This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4088709501724217216,2461140.9104,12.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4088709501724217216 20260410.4104 12.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J191742-1854.2,2461140.9104,12.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J191742-1854.2 20260410.4104 12.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4101278809443501952,2461140.9104,12.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4101278809443501952 20260410.4104 12.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461140.9104,12.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260410.4104 12.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461140.9104,11.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260410.4104 11.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461118.99455619 19.03.2026 11:51:59.655 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
First image: 2461118.99455619 19.03.2026 11:51:59.655 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Last image: 2461140.91087486 10.04.2026 09:51:29.588 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.53
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9412
Objects passed selection criteria: 9399
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7639.25
Average stars matched: 7059.75 (92.4142 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115872 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 10 04:57:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461118.99455619 19.03.2026 11:51:59.655 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
First image: 2461118.99455619 19.03.2026 11:51:59.655 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Last image: 2461140.91087486 10.04.2026 09:51:29.588 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 58
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.17
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 37 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 89747
Objects passed selection criteria: 89633
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 80257.2
Average stars matched: 70973.2 (88.4322 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1874204 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Apr 8 18:56:33 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-5-g00c52b5f
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 10 04:59:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461140.91001795
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits'
wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits'
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:33:22.678 -18:00:40.27
Second-epoch image center 19:33:19.681 -18:00:27.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0124 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:33:22.678 -18:00:40.27
Second-epoch image center 19:33:22.728 -17:59:54.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0126 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:33:19.681 -18:00:27.47
Second-epoch second image center 19:33:22.728 -17:59:54.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01511 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Z2yno8dGXc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GvSDwqCU6o
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7ST9YroOog
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nK6Gf3rTxe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11017 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 284.7685 to 301.7245 deg, Dec -23.3021 to -12.5136 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 284.7685 to 301.7245 deg, Dec -23.3021 to -12.5136 deg
Loaded 13778 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8233 out of 8546 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8546 out of 11017 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.784657
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.784657
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.25
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.25
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
2.0 pix Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
2.7 pix fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits
2.7 pix fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
14.6 mag. Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Z2yno8dGXc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=800, passed=11017
Got 11017 stars (including 10207 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11017 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10657 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10657 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -region wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GvSDwqCU6o (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1081, passed=13469
Got 13469 stars (including 12369 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13469 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13040 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13040 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits -region wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7ST9YroOog (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=449, passed=5651
Got 5651 stars (including 5196 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5651 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013038 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010430 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5533 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nK6Gf3rTxe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=451, passed=5531
Got 5531 stars (including 5071 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5531 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013036 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010429 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5377 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5379 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5379 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01564_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 01564_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:27.13 -21:33:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:33:22.678 -18:00:40.27
Second-epoch image center 19:33:19.681 -18:00:27.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0124 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:33:22.678 -18:00:40.27
Second-epoch image center 19:33:22.728 -17:59:54.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0126 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:33:19.681 -18:00:27.47
Second-epoch second image center 19:33:22.728 -17:59:54.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01511 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits &> /tmp/tmp.B6LAEtaN1d
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits &> /tmp/tmp.X2PXbgMfSF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eLTTVibKJW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jUDuB8WvEE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits and wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 101850 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 284.7602 to 301.7245 deg, Dec -23.3064 to -12.5129 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 284.7602 to 301.7245 deg, Dec -23.3064 to -12.5129 deg
Loaded 13790 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10156 out of 11996 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11996 out of 101850 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.547522
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.547522
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.17
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.38
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.38
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 44 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
2.0 pix Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
2.3 pix fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.4 mag. Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
14.7 mag. Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.B6LAEtaN1d (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=8404, passed=101839
Got 101839 stars (including 93311 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 101839 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -region wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.X2PXbgMfSF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=12676, passed=138124
Got 138124 stars (including 125221 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 138124 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134051 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134051 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits -region wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eLTTVibKJW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=3479, passed=60452
Got 60452 stars (including 56908 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60452 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013038 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010430 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59053 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59011 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jUDuB8WvEE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=3486, passed=61091
Got 61091 stars (including 57528 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61091 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013036 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010429 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59580 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-51-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/wcs_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0390.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-50-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0298.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-10_CI_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_045348_TTUQ2b1x1_17825_PtGFD7Vz/wcs_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out148133.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out148138.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out148145.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out148153.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out148157.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out148163.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out148167.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out148183.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out148190.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out148196.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out148197.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out148199.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out148202.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out148205.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out148422.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out148487.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out148705.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148159.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148210.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148211.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148467.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36383.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 25s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148133_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148133_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:54.46 -16:54:15.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.548 4088345971398496896 286.47760936764 -16.90444251850 12.5494 11.8163 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.548#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148138_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148138_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:14:44.54 -15:16:37.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.20, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.18)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.731 4185008436641206912 288.68587230281 -15.27802590500 12.7974 12.2612 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.731#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148141_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148141_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:22:52.46 -18:00:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148145_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148145_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:12:50.33 -15:24:50.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.92)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148153_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148153_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:46:10.20 -14:19:26.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.01, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.99)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.829 4182489421146158336 296.54215078094 -14.32451789590 12.7705 11.9168 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.829#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148157_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148157_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:37.37 -13:57:54.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.06, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.04)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.914 4197388460853834112 286.90626417261 -13.96560348896 12.8108 12.4157 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.914#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148159_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
Preparing report for the candidate 148159_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148163_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148163_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:45.18 -17:12:05.1 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.91)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148167_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148167_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:12:27.21 -15:21:47.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.195 4184994349153761152 288.11387414124 -15.36367968596 12.4497 11.9350 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.195#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148174_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148174_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:46:32.22 -20:21:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148176_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148176_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:36.90 -18:35:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148179_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148179_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:48:35.97 -19:56:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148183_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148183_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:11:13.11 -22:06:30.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.52)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.298 4081159224108670976 287.80402769215 -22.10807073967 12.6096 11.8072 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.298#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148186_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148186_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:12.97 -15:35:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148190_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148190_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:11:51.82 -16:40:03.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.36)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148196_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148196_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:12:16.53 -15:11:53.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.42, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.40)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148197_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148197_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:11:33.46 -15:45:09.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.47)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148199_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148199_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:19.39 -16:13:54.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.30, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.28)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.279 4088765916123919616 287.08144587147 -16.23175527617 11.9870 11.2555 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.279#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148202_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148202_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:44.06 -13:45:47.8 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.42)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148203_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148203_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:12:44.16 -14:57:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148205_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148205_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:30.29 -14:42:54.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.14, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.12)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.173 4184712633656125696 290.12710360209 -14.71497462225 11.6794 10.6151 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.173#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148210_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
Preparing report for the candidate 148210_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148211_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
Preparing report for the candidate 148211_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148214_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148214_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:01.10 -19:35:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148300_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148300_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:42.99 -18:55:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148330_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148330_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:31:00.15 -21:18:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148410_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148410_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:52.16 -18:57:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148411_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148411_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:37.22 -21:46:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148422_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148422_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:35:39.81 -20:46:05.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.051 6772287836579168512 293.91588299748 -20.76823785105 12.2109 11.4665 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.051#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148426_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148426_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:26.26 -18:52:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148467_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
Preparing report for the candidate 148467_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148471_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148471_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:21.49 -21:14:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148487_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148487_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:04.68 -15:55:57.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.58)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148499_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148499_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:36.60 -15:57:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148501_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148501_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:51:10.42 -15:10:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148509_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148509_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:17.78 -16:20:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148613_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148613_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:37:49.52 -17:12:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148676_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148676_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:29:32.76 -21:19:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148705_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 148705_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:58.67 -16:27:10.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.49)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.818 4181631600214583936 295.74423966121 -16.45286500139 13.6653 13.1238 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.818#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116965_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 116965_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:12:28.70 -20:05:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114202_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 114202_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:22.56 -17:11:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48852_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 48852_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:31.71 -18:01:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12226_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299
The candidate 12226_fd_Sgr-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_04-51-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0299 did not pass the final checks