8090 15.10Cmag
05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5 TCP J05191540-0204515 2026-02-13.4306 14.5mag
10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9 TCP J10524126+3640089 2026-02-17.6065 17.4mag
05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1 TCP J05505081+3622451 2026-02-17.5511 15.7mag
00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag
00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag
17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag
09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 187K Apr 10 05:12 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
10:34:23.750 +44:37:52.78 AT 2026ilj 2026-03-28.82 20.88
10:22:27.680 +34:19:20.03 AT 2026ili 2026-03-26.73 20.17
11:13:24.630 +35:18:50.10 AT 2026ilh 2026-03-26.72 20.38
11:08:00.250 +43:03:49.46 AT 2026ilg 2026-03-26.71 20.44
12:43:47.830 +50:53:50.11 AT 2026ilf 2026-03-24.69 20.5
11:22:31.710 +50:15:03.24 AT 2026ile 2026-03-24.66 21.56
11:51:00.240 +50:24:44.16 AT 2026ild 2026-03-24.66 22.08
16:09:39.700 +41:58:22.06 AT 2026ilc 2026-03-23.81 21.36
12:43:38.630 +34:06:30.25 AT 2026ilb 2026-03-22.71 21.66
13:18:04.360 +55:35:55.40 AT 2026ila 2026-03-19.80 21.3
10:59:06.280 +46:45:22.92 AT 2026ikz 2026-03-19.66 21.07
13:16:17.130 +52:30:17.46 AT 2026iky 2026-03-19.80 20.85
10:24:12.482 +42:11:55.90 AT 2026ikx 2026-03-07.58 21.39
10:41:54.510 -01:26:19.22 AT 2026ikw 2026-04-03.66 20.82
10:43:38.720 +04:39:38.40 AT 2026ikv 2026-03-22.64 22.16
10:34:06.300 +04:06:25.11 AT 2026iku 2026-03-19.63 22.6
11:40:08.790 +04:58:19.09 AT 2026ikt 2026-03-22.66 22.08
11:22:52.580 +02:15:24.51 AT 2026iks 2026-03-15.61 21.97
10:28:53.530 +01:08:32.24 AT 2026ikr 2026-03-15.59 22.4
11:00:12.130 -00:25:26.16 AT 2026ikq 2026-03-13.74 21.8
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Apr 10 05:12 tns_transients_list.txt